Super Tuesday 4. I'm really feeling (The After Bern) March 22, 26 contests

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. That is pretty much exactly what your post says, that minority groups "doubled down" on Hillary, not because they like her or her policies, but because white guys coalesced around the good candidate first.

You may not have meant it that way, but that is fairly clearly what it said. So far 3 people commented on reading it was way, so it is not like I am the only one who saw it.
I clarified the response. In quickly browsing the post, I misread the post I quoted as being limited to this board when it made a larger point that clearly went well beyond my original post.
 
here at a caucus in Oahu and I'm somewhat confident that Bernie won the 21st and 22nd districts. Lots of young white dudes with ironic tshirts.
 
CNN right now:

BREAKING NEWS
Washington and Alaska break for Sanders; Hawaii still to come
Takeaways from 'Western Saturday' Bird lands on Sanders' podium

I love how the bird is part of the breaking news.

It's a sign

a turning point

Sam came back from the future to take over Bernie Sanders' body and we're getting history corrected
 
That's what it sounded like to me too.

Stupid minorities. Always ruining everything.

Well... Minorities overwhelmingly supported Clinton vs Bush 1 and Bob Dole, Gore aganist Bush II, Kerry against Bush II, Obama against McKane, and Romney.

Minorities have been on the right side of history for the last 30 years. It's white folks that seem to love to try and fuck things up for the rest of us.
 
Keep it up, Bernie! Only... 278 delegates left to tie it up

BqZBl3S.gif
 
Minorities have been on the right side of history for the last 30 years. It's white folks that seem to love to try and fuck things up for the rest of us.

Those contests wouldn't have been won without a majority of the white vote.
Obama wouldn't have won without "the white vote", for example.
We've also seen minorities in favor of Trump, of all people.

If there's any demographic to talk about here, it's Southern States vs Middle America vs Bluewater:
 
Those contests wouldn't have been won without a majority of the white vote.
Obama wouldn't have won without "the white vote", for example.
We've also seen minorities in favor of Trump, of all people.

If there's any demographic to talk about here, it's Southern States vs Middle America vs Bluewater:

Johnson was the last Democrat to win with the majority of the white vote...........

Democrats can not win the presidency without PoC and a plurality of the white vote of around 35-40%.
 
My mistake. You're right on the numbers.

However it's still a regional issue, which plays on Southern/Middle America racial issues (the Southern Strategy).
 
Whichever makes me sound better.

Just kidding, sort of. It's a fair point, though. You can't win without least a significant portion of the "white" vote.
Thanks to the internet and Dubya's disastrous presidency, the conservative share of the white vote has been shrinking over time (along with the increasing hispanic population.) The dems are getting more of it and needing less of it at the same time.
 
Thanks to the internet and Dubya's disastrous presidency, the conservative share of the white vote has been shrinking over time (along with the increasing hispanic population.) The dems are getting more of it and needing less of it at the same time.

Which gives me hope for the future.

The Republican "Southern Strategy" is collapsing. In my idealistic world, this means they have to adopt more reasonable, truly "conservative" policies and less of the horrific pro-corp, pro-war, pro-fascist, pro-racist, lip-service "populism" BS they're accustomed to. That or face a gutting of the party.
 
Which gives me hope for the future.

The Republican "Southern Strategy" is collapsing. In my idealistic world, this means they have to adopt more reasonable, truly "conservative" policies and less of the horrific pro-corp, pro-war, pro-fascist, pro-racist, lip-service "populism" BS they're accustomed to. That or face a gutting of the party.
I don't know how they recover from this, because that toxic mess of a core demographic is poison.
 
Which gives me hope for the future.

The Republican "Southern Strategy" is collapsing. In my idealistic world, this means they have to adopt more reasonable, truly "conservative" policies and less of the horrific pro-corp, pro-war, pro-fascist, pro-racist, lip-service "populism" BS they're accustomed to. That or face a gutting of the party.

I'll be more convinced the Southern Strategy is failing when the GOP stops getting shitheads elected into other levels of government like governorships and congress.

But yes I do agree it's nice to see it crumbling for presidential elections at the very least.
 
I don't know how they recover from this, because that toxic mess of a core demographic is poison.

I don't know, but the next 10-20 years of American politics will definitely be interesting.


I'll be more convinced the Southern Strategy is failing when the GOP stops getting shitheads elected into other levels of government like governorships and congress.

That's a valid concern. I'm worried about Balkanization of the US. We're already there in some ways, with Southern and some Middle States going even further with their anti-Union strategies.

The strength of the nation is in union. States like California and New York can carry a lot of the load, but if more and more states see antagonism to the federal government (and to Blue states) as a viable strategy to attract some types of business, it seems like a great way to fracture and weaken the nation.

I'd say that's why, partially, some countries (Russia) are so quick to compliment the Republican platform.
 
Actually totally non ironically, do keep us posted. A post of the final tally could be a sign of how it eventually ends up.

21 is 299 Bernie votes to 105 Hillary votes atm, they're still counting 22. I wouldn't take the Waikiki area as representative of the island or state as a whole tho.

edit: it's a huge stack and they don't have enough people, I could see this taking another hour.
 
21 is 299 Bernie votes to 105 Hillary votes atm, they're still counting 22. I wouldn't take the Waikiki area as representative of the island or state as a whole tho.

edit: it's a huge stack and they don't have enough people, I could see this taking another hour.

What was turnout like? The article I posted said that the party is expecting a larger turnout than in 2008.
 
