• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Wkd BO 03•25-27•16 - Batman vs Superman (or Grindr hookup gone sideways) bests Bunny

Status
Not open for further replies.
What's a mook, do you mean villains? I mean, people who know comics know who Malekith or Ronan are, so it's a bit of a dumb question.

They are extremely underdeveloped in the movies, so there is nothing to describe. If you are talking about the generic minions, well, yes, they are just generic minions.

Minions don't have to be generic, though. Look at Star Wars, or Lord of the Rings. People will dress up as a stormtrooper or Uruk-Hai even though they're mainly just mooks meant to be killed by the heroes. But no one's going to dress up as a Marvel mook because people wouldn't even recognize you.
 
Minions don't have to be generic, though. Look at Star Wars, or Lord of the Rings. People will dress up as a stormtrooper or Uruk-Hai even though they're mainly just mooks meant to be killed by the heroes. But no one's going to dress up as a Marvel mook because people wouldn't even recognize you.

Funnily enough, I thought the elves in Thor 2 looked pretty cool and unique. Someone would recognize you for sure, but he would just wonder why you did in the first place...

So sure, they don't have to be, but they are. That's a fault I think a lot of people, even the most ardent fans, recognize. Hardly a thing unique to the Marvel movies, but OK.
 
4sYshhj.gif
He's probably drifting off to memories of visiting his divorce attorney.
 
Anecdotal, but it looks like a couple theaters round this way are already reducing their screenings of BvS for next weekend. Dunno if the larger chains are looking to do this already in other cities, but at least here in Portland, some houses have already decided to scale back by a couple shows per day.
 
Anecdotal, but it looks like a couple theaters round this way are already reducing their screenings of BvS for next weekend. Dunno if the larger chains are looking to do this already in other cities, but at least here in Portland, some houses have already decided to scale back by a couple shows per day.

It has begun...
 
Anecdotal, but it looks like a couple theaters round this way are already reducing their screenings of BvS for next weekend. Dunno if the larger chains are looking to do this already in other cities, but at least here in Portland, some houses have already decided to scale back by a couple shows per day.

4sYshhj.gif
 
Anecdotal, but it looks like a couple theaters round this way are already reducing their screenings of BvS for next weekend. Dunno if the larger chains are looking to do this already in other cities, but at least here in Portland, some houses have already decided to scale back by a couple shows per day.
Typically, after opening weekend, theaters reduce the number of screenings. But anyways, I've actually seen the opposite happening here. Some theaters adding more screenings, though that could be due to them underestimating the demand initially due to the critical reception and not assigning enough screenings in the first place.
 
Anecdotal, but it looks like a couple theaters round this way are already reducing their screenings of BvS for next weekend. Dunno if the larger chains are looking to do this already in other cities, but at least here in Portland, some houses have already decided to scale back by a couple shows per day.
1459011920708.jpg
 
Typically, after opening weekend, theaters reduce the number of screenings.

I'm not unfamiliar with the booking practices of theaters. Some shows do have their schedules switched up & altered, for a variety of reasons.Strong performers don't tend to get showtimes cut, especially without a new release competing for those screens.

I haven't seen what the chains are doing with it just yet, and even then, like I said, it's no guarantee it's going to be a reflection of other regions. Just saying there's a couple houses out this way who have decided against running it as much as they did last weekend.
 
So Deadline is saying that current projections are for a 65% drop. Seems pretty crazy if it ends up being the case.

Not too crazy. A drop in the 60s makes sense with those huge Thursday previews / not great word of mouth. If it hits as high as 70% then yeah thats a crazy ass drop
 
So Deadline is saying that current projections are for a 65% drop. Seems pretty crazy if it ends up being the case.
Well, superhero pics is one of the most front-loaded genres out there. Consider even a well-received one like Captain America 2 dropped over 55%; BvS had a far higher share of its OW come from Thursday previews and had an inflated Friday. Just based off of those two factors you would expect at least a 60% drop. Given essentially every metric we have points to WOM quite a bit worse than CA2's, a 65+% drop becomes likely.
 
The reviews easily cost them $100 million.

Considering they are estimated to make $210 million in profit... that's a good chunk of money right there. That's almost the production cost of the next JL movie!
 
The reviews easily cost them $100 million.

Considering they are estimated to make $210 million in profit... that's a good chunk of money right there. That's almost the production cost of the next JL movie!

I don't think the reviews cost them much, given the size of the opening. The reason for the reviews and WoM (the film itself) will be what costs it. Unless that's what you mean, in which case, never mind.
 
i mean sony cancelled their entire TASM universe plans because TASM2 made 700m. 800m would be a huge disappointment, especially when you can predict the JL movie to get way less intial goodwill from the public

damn

edit: misread the image as it's very small on my comp. thought the worldwide BO gross was 800m
 
They probably won't make any changes bc their stock would take a massive hit and their fighting up a takeover.

