This is the big problem, yeah. Many women will just stay at home now.I kinda feel bad for women who are basically forced to wear one and now they cant even go out to a beach to have a nice day.
This is the big problem, yeah. Many women will just stay at home now.I kinda feel bad for women who are basically forced to wear one and now they cant even go out to a beach to have a nice day.
"If I weren't Muslim, I think I would be so afraid of these people," she said, referring to Muslims. That's precisely why she came to volunteer, hijab proudly wrapped around her head.
"For me, it's discouraging. We want to show that we are against this violence," she said, adding, "We are demotivated."
Wow. I can't believe that this is happening in France of all places.
I am saying that we should be proud of having educated our women enough so they don't have to put up with such non sense.
I just came here to see what a burkini is...And it looks really OK, I really don't see the need for a ban. Maybe the mayor of Cannes should come to a Bosnian beach
![]()
I am saying that we should be proud of having educated our women enough so they don't have to put up with such non sense.
This reminds me of the NPR story about Muslim women who want to help the French military fight actual terrorists but are turned away because they aren't allowed to wear their hijab even in support positions. There's even a photo of one of the quoted women showcasing her in her hijab at a pool.
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallel...scarves-please
Even although I'm fighting against this that is a stupid comparison. Turkey isn't too bad.
In some places in those countries try wearing a typical bikinni and seeing how you get on.
France is in the wrong here but I wouldn't use even more oppressive locations to prove a point.
I have no idea why France has such problems assimilating immigrants.
What question?
Your two examples aren't even close being somehow related to the opression of such muslim women.
Banning oppressive things isn't oppressive.
Again, some women want to wear this as their swimwear. By telling them what to wear, you're oppressing them.
I don't understand what separation between Church and State has to do with what you wear on the beach. Can the people somehow invoking secularism in this thread explain to me the connection?
Quit dodging. Your statement was:
One thing is rooted in white beauty standards, one thing is related in patriarchal religious standards. Explain to me why it's ok for those things not to be banned but for this thing to be banned. If your argument is "because Muslims" then your argument is flawed.
I know you've probably heard it a million times and just choose to ignore it, but if you somehow weren't aware because you watch too much Fox News, some women choose to wear head scarves and burkinis. Maybe you don't think women are capable of making choices for themselves, but I personally have no problem with someone choosing to wear a swimsuit they prefer.
Women shouldn't be forced to wear them and they shouldn't be banned from wearing them. Simple.
Black women straightening their hair largely stems from oppressive white beauty standards that say that natural black hair is unkempt or unclean.
So again, here, we see that this is about cultural Christianity and not a commitment to freedom.
Could you explain why you think banning this isn't oppression?What question?
Your two examples aren't even close being somehow related to the opression of such muslim women.
Its not a stupid comparison at all. I lived in the UAE for 6 months for work and seen enough skin as it is, i couldve sworn i was in a western country. Pakistan (more upper class Pakistan that is, so Lahore, Islamabad) are very modern in clothing whereby you see girls in mini skirts and a lot of revealing clothing. Unless you are in a really fucked up country like Iran or Saudi Arabia, its a whole different story, and while its off topic, they do have a lot of crazy laws, especially on women, which even go against Islam as a religion, but in the most part, it goes to show how fucked up this law really is, but then again, it is France after all.
France is very intolerant of what they perceive as anti-French. To a rather jingoist extent.
At some point you just have to admit the French are egging it on the Muslims, hence they get more attacks than Germany.
So for all the people telling how oppressive that is to woman that they can't wear want they want, is this ok?
![]()
You touch on two different, yet important things.
-Straightening your hair is a fashion statement
Covering your hair with a veil or skin with burkini is a religious statement.
It says : a holy book claims that women should be "modest in their appearance" in order not to tempt men. For a country that believes in equality between men and women, this is should not be ok.
Could you explain why you think banning this isn't oppression?
the question though is how do you determine whether someone does so willingly or not especially with children. I don't agree with the banning but I also don't like parents enforcing/imprinting their religion on their kids, any religion.
