NYT: Republicans close to Trump say he's "exhausted, frustrated and bewildered"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blah blah blah

Impressive - this is by far the most intelligent political argument I have ever seen you make.

What? You don't think the imapacts of the markets crashing, torture being deemed acceptable and reinstated, and his Supreme Cout picks all don't have long term implications. Those are all things he has a direct hand and direct control over.

No, see, you don't understand. Ironically Supporting Fascism Is Cool Bro doesn't get hurt by those things, so it's negligible. Because "fuck the system" Trump supporters love to stick it to the man by ruining the lives of millions of the least powerful in our society.
 
Thanks for seeing into my soul over the internet and reading my innermost thoughts, you should open a palm reading business out of your house and put a flashing neon sign in your window

I think the point is that your inner-monologue reasoning in your head is separate from the reality that is what the world sees when someone votes for Trump.

I can do crazy shit on the outside that in head sounds like for completely legitimate reasons. Maybe I have read up on the positive effects on vitamin D and have committed to absorb as much of it as possible, so I venture to areas that trap the most heat around moving objects that reflect the most sunlight. That makes great sense in my head! To everyone else in the world, however, I'm actually just doing calisthenics in the middle of a highway.
 
Trump supporter is a Trump supporter. There's no need to talk around the fact. If you vote for Trump you are supporting Trump. You are doing the one thing he needs voters to do to help him become president, voting for him to become president.
 
Seriously

If your reply to "here are the horrific implications of your actions" is nothing more than "blah blah blah", it essentially means that the alternative response is "you're right, I'm horrid"

No one is stopping you from voting for Trump, but acting indignant when people make very clear, very factual rebuttals to your decision and who make a point of demonstrating why your actions are bad is ridiculous. If you're old enough to vote, you're old enough to own the consequences of your actions.
 
Seriously

If your reply to "here are the horrific implications of your actions" is nothing more than "blah blah blah", it essentially means that the alternative response is "you're right, I'm horrid".

Actually the blah blah blah was in response to the ad hominem at the end. Thought those were bannable around these parts anyway, but perhaps there's an exception to the rule when used against trump supporters
 
Actually the blah blah blah was in response to the ad hominem at the end. Thought those were bannable around these parts anyway, but perhaps there's an exception to the rule when used against trump supporters
Why would supporting a absolutely vile man shield you from judgement? Especially when that choice can cause great harm to people. He's made racism mainstream acceptable amongst many other things.
 
Actually the blah blah blah was in response to the ad hominem at the end. Thought those were bannable around these parts anyway, but perhaps there's an exception to the rule when used against trump supporters

Perhaps that's why you vote for Trump - he also says things without thinking and is thus required to followup and offer explanations for why what he said wasn't actually awful.

EtrfySt.gif


Ultimately, this is a heated election, and for good reason - a lot of people in this thread have some pretty strong stakes in this thread and, if Trump were to win, he would create a worse country specifically for some of the worse off among us (myself included). When you declare your intent to support Trump, even if (in fact, ESPECIALLY if) your goal is to burn it down (which inherently has the ultimate result that minorities get FUCKED), people are understandably going to be really, really angry with you. To them, it would be akin to getting angry at a white supremacist coming onto these forums. What you're proposing is not only untenable to many, but in fact utterly sickening, and people will inevitably lose their cool when confronted by what I consider a pretty miserable belief system.

My perception of you is that you aren't honest. You originally supported Trump to support Trump. You got the name and tag for a reason. Characterizing it now as:

tumblr_lcr9cm07Ry1qc0s10o1_r2_500.gif


Just feels like backpedaling, but not backpedaling far enough away from ironically supporting a fascist, bro.
 
You should be forced to explain this to a six year old orphaned from his gay parents because of one supreme court judge.

Or an illiterate Pakistani 12 year old waterboarded for lying for his dad.


Or look at your fucking 401k, you thuddingly dense blatherskite.
This is kinda hypercritical though to put it mildly because what about Clinton and the dead Iraqi children?

Voting for Clinton should not be done with arrogance like that.
 
Why would supporting a absolutely vile man shield you from judgement? Especially when that choice can cause great harm to people. He's made racism mainstream acceptable amongst many other things.

It shouldn't. But there is a difference between "I don't like your ideas and i do not wish to subscribe to your newsletter" and "by god you're a complete fucking idiot". I'm pretty sure the latter is bannable, but even if sympathetic mods make an exception, i still feel more than justified responding to such comments with "talk to the hand"
 
This is kinda hypercritical though to put it mildly because what about Clinton and the dead Iraqi children?

