ANBUcaptainACID
Banned
Didn't Synder say that Robin's weapon was broken thats why it looks sharp?
I know I'm in the minority but I appreciated the contrast of a big burly Superman opposed by a lanky squirrely Lex. I liked that he didn't look physically imposing and still made Supes his bitch.
This might be the best dressing down of Snyder and Batman v Superman of them all, and there have been plenty.
Lex can be small and skinny to contrast Superman physically, if you must, but do not make him a worm.
Eisenberg's Luthor was a worm.
No, Moviebob's review still holds that honor.
Nah, I feel the worm is part of the charm. Superman is this mountain of a man, bass in his voice, confident, powerful. Lex is small, almost pitiful looking but it doesn't matter because his brain is his weapon.
I fully understand why people dislike the Eisenberg version starting from the actor all the way through to the portrayal but it worked for me in spades. Easily my favorite moments in the movie are his scenes.
Watching now ... you might be onto something...
The dream sequences were super cheesy.
Just saw it, and overall really enjoyed it.
This was pretty much my sentiment. But they nailed the shift in tones between their two stories, you could always tell whether it was going to be a Superman or Batman segment. Laurence Fishburne was great too.
I didn't plan to give this one money, and if I was going to see it I was going to use one of the Buy One Get One free coupons I have from Cineplex via buying Coke. I have a few.
However, last night didn't go as planned. A friend texted me, asking if I wanted to go see a movie, and that was his pick. I was okay with it. He'd previously told me he'd buy the one ticket and I could get in free, but he was later getting here and didn't want to use his credit card online (he did at the movies, though?). He said he'd just buy both, but I felt bad about that and ended up buying my own.
So I have a question about the scene where Lois throws away the spear and then later on retrieves it. What was so confusing about that scene? Frosty from Collider brought it up in a recent video as being a major plot hole but I don't understand why. Did anyone not understand her reasoning for throwing the spear away or was there more of a problem that that she thought to retrieve it? Personally, I thought that scene depicted the two sides of her rationale very well. It was the like the most human thing that happened in the movie.
there's nothing confusing about it, it's just silly and unnecessary for an already bloated movie. retrieve the spear she already threw into the water only to get trapped so we can give lois some more screentime during the doomsday fight. it was just shoehorning her into the damsel in distress situation.
she really should have been out of the picture after the Batman and Superman fight tbh.
Lois being in that scene is another factor to Batman realizing Superman was just a man and that Batman was losing himself. People don't give Lois's involvement in that scene any credit whatsoever.
I was more talking on how people reacted to that entire scene in general. Many give flak for that Martha comment, but rarely do people acknowledge this woman risking her life to be with this alien that Batman wanted to destroy.i said after the fight. miss me with that "you don't understand the depth of this film" mess.
That still doesn't make it a plot hole but just, as you said, unnecessary. I've heard it called a plot hole more than a few times. Luthor knowing Superman can't see through lead or has x-ray vision in the first place is a plot hole. What Lois did was not.
Anyone seen the theater release and the new rated R cut yet? is it better? or still shit?
Anyone seen the theater release and the new rated R cut yet? is it better? or still shit?
The ultimate cut is available digitally on Cineplex or some such service in the UK I think?
Better. If you hated this movie because of Lex or because of the Martha scene or what not you'll still hate it; you'll just hate it slightly less.
My score went up from 5 to a 6.5 maybe a 7.
It was available in UK? Damn it where?
Care to give more detailed impressions?![]()
Care to give more detailed impressions?
I think Cineplex is Canadian. My bad
http://store.cineplex.com/store/search.jsp?screen=low&_requestid=3219062#&isIOS=true
That still doesn't make it a plot hole but just, as you said, unnecessary. I've heard it called a plot hole more than a few times. Luthor knowing Superman can't see through lead or has x-ray vision in the first place is a plot hole. What Lois did was not.
How do we know Luthor knows he can't see through lead?
How do we know Luthor knows he can't see through lead?
It actually would have been more interesting if Superman had reverted to a childlike "mama...mama..." showing the rough state he was in.
Like a shell shocked soldier going from bravado to childlike behavior.
One of my biggest problem with the Martha scene is that, well, using your parents name instead of referring to them as mother or mama seems symbolic of disrespect and irreverance to your mother.
![]()
Bart sure isn't being respectful calling his dad by his name.
It actually would have been more interesting if Superman had reverted to a childlike "mama...mama..." showing the rough state he was in.
Like a shell shocked soldier going from bravado to childlike behavior.
If you listen closely he was about to say "Kent" when batman asked for an explanation
He tries to say "Kkkkkk"... but Batman's metal boot on his throat doesn't let him.I don't know about this. I've watched that scene multiple times and not once did I hear anything resembling him trying to say Kent.
He tries to say "Kkkkkk"... but Batman's metal boot on his throat doesn't let him.
Works either way for me. It is after saying "Martha" after all.That sounded more like he was just choking because Batman's boot is on his throat.
Theatrical Cut: 4.3/10 Ultimate Edition: 7.8/10
...
The Ultimate Cut flowed way better and it wasn't a mess of a film. The scenes were clearly established, instead of abruptly cut to, and they were arranged far more coherently.
I wasn't too happy with Lex Luthor in the TC, but I was very happy with his character in the UC. He had more of a bearing on the story, and came across as far more calculating and menacing rather than a maniacal, unpredictable child.
...
Lois was more than just a damsel in distress in this version of the film. She actually did some good investigating. Her story and the Africa subplot were great and it sucks that they had to butcher it in the TC.
Also, KGBeast was a brutal character. This film went from having two mediocre villains to having two very good villains.
...
So many moments that make this feel like a complete film rather than a hacky mess.
So yeah, this is the film I waited for. It still has some of the same issues as the TC, but my main ones were rectified for the most part so I'm happy.
I imagine he does, because LoisSomething that neither MOS/BVS showed us I think, so it's something that we as the audience don't know unless of course we're versed in the character.reacts "that's why he didn't see it"
I would've perferred he kept with Martha, but the scene afterwards is more like "no, I can't turn into what I promised I'd protect Gotham from... I won't turn into Joe Chill killing Martha on the street"... or something along those lines.
Well I was mainly asking because Icon says it's a plot hole that he knows Clark can't see through lead. The movie doesn't really explicitly say that Lex knows this
It's implied in the Ultimate Cut because of what Lois finds out,. That scene isn't in the theatrical cut so the only excuse given in the movie is when Superman says, "I'm afraid I didn't see it because I wasn't looking for it." Bu no scene in MoS or either version of BvS implies that Superman's x-ray vision is public information. In the Reeve movie it's well-known because it was in the interview Lois published. Lex points it out when describing how he will hide the kryptonite. There's nothing similar in BvS.that Lex lined the wheelchair with lead
It's implied in the Ultimate Cut because of what Lois finds out,. That scene isn't in the theatrical cut so the only excuse given in the movie is when Superman says, "I'm afraid I didn't see it because I wasn't looking for it." Bu no scene in MoS or either version of BvS implies that Superman's x-ray vision is public information. In the Reeve movie it's well-known because it was in the interview Lois published. Lex points it out when describing how he will hide the kryptonite. There's nothing similar in BvS.that Lex lined the wheelchair with lead
dude prolly figured out the physiology and limitations of kryptonians as he worked on Zod.
I kind of liked it in the TC because it really shows Supes conflict. He really didn't see it because he wasn't looking for it, which worries him. Ah well
Here's a review of the Ultimate Cut from someone on reddit who thought the theatrical version was bad.
Some of the less spoiler-y bits:
Kgbeast was in BvS? I did not notice at all.
Was he the guy who was set on fire?
Batman doesnt know who Superman's mom is.
But he could save "M-Martha...Kent" in Superman's place if he dies. It's that simple, come one.
Seeing a crying baby Superman sounds horrible.
Kgbeast was in BvS? I did not notice at all.
Was he the guy who was set on fire?