Re: people saying Obama needs to say "radical Islamic terrorism" more.
Here in America, connotation smuggling and semantic games are more important than addressing tragedies in any way other than blaming non-White people as a collective. Any solution that might have an impact on white people, such as enhanced gun control, is disingenuously swatted away - conservatives appealing to mental healthcare reform when they, their policies, and their philosophies have both destroyed the system and stigmatized both mental health sufferers and therapy as a concept disgusts me on both a deeply personal and logical level - in favor of just broadly tarring an entire religion of people, because xenophobia is easier than actually understanding the world with more nuance than someone left behind by Piaget. Please, use your brain.
If any of you fools payed any attention in even the smallest capacity, you would realize that Obama has directly condemned ISIS many, many, many, many times. But he also has the tact to recognize that speaking in broad statements that implicate an entire religion of people is unwise and will just incite further hatred. I agree that there are extremely problematic sections of the Quran just as there is in the Bible, and any other piece of literature written by people hundreds of years ago. But the solution isn't to alienate moderate religious people who have modernized by inciting hatred against them - especially when the moderate religious folk condemn terrorism over and over and the fools must try harder and harder to maintain their ignorance - it's to cultivate the moderate religious folk, to gentrify religion into an acceptably toothless form. After all, it worked on Christianity (mostly), so it will work on Islam as well.