Voting for Clinton should not be done with arrogance like that.

I don't think even the biggest Clinton supporters here believe that she is without fault in that respect

But voting for Trump and voting for Clinton are different in that respect. A vote for either empowers them to do these things, but Trump is actually CAMPAIGNING on doing these things. Trump's voters aren't voting for him in SPITE of his views on waterboarding, it is BECAUSE of his views on waterboarding. He's not a case of "he's good, except for that whole anti-LGBT thing he's going to enact" to his voters, he's a case of "he's good because he's going to put all of the homos in jail"

His campaign is, more often than not, Trump declaring his intent to harm.
 
It shouldn't. But there is a difference between "I don't like your ideas and i do not wish to subscribe to your newsletter" and "by god you're a complete fucking idiot". I'm pretty sure the latter is bannable, but even if sympathetic mods make an exception, i still feel more than justified responding to such comments with "talk to the hand"

It's less "I dont like your ideas and I do not wish to subscribe to your newsletter" and more "your actions and opinions are extremely dangerous to me and my loved ones and your protest vote isn't actually a protest".

And disregarding that posters insult, you didnt actually respond to his points. So until you make a good argument for it, you're going to continue to get called out on this forum, I imagine.
 
It's less "I dont like your ideas and I do not wish to subscribe to your newsletter" and more "your actions and opinions are extremely dangerous to me and my loved ones and your protest vote isn't actually a protest".
This is really well put. Thank you.
 
My perception of you is that you aren't honest. You originally supported Trump to support Trump. You got the name and tag for a reason.

I'm plenty honest. Here's how honest i am, I'll list out all the areas i agree and disagree with trump.

Agree:
* build the wall
* America is too politically correct

Disagree:
* pretty much everything else

I admit, while everyone else is running around picking apart every little thing he says and going nuts over it, I'm just over here laughing at what this country has become. I mean eventually things get so screwed up that all you can really do is laugh about it, and that's where i am. Who knows, maybe after you put a few more years on you'll be there too :)

And btw, I got the name because I requested "Donald Trump Building a Wall" (see agree point #1 above) and a mod thought it would be funny to pwn me.

I got the tag because I said i was so disenfranchised that I'd be willing to let someone come in and do whatever the hell they wanted even if I didn't agree with them. /shrug
 
Define politically correct. And name instances in which we were too politically correct

And it's great that you can just laugh it off. Dont think all the minorities will be able to though
 
He can't, a mod just pwned him. Also, pwned is in Firefox's dictionary.

Anyway, cpp_king, if you are reading this: I know exactly how you got your name. And the mod was right to do so. Because you are, like it or not, a supporter of a fascist.

That said, in his absence, I will answer Lo_Fi's question. Boy, Ironically Supporting Fascism Is Cool, Bro sure got politically correct over being called a name, maybe he should get a thicker skin
 
He's already banned but I still want to say, anyone who thinks "build the wall" is an effective means of addressing illegal immigration demonstrates that they have no understanding of the issue of illegal immigration just by supporting Trump's policy of "build the wall."
 
I don't think even the biggest Clinton supporters here believe that she is without fault in that respect

But voting for Trump and voting for Clinton are different in that respect. A vote for either empowers them to do these things, but Trump is actually CAMPAIGNING on doing these things. Trump's voters aren't voting for him in SPITE of his views on waterboarding, it is BECAUSE of his views on waterboarding. He's not a case of "he's good, except for that whole anti-LGBT thing he's going to enact" to his voters, he's a case of "he's good because he's going to put all of the homos in jail"

His campaign is, more often than not, Trump declaring his intent to harm.
Sure that I'll agree with. However, it also is a different kind of argument from the post I quoted. Your point can't be mirrored as effectively as the other one where you can easily sum up negative issues about Hilary.

Might seem like part pooping but it's important if you care about keeping the pressure on Hilary after the election in the hope she betters herself when it comes to her faults or keep her from moving astray from her promises. Politicians are politicians after all.
 
I'm plenty honest. Here's how honest i am, I'll list out all the areas i agree and disagree with trump.

Agree:
* build the wall
* America is too politically correct

Disagree:
* pretty much everything else

I admit, while everyone else is running around picking apart every little thing he says and going nuts over it, I'm just over here laughing at what this country has become. I mean eventually things