What was turnout like? The article I posted said that the party is expecting a larger turnout than in 2008.

they set up the room so that half the tables were for 21 and half were for 22, but the turnout for 22 was much bigger than anticipated and they had to do a lot of reorganizing on the fly. There was only enough seating for about 1/4th of the room and I heard the phrase "honor system" beong thrown around a lot.
 
Am I to understand from this thread that there are no minority Sanders supporters? I'm starting to think I'm the only one.

There are many minority Bernie supporters. The narrative by Hillary supporters has been to characterize Bernie supporters as being uniformly young white males, hence the frequently repeated accusations of sexism and racism.

That said, Bernie getting killed by Hillary in the South because of the African American vote doesn't help his case to support claims that he has a large minority support base.
 
Am I to understand from this thread that there are no minority Sanders supporters? I'm starting to think I'm the only one.

Actually you are not, at least on GAF lol. There are a couple of Latino Bernie supporters on GAF that have said as much. And a couple of Black supporters to boot.
 
There are many minority Bernie supporters. The narrative by Hillary supporters has been to characterize Bernie supporters as being uniformly young white males, hence the frequently repeated accusations of sexism and racism.

That said, Bernie getting killed by Hillary in the South because of the African American vote doesn't help his case to support claims that he has a large minority support base.

Well to be fair, if you spent a lot of time in the politcal subreddits you would come away with this impression too (so I'm told). But,that's just a small percentage of Bernie supporters. I have never visited one of the subreddits and never will. Don't have time or patience for that crap.
 
Am I to understand from this thread that there are no minority Sanders supporters? I'm starting to think I'm the only one.
You're not. Everyone around me is seemingly a Bernie supporter. Granted, I'm from WV, she's going to be decimated here. Like sub 15 percent. We'd sooner tar and feather the woman than vote for her.
 
You're not. Everyone around me is seemingly a Bernie supporter. Granted, I'm from WV, she's going to be decimated here. Like sub 15 percent. We'd sooner tar and feather the woman than vote for her.

what was the reason for her winning it 66-25 last time? obama effect? since she has tied herself to obama democrats there don't like her anymore?
 
Is he really a judge? I always imagined him as an over-qualified Subway manager.

That's only because the state is illegitimate.

what was the reason for her winning it 66-25 last time? obama effect? since she has tied herself to obama democrats there don't like her anymore?

They picked the white woman over the black man, I hate to say it but they were likely more racist than sexist. This time they won't have that issue.
 
Black Sanders supporters have to be able to look past the statements of some of his white and white passing supporters to the man himself. We've had people here do more than suggest that a lack of black intelligence is responsible for him not capturing the black vote (and only some of those posters were banned); I can only imagine how bad it is in the subreddits.
 
Black Sanders supporters have to be able to look past the statements of some of his white and white passing supporters to the man himself. We've had people here do more than suggest that a lack of black intelligence is responsible for him not capturing the black vote (and only some of those posters were banned); I can only imagine how bad it is in the subreddits.

Yeah those comments pissed me off. I mean seriously? "too bad they are voting against their best interest". People vote for who they want end of story. Just like the many White people I know that are voting for, of all people, Trump.
 
Yeah those comments pissed me off. I mean seriously? "too bad they are voting against their best interest". People vote for who they want end of story. Just like the many White people I know that are voting for, of all people, Trump.

While I find it detestable to use the example previously discussed, I don't think it should be forgotten that people, in general, are persuadable. So whether or not a person has easy access to information (cable/internet) and might be ignorant of a candidate means people should want to calmly, politely tell people about other candidates they like (but do so like a dang human being obviously, not with belittling and shit).

I've converted a few family Trump votes to Sanders votes just by talking. The people who I talked to, for whatever reason, believed what I said and believed I was telling the truth. That's why they continued to open up their minds and learned more about the government outside of the right's media narrative.

So we should definitely keep sharing our opinions, but it's just unfortunate that I should have to qualify that with "in a peaceful, reasonable, human way."
 
It's also completely possible to know about Bernie, know all of his positions, even agree with his positions, and still not want to vote for him.
 
It's also completely possible to know about Bernie, know all of his positions, even agree with his positions, and still not want to vote for him.

That wasn't even the point of my post, it was more directed at people in general. I was saying it as a Bernie supporter but I would hope that everyone would do what I described.
 
While I find it detestable to use the example previously discussed, I don't think it should be forgotten that people, in general, are persuadable. So whether or not a person has easy access to information (cable/internet) and might be ignorant of a candidate means people should want to calmly, politely tell people about other candidates they like (but do so like a dang human being obviously, not with belittling and shit).

I've converted a few family Trump votes to Sanders votes just by talking. The people who I talked to, for whatever reason, believed what I said and believed I was telling the truth. That's why they continued to open up their minds and learned more about the government outside of the right's media narrative.

So we should definitely keep sharing our opinions, but it's just unfortunate that I should have to qualify that with "in a peaceful, reasonable, human way."

Absolutely! I know this from personal experience. Within the last 8 years or so I went from pretty hardcore conservative to where I am now, pretty damn liberal. I got that way from informing myself, in particular, reading perspectives from others, much different from my own. May have never changed if people were actively trying to make me feel like shit every day.

Conversation about these things is a good thing. People explaining why they think Trump as president is bad for not only minorities but the whole country, is a good thing. And I am certainly open to different perspectives on Bernie as well, and you know what? I actually agree with some things people are saying about how unrealistic he can be at times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom