Xbox Project Scorpio Announced - 6TFlops, 320GB/s - Fall 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
Curious why people think Neo would have an advantage being first.

The way I see it is if you have a PS4 already the jump to Neo (1.84TF to 4.2TF) isn't as big as the jump to Scorpio. If you believe the rumors then all PS4 games will run in both so you still get Sony exclusives on your PS4.

This isn't a new gen it's an upgrade. Why not keep the PS4 for exclusives and get the Scorpio for better multi-plats. This only works if you don't plan on buying PC.

You're assuming that most consumers plan to buy and own multiple consoles. I don't know the numbers on multi-console ownership, but I would assume it's a relatively small portion of the market. Also trading in or selling your old console does reduce the initial cash outlay and sticker shock. Also factor in stuff like accessories (a 2nd controller) and paid online for 2 consoles now and the costs start to add up. I think more people will move from Sony to Microsoft than vice versa, but I don't think the numbers will be particularly significant.
 
I'm confused about one thing. If the Scorpio is supposedly that much of an upgrade compared to the One, how are they going to develop games that aren't hamstrung by having to support the One?

There was a pretty significant jump in quality, IMO, when true current gen games were not also being developed for 360.

Check out that Doom super-lower-settings-and-resolution screen shot thread from earlier today/yesterday. That games is a very 2016 take on Doom both graphics and gameplay wise yet it was running on a seemingly 10+ year old piece of hardware.
 
Why would NEO need a spec bump? Release it this year as the most powerful console on the market at $399, making the Xbox S feel like an extremely weaker option. Price cut next year. Then PS5 in 2018/19.
 
So my read on the Neo/Scorpio thing is that Sony is in coast mode while Microsoft is desperate to shake up the game (this is not a negative). They are effectively going to repeat what they did with the Xbox 360; get out early and with a power/development edge. This is smart. I’m on record as saying power matters and I think it will continue to matter going forward.

I think things are a little murkier than with the PS4 vs. Xbone because the release dates are staggered and we don’t have a lot of precedents to look at. With the 360, clearly launching early was critical for Microsoft. If Neo launches earlier at a comparable or more competitive price (could Sony drop it when Neo launches?), that would be comparable. Additionally, PS2 was out for a year before Xbox and trailed it significantly for an entire generation and it didn’t matter so much. On the other hand, things have changed. More of the console’s library is multiplatform than it would have been on the PS2, so direct port vs. port comparisons matter more. And obviously you have people on the PlayStation platform because they wanted stronger hardware. So I’m not sure what the end result would be.

Sony wants to keep things status quo. Microsoft needs drama to alter their course.

I absolutely despise the “everything is compatible with everything else” thing. I am going to be the first one to line up to get a generational leap, but I want just that: generations. It does not benefit me to spend a lot of money for a machine that is going to be playing games still ultimately designed for very old hardware. You’re obviously going to get a nice bump and developers know how to do their thing and hide the seams to make things feel new, but you are always kind of aware. I am extremely unhappy about this with both the Neo and the Scorpio and it is making me consider just dropping consoles.

I’ll probably get one if I don’t build a PC, which I think I will do since Microsoft has basically given you no reason to own an Xbox unless you are really not technically inclined or you don’t believe you can get plug and play functionality from a PC.

Sony has no reason to feel “threatened,” as they’re going to be so far ahead by the time this even launches, but it’s clearly a challenge to them for their most lucrative, most engaged customers. In that sense, they really have their work cut out for them.

You want generations but you're going to build a PC? You lost me there. I think the way we look at XBOX will be different. We'll look at our profile, gamerscore, library of games, and it will travel with us as we move between hardware.
 
I’m on record as saying power matters and I think it will continue to matter going forward.

I feel the same.

I see some people saying PS4 didn't win because of the power.
But it was definitely one of the important aspects. ( I remember the amount of hype when 8GB GDDR was rumoured then announced officially)
Not the only one of course, like the no DRM video they released. That was huge too.
 
Even if you aren't buying games or gaming on a windows 10 machine they profit so long as you're using their OS or a computer built by one of the various vendors.
Lots of people fail to realize how much they support MS even though they think they are hurting them. The best thing they could have done was bring their first party games to PC, allow cross buy and cross play. I absolutely love it.
 
Why would NEO need a spec bump? Release it this year as the most powerful console on the market at $399, making the Xbox S feel like an extremely weaker option. Price cut next year. Then PS5 in 2018/19.

I'll probably wait for PS5 then. Seems silly to upgrade inbetween.
 
and the jump to Scorpio will likely not be as big as the jump to PS5 so?

