PS4K information (~2x GPU power w/ clock+, new CPU, price, tent. Q1 2017)

Welp. I've been a console gamer for 20 years. It's kind of sad that it'll end now.

Congratulations Sony. And a hearty fuck you. I'm going to PC.

You're pissed about a company releasing a revised product after 3 years of the release of the original one

If that's the case you'll lose your shit having to upgrade every 1-2 years on PC
 
I hate hypocritical people.
My console is 30fps, my PC can't do 60fps on most newer games. But I don't 'prefer' 30fps, I always want 60fps in my games.



Yeah, kinda. It's 2x more powerful afterall.
It's like going from 7870 (PS4 equivalent gpu) to the 980Ti or even better, somewhat.
Stahp
 
It's like people are reacting as if they have to upgrade

*news flash*

No you don't

Sony would be stupid to leave 40 million people with obsolete consoles. come the fuck on now

yeah people in here are acting like companies make bad moves or something
 
I was waiting to get another PS4(slim model). Now I'm definitely holding out for this (PS4K) if this is true.
 
The part that makes absolutely zero sense to me is that current games will not gain performance boosts from being played on a system that's more powerful.

What, does the PS4k throttle its CPU and GPU?...
The games are hard-coded to run at a certain performance level, so any enhancements have to be patched in.
 
Meh, this kind of stuff may just cement me not bothering with consoles anymore.

PC is my primary system, and I spend money every couple of years upgrading it already.

I don't really need consoles to go that route too.

A) I don't use them enough
B) In the long run I don't think just keeping a PC up to date would even be much dearer than this kind of model. I mean I've only upgraded my graphics card in the last 5 years, which was £280. The only other thing I did was replacing a seven year old hard drive that broke for about £40. I mean I'm expecting the console to be £350 judging by the PSVR conversion rate.
C) It's still not going to be as powerful as a PC.
 
Let's say you were playing a multiplayer game. Available on both consoles, one runs at 30fps, the other at 60fps. Isn't that a pretty decent advantage to those with the 4.5? I keep seeing people say you'd still get to play the same games, but not without a disadvantage.
 
I'm not sure what you're asking me to show you.

I'm not sure what you're asking me to show you. There will be people that buy a PS4K as their first PS system, specifically because they like the power of it, or they just bought a 4K tv, or they want to upgrade from their xbox or mid-range PC and PS4 doesn't quite cut it for them. There are people in this thread who say they are glad they waited and will get the PS4K.

Every one of these people and every one of the people who sell or give away their PS4 to upgrade are additive to the install base and justify a reallocation of optimization resources.

You were talking about this move will help grow the market/user base. I'm saying I don't see any evidence of that. It's a wash. Anyone can go out and buy a used PS4 right now without any effort to find one if they wanted. A price drop would likely grow the user base much more than this new model will. The only way this benefits is if there is a significant number of people who would not have bought a PS4 and only would jump in because there is a new more powerful PS4. These people would show how this really helps grow the market because they are sales you would have had otherwise. Someone buying a PS4K instead of a PS4 is an increase in one user regardless which one they went with so that's not growth. Just like you can show that there are people who won't buy a PS4 now because of the price but if you drop it by $50 or $100, they would, that shows the price drop would have growth. So the only way a 4K system has growth is if you can show a significant number of people who would never have bought a PS4 but now will buy a PS4K.
 
Because this is the console market. There's a reason why console gamers are console gamers and not PC gamers. Yes, developing for multiple hardware configurations has existed for decades on PC but this is a first for the console market. People are going to have to deal with the hassle of, "Will my PS4 run this game?" and "Will I have to play it on crappy settings?" and "Oh, this is only a PS4K game?"

It would have been better if they had just done a full upgrade and called it a PS5 that's completely bc with PS4. Then it creates a clear line for consumers.

Everyone was waiting for the time when Sony screwed up a good thing, well here it is, if true.
Hard resets are the worst possible scenario. Games will be listed as PS4 games, it won't be rocket science. Forwards/backwards compatibility means that developers don't have to worry about not having an install base. PS4 is still going strong, so why put out a PS5 with exclusive software?
 
Ok, here's my problem; older games don't scale to the new hardware, without the developer getting involved.
I still don't get that part.

Why wouldn't the games naturally perform better on more powerful hardware ala what you see on PC?

Wouldn't it actually take more work to limit those games to their regular PS4 performance? Does that mean running those games in a virtual PS4 environment with no capability to use the extra power in the box?
 
