Pretty shitty of them honestly. I just asked about this in the OT last night.
Well it was definitely answered on Murray's Twitter two days ago ..
Pretty shitty of them honestly. I just asked about this in the OT last night.
This I'll agree with. I'm disappointed about it but I'll let him speak on it first before I cast my final judgement as well. The defending and attacking relentlessly is just stupid to meThat's because so many chose a side before they even begin discussion.
"integrity"
He is a person who is out to get money, he makes a product and people pay for it. He isn't your buddy and he doesn't care at all about you past paying for his game. If the consumers are annoyed because he misrepresented the game they are in the fully in the right to attack his "integrity". If they just failed to do their research though then it's just on them.
So first I was accused of having a financial stake in the game, now I'm supposedly trying to have sex with Sean Murray.
What a disastrous thread full of absurdly angry gamers.
Are you kidding me? It's in direct conflict with his comment in the op from 2 weeks ago. The message is a complete mess and you live in a fantasy world if you think otherwise.
But if the servers are down, how do you expect to see others?
Magic?
I'm seriously completely calm. I had no plans to buy this game. A friend asked me about it last week, asking if we should buy it based on the claims of multiplayer he'd read about. I told him about my fears regarding developer communication, fears that many of us gaffers have been trying to express literally forever only to be angrily jumped on by a certain *cough* subset of this forum. Man am I glad I stuck with my position and didn't get sucked into the hype vortex. I told my friend not to buy it and he just texted me to thank me for his advice. I don't see how you could take my posts as 'losing my shit'. Maybe but smugly self satisfactory for sure. Im sorry for posting in a forum I enjoy about a topic I'm keenly interested in but I assure you, I'm doing just fine, lol.Well your posts sound like you're absolutely losing your shit.
It's funny and all but maybe take a deep breath.
Are we reading the same thread. People act like they don't see two sides shouting at each other and hyperbolic posts. Always seems like whatever side someone is on is the one they can't see apparentlyWait, so being confused about mixed messaging is the same as holding pitchforks now?
Some of you need to take a step back from this game. Asking questions in not attacking. Being disappointed at something is not calling it shit.
What are the chances?!
No doubt the defence force will say it's because everyone starts on the same planet and in time as people travel the galaxy the chance of seeing the same thing is unlikely.
Whereas I just think the smoke and mirrors is clearing up and the game is not living up to the hype.
I'm not saying in terms of gameplay, I've not really given it a proper chance yet (will do tomorrow) but in terms of hype with regards to the size, and players having vastly different experiences.
Unless I've been smoking crack, or possibly been on a different planet, I'm absolutely certain that the whole premise of the game was how many different planets there were to explore, and then it was mentioned several times how unlikely it was that two people would see the same thing due to procedural generation.
I'm seriously completely calm. I had no plans to buy this game. A friend asked me about it last week, asking if we should buy it based on the claims of multiplayer he'd read about. I told him about my fears regarding developer communication, fears that many of us gaffers have been trying to express literally forever only to be angrily jumped on by a certain *cough* subset of this forum. Man am I glad I stuck with my position and didn't get sucked into the hype vortex. I told my friend not to buy it and he just texted me to thank me for his advice. I don't see how you could take my posts as 'losing my shit'. Maybe but smugly self satisfactory for sure. Im sorry for posting in a forum I enjoy about a topic I'm keenly interested in but I assure you, I'm doing just fine, lol.
So the server was down....you speculating or just giving benefit of the doubt or you got some sort of proof that none of us have...
The times of day are different because there is no actual persistence between each players universe (other than planet/species names). When you quit or pause the game it has been effectively frozen in time, meaning that when you un-pause or start the game the universe continues from where you left off (like all single player games). This right here is why multiplayer in NMS is not possible (other than the planet/species names thing).
So the server was down....you speculating or just giving benefit of the doubt or you got some sort of proof that none of us have...
Yeah it's called in game tracker. It tells you clear as day if you're connected to the online servers.
They literally said multiplayer was in the game and it isn't? Is there some phenomenon to describe posts like this? Some sort of acute, deeply seeted form of denial? I find it fascinating from a psychology standpoint?The only Fantasy is someone thinking No Man's Sky was ever a MP game. From Day 1 they have focused on the single-player experience.
Are you kidding me? It's in direct conflict with his comment in the op from 2 weeks ago. The message is a complete mess and you live in a fantasy world if you think otherwise.
Read the damn quote in the op from the developer himself from 2 weeks ago. Also, look at the dozens of links posted in this thread of Murray being ambiguous about the multiplayer component in No Man's sky. It only became "clear" today.
So if they're the defense force, are you then the witch hunter? The "defense force" is making claims based on how we know the game works. We know you start out farther out from the center so it would make sense that the places with the highest likelihood of meeting would be at the edge and the center.
