clockworkinyou
Banned
![]()
This could backfire so hard
'oh shit, am I winning?'
![]()
This could backfire so hard
my predictions
Wings vs DC this could be a bloodbathmy predictions
An EG vs OG finals would be amazing, regardless of who wins.
DC vs Secret lb bo3 elimination plz
my predictions
1 monthAnyone know mono irl
Hao long his ban?
Anyone know mono irl
Hao long his ban?
Sit down kid.
I would but you dodged TI6.Fite me
I would but you dodged TI6.
Do you have the week off?Pay for my plane ticket and I'll be there ull see
Do you have the week off?
When is the next match?
So, anyone can recommend me any of the matches?
I have only seen the EG and Secret games, if there is any great ones I would watch the replay. Maybe some of the DC or MVP?
If you haven't seen it, watch EG vs Alliance game 1. Also, DC vs MVP game 1. Here's a couple more recommendations:
https://www.reddit.com/r/DotaVods/c...6_group_stage/d62uw9d?st=irjn1jxh&sh=467e6d91
The heartbreak begins;
![]()
Yep. And both those teams were direct invites.
Nice going Volvo.
both deserved their invites.
your point is?
Touched a nerve did I? Pity.
I'll give that Liquid probably did, although Kuro and FATA have been a disaster. But Navi getting a direct invite is dubious and was very much debated at the time.
They were the only team with a stable roster that had been doing alright. The only other team that would have made sense was Fnatic, but there's no way they could invite 2 SEA team (or so they thought, TNC has been a pleasant surprise). They couldn't invite Secret or EG because of roster changes. They couldn't invite any of the other Chinese teams because they had either changed rosters or been impressively bad. I think there was a case for giving coL the last spot over Na'vi, but considering they couldn't beat Execration in the Wild Card, Valve was right not to invite them.
Prior to TI they had consistent good performances in LANs, reaching grand finals and even winning. Add the fact all invited teams had stable rosters for months.
The question still stands, what's the point of your observation? Who deserved the invite if not them then?
How about the team that had to play through Wildcards and ended up not only at the top of their group but with the best score overall?
Good hindsight. Their record up until then (after FaN joined) wasn't exactly "direct invite" worthy.
![]()
How about the team that had to play through Wildcards and ended up not only at the top of their group but with the best score overall?
watch out he's going to own you by saying some other rendition of "oh u mad?"
Not really. I'd say if it was down to consistency, then Fnatic has just as big a shout as NAVI then. Besides two recent wins, Navi has done nothing in two years. In that time, Fnatic has qualified for three of the recent Majors and last year's TI. Something Navi didn't do. I'll add Wings to that discussion too.
Liquid has been a huge failure this TI (so much for "having a stable roster"). Navi have performed as quite a lot expected. They should have gone through regional qualifiers - they would have probably performed better right now.
Yep, as I said, I'm probably being too harsh on Liquid (although they have been a failure this TI - no one can really deny that - and it also disproves the whole thing about a stable roster being core to success). You do have to wonder how they could perform so badly when they have been at the finals of Majors.
My main issue with Navi is that they have literally only won two recent tournaments and nothing else for two years. Even qualifying for a major is an achievement IMO, and yes - I think there is some Dendi/Navi Fanboy bias there. When you go as far as getting a guy to dress up in a costume just to get him into an All Star Game when his team didnt even qualify for last year's TI, its clear to all. I feel that the Navi direct invite was a complete waste, likely complete fan service and statistically only defendable due to winning two relatively lower level (in comparison to Majors) recent tournaments.
This is dumber than the post in poligaf
So explain why is it dumb?
here's what I think should happen. Valve has already addressed the fact there is too much team instability and too many majors. This is why they're scaling back to three majors (including TI7) and specific team movement windows (for "leavers" and "joiners"). I think they should have global rankings and regional rankings for tiered tournaments on a points system for all four regions. Have that ranking system consider the results and earnings of the teams for that past calendar year (so to actually reward consistent high placings).
When it comes to a Major, the top 1 or 2 teams then get an automatic invite because of recorded, legitimate achievement over the past year. Then have the rest of the teams in the regional top 8s go onto regional qualifiers and two placings for open qualifiers. Publish the rankings and show movement. Give actual statistical justification for each direct invite. That way there is more legitimacy for it.