PS4K information (~2x GPU power w/ clock+, new CPU, price, tent. Q1 2017)

Does anyone know whether the PS4K will have a 10bit color depth?

I would have thought so, as this is something audio/video enthusiasts would be looking for from a device. I am not an expert, but is 10bit colour depth not part of the UHD spec. Guess all will become clear this year.
 
I already have a 4k TV, and I would probably buy a PS4k next year. I could give my old PS4 to my brother and bring him to the current gen.
 
4K isn't nearly as big as you believe it is. It will probably take another 5 years before it is wildly accepted as 1080p is now.

It's big enough to give Sony a buzz word to use to keep people buying PS4s & new TVs.


I know people with 60" 1080P TVs who are now looking to get 4K TVs because it's the new talk. these people don't really know what 4K is they just know that it's clearer & everyone is talking about it.
 
Anyone save that amazing post earlier in this monstrosity where the poster basically said "if Henry Ford came to GAF to introduce the automobile, GAF would tell him to go make a better horse?" or something to that effect?

This one?

That's the one. That's up there with the GOAT posts.
 
Anyone save that amazing post earlier in this monstrosity where the poster basically said "if Henry Ford came to GAF to introduce the automobile, GAF would tell him to go make a better horse?" or something to that effect?

This one?

There was also a backlash when Nintendo introduced its Wii. Hell, if Henry Ford had asked NeoGAF how his first car should look like, we would have told him to skip this shit and produce faster horses...
 
Anyone save that amazing post earlier in this monstrosity where the poster basically said "if Henry Ford came to GAF to introduce the automobile, GAF would tell him to go make a better horse?" or something to that effect?



That's the one. That's up there with the GOAT posts.
He's just paraphrasing a quote commonly attributed to Ford that he may not have even said.
 
There were around 5-6 million UHD owners at the end of 2015, it is predicted to be in 50% of homes by 2020, that's a pretty significant shift to UHD in a short period of time. With that in view, Sony getting their foot in the door a bit early with a PS4k revision doesn't seem so crazy.

Yea, that's 4 years from now. PS5 can offer that which makes more sense than trying to increase the rate of Ultra bluray and 4k tv's by adding another SKU that has significant advantages over the prior model in versions of games.

PS1 could have had some kind of update late 90's like in 1998-1999? But they didn't they waited and it made sense for 2000 as dvd was more mainstream, making the PS2 the optimum purchase for dvd, and game media.
 
I would have thought so, as this is something audio/video enthusiasts would be looking for from a device. I am not an expert, but is 10bit colour depth not part of the UHD spec. Guess all will become clear this year.

UHD isn't a unified spec, that I know of, and it can very well be marketed as 4K and still be 8-bit.
 
I think one thing a lot of people are forgetting is UHD Blu-ray. There are a lot of streamers and people that steal movies these days but the Blu-ray market is worth billions.

The PS3 helped Sony win the HD format war against HDDVD and a 4k Blu-Ray drive in the system instantly makes them the #1 choice for the player.

I think people are looking at this more as an upgraded PS4 which it is, but I see it more as a Trojan horse for UHD media.
 
I was quite sceptical to say the least about that mid gen PS4 upgrade and thought this would be a very risky move for Sony and their PS brand, without many opportunities to make it a winning move.

But posts by onQ123 amongst others made me less sceptical, because of that 4K living room strategy, but I've got to ask, is that really such a big market? Does anybody care about 4K TVs compared to FullHD sets? Has blu-ray even outclassed the DVD in sales? UHD BDs will be even less important I'm sure. Many people dreaming of 4K streams??

I somehow doubt it, yeah most TVs sold from now on will probably be UHD, because that's all that is on the shelves, but what about the content? Are all getting tears of joy in their eyes at the thought of 4K stuff? Or do most not really care about it?
Go into any best buy and count how many 4k tvs they have in display versus 1080 sets. The majority of the 45" or bigger are 4k sets. Price is also coming down a lot over the last 2 years. It is a bigger market than many on here are giving it credit for and it is growing very fast.
 
I've seen posts which put all the responses concerned into "Consoles are doomed because of mid-cycle upgrades" category and dismiss all the concerns because they don't believe the consoles are doomed.

I, for one, don't at all think consoles are doomed because of this, it might make the console space more healthy, or less healthy, or won't make much change in case of total revenues and software sales. It could go any direction, but I don't think consoles are doomed because of it.

However, it's just something that's not necessary for the typical console buyer, the majority of the console crowd are barely getting the taste of the new generation, and were not in anticipation of such an upgrade.

PS4K is just another unnecessary piece of equipment that will put pressure on you to buy it, at least 2-3 years earlier. Graphics of the order, driveclub, UC4 is good enough for me, until I see massively more awesome stuff on the PC that will put these titles to shame. These consoles still have some spare.

The phone analogies don't work, Ipads barely touch the subject.
 
Yea, that's 4 years from now. PS5 can offer that which makes more sense than trying to increase the rate of Ultra bluray and 4k tv's by adding another skew that has significant advantages over the prior model in versions of games.

PS1 could have had some kind of update late 90's like in 1998-1999? But they didn't they waited and it made sense for 2000 as dvd was more mainstream, making the PS2 the optimum purchase for dvd, and game media.

Why should Sony wait 4 years to profit off of 4k adoption when they can offer a completely optional PS4k sooner? Much like those people who think Sony should wait to release VR until the PS5, that is a lot of time to leave the competition unchallenged just for the sake of it. It's better they have an optional sku and be on the forefront, rather than reacting after the fact.
 
What's the deal with posting inside information? I need to contact who first?

I don't want to pull rank on you but I'm a Time Mod from the future send me the info

mtr___time_cop_by_driscolldoll-d35f3ix.png
 
Why should Sony wait 4 years to profit off of 4k adoption when they can offer a completely optional PS4k sooner? Much like those people who think Sony should wait to release VR until the PS5, that is a lot of time to have leave the competition unchallenged just for the sake of it. It's better they have an optional sku and be on the forefront, rather than reacting after the fact.

This.
The rest of Sony are not going to want to sit and wait another 4-5 years so they can coincide a wider release of UHD discs. Not just as 4K sets have become affordable
 
UHD isn't a unified spec, that I know of, and it can very well be marketed as 4K and still be 8-bit.

I think UHD discs don't need to support 10bit encoded video, but I believe the players most certainly have to support the ability to play it. It's part of the standard that was announced last year.

I think one thing a lot of people are forgetting is UHD Blu-ray. There are a lot of streamers and people that steal movies these days but the Blu-ray market is worth billions.

The PS3 helped Sony win the HD format war against HDDVD and a 4k Blu-Ray drive in the system instantly makes them the #1 choice for the player.

I think people are looking at this more as an upgraded PS4 which it is, but I see it more as a Trojan horse for UHD media.

I think UHD is going to be a niche market. A move like this certainly helps expand it more than it would otherwise, but its going to be a downward trend just like Blu Ray was from DVD which Sony did the same for the PS2 and PS3.
 
UHD isn't a unified spec, that I know of, and it can very well be marketed as 4K and still be 8-bit.
UHD Blu-ray players must be capable of decoding and displaying all these features. Content providers can pick and choose which to encode on their UHD discs.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=15769
SPECIFICATION NOTES

4K / 60p
High speed display in 60 frames per second of 4K video (3,840 x 2,160 pixels - Ultra HD), which has four times the resolution of Full Hi-vision [Full HD] for highly detailed videos with extremely smooth movement.

10-bit gradation
Previous Blu-ray Discs displayed the color signals (Y, Cb, Cr) in 8-bit gradation each (256 gradations). By expanding this to 10-bit gradation each (1,024 gradations), even minute signals can be faithfully reproduced to realize richly textured video.

High Dynamic Range
A technology that drastically expands the brightness peak from the previous 100 nit to 1,000-10,000 nit, marking a significant leap in the dynamic range of the picture. Bright light sources (e.g. lights or rays of the sun) and reflected light (from metal or water) that up to now were difficult to display can now be shown in rich textures.

BT.2020 wide color gamut
Compliant with the ITU-R BT.2020 wide color gamut signal formulated for 4K/8K broadcasting. Enables vividly rich coloration not previously possible on Blu-ray discs (BT.709 standard).

HEVC (H.265) / 100Mbps
Support for the highest 100Mbps video signal using the latest high-efficiency video compression technology. Compression efficiency and high bit rate far beyond previous Blu-ray discs (MPEG-4/AVC (H.264), maximum 40Mbps) enabling outstanding playback of high quality video with 4K/60p/10bit, High Dynamic Range, BT.2020, etc.
 
UHD Blu-ray players must be capable of decoding and displaying all these features. Content providers can pick and choose which to encode on their UHD discs.

http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=15769

Pretty cool info.