You are simply making assumptions and insinuating dishonesty. Pretty bold claims with no evdence.
All I'm going on is the game's creator and the media kept talking about how many planets there were, how the game would be different for each person, and the chances of two people coming across the exact same planet was unlikely.
Time in this game has no meaning other than time of day. Who gives a shit if someone is in my game and it's noon for me, 4 AM for them?
I'm clearly connected to the internet but the game is constantly telling me I'm not connected.
Um, again, do you have proof that the server was down during this meet. I'm well aware of the connection status thing in the menus.
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?
The only Fantasy is someone thinking No Man's Sky was ever a MP game. From Day 1 they have focused on the single-player experience.
Anyone thinking intentional meet ups just by travelling to the same spot on the same planet was deluding themselves.
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?
The sad part is that the messaging has been consistent. The only factor out of HG's control was how wildly people would misinterpret it.
The chances of two players ever crossing paths in a universe this large is pretty much zero.
Doesn't the day 1 patch literally discuss improving the odds of players colliding?
It actually does matter. As said earlier in the thread, conditions on the planet change depending on the time of day. It'd be like if in Minecraft one player was playing at night and there were creepers and spiders all over, and another was seeing daytime and none of those monsters. You watch your friend frantically attack nothing, get hit with knockback from unseen attackers and die and there's nothing you can do about it.
I suppose it's possible that the game is set up that way. It'd be really weird though. Certainly not a well-thought-out system.
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?
The sad part is that the messaging has been consistent. The only factor out of HG's control was how wildly people would misinterpret it.
I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?
The sad part is that the messaging has been consistent. The only factor out of HG's control was how wildly people would misinterpret it.
Link to this definitive answer?
I don't think he definitively clarified it. The precious messaging was always that the multiplayer wasn't the FOCUS of the game, but there was the ability to at least see other players if you happened to be in the same place at the same time, but it would be so rare that it's better to just not think about the game as a multiplayer game.
The tweet can be read both ways. Either as a straight up confirmation that the is no functionality or as a reaffirmation that multiplayer is not the focus of the game.
By all means guys, if the multiplayer component mentioned that Sean repeatedly said would be incredibly rare and meaningful isn't working exactly the way you've decided it's supposed to on day 1 of release, go fucking crazy.
But maybe, just maybe, we should calm the fuck down and either keep playing and see what happens (which is clearly what the developers intend) in the coming days and weeks.
Jumping from "these two went to the same place and couldn't see each other" to "Sean Murray is a liar" feels a bit ridiculous. Especially when there are countless reasons that they might not have seen each other, from the mundane networking issues that might cause such a thing, to deliberate design decisions. What we absolutely do not know, based on today's information, is that there is no MP whatsoever, and Sean Murray lied.
This miiiiight be a valid point if pre order culture weren't a thing. You don't get potentially millions of people pre ordering your game only to suddenly backtrack on what many consider a key feature hours before release. Not to mention how incredibly vague the statement was. 'Don't do looking for multiplayer, this isn't that kind of game' is pretty much what they have been saying all along. They've also been saying 'yes, multiplayer is in the game' if he was going to do damage control hours before release he should have literally said 'no, there isn't multiplayer' his 'to be clear' remark is therefore hilariously misleading in hindsight. Such a massive pr stumble.I don't think anybody should care what he said two weeks ago if he definitively just set the record straight. Can you not understand that he recognized the message issue and rectified it by answering the question directly? What were they supposed to do, shoe horn it in to make it happen? What kind of fantasy world do you live in that fixing a mistake in messaging is frowned upon?
Oh, by all means if it isn't working flawlessly the way you think it should on day 1, then feel free to blow a fucking gasket.
Sorry for the mobile link, can't be helped. Tweet from two days ago.
The chances of two players ever crossing paths in a universe this large is pretty much zero.
.such a neutral stance get outta here with this!!Folks who are already distrustful and/or are looking for faults can finds many ways to justify their demonization. By the same token, those who are basically retroactively justifying an actual complete lack of player interaction by virtue of selective quotes are just as silly.
Me, Ima wait for Sean.
Oh, by all means if it isn't working flawlessly the way you think it should on day 1, then feel free to blow a fucking gasket.
This miiiiight be a valid point if pre order culture weren't a thing. You don't get potentially millions of people pre ordering your game only to suddenly backtrack on what many consider a key feature hours before release. Not to mention how incredibly vague the statement was. 'Don't do looking for multiplayer, this isn't that kind of game' is pretty much what they have been saying all along. They've also been saying 'yes, multiplayer is in the game' if he was going to do damage control hours before release he should have literally said 'no, there isn't multiplayer' his 'to be clear' remark is therefore hilariously misleading in hindsight. Such a massive pr stumble.
They don't? Darn.The planets don't even rotate. The dude on twitch has launched multiple times from the same space station in a straight line and you end up in the same spot.