It isn't oppressive if she is more comfortable wearing it...Don't be dense and try to think about it from a different perspective instead of in the frame of religion.
So for all the people telling how oppressive that is to woman that they can't wear want they want, is this ok?
![]()
? It's has nothing to do with "anti-French", France has been strongly anti-clerical for a while, we don't have much patience for religious expression, that's all.
I'm not a fan of parents indoctrinating kids into their religion but yeah it's a pretty universal thing and I think the only way to reduce it is to be more inclusive. Let's say this ban goes through -- what do we expect the outcome to be? You think muslim women will just wear a regular bikini? My bet is they'll just stop going to the beach. Now you've further isolated them, which is simply counter-productive.
Integrated, modern societies are the best way to reduce religiousness and increase secularism. Europe has done a poor job integrating their muslim populations -- they end up with what are basically ghettos that are highly segregated and often have high poverty rates. When you segregate communities and a lack of support allows poverty to decimate livelihoods and socioeconomic mobility, it creates problems -- this goes for all races and religions.
Because wet suits serve an actual purpose
So for all the people telling how oppressive that is to woman that they can't wear want they want, is this ok?
![]()
And for some reason the non-white French are the ones being targeted, particularly Muslim women who are also the weakest socio-economically. Please, this is quite clearly along the same continuum of jingoism and bigotry that has spawned the anti-Islamic far right parties in Europe.
Is protecting against skin cancer not an actual purpose?
You have to understand that having these kind of debates about religion is just fucking annoying to us. I'm seriously sick of it.
Reading and posting in a thread you detest is entirely self-inflicted.
You also have to realize that the problem lies with modern Islam.
Until the 80's Islamic societies such as Iran, Egypt, Lebanon were more or less as free as the West and women were not bothered with anything.
Example: a Egyptian beach in 64
http://egyptianstreets.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1964beach2.jpg
More examples : http://egyptianstreets.com/2014/04/05/egypts-golden-years-in-23-vintage-photos/
Yeah it is sad what has become of many of these places. Hopefully one day they will auto-correct themselves but until then it's up to countries that are liberal and have a vast array of freedoms to fight to keep it that way. Hence why this ban is stupid, regardless of the problems with Islam and how it treats women.
That's a place of worship, completely differentSo for all the people telling how oppressive that is to woman that they can't wear want they want, is this ok?
![]()
Living in the country means I have to hear about it. and live with it.
Nothing will change if you support or ignore the oppression of people.
I'm not a fan of parents indoctrinating kids into their religion but yeah it's a pretty universal thing and I think the only way to reduce it is to be more inclusive. Let's say this ban goes through -- what do we expect the outcome to be? You think muslim women will just wear a regular bikini? My bet is they'll just stop going to the beach. Now you've further isolated them, which is simply counter-productive.
Integrated, modern societies are the best way to reduce religiousness and increase secularism. Europe has done a poor job integrating their muslim populations -- they end up with what are basically ghettos that are highly segregated and often have high poverty rates. When you segregate communities and a lack of support allows poverty to decimate livelihoods and socioeconomic mobility, it creates problems -- this goes for all races and religions.
I like how people are arrogant enough to claim that they know women are forced to wear it. Like how do you know that all of them want to wear a bikini instead. It's amazing how if a girl wants to sit nude she impowering yet if she decides she wants to cover herself up she's oppressed. A little anecdotall evidence my sister decided to wear the hjab at 13 nobody told her she had on the contrary we told her shr should wait a bit longer and think it through but when we came to US she wanted to take it off because she was scared that people would judge her at school and assume she's a terrorist my dad didn't object I was against it because she was doing it out of fear of other people but I bet you looking at her you would assume she's making her own choice and impowered when it's the opposite and it's that society is forcing on her there ideals
'Look at when we were colonizing those savages!'Who remembers the Cairo '48 swimsuit competition?
![]()
Isn't secularism and liberalism all about separating church and state, and personal freedoms?
Rings a bit hollow. Seems like your opinions and ideas are fine as long as they're the same as ours.