Yeah, but how far off is that? 3-4 years. I'm just saying consoles are iterative now. Getting out ahead doesn't mean shit if the next big thing is only 10 months down the road if that. It depends on when Sony plans on releasing Neo.

You're assuming that most consumers plan to buy and own multiple consoles. I don't know the numbers on multi-console ownership, but I would assume it's a relatively small portion of the market. Also trading in or selling your old console does reduce the initial cash outlay and sticker shock. Also factor in stuff like accessories (a 2nd controller) and paid online for 2 consoles now and the costs start to add up. I think more people will move from Sony to Microsoft than vice versa, but I don't think the numbers will be particularly significant.

Most people I know own multiple consoles, but that's probably because that's the people I talk to. I agree with the dual pay for online except that if you were to buy a Scorpio for multi-plats, which is a bulk of gaming then you can drop your PS+ until a exclusive with multiplayer releases. Not saying it's perfect or even makes sense, but I don't think getting out ahead matters to people looking for the most powerful console.
 
Honestly this isn't even true. i can't run Witcher 3 on my 2008 system. There are generations on PC too.

Lol well yeah, eventually things will move one and people will need to upgrade to a higher spec Xbox which is expected with a gap of 8 years(!), just as you upgrade your PC. Your post pretty much proves my point. The really important thing is that the successor to Scorpio, in 8 yrs or whatever, will continue to play XB1 games (and 360 BC games included). This is a fucking great move.
 
I'm confused about one thing. If the Scorpio is supposedly that much of an upgrade compared to the One, how are they going to develop games that aren't hamstrung by having to support the One?

There was a pretty significant jump in quality, IMO, when true current gen games were not also being developed for 360.

That extra power will likely be used for things better AA, AF, framerate and / or 4k native resolution.

4k gaming is still extremely demanding on High end games, even the mighty Nvidia GTX 1080 cant do 4k 60fps, so normal Xbox One will run games like it does now, say a game runs at 1080p/30fps, the Scorpio version could be 4k/30fps for example. 4k resolution will eat up that extra power.
 
They'll have to navigate the whole "forward and backward compatible" thing carefully. I'm sure they will. It seems like it's gonna be a little tricky.

Eventually, two or three years from now, enough people will have moved over to Scorpio from OG Xbox One that developers will simply stop supporting the original. It'll be like developers nowadays pretty much having dropped PS3/ 360, since the audience is almost completely switched over to current gen from last gen at this point.
 
I'm confused about one thing. If the Scorpio is supposedly that much of an upgrade compared to the One, how are they going to develop games that aren't hamstrung by having to support the One?

There was a pretty significant jump in quality, IMO, when true current gen games were not also being developed for 360.

doom1.jpg
 
I'm just glad we're not going in the direction of computing "in the cloud". Though I do wonder how many people upset with half-generation consoles will just switch to PC.
 
You want generations but you're going to build a PC? You lost me there. I think the way we look at XBOX will be different. We'll look at our profile, gamerscore, library of games, and it will travel with us as we move between hardware.

Sure and there may come time when Microsoft decides the R&D expense for a box isn't worth it and moves the platform to PC. They have that advantage over Sony.

However I'm not really sure I follow Y2KEV's argument here. Going by the rumors Microsoft isn't launching first while it does have the power advantage. So it's not the 360 at all. Unless he means going before what's after the NEO but then you could say whatever iteration launches at the time is the 360 if they keep the one year offset as I'd expect them to leapfrog each other every time unless someone did a $599 or something of that nature.
 
I'm confused about one thing. If the Scorpio is supposedly that much of an upgrade compared to the One, how are they going to develop games that aren't hamstrung by having to support the One?

There was a pretty significant jump in quality, IMO, when true current gen games were not also being developed for 360.

That's the million dollar question, and I suspect the answer is going to be "they won't: the PS4/Xbone will remain the lead platform".

So where does the NX sit in all of this? as everyone here is talking Neo Scorpio, surely Nintendo doesn't want to be left out of the party again! How does Nintendo react? Or is it true that they'll stick to their console being the equivalent in power to xbox-1? (which were the strong rumours being buzzed about)

That's a big question, and I suspect that they'll wind up being (half of a) generation behind on power again.
 
1080p/60 is more than enough upgrade for me. Throw in a 4k/30 option for those with a 4k TV and that is fine upgrade.

Yup, Witcher 3 1080p60 locked / Souls 1080p60 locked etc. Sony need to make sure Neo has enough guts to do the same, or its dead.

Also dont get the hamstrrung posts, games now run in 1080p30 or 900p60 on current gen with poor shadows and LOD, low AA.

A better console will just bang out a locked 1080p60 with superb AA, AF, LOD and effects. Thats all I care for. Sold.
 
Why is there so much confusion about Scorpio vs Xbox One games?

Don't PC developers right now have to develop games for PC that are multiple specs? Can't the games auto-detect specs and adjust accordingly?

This will be no different.
 
It's also nice knowing that, if I'm not interested in VR and 60fps AAA games, I can just stick with the X1 and continue to enjoy indies, etc. with a sprinkling of AAA stuff. It won't perform as well as on Scorpio, but who cares? It'll run!

I'm confused about one thing. If the Scorpio is supposedly that much of an upgrade compared to the One, how are they going to develop games that aren't hamstrung by having to support the One?

Look at all of the amazing engines we've got these days. Look at how scalable Doom, MGSV, and many of the newer games are. We're in a much better position to get those kinds of games now then we were even just a few years ago, and that will make it possible to create more new, cutting-edge games that run acceptably on older hardware, rather than older-style games that are slightly enhanced for newer systems. Those are going to become the norm, I think.

So where does the NX sit in all of this?

Nowhere, really. Nintendo has demonstrated by this point that they're in their own little world, for better or worse. Unless the NX is just a single-screen console that utilizes a typical handheld controller, you're not going to see multi-platform stuff on there anyway, regardless of how more or less powerful it is.

The reason you don't see games released on all 3 (PS4/XB1/WiiU) consoles isn't just because of a power difference. If you release on Wii U, you have to fully support the GamePad.
 
Wait, why are you posting this in a Scorpio thread?

Because this topic also has a lot about Neo.

And because that game is one of the best looking of this gen under certain circumstances, but suffers from 30fps and other graphical issues. I would be okay with it if the Scorpio and comparable Neo would deliver such upgrades on it.

But Witcher 3 is a fine example too. 60fps, no pop in etc.
 
Why would NEO need a spec bump? Release it this year as the most powerful console on the market at $399, making the Xbox S feel like an extremely weaker option. Price cut next year. Then PS5 in 2018/19.

Yea I think some of us are forgetting the Neo isnt supposed to be the PS5. The Scorpio for all intents and purposes is probably the XBox Two.

IMO Microsoft is probably ready to jump to their next gen console right now, Sony isnt. Would Sony really be thinking about changing the specs? If Sony waits til they are ready they could one up MS in specs again....then again MS could have a comfortable lead in sales if ppl gravitate to the Scorpio due to specs.

What a time to be alive...
 
Feels too early for the Neo so I probably would have waited a year anyway, I'll make my decision partially based on how The Witcher runs on Neo vs Scorpio.

Didn't think I'd ever go back to Xbox though. If I can keep playing PS4/Neo first party titles like Last Of Us 2 on an old PS4, why not get a Scorpio for 3d party?
 
I don't actually understand what this does for the Xbox CONSOLE brand. I think it actually damages it (not in any strong way). If you're a PC gamer, you really have no incentive to buy an Xbox One.

"I game on PC, I have no interest in an Xbox console."
"Hey cool, I can buy Xbox games on PC now, I have even less than zero interest in an Xbox console."
"Wow, Forza Horizon 3 is great."
"Wow, ReCore is great."
"Wow, Gears 4 is great."

(fast forward a few years)

"Upgrade my video card AGAIN? I don't feel like doing that any more."
"I don't have as much time to tinker with my PC as I used to."
"Maybe I could just buy a console. But which one?"
"...you know? I have this whole library of Xbox games and content already..."

And even if this doesn't happen, they earned 100% more revenue from PC players buying Xbox games than they did before. But it'll happen a few times...mark my words.

They want you in the ecosystem. They want you buying content and building up a library that you won't want to give up. In the end, they may or may not sell you an Xbox console, but it's less likely that you'll grab a PlayStation.
 
Shadow2222 said:
IMO, when true current gen games were not also being developed for 360.
Delta from 360 to XOne was significantly bigger than what you're getting here, even before we talk about architectural changes.
Also if 4k support is any sort of a requirement - that takes most of power difference to run by itself - better question would be how multiple configurations will be handled, as this is literally PC if you're getting a completely different performance/settings at 1080p vs 4k.
 
One thing I absolutely don't care about at the moment is 4k gaming. I hope it won't hamstring other aspects of visuals. I want better geometry, better effects, better AA, higher FPS, better lighting. I will take all of those a long time before 4k. If most devs just push 4k visuals versus 900p on Xbone then...blah.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom