Sho_Nuff82
Member
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
I want to frame this post. Fucking lol
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
The times of day are different because there is no actual persistence between each players universe (other than planet/species names). When you quit or pause the game it has been effectively frozen in time, meaning that when you un-pause or start the game the universe continues from where you left off (like all single player games). This right here is why multiplayer in NMS is not possible (other than the planet/species names thing).
Mercilessly attacking Sean Murray's personal integrity when we don't have all the facts or an official response is pretty insensitive.
Saddens me lol. I'd happily pay $60 for this on Xbox haha. Single player? Multiplayer? Who cares. I just want to explore an entire universe at my leisure.This thread is mental. GAF at its worst.
If only more people in this thread had your frame of mind...so many are so quick to hurl personal insults and it's sad and patheticThat makes sense. I haven't jumped in myself so I am not sure how it works, thanks for clarifying. Still could be a server issue or could be that he was lying. I have no clue, but I'm not gonna jump to a conclusion until I either see more evidence or get a reasonable real explanation from Hello Games.
I wish more people had your mind set...Saddens me lol. I'd happily pay $60 for this on Xbox haha. Single player? Multiplayer? Who cares. I just want to explore an entire universe at my leisure.
Saddens me lol. I'd happily pay $60 for this on Xbox haha. Single player? Multiplayer? Who cares. I just want to explore an entire universe at my leisure.
But....I didn't. I said it's ok to be invested in the game and it seems pretty great....which is completely contrary to the contingent on here that seems to want to hate it no matter what. I fully acknowledge that. Fact remains that the dev has stated MULTIPLE TIMES that multiplayer was in. With the little caveat that the game is just soooooo biiiiigggg that you'll probably never encounter another player.
What they failed to anticipate is that redditors, like redditors ALWAYS FUCKING DO, managed to land in the same location at the same time within HOURS of play and confirm that the developer is, in fact, a god damn liar lol. Of course that's barring the extremely unlikely scenario that they just haven't gotten around to implementing multiplayer or other technical issues. I'm pretty eagerly awaiting a statement from the dev here, because honestly I won't be buying this without multiplayer. I know, I know that's not the selling point for the game. For you. For me, however it is. I pretty much exclusively play multiplayer games these days, it was a promised feature, game will be significantly less cool for me without the chance of random player encounters and If it's not in then neither am I. This is why I never pre order. It shouldn't take the Reddit investigation squad to confirm that a promised feature is absent from the game, they should have been up front about it. Again, game seems awesome hope everybody is enjoying it.
I'm not sure why this is a controversy. The developers were very clear that this isn't a multiplayer game.
I'm not sure why this is a controversy. The developers were very clear that this isn't a multiplayer game.
Mercilessly attacking Sean Murray's personal integrity when we don't have all the facts or an official response is pretty insensitive.
The times of day are different because there is no actual persistence between each players universe (other than planet/species names). When you quit or pause the game it has been effectively frozen in time, meaning that when you un-pause or start the game the universe continues from where you left off (like all single player games). This right here is why multiplayer in NMS is not possible (other than the planet/species names thing).
I'm not sure why this is a controversy. The developers were very clear that this isn't a multiplayer game.
I'm not sure why this is a controversy. The developers were very clear that this isn't a multiplayer game.
Just a quick comment: if anyone's expecting the developer to comment soon. They are in the UK and it's like just after 4am here. So 'if' anyone comments, it won't be for a while.
Just a good thing to keep in mind since this thread is likely to get a lot bigger before the start of the work day here... probably.
I'm not sure why this is a controversy. The developers were very clear that this isn't a multiplayer game.
![]()
As others have said this was an easy question to answer and he chose not too.
Plus I'm almost certain he said you'd be able to interact in the super small chance you get to meet someone
Apparently a lot of people care. That's why this thread exists and why people have been acting hysterical.
If you don't care, good for you, but don't just say who cares when obviously people in this thread are "discussing" the topic
So first I was accused of having a financial stake in the game, now I'm supposedly trying to have sex with Sean Murray.
What a disastrous thread full of absurdly angry gamers.