Makes more sense to launch PS4K with this stuff, if all this is needed to satisfy the best possible 4K viewing experience.

I still think this is heavily related to 4K BluRay and IPTV/streaming business.... it's just growing now.

If Sony offers a deal first, and offers more content.... this is the trojan horse for Sony then.
 
I think UHD discs don't need to support 10bit encoded video, but I believe the players most certainly have to support the ability to play it. It's part of the standard that was announced last year.
Even if you are not using a wider colour gamut, most UHD encodes should utilize 10-bit. It's a core feature in H.265 and provides a significant efficiency improvement when encoding video.
 
I don't know why, but I'm getting a lot of Deja Vu about this... It reminds me of Sega 32X and Sega CD, just without add-ons and having to buy a whole new console...
 
I don't know why, but I'm getting a lot of Deja Vu about this... It reminds me of Sega 32X and Sega CD, just without add-ons and having to buy a whole new console...


How is it like either of them when it's still playing the same games? you couldn't play a 32X or Sega CD game on your Sega Genesis.



A dev can make a game for the PS4K even if only 10 people own it at the time their game is released & there is still 40 million people who could still buy & play that game. how is this anything like 32X or Sega CD?
 
How is it like either of them when it's still playing the same games? you couldn't play a 32X or Sega CD game on your Sega Genesis.



A dev can make a game for the PS4K even if only 10 people own it at the time their game is released & there is still 40 million people who could still buy & play that game. how is this anything like 32X or Sega CD?

The desire to see this fail is the same as those. Unfortunately for some, this isn't like those at all. It is another product that will provide Sony with MUA and software sales. I'd hate to see the day you can buy PS4 games through a TV. People will be livid.
 
How is it like either of them when it's still playing the same games? you couldn't play a 32X or Sega CD game on your Sega Genesis.



A dev can make a game for the PS4K even if only 10 people own it at the time their game is released & there is still 40 million people who could still buy & play that game. how is this anything like 32X or Sega CD?

Market fragmentation. No matter how you look at it, this will fragment the market. But the question should be is it a good idea and can the market support it?

Market fragmentation in itself is not a bad thing. Even in the games industry, it's always existed in some form or another. Be it different machine types to play games on (arcade, console, PCs) or region-specific offerings from certain platform holders (NEC, for example), it's always existed in some way.

Now, can today's market support it on a wide scale? Well, I'm of the idea it can, to an extent. It's a lot different than the early '90s when Sega tried it; the homogenization/convergence of different tech industries just wasn't there yet, and that was a key factor in making it work. Today however we can all agree that convergence is real, and Sony has more good will than Microsoft and Nintendo combined.

Mind, I'm still not 100% on board w/ a PS4K and PSVR (a singular device combining the two likely would've worked better, imho), but I can recognize the reality that the market at large is more receptive to the idea today vs. say 1992 or 1994.
 
Market fragmentation. No matter how you look at it, this will fragment the market. But the question should be is it a good idea and can the market support it?

Market fragmentation in itself is not a bad thing. Even in the games industry, it's always existed in some form or another. Be it different machine types to play games on (arcade, console, PCs) or region-specific offerings from certain platform holders (NEC, for example), it's always existed in some way.

Now, can today's market support it on a wide scale? Well, I'm of the idea it can, to an extent. It's a lot different than the early '90s when Sega tried it; the homogenization/convergence of different tech industries just wasn't there yet, and that was a key factor in making it work. Today however we can all agree that convergence is real, and Sony has more good will than Microsoft and Nintendo combined.

Mind, I'm still not 100% on board w/ a PS4K and PSVR (a singular device combining the two likely would've worked better, imho), but I can recognize the reality that the market at large is more receptive to the idea today vs. say 1992 or 1994.

How is the market fragmented when every console is still a PS4 & every game is still a PS4 game?
 
Pretty cool info.

Makes more sense to launch PS4K with this stuff, if all this is needed to satisfy the best possible 4K viewing experience.

I still think this is heavily related to 4K BluRay and IPTV/streaming business.... it's just growing now.

If Sony offers a deal first, and offers more content.... this is the trojan horse for Sony then.

Agreed.
 
From a developer viewpoint, it's the beginning of fragmentation, especially if generations disappear for iterative releases.

Or it means the beginning of scalability.


They can continue making PS4 games until they become PS4P /PSVRP /PS4K/PS4Now games.

still the same games but on more devices.
 
Top Bottom