If the film doesn't crack $1 billion their stock is taking a hit regardless, investors (usually) aren't stupid.

And whats this I keep hearing about a WB buyout? I did a quick google search and the last rumors were from 2014. Are they still hurting that much?
 
I don't think the reviews cost them much, given the size of the opening. The reason for the reviews and WoM (the film itself) will be what costs it. Unless that's what you mean, in which case, never mind.
That's what I meant. The quality of the movie (or rather the type of movie) will cause shorter legs due to less than stellar WoM which means less money for them in the long run.
 
i mean sony cancelled their entire TASM universe plans because TASM2 made 700m. 800m would be a huge disappointment, especially when you can predict the JL movie to get way less intial goodwill from the public

damn

This isn't really accurate. Sony didn't cancel the TASM universe plans because TASM2 made 700m. They cancellde the TASM universe plans because they managed to cut a deal with Marvel which they perceived would give more value to their Spider-man brand. That's a key difference. If the Marvel deal fell through, the TASM universe would have continued.
 
This isn't really accurate. Sony didn't cancel the TASM universe plans because TASM2 made 700m. They cancellde the TASM universe plans because they managed to cut a deal with Marvel which they perceived would give more value to their Spider-man brand. That's a key difference. If the Marvel deal fell through, the TASM universe would have continued.
I am thankful I don't live in that universe.
 
This isn't really accurate. Sony didn't cancel the TASM universe plans because TASM2 made 700m. They cancellde the TASM universe plans because they managed to cut a deal with Marvel which they perceived would give more value to their Spider-man brand. That's a key difference. If the Marvel deal fell through, the TASM universe would have continued.
At the time, TASM3 was planned for a June 2016 release, so it'd would have been the fifth superhero film of the year and the third in six weeks.

Sony's planned Spider-Man universe may have survived TASM2, but I don't think it would have survived a third installment failing to break $150M domestically.
 
This isn't really accurate. Sony didn't cancel the TASM universe plans because TASM2 made 700m. They cancellde the TASM universe plans because they managed to cut a deal with Marvel which they perceived would give more value to their Spider-man brand. That's a key difference. If the Marvel deal fell through, the TASM universe would have continued.

true. it wouldn't have been outright cancelled without that route being there for them

and warner don't have an equivalent alternative either

Keep in mind that Warners shitcanned an entire Justice League movie days before it was set to start filming once already, and declined to make Singer's Superman Returns follow up. Granted, this isn't the same management, so that kind of decisionmaking might not be on the table in response to a Batman v Superman that makes, as I said near the beginning of the thread, only 350+ domestic and 800+ worldwide.

But I could see a very sharp trimming back of what they had planned, giving them a little more maneuverability to go in a different direction should the opportunity present itself.

thanks for the information, i'm not as well versed as most here

this is gonna be fascinating to watch unfold
 
i mean sony cancelled their entire TASM universe plans because TASM2 made 700m. 800m would be a huge disappointment, especially when you can predict the JL movie to get way less intial goodwill from the public

damn

Keep in mind that Warners shitcanned an entire Justice League movie days before it was set to start filming once already, and declined to make Singer's Superman Returns follow up. Granted, this isn't the same management, so that kind of decisionmaking might not be on the table in response to a Batman v Superman that makes, as I said near the beginning of the thread, only 350+ domestic and 800+ worldwide.

But I could see a very sharp trimming back of what they had planned, giving them a little more maneuverability to go in a different direction should the opportunity present itself.
 
Deadline needs to proof-read their own graphs.

I don't know that product placement is taken into consideration for the profit part, and of course a big film like this generates money from merchandising and licensing, but it seems reasonable.

So "rentals" is the actual revenue a studio gets from the box office?
 
So "rentals" is the actual revenue a studio gets from the box office?

Yes.

~55% domestic, ~40% overseas (varies per territory, but that is a ballpark average), and 25% in China.


For older movies from the 70s and prior, rentals was the only number reported. All of the box office numbers we have from that period are just estimates based on the reported rentals.
 
Yes.

~55% domestic, ~40% overseas (varies per territory, but that is a ballpark average), and 25% in China.


For older movies from the 70s and prior, rentals was the only number reported. All of the box office numbers we have from that period are just estimates based on the reported rentals.

Thanks, that makes shit a lot clearer. I was never sure what they meant by rentals when I read box office data about older films.
 
Not making a billion wouldn't look good considering the last two Nolan films pulled it off.
Still can't believe they shelved a Justice League movie days away from starting production
I read some of Justice League Mortal's script and it wasn't half bad. Wish we could've seen it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom