A polite discourse amongst friends on the importance of MP-elements in No Man's Sky

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait, so being confused about mixed messaging is the same as holding pitchforks now?

Some of you need to take a step back from this game. Asking questions in not attacking. Being disappointed at something is not calling it shit.
 
"integrity"

He is a person who is out to get money, he makes a product and people pay for it. He isn't your buddy and he doesn't care at all about you past paying for his game. If the consumers are annoyed because he misrepresented the game they are in the fully in the right to attack his "integrity". If they just failed to do their research though then it's just on them.

Absolutely. I don't care how warm and fuzzy Murray tries to come off as in interviews, he's a person selling a commercial product that costs a solid amount for many people. If he wasn't honest about the features of the product, he deserves all the criticism he gets.
 
So first I was accused of having a financial stake in the game, now I'm supposedly trying to have sex with Sean Murray.

What a disastrous thread full of absurdly angry gamers.

Honestly I just wanted the knight to show how you're acting.

Calling folks GG was overtly aggressive. For no reason what so ever.

Its lame he didn't clear the air on this and he could have. And people bought the game possibly hoping for just 1 cool piece of interaction whether it be in a day or a year but now it seems that isn't possible.
 
Are you kidding me? It's in direct conflict with his comment in the op from 2 weeks ago. The message is a complete mess and you live in a fantasy world if you think otherwise.

The only Fantasy is someone thinking No Man's Sky was ever a MP game. From Day 1 they have focused on the single-player experience.
 
Well your posts sound like you're absolutely losing your shit.

It's funny and all but maybe take a deep breath.
I'm seriously completely calm. I had no plans to buy this game. A friend asked me about it last week, asking if we should buy it based on the claims of multiplayer he'd read about. I told him about my fears regarding developer communication, fears that many of us gaffers have been trying to express literally forever only to be angrily jumped on by a certain *cough* subset of this forum. Man am I glad I stuck with my position and didn't get sucked into the hype vortex. I told my friend not to buy it and he just texted me to thank me for his advice. I don't see how you could take my posts as 'losing my shit'. Maybe but smugly self satisfactory for sure. Im sorry for posting in a forum I enjoy about a topic I'm keenly interested in but I assure you, I'm doing just fine, lol.
 
Wait, so being confused about mixed messaging is the same as holding pitchforks now?

Some of you need to take a step back from this game. Asking questions in not attacking. Being disappointed at something is not calling it shit.
Are we reading the same thread. People act like they don't see two sides shouting at each other and hyperbolic posts. Always seems like whatever side someone is on is the one they can't see apparently
 
What are the chances?!

No doubt the defence force will say it's because everyone starts on the same planet and in time as people travel the galaxy the chance of seeing the same thing is unlikely.

Whereas I just think the smoke and mirrors is clearing up and the game is not living up to the hype.

I'm not saying in terms of gameplay, I've not really given it a proper chance yet (will do tomorrow) but in terms of hype with regards to the size, and players having vastly different experiences.

Unless I've been smoking crack, or possibly been on a different planet, I'm absolutely certain that the whole premise of the game was how many different planets there were to explore, and then it was mentioned several times how unlikely it was that two people would see the same thing due to procedural generation.

So if they're the defense force, are you then the witch hunter? The "defense force" is making claims based on how we know the game works. We know you start out farther out from the center so it would make sense that the places with the highest likelihood of meeting would be at the edge and the center.

You are simply making assumptions and insinuating dishonesty. Pretty bold claims with no evdence.
 
This is kind of a big deal for me.

While it may be true that the chances of seeing another player is slim, It makes it all the more exciting just thinking that there is a chance to encounter someone else.

I will probably still play the game, but this is disappointing to hear... T.T
 
I'm seriously completely calm. I had no plans to buy this game. A friend asked me about it last week, asking if we should buy it based on the claims of multiplayer he'd read about. I told him about my fears regarding developer communication, fears that many of us gaffers have been trying to express literally forever only to be angrily jumped on by a certain *cough* subset of this forum. Man am I glad I stuck with my position and didn't get sucked into the hype vortex. I told my friend not to buy it and he just texted me to thank me for his advice. I don't see how you could take my posts as 'losing my shit'. Maybe but smugly self satisfactory for sure. Im sorry for posting in a forum I enjoy about a topic I'm keenly interested in but I assure you, I'm doing just fine, lol.

