perfectchaos007
Member
What time is Trump's event? I would like to watch
What time is Trump's event? I would like to watch
To a point. Some people holding some signs doesn't draw much attention from anybody. I will say though that what really works well is numbers. I wish more people would get out there and participate, as long as they have peaceful intentions.
Protesting publicly can raise awareness, but it has to be done right. Making the lives of bystanders an issue blocking passage or roads just pisses people off and achieves nothing. Other than some bad press and general disdain at your protest.
Protesting with a message that is done peacefully and correctly gets you some airtime and headlines, and may impact some voters minds.
I'm clearly talking about those that resort to rioting/violence or destruction. That is stamping your feet because something isn't going as you want it. Better to fight a bad idea with a better one and win the battle with wisdom and maturity.
Pretty much this. It's like addressing a super aggressive personality with a super aggressive response. Some of these protests lately are lacking on the emotional intelligence aspect.
Being this aggressive will likely turn more people against the cause which causes a larger divide. I'd much rather hear clear and well constructed messages that can truly change minds and further the dialogue in a meaningful way.
Why would you bring this up? State violence has nothing to do with this thread.
"Jobs and schools not war"
It's kinda funny since, in a manner of speaking, part of Trump's platform actually advocates that very thing. Granted, the devil's in the details.
"Jobs and schools not war"
It's kinda funny since, in a manner of speaking, part of Trump's platform actually advocates that very thing. Granted, the devil's in the details.
I'm fine with protests and sit ins.
I'm clearly talking about those that resort to rioting/violence or destruction. That is stamping your feet because something isn't going as you want it. Better to fight a bad idea with a better one and win the battle with wisdom, dialect and maturity.
I know feelings and passion run high over such important matters, but always keep your head held high and behave as you would want others to.
I mean I can understand it, and hope if ever put in such a dire position I would heed my own advice, but like it or not it is the right advice given this situation. Protesters must stick together and show they have a grounded, reasonable and better message to deliver than what a candidate and some of his/her supporters may be flogging. That is the only way to win a battle of ideas and convert enough people into reason.
Somehow, if the roads being blocked would make your blood boil, I'm baffled how you would be ok with someone making eating at your favorite restaurant difficult.
Stop.
Instigators are found at every protest. They do not make up the majority of protests, otherwise, you would see absolute mayhem happening at these protests. There is no wisdom, dialect or maturity that will stop them and the agenda they have to wreck shit. They are not there to protest as much as do shit they wouldn't do outside a protest setting. Safety in numbers and all that...
It is our responsibility to siff through the fuckery and not allow the message of the protest to be lost. It is so fucking lazy to take the chastising approach to everyone there.
For the people there, ACTUALLY PROTESTING, they do keep their heads for the most part.
Stop clumping everyone together as the same group. That is not the case at all and it is part of the problem.
Somehow, if the roads being blocked would make your blood boil, I'm baffled how you would be ok with someone making eating at your favorite restaurant difficult.
Stop.
Instigators are found at every protest. They do not make up the majority of protests, otherwise, you would see absolute mayhem happening at these protests. There is no wisdom, dialect or maturity that will stop them and the agenda they have to wreck shit. They are not there to protest as much as do shit they wouldn't do outside a protest setting. Safety in numbers and all that...
It is our responsibility to siff through the fuckery and not allow the message of the protest to be lost. It is so fucking lazy to take the chastising approach to everyone there.
For the people there, ACTUALLY PROTESTING, they do keep their heads for the most part.
Stop clumping everyone together as the same group. That is not the case at all and it is part of the problem.
But instead you get sweated at and called names when trying to attend one of these speeches. The protesters assume you are a racist bigot for even attempting to attend and be informed about the candidates.
Sad that my wife and I couldn't attend one of his events out of fear for ourselves and personal property. Trump has just every right to run a campaign and it is disheartening to see this kind of animosity, not only towards Trump, but towards anybody attending these events.
A group preventing me from eating at my favorite restaurant is not even comparable to a group blocking vital infrastructure and access to medical and security services. Then if you had to get to that hospital there would be people outright attacking you and your property as you tried to get through the crowd.
