And so it is AMD's Vega after all, isn't it? I wonder if this got Sony legit shook. They can't go forward with their Polaris plans.
No it´s Polaris 10
And so it is AMD's Vega after all, isn't it? I wonder if this got Sony legit shook. They can't go forward with their Polaris plans.
Absolutely, if these can run 4k games at 30 fps it's going to be awesome. I don't have a 4k tv and haven't had a need for one but I would absolutely buy one for these consoles next year.
Good luck selling this under $500.
Translation...
We need much more brute force for our less than desirable engine optimization for VR.
They had nothing new to the table for software really, so I see why this was done to shift focus.
Exactly this. It's a gamble. There is no telling that a more powerful system will mean they are back to being number 1 in the U.S. The first thing they have to hit is the price and I remain skeptical that this thing is going to be anything less than 499$. It's a reset for MS to try and get back the market.
Ading more memory is a pretty easy engineering feat compared with an entirely new gpu.Considering that Sony matched the Xbone's 8Gb of RAM after they sent out PS4 dev kits with 4Gb of RAM, that's not a statement I would agree with.
And so it is AMD's Vega after all, isn't it? I wonder if this got Sony legit shook. They can't go forward with their Polaris plans.
I hope Sony is crying and whimpering somewhere in a corner. Competition is good for consumers. Sony and Microsoft going into a power war is a win for everyone.
Sony must be worried about a console that's 17 months away. It's all over now rip PS4 and the 40+ million and growing gamers.
You had a good run.
To the people who know PC gaming, how much would it cost to build a PC with comparable specs today? Is this as powerful as a mid-tier PC or is it more in line with higher end PCs?
That 4K line has me pretty confused, because I thought that was only really prevalent in higher end machines(without compromising other specs that is).
Personally for me I don't want to get my hands messy upgrading parts in this. If I eventually buy a Windows 10 PC with a beefy graphics card it will be an added bonus but I prefer to game on consoles and not sit at a workstation and I don't want a traditional PC where I do work on in my living room.
I'm 200% ok with paying through the nose regularly for more power. But I want to cast off all ties to the past. I don't want to pay a ton and have old architecture and last gen laggards holding in. I hate this strategy from all parties, Sony AND Microsoft. I hate this!
Now they know how the Xbox department felt when PS4 was announced to be 399.
Except the 1070 alone costs around 450 does it not? So if the Scorpio can sell a whole console for let's say 500 , why spend 1000+ on a PC build to get that same performance.
2013 is that you?
And so it is AMD's Vega after all, isn't it? I wonder if this got Sony legit shook. They can't go forward with their Polaris plans.
You can't effectively compare TFLOPS across architectures like this, historically Nvidia's cards are significantly more effective at utilizing those flops.
What you can think of is that a 6flop AMD driven console is just over the threshold required to run a current XBone game as-is at 4K, and still under the threshold required to run a PS4 game as-is at 4K.
I'm loving the defacto "cancel the Neo" post that pops up every few pages.
E3 is a glorious time of year.
Maybe this was already said but what if neo will be absent today because they are rethinking the specs to better compete with Microsoft?
Where is that halo mate?!
Why wouldn't I? It's not like I would switch over to PC to spite consoles.
It just wouldn't make sense getting a new box every year when you can just upgrade a PC.
The MS defense force is active alright lol
naw i don't agree with this, you can have games run on the same hardware, and there could be still a huge difference, the last of us on ps4 still looks great, i can really appreciate clean IQ and 60fps, its a night and day difference. i'm playing bloodborne, and the framerate is bad and iq look like shit, the old ps3 game on ps4 looks far more pleasing to my eyes.
Yup, same here. Only reason I went over to the Sony side was cause it was the more powerful console.
Watch the video in OP, there are 16 memory chips.
Is there some sort of conversion table for AMD flops vs. Nvidia flops?
Is that really strong enough to play games like BF1 at 4K?
I kinda doubt it.
It's a little different though because both companies are maintaining the relevance of the last gen consolesCalling it right now, this is going to be ps2 vs the of Xbox all over again.
Sony will get a cheaper box out the door, way ahead of ms. Neo lower speced but with the ms console having less exclusives and a lot of mildy optimised sw
I've always thought that console gaming was at its best with games that feel custom tailored for the hardware. Unfortunately, starting with PS3/360, very few games felt like that anymore. Most of them felt like PC games that were asking just a little more than the hardware could comfortably provide (and in fact, most games were made on multiplatform game engines that run better on a decent PC).That said, generations are why I like consoles. I like buying a box knowing it will be supported for at least 6 years and that every game I play on it was built with my hardware in mind. Iterative consoles have me seriously considering building a gaming PC.
?
It's still coming to PC, but I never confirmed or claimed it'd be a sure thing for E3.
Calling it right now, this is going to be ps2 vs the of Xbox all over again.
Sony will get a cheaper box out the door, way ahead of ms. Neo lower speced but with the ms console having less exclusives and a lot of mildy optimised sw
No it´s Polaris 10
This isn't what I have been told by a vetted insider on here. He says Sony has a version of Neo under consideration that is comparable to Scorpio, but the pricing is an issue.
Not ignorant, just not drinking the koolaid and can think of this from a strategic pov.
So say PS Neo launches this year (because if you are so set on believing in rumors, you must go all the way). That means Sony will leave MS in the dust power wise and sales wise even more so for one year. You honestly believe that 'obviously everyone will wait for a scorpio'? lol come on now. Tell you what, let's see how this plays out and have this convo again. Bookmark this. Sony is not at a disadvantage as you may think they are here.
Oh and Sony did bump specs for PS4 after the initial dev kits fyi. But again let's see the final specs release and the launch date and see if your theory of people not buying Neo and holding out for Scorpio play out
If you are talking about playing it at high settings and 60 FPS, then no, it's not.Is that really strong enough to play games like BF1 at 4K?
I kinda doubt it.
I'd get a Steam link.From the great words of Rorschach, "Hrm." I currently own a solid PC with a 980ti but I miss the under the TV box set up. I guess I have plenty of time and with the Play Anywhere initiative I could easily transfer over my games. Just wondering what you guys think? I have a 6700k 24GB ddr4 ram and a 980ti so how does that really compare with the Scorpio? I got that HP deal posted on NeoGAF a while ago. I use my MacBook for work and this new PC is just for play. I do miss having a dedicated box. But playing Forza 3, Recore and Gears 4 on full blast will definitely hold me over until the Scorpio. What would you do?
http://pcpartpicker.com/list/hV4JxY
I guess ~$500 for a typical barebones pcpartpicker build, but the scorpio GPU sounds different than the RX 480 if it has 320 GB/s bandwidth. Maybe it's using a downclocked version of the next step up?
Same doubts here but they kept saying "true 4k resolution" gaming... I just assumed it could just output scaled 4k.
Is there some sort of conversion table for AMD flops vs. Nvidia flops?
Today it would be significantly more expensive than it will be one month from now.
One month from now it will be the new mid-tier (with comparable GPU performance in the $250 range).
The same way you can run the same games on low end and high end PCs but with auto optimisation. Come on people, its really not that hard to understand.
Yea, poor Sony.
![]()
Wut is this? Are there more of those?