No, it's worse than paid. It is was gaming reviews too often also have become, a cultural statement rather than a review about a game or movie. If the frame rate is bad in game it is a part of a review, if the editing does not work in a movie, if plot lines are dropped, that is part of a review. How well a movie was crafted is an important information and how often in any of the reviews did you read anything about it.
To often you read the argument, well it is a fun movie and that is the most important part. No, it is not. If you read a movie review you are interested in movies, this also means technical aspects, narrative aspects, plot and several other things. If you just argue with fun and how important that is, that this social issues was addressed, you missing the point of movie or game review.
Game reviews are already pretty much irrelevant. A guy like angry Joe is way more influential than Kotaku or Eurogamer. If this continues with movies, they will learn the same thing and Youtubers will have more influence over movie critics as anyone who writes for a newspaper or has a TV show.
Your political or social preference is not the most important part of a movie or game review. It can be part of it, as well as if the movie was still fun, even with the technical problems. But if you ignore all of this, just to give everybody your opinion, of course you will stand no chance against the Youtubers, which are way better in this. People want to know if it is a good or bad movie and sorry, this also includes all the boring technical parts, even if you would rather write about your feelings.