But instead you get sweated at and called names when trying to attend one of these speeches. The protesters assume you are a racist bigot for even attempting to attend and be informed about the candidates.
Sad that my wife and I couldn't attend one of his events out of fear for ourselves and personal property. Trump has just every right to run a campaign and it is disheartening to see this kind of animosity, not only towards Trump, but towards anybody attending these events.
They're holding rallies. If you don't know why KKK/white nationalist rallies are extremely dangerous, you need to read up on American history.
His supporters haven't been very violent though. There have been a few incidents but in relation to his votes and rally numbers it's almost none existent. If this encouraging violence is so prevalent in his campaign then his supporters haven't got the message at all or they simply don't agree with him.
A group preventing me from eating at my favorite restaurant is not even comparable to a group blocking vital infrastructure and access to medical and security services. Then if you had to get to that hospital there would be people outright attacking you and your property as you tried to get through the crowd.
But instead you get sweated at and called names when trying to attend one of these speeches. The protesters assume you are a racist bigot for even attempting to attend and be informed about the candidates.
Sad that my wife and I couldn't attend one of his events out of fear for ourselves and personal property. Trump has just every right to run a campaign and it is disheartening to see this kind of animosity, not only towards Trump, but towards anybody attending these events.
Hypotheticals and all that.
If someone is kept from life saving aid as a result of a road being blocked during a protest, I will come out and say, "diablos991 was right".
Until then, it is posturing with nothing real associated with it.
Yes, history. If this was a time when the KKK was prominent, it would be easier to take that side. In the modern day when the KKK are a fringe group of idiots whose main talking point has become "whites are being oppressed!", then no, crashing a rally and assaulting members isn't right.
But instead you get sweated at and called names when trying to attend one of these speeches. The protesters assume you are a racist bigot for even attempting to attend and be informed about the candidates.
Sad that my wife and I couldn't attend one of his events out of fear for ourselves and personal property. Trump has just every right to run a campaign and it is disheartening to see this kind of animosity, not only towards Trump, but towards anybody attending these events.
Seems slightly weird and comical for people to protest waving another country's flag while being in america.
This position isn't so fringe anymore.
White Nationalism is on the rise since Obama and has surged under Trump. The KKK's irrelevance being the posterchild for these kinds of groups is dismissive of the sort of loons who are coming out of the woodwork to support this clown.
I'm not saying it's a majority. It's a vocal minority that should be taken seriously. Him winning the election is not likely to happen, but that doesn't mean the side effects of his rhetoric go away, either.
diablos991 was right
Nope.
The victim was not kept from life saving aid. They were diverted to another hospital.
I was very clear with what I said.
But, we don't believe him that's the problem. Trump wants to do things like stopping companies from doing business in other countries, while he is engaged with doing business in other countries. If you are a minority, especially somebody that Trump has said negative things about or has implied negative things, I doubt you'll be waiting for a job from Donald Trump's policies.
It's just like these people that are oppressed by the system and are poor. They turn to man like Donald Trump of all people, a billionaire looking to add a notch on his legacy belt. He doesn't care if you have a job or not. Not really. I refuse to the believe that.
Yup. Just pointing out the different points of view. Like I said, the devil's in the details.You mean that small 5% of stuff he talks about when he isn't talking about killing the families of enemies and saying he's going to "bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding."
?
If you support a candidate that calls Mexicans "rapists and murderers", Black people "The Blacks" and thinks we should look at closing our borders to Muslims until we "figure out what's going on", well, you support that person and their views.
What else is someone supposed to think?
Nope.
The victim was not kept from life saving aid. They were diverted to another hospital.
I was very clear with what I said.
Oh absolutely, and I hope no one took my post as some kind of "yeah, post-racial America!" thing or something. There are issues, and Trump's rise has shown there are still a disappointingly large number of hateful lunatics in this country.
But despite that all, I still won't get behind the acceptance of assaulting people rallying provided said rallies are words only.