Never in the history of game development has there been a 100% consistency in performance between platforms. Heck, there's even a couple instances where the Xbox One version is better than the PS4 version on a title. So I think with the high number of developers out there, with the hundreds of games developed each year, and all the examples where this has happend before, the odds are in favor of me being correct that some PS4 games will suffer because of the PS4K.

OK but that does not mean neglect. The PS4 doesn't automatically become obsolete. Sure we have never seen it but that's just it... We haven't because we have never had launches this close together... But seeing as these systems changed the whole script by adopting a PC standard, just like all other Min and Max's on PC, they will (imo) be treated like that. I don't see anything wrong with the PS4 being the minimum requirement like PCS and the PS4XK being the Max. However I still hold back to my original comment... We really don't know anything...

We have seen it everytime a new more powerful hardware iteration of a product arrives, software in the lesser hardware starts getting worse.

0f1c0fa9-6f02-0192-d56a-9493cee18fa7.jpg

Like I said above, that really doesn't matter in a business where there are minimums and maximums. The PS4 is already at it exact minimum and on top of that, if these consoles adopted the PC standard on top of having the same updated tools as its predecessor... I don't see how this can all come crashing down over night. But I can't really say much because we simply don't know. I can't share the doom and gloom because I have no real answers and none of us do. Please don't take that as me saying that no discussion can't happen. I'm just kind of thrown back by all of this panic lol
 
Welp. I've been a console gamer for 20 years. It's kind of sad that it'll end now.

Congratulations Sony. And a hearty fuck you. I'm going to PC.

I might be with you. I bought 2 PS4's and Xbox Ones because they dropped split screen. Now. I dont even get a half gen out of that? Anyone who thinks this wont impact PS4 games is just silly. Why the fuck would they even make a new version if that wasn't going to be the preferred platform now?
 
I guess not buying a PS4 has paid off for me.

Actually I don't even know if it's worth buying a PS4K, since there will probably be another new system coming out in late 2018. I'll be interested to hear what Sony has to say about future iterations on the system.

Or what till 2025 for PS6 and so on. This logic doesn't make any sence outside of holding off when you know for sure when a newer version is coming out say 6 months or less not 3 years out lol how do you ever pull the trigger on anything that way? Tech moves too fast to always wait for the next big thing.
 
You're giving up all consoles? As of when?

Consoles as a primary gaming device yes.

Xbox is releasing loads of their titles on PC, so not getting their next console. Not to mention they're also rumored to do something like this.

Nintendo has been doing this with handhelds which and I usually stick with getting one of the two versions anyways since I barely play handheld.

Sony was my primary reason to stick with consoles over the occasional low-intensity PC title. Now with this, I'm out. I might get the Nintendo consoles/handhelds on the side, but after this I have no interest in sticking around with a console as my primary gaming device.

You're pissed about a company releasing a revised product after 3 years of the release of the original one

If that's the case you'll lose your shit having to upgrade every 1-2 years on PC

Or you upgrade the first time and keep the same graphics card for 4-5 years, I don't need to play every game at ultimate settings, but I'm not gonna take this shit from consoles might as well go to PC.
 
They have been making games for PS4 and PS3 for quite a while now, it is not a big deal.

Show me a crossgen game where the PS3 version isn't a horseshit afterthought. I mean crossgen Japanese games aren't even coming out on PS3 over here anymore. Compare how long the PS3 was out vs PS4. Think.
 
I still don't get that part.

Why wouldn't the games naturally perform better on more powerful hardware ala what you see on PC?

Wouldn't it actually take more work to limit those games to their regular PS4 performance? Does that mean running those games in a virtual PS4 environment with no capability to use the extra power in the box?

I would imagine that on the developer would have to patch the game to unlock things like frame rate and resolution when running on the newer hardware.
 
This might force MS out of the console business if this PS4K is this powerful at $399 because I don't think MS is ready to make a big upgrade like this for the Xbox One when they haven't been selling so good this year.

::scratches head:: The rumors about "incremental upgrade consoles" started with MS though so...
 
Well if Sony don't someone else will. If Nintendo NX is indeed more powerful than PS4 Sony need to keep ahead of the game. They have it good with PS4 and they are no doubt betting the momentum will continue with PS4K.

They ARE ahead of the game with their huge user base. They just need to push games out faster, not push consoles.
 
I bought a PS4 knowing there would be growing pains (and there sure were), but I also knew (thought I knew) that it'd be the most powerful console for at least 5 years. Now that I've survived the cross gen phase, I'll now have their lesser console.

Fuck you Sony.
 
How technically minded were the people in the OP's meeting?

Could the 2X refer to core or CU counts rather than directly to performance?

Or number of pixels it can push (meaning it will perform half as well pushing 4x the pixels of 4k than the original pushing 1080p... lol)

I kid, I kid... but I also sort of have a point...
 
It was $299 in Jan & Feb & it didn't do to good & that's in the US , World Wide is even worse.

It was not $299 nationwide in either of those months.

This is a serious problem that GAF and other internet forums have. Just because you are informed does not mean the casual is. Not everyone goes to Amazon to see what price it is to price match, and not everyone is going to care about this 4K model the same way you guys are reacting right now.

Sony will market this new model as the newest and greatest way to play PS4 games and the consumer will see it and say, "Oh ok. Maybe this will get me to pick up a 4k tv/this will be what I use to show off my 4k tv." or "Oh that's ok I guess."
 
Go listen to the bombcast from after the PSVR event. They were more than happy with its performance.

No, I mean from the point of view of the restrictions on consoles. I can imagine many games being modded to be VR compatible, like my dream VR game Arma 3. You're just so limited with the consoles.
 
exactly... if i had known a more powerful PS4 was coming... i would have waited for the better one... knowing that the PS4 games wont be running the best on my console sucks. the whole point of consoles is that i know the games are optimized as much as possible for the current gen... but now... the games arent optimized for mine... theyll be optimized for PS4k and i dont get the best console gaming experience. If i can trade my current console in (no receipt any more) for a direct upgrade for free... great. otherwise... i got screwed. i want the best PS4 games... i wont have that. I dont want to have the PS3 Shadow of Mordor syndrome if a new PS4 comes out.


PS4 and ps4k share the same platform. An optimized game for ps4k will also be an optimized game for the ps4. That's the whole point of the move, to get better graphics and performance without increasing dev cost.

All you people disappointment would have a point if the ps4k was a completely new platform with new way to optimize the code of the game.
In reality, ps4k simply offers more power to developers in order to have better performance or use fancy effects.

If a ps4k optimized game doesn't run well on the ps4, you need to consider that it wouldn't have run well without it neither.

The difference between ps4k and ps4 are a matter of using different settings and effects, optimization will just be chosing wich effect or setting match the console the best.

If a during development they find a new way to use the gpu in order to run the game better, it will benefit all versions because they share the same architecture.

If a game runs at 30fps on the ps4k and sub 20 on the ps4, it would mean that even without the ps4k you couldn't make the game run better. It is not a matter of optimization, but a poor game design choice when you rather sacrifice framerate over fancy effects, number of objects on screen or draw distance.

People disappointed by the news should prove exactly why optimizing for ps4k is hurting the ps4, this line of thinking doesn't make any sense with the informations we have.

This is even worse than saying that a developer who put lot of effort in a pc version, is bad for the ps4 and Xbox one versions. That doesn't make any sense.

The only good point is concerning online multi-player. It socks for you that ps4k users will have the advantage.
 
Well if Sony don't someone else will. If Nintendo NX is indeed more powerful than PS4 Sony need to keep ahead of the game. They have it good with PS4 and they are no doubt betting the momentum will continue with PS4K.
Yes, Sony must release a new PS4 right now because the NX exists. Don't you remember how Gamecube and Xbox were more powerful and totally destroyed the sales of the PS2? And how Dreamcast stole the sales of the PS1? Yeah, really Sony must release a substitute to it's record selling console inmediately to stop history repeating again.
 
Because that minimum is gonna get lower than what it would have been.

And where's the proof of that? I'm not the biggest PC guru but I know for a fact that someone can have a Titan and possibly achieve amazing quality 9/10. However the game isn't drastically problematic for someone who has 50% less power of that card. I don't believe that the difference is so far gone from the PS4 that it all of a sudden becomes hard to develop for and becomes a PS3 over night.
 
Whhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhy?
 
If this thing releases in March 2017 with God of War 4 with a trade in or monthly plan, I'M IN



Hell, if this thing releases in March 2017 with God of War 4 I'm in

2x GPU and better CPU? Yesssssss
 
If this shit works, "generations" as we know them now are all but dead. This kind of makes me sad and nostalgic at the same time.
 
Top Bottom