Oh grow up. Sean has had months to say how this works but he chose Pr and low probabilities instead. He should yell at the statistics guy since they probably assumed we wouldn't figure this out for a few weeks atleast.
I couldn't connect when I was playing a few hours ago.Wasn't the multiplayer servers down all day?
I don't think the thread is disastrous....I think the devs got caught in a big lie. Whether or not THAT turns out to be disastrous remains to be seen.So first I was accused of having a financial stake in the game, now I'm supposedly trying to have sex with Sean Murray.
What a disastrous thread full of absurdly angry gamers.
I'm not buying the game and wasn't really planning to because it seemed to overhyped to be true. Still, when redditors manage to meet the conditions for multiplayer within HOURS of release I find your claims of 'extremely unlikely' to be frankly laughable. What are you trying to prove here? That it's ok they lied about a feature that millions of gamers consider core to their experience? Don't tell me how to manage my expectations, my hype for this game has been zero all along. I'm merely commenting on the situation.Don't buy this game man. Why would you buy a game for a feature that the developer mentions is not the point of the game and unlikely to even be experienced by the vast majority of players in the game? Even if it turns out that meeting others is possible this still isn't going to be the game you want it to be.
I honestly doubt itI don't think the thread is disastrous....I think the devs got caught in a big lie. Whether or not THAT turns out to be disastrous remains to be seen.
Read the damn quote in the op from the developer himself from 2 weeks ago. Also, look at the dozens of links posted in this thread of Murray being ambiguous about the multiplayer component in No Man's sky. It only became "clear" today.
That image is a pretty unnecessary.![]()
As others have said this was an easy question to answer and he chose not too.
Plus I'm almost certain he said you'd be able to interact in the super small chance you get to meet someone
There's an OT if you want uncompromisingly positive discussion and nothing else.I wish more people had your mind set...
Discussing games day 1 would be a lot more enjoyable
Thats what they said... Appears to not be the case but everybodies pretty much still in the dark since the devs havnt spoken up/respondedTo bo honest, I've wondered about this for a long time. They never gave a definitive answer. They seemed to imply that if two players were in the same spot, they could see each other, but it was so rare that it would never happen.
The amount of folks holding up shields is crazy
it's a game calm down
I couldn't connect when I was playing a few hours ago.
Again I hate when people do this like wise the amount of people holding swords is crazy it's a game calm down.The amount of folks holding up shields is crazy
it's a game calm down
The amount of folks holding up shields is crazy
it's a game calm down
GAF you're really letting me down here tonight with the pitchforks you're raising over a game that was never going to have a true multiplayer component.
With 18,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets, it does imply that the starter systems are not random or possibly unique...
Thats not 'getting lucky', thats worse than if I hid a grain of sand someplace on the earth and you asked you to find it.
Rather than luck, there is some other mechanism at work to link up so quickly.
So the servers are down.
But lets just ignore that. Some of y'all get way to excited and angry over seeing things/people fail.
Again I hate when people do this like wise the amount of people holding swords is crazy it's a game calm down.
Entire thread both sides are acting supremely childish no matter how you look at it
To bo honest, I've wondered about this for a long time. They never gave a definitive answer. They seemed to imply that if two players were in the same spot, they could see each other, but it was so rare that it would never happen.
There's always a chance.
If I wrote a random number generator that went up to 18,000,000,000,000,000,000 and said there is a near 0% chance that you won't get sequential numbers, I wouldn't be lying. However, if it happened, you can't just assume I was lying or made it easier to get those sequential numbers. No matter how unlikely it is, it happened.
it's a game calm down
So the servers are down.
But lets just ignore that. Some of y'all get way to excited and angry over seeing things/people fail.
I'm pretty sure it's more about not being lied to. As gamers we can't let shit like this dude without at least a say in it.
Posted as recently as Monday at noon. This message is no different than the hundred other bloody times he's said it.
Sorry for the mobile link. Can't be helped at the moment.
Not entirely sure why anybody would be upset about this unless they're intentionally trying to stir up shit for some obscure reason.