I wish I had a solution to this shit, but I don't believe removing liberties is that. Maybe I'll be proven wrong at some point, but goddamn is the whole thing a shitshow.
So it's ok for people with critical injuries to be diverted to less equipped hospitals which adds time and increases the risk of death or permanent injury.
Hypotheticals and all that.
If someone is kept from life saving aid as a result of a road being blocked during a protest, I will come out and say, "diablos991 was right".
Until then, it is posturing with nothing real associated with it.
So long as nobody actually dies then it's all fun and games right?
Nope, I simply said:
Yeah, it sucks they had to divert but the life wasn't lost....so it's still a...hypothetical!
So long as nobody actually dies then it's all fun and games right?
Nope, I simply said:
Yeah, it sucks they had to divert but the life wasn't lost....so it's still a...hypothetical!
Man, this is a hell of a gamble. Can't the point be made without playing with people's lives like this? The fact that you're treating this whole thing like a box office prediction "quote me" bet is... well, it's a foreign mindset compared to what I'm used to.
So is it or is it not a good idea to block critical infrastructure leading to a hospital in regards to these protests?
Wow, so the person can be in serious pain in the need of medical attention (not life threatening) and you feel it is okay for an innocent to be in a painful state for longer because of some protest?
You really need an adjustment.
Huh? I'm genuinely confused. If it's a possibility that the cops escalated the situation how is that not relevant to "Riots outside of Trump Rally"?
The goal of protesting isn't to stop someone from getting live saving care but at what point do we look at the reason people are protesting (in the article's case it was BLM, where very real, non-hypothetical people are dying) vs. defending the loads of hypothetical deaths their protesting might cause?
The goal of protesting isn't to stop someone from getting live saving care but at what point do we look at the reason people are protesting (in the article's case it was BLM, where very real, non-hypothetical people are dying) vs. defending the loads of hypothetical deaths their protesting might cause?
For what it's worth, I get where you're coming from.
I'm not in favor of violent protest or rioting, but I understand why it happens and I'm not going to act all huffy and indignant on a message board about the outcome while not being upset about the problem.
The hypocrisy is what burns me about it. If people were as mad about the general state of inequality and racism which is woven into the framework of this country as they were about a car being torched or a CVS being burnt down, we would have never gotten to this point.
Ultimately, there is no solution until the majority population cares enough to uproot the american status quo. As people become more aware, there's going to be more unrest. Sitting down and being peaceful and quiet in the corner isn't going to garner any major change, and history has proven that.
So protest unjust deaths by increasing the likelihood of more unjust deaths. Got it.
So long as nobody actually dies then it's all fun and games right?
Nope, I simply said:
Yeah, it sucks they had to divert but the life wasn't lost....so it's still a...hypothetical!
The goal of protesting isn't to stop someone from getting live saving care but at what point do we look at the reason people are protesting (in the article's case it was BLM, where very real, non-hypothetical people are dying) vs. defending the loads of hypothetical deaths their protesting might cause?
Wow, so the person can be in serious pain in the need of medical attention (not life threatening) and you feel it is okay for an innocent to be in a painful state for longer because of some protest?
You really need an adjustment.
Dude that is a pretty awful way to look at it. It's not even always about life or death, a few minutes more can mean the difference between something being worse/permanent or being fully curable.
People need to take their heads away for a political lens in favour of their party and just accept if it was your loved one unable to get into a hospital, and even if they didn't die you'd still be absolutely livid at the protesters for the added stress and uncertainty.
So now, we're not only arguing hypothetical people, we're arguing additional hypothetical time in hypothetical pain for hypothetical people.
There are any number of scenarios that could result in someone being in pain for longer outside of protest, all of which could have happened regardless of there being a protest that caused a critical health person to be diverted or not.
Suffice it to say I don't think there is any good reason to block access to a hospital. You disagree, that's fine.
I choose not to live with "what if" scenarios in order to ignore other issues.
Bingo.
Couldn't technically every single road in any city be being blocked prevent someone, anyone from getting to a hospital?