You sir are a hero and a visionary.

*Salute*
 
The cynic in me tells me that Sean's repeated claims of multiplayer functionality, followed by his "clarification" less than 24 hours before release that this is a single player game is a sign that the multiplayer functionality was probably being worked on and didn't make release.

I guess we shall see. I have a feeling this won't be the only time two players get a chance to meet up and test whether or not it works.
 
The times of day are different because there is no actual persistence between each players universe (other than planet/species names). When you quit or pause the game it has been effectively frozen in time, meaning that when you un-pause or start the game the universe continues from where you left off (like all single player games). This right here is why multiplayer in NMS is not possible (other than the planet/species names thing).

Sorry but how does this make MP impossible?

Competitive MP, sure, but as far as seeing someone else in my game, or seeing them in mine it is irrelevant.

If I am the host and I pause my game, they will continue moving in their world and when I unpause it would presumably just update their character model in my world to its latest position. If they pause they would stop moving in my world. Where's the problem? (This is assuming weather/AI/time of day/etc are all non-syncrhonized between players, which is perfectly fine for the simplistic "oh hi there, you're on this planet too?" MP that was implied by the 2+ years of vague comments from the developers)

Time in this game has no meaning other than time of day. Who gives a shit if someone is in my game and it's noon for me, 4 AM for them?
 
The defense force is genuinely astounding and is almost certainly delusional in thinking that this situation has been anything but clear. Murray posting at the 11th hour after the game has shipped that it isn't multi isn't the smoking gun that solves everything, or everyone wouldn't be this confused or upset.
 
The only Fantasy is someone thinking No Man's Sky was ever a MP game. From Day 1 they have focused on the single-player experience.
They literally said multiplayer was in the game and it isn't? Is there some phenomenon to describe posts like this? Some sort of acute, deeply seeted form of denial? I find it fascinating from a psychology standpoint?
 
Are you kidding me? It's in direct conflict with his comment in the op from 2 weeks ago. The message is a complete mess and you live in a fantasy world if you think otherwise.

I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?

The sad part is that the messaging has been consistent. The only factor out of HG's control was how wildly people would misinterpret it.
 
Networking – Ability to scan star systems other players have discovered on the Galactic Map, increasing the chance of collision. Star systems discovered by other players appear during Galactic Map flight

Why would they lie in the patch notes? If the online servers are still down then this is for nothing.
 
Read the damn quote in the op from the developer himself from 2 weeks ago. Also, look at the dozens of links posted in this thread of Murray being ambiguous about the multiplayer component in No Man's sky. It only became "clear" today.

It was clear all along. He said the chances of running into another player were so low as to be virtually nil (paraphrase). He talked about the 'bubble' around you (aka instancing system). He talked about there not being a true multi-player component to the game. Anyone thinking intentional meet ups would happen just by travelling to the same spot on the same planet was deluding themselves.

I tried to dispell this minformation in the spoiler thread, but you had too many people banging that drum, pretending co-op and intentionally finding a specific player was a 'thing'. There was no convincing them otherwise.

Now we have the cold, hard truth, and all I can say to those folks is told ya so. The game is still awesome as-is, and should only disappoint the folks who chose to delude themselves.
 
So if they're the defense force, are you then the witch hunter? The "defense force" is making claims based on how we know the game works. We know you start out farther out from the center so it would make sense that the places with the highest likelihood of meeting would be at the edge and the center.

You are simply making assumptions and insinuating dishonesty. Pretty bold claims with no evdence.



No evidence?! All I'm going on is how the game's creator and the media kept talking about how many planets there were, how the game would be different for each person, and the chances of two people coming across the exact same planet was unlikely. The quotes are out there in black and white, or on Youtube from the horses mouth. My evidence on how big the world was is concrete.

Yet here we are already. Yes nothing is impossible, I could get hit by lightning 3 times in one day, not likely but possible. The same way two people found themselves discovering the same planet.

Perhaps my "defense force" comment was inappropriate so I'll retract it.

I can understand the frustration from people though, and to be fair the backlash isn't that harsh, imagine if this was Ubisoft, Activision or EA?!
 
By all means guys, if the multiplayer component mentioned that Sean repeatedly said would be incredibly rare and meaningful isn't working exactly the way you've decided it's supposed to on day 1 of release, go fucking crazy.

But maybe, just maybe, we should calm the fuck down and either keep playing and see what happens (which is clearly what the developers intend) in the coming days and weeks.

Jumping from "these two went to the same place and couldn't see each other" to "Sean Murray is a liar" feels a bit ridiculous. Especially when there are countless reasons that they might not have seen each other, from the mundane networking issues that might cause such a thing, to deliberate design decisions. What we absolutely do not know, based on today's information, is that there is no MP whatsoever, and Sean Murray lied.

All I'm going on is the game's creator and the media kept talking about how many planets there were, how the game would be different for each person, and the chances of two people coming across the exact same planet was unlikely.

I dare say it's a combination of the usual underestimation of how quickly gamers tend to break past developer expectations and the random nature of placing players on starting planets. Unless the game uses some kind of specific distribution to ensure that all players start equally distant from each other, there's the possibility (moreso as more players buy it) that two people start quite close together.
 
Time in this game has no meaning other than time of day. Who gives a shit if someone is in my game and it's noon for me, 4 AM for them?

It actually does matter. As said earlier in the thread, conditions on the planet change depending on the time of day. It'd be like if in Minecraft one player was playing at night and there were creepers and spiders all over, and another was seeing daytime and none of those monsters. You watch your friend frantically attack nothing, get hit with knockback from unseen attackers and die and there's nothing you can do about it.

I suppose it's possible that the game is set up that way. It'd be really weird though. Certainly not a well-thought-out system.
 
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?

The only Fantasy is someone thinking No Man's Sky was ever a MP game. From Day 1 they have focused on the single-player experience.

Doesn't the day 1 patch literally discuss improving the odds of players colliding?
 
Anyone thinking intentional meet ups just by travelling to the same spot on the same planet was deluding themselves.

murray2e0up8.gif

Again, if people were thinking those things, it's because Sean said it existed.
 
I honestly don't care if the game is multiplayer or single-player, it's just kinda shady how they've implied over the years (as recently as March) that you can definitely run into other players but have never clearly said that's changed.
 
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?

The sad part is that the messaging has been consistent. The only factor out of HG's control was how wildly people would misinterpret it.

Did you see his next tweet after that which shattered this "definitive" statement and made it wishy-washy again?

The chances of two players ever crossing paths in a universe this large is pretty much zero.
 
It actually does matter. As said earlier in the thread, conditions on the planet change depending on the time of day. It'd be like if in Minecraft one player was playing at night and there were creepers and spiders all over, and another was seeing daytime and none of those monsters. You watch your friend frantically attack nothing, get hit with knockback from unseen attackers and die and there's nothing you can do about it.

I suppose it's possible that the game is set up that way. It'd be really weird though. Certainly not a well-thought-out system.

For a "one in a million" type system, it's more than good enough, and certainly no less poorly thought out than some other systems in the game as released.
 
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?

The sad part is that the messaging has been consistent. The only factor out of HG's control was how wildly people would misinterpret it.

You don't think it's important that the marketing for the game was misleading literally right up until the morning before release?
What was keeping him/them from "setting the record straight" weeks, months, or even a year or more ago?

You realize there's a huge majority of people who play video games and *don't* hang out on NeoGAF or even follow the industry that closely, right?

It's totally cool to you that someone could have formed their view of this game months ago from dodgy information, pre-ordered and put money down, and then picked up their copy to find it's not what was described or hinted at to them by the devs themselves? It's that person's fault for not religiously checking the dev's Twitter feed?
And electronics and video games don't generally have return policies that could fix this on a person-by-person basis, either.

