brandonh83
Banned
gf just dropped this on me while I was eating breakfast. I almost threw the fuck up.
Holy shit.
Holy shit.
So um if I want to visit relatives in florida do I just avoid any and all water I can't see to the bottom of? As a Canadian who grew up in the country I'm more used to bears and moose and while extremely dangerous those aren't exactly subtle creatures you can miss approaching.
It's because it's hard to imagine a 2-years old being allowed to run around on his own, near a large body of water and also very hard to imagine an alligator, attacking a child that's standing immediately next to his parent. So the immediate picture that get's painted, is that the 2-year old was near the water, alone. Maybe I am being overly cautious though. My first child is due next month, so I'm still reading about how you should never bathe baby in more than an inch or so of water...So letting a small child that near a lake, without holding their hands seems like it would be abnormal, is it not?
Original one.
Surely this is going to lead to the biggest lawsuit in human history?
So um if I want to visit relatives in florida do I just avoid any and all water I can't see to the bottom of? As a Canadian who grew up in the country I'm more used to bears and moose and while extremely dangerous those aren't exactly subtle creatures you can miss approaching.
We go to the beach quite a lot with our kids (5, 3, 2)
We're always close by when they are playing by the sea, but the 2 year old will have a splash in the (very) shallow water without holding our hand.
Now obviously we haven't got alligators, but can totally understand how the parents, on a "beach" in a Disney land resort, having an organised film evening just wouldn't even consider such a thing.
And its completely imaginable that the 2 year old was sitting nicely next to a parent 2 minutes earlier, before quietly (as they do) run off
Best of luckThanks for the response. I'll have more personal experience with this in...exactly 2 years and 1 month.
Horrible.
This is why I used to get nervous when my kid was even walking along the boat dock of our canal. I just imagine some big hungry gator coming up and getting him.
Now he swims in the lake. 8 years old in the middle of a lake that we've seen a dozen or more gators on.
I sometimes look at my inlaws and my wife and go "are you out of your fucking mind?" but sit and just watch him...just watch him and not have fun because I'm fucking terrified he's going to be pulled under.
Were there no signs saying to stay out of the water?
Were there no signs saying to stay out of the water?
Were there no signs saying to stay out of the water?
God damnit.They have signs all over that say no swimming. Reports are the kid and his dad were about a foot into the water.
What does that mean with the gatorsDisney employs tons of people, many of which are simple no skill required jobs, so yea lot of folks are going to not get amazing pay. They do offer lot of benefits to their employees though.
I feel there is an essential difference between "no swimming" and "beware alligators". I feel like they illicit two potentially contrasting reactions, especially if you're not from FL. One gives way to curiosity or a bit of rebellion. Maybe one thinks the water is dirty or unwatched by life guards for which the sign amounts to legal coverage for Disney. The other says, "oh shit let me say way the fuck back, lest I get bit in the ass by a dinosaur ancestor."Read tha article and the CNN one. There are many signs.
I am not blaming the fathers but they were very naivy to let their younger child to play in that water even a foot in (as I look at the pictures). Specially at sundown. But they were on vacation on a luxery resort, so they probable felt very safe. My family was been at Disney almost every year in the last years. I remember when staying at Caribbean Resort the staff would make bonfires to cook marshmallows at the artificial beach from its lake, and at sundown too. So... I cannot blame anyone here.
I feel there is an essential difference between "no swimming" and "beware alligators". I feel like they illicit two potentially contrasting reactions, especially if you're not from FL. One gives way to curiosity or a bit of rebellion. Maybe one thinks the water is dirty or unwatched by life guards for which the sign amounts to legal coverage for Disney. The other says, "oh shit let me say way the fuck back, lest I get bit in the ass by a dinosaur ancestor."
Anyway, the lawyers will figure out who can be blamed. I think you're fooling yourself if this family is going to shrug off their 2 year old disappearing into the Buena Vista night surrounded by gator jaws.
My guess is we'll see soon enough. Assuming they were in the water, swimming is just that: an assumption. Depending on the family's account, Disney could very well be in a heap of trouble.I highly doubt legally they can say "the signs said no swimming but we thought its okay to be a little rebellious". I do not see how they could win here, it would be against Disney of all companies. They know how to make sure they are legally protected.
I highly doubt legally they can say "the signs said no swimming but we thought its okay to be a little rebellious". I do not see how they could win here, it would be against Disney of all companies. They know how to make sure they are legally protected.
I feel there is an essential difference between "no swimming" and "beware alligators". I feel like they illicit two potentially contrasting reactions, especially if you're not from FL. One gives way to curiosity or a bit of rebellion. Maybe one thinks the water is dirty or unwatched by life guards for which the sign amounts to legal coverage for Disney. The other says, "oh shit let me say way the fuck back, lest I get bit in the ass by a dinosaur ancestor."
Anyway, the lawyers will figure out who can be blamed. I think you're fooling yourself if you think this family is going to shrug off their 2 year old disappearing into the Buena Vista night surrounded by gator jaws.
Disney gonna have to pay up if its on their property
Gators will travel for miles overland between bodies of water too. Unless it's completely enclosed like Echo Lake you must assume there are gators.I feel like too many people see a "No Swimming" sign and seem to think that it means it must be OK to just wade in a few feet into the water.
Alligators aren't the only reason WDW doesn't want you in the lagoon, so a broader sign like "No Swimming" made sense, I thought.
Maybe it should be changed to "Do Not Enter the Water" to stop people from wading?
EDIT: Also, if people are still wondering how that lagoon has gators, go look at Google Maps. It's directly connected to the larger Bay Lake, and both have a ton of canals connecting them to even more bodies of water
I don't disagree right now, but if someone or some entity was negligent, they need to be held accountable. If for no other reason to ensure better safety measures are put in place to reduce the likelihood of something like this happening again. Better lighting at night events on beaches by gator-infested waters, for example. Or increased distances from the shore. Or clearer signs. Or lit signs at night to ensure they aren't missed in the darkness. Stuff like that.Disney legally is probably covered yes, but that doesn't bring this little boy back and knowing the Disney company they will most likely settle with the family without it ever going to court.
In the end a little boy is lost and that is the most tragic thing here, I don't think the blame should be put on anyone though.
I don't disagree right now, but if someone or some entity was negligent, they need to be held accountable. If for no other reason to ensure better safety measures are put in place to reduce the likelihood of something like this happening again. Better lighting at night events on beaches by gator-infested waters, for example. Or increased distances from the shore. Or clearer signs. Or lit signs at night to ensure they aren't missed in the darkness. Stuff like that.
I feel like too many people see a "No Swimming" sign and seem to think that it means it must be OK to just wade in a few feet into the water.
Alligators aren't the only reason WDW doesn't want you in the lagoon, so a broader sign like "No Swimming" made sense, I thought.
Maybe it should be changed to "Do Not Enter the Water" to stop people from wading?
EDIT: Also, if people are still wondering how that lagoon has gators, go look at Google Maps. It's directly connected to the larger Bay Lake, and both have a ton of canals connecting them to even more bodies of water
I highly doubt legally they can say "the signs said no swimming but we thought its okay to be a little rebellious". I do not see how they could win here, it would be against Disney of all companies. They know how to make sure they are legally protected.
I don't disagree right now, but if someone or some entity was negligent, they need to be held accountable. If for no other reason to ensure better safety measures are put in place to reduce the likelihood of something like this happening again. Better lighting at night events on beaches by gator-infested waters, for example. Or increased distances from the shore. Or clearer signs. Or lit signs at night to ensure they aren't missed in the darkness. Stuff like that.
awful story to hear
but its Florida , gators all over the place so I'd be no where near a body of water thats not an ocean
doesn't Disney resorts have pools?
My wife and I are taking our 10 month old to WDW on July 4. This story is giving me chills.
I don't disagree right now, but if someone or some entity was negligent, they need to be held accountable. If for no other reason to ensure better safety measures are put in place to reduce the likelihood of something like this happening again. Better lighting at night events on beaches by gator-infested waters, for example. Or increased distances from the shore. Or clearer signs. Or lit signs at night to ensure they aren't missed in the darkness. Stuff like that.
As mentioned, it really depends on the clarity of the signs. "No swimming" is a different message than "no wading" is a different message than "do not enter the water: danger" is different message than "danger: alligators in water".If there were signs (and honestly, even if there weren't), this is 100% on the parents. I can't imagine bringing any kind of charges against then after suffering this tragedy, but it's definitely criminal negligence
They do. The signs also say "No wading". They make it clear that they don't want you in the water at all.
(says "Steep Drop-off / Deep Water / No Swimming")
Optimistic to recover the body...
It's Florida man. No body of water is safe there.Lol, why would you make a beach where it's not safe to be in the water?
One has to imagine the past 5 days - unrelated incidents or not - is going to hurt their tourism industry.
Ah, they do? I haven't stayed at the Grand Floridian or been on its beach yet. I know some of the signs on property don't say anything but "No Swimming".
(this one is from the Beach Club resort, taken on Feb 5, 2016)
EDIT:
Not sure what part of GF's beach this is, but this is from a Chicago Tribune article:
(says "Steep Drop-off / Deep Water / No Swimming")