That can't be right.
 
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?

The sad part is that the messaging has been consistent. The only factor out of HG's control was how wildly people would misinterpret it.

I don't think he definitively clarified it. The precious messaging was always that the multiplayer wasn't the FOCUS of the game, but there was the ability to at least see other players if you happened to be in the same place at the same time, but it would be so rare that it's better to just not think about the game as a multiplayer game.

The tweet can be read both ways. Either as a straight up confirmation that the is no functionality or as a reaffirmation that multiplayer is not the focus of the game.
 
Link to this definitive answer?

Sorry for the mobile link, can't be helped. Tweet from two days ago.

I don't think he definitively clarified it. The precious messaging was always that the multiplayer wasn't the FOCUS of the game, but there was the ability to at least see other players if you happened to be in the same place at the same time, but it would be so rare that it's better to just not think about the game as a multiplayer game.

The tweet can be read both ways. Either as a straight up confirmation that the is no functionality or as a reaffirmation that multiplayer is not the focus of the game.

Check the link above. Pretty fucking clear.
 
By all means guys, if the multiplayer component mentioned that Sean repeatedly said would be incredibly rare and meaningful isn't working exactly the way you've decided it's supposed to on day 1 of release, go fucking crazy.

But maybe, just maybe, we should calm the fuck down and either keep playing and see what happens (which is clearly what the developers intend) in the coming days and weeks.

Jumping from "these two went to the same place and couldn't see each other" to "Sean Murray is a liar" feels a bit ridiculous. Especially when there are countless reasons that they might not have seen each other, from the mundane networking issues that might cause such a thing, to deliberate design decisions. What we absolutely do not know, based on today's information, is that there is no MP whatsoever, and Sean Murray lied.

Folks who are already distrustful and/or are looking for faults can finds many ways to justify their demonization. By the same token, those who are basically retroactively justifying an actual complete lack of player interaction by virtue of selective quotes are just as silly.

Me, Ima wait for Sean.
 
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?
This miiiiight be a valid point if pre order culture weren't a thing. You don't get potentially millions of people pre ordering your game only to suddenly backtrack on what many consider a key feature hours before release. Not to mention how incredibly vague the statement was. 'Don't do looking for multiplayer, this isn't that kind of game' is pretty much what they have been saying all along. They've also been saying 'yes, multiplayer is in the game' if he was going to do damage control hours before release he should have literally said 'no, there isn't multiplayer' his 'to be clear' remark is therefore hilariously misleading in hindsight. Such a massive pr stumble.
 
Folks who are already distrustful and/or are looking for faults can finds many ways to justify their demonization. By the same token, those who are basically retroactively justifying an actual complete lack of player interaction by virtue of selective quotes are just as silly.

Me, Ima wait for Sean.
.such a neutral stance get outta here with this!!
 
The planets don't even rotate. The dude on twitch has launched multiple times from the same space station in a straight line and you end up in the same spot.
 
Oh, by all means if it isn't working flawlessly the way you think it should on day 1, then feel free to blow a fucking gasket.

It's fucking disgusting how some act and others don't care about the game but dogpile on anyway.

Someone check the damn online server in game and see if its up yet. Wasn't earlier.
 
This miiiiight be a valid point if pre order culture weren't a thing. You don't get potentially millions of people pre ordering your game only to suddenly backtrack on what many consider a key feature hours before release. Not to mention how incredibly vague the statement was. 'Don't do looking for multiplayer, this isn't that kind of game' is pretty much what they have been saying all along. They've also been saying 'yes, multiplayer is in the game' if he was going to do damage control hours before release he should have literally said 'no, there isn't multiplayer' his 'to be clear' remark is therefore hilariously misleading in hindsight. Such a massive pr stumble.

It was never a key feature. Never once.

That's revisionist history to an extent that I can't even fathom how you could get there. Gold in mental gymnastics at Rio levels of ridiculous.
 
Mistake. If the game is really so vast it would be rare and awesome to see other players...I would love if they'd made it Journey style. They could also add some unique interactions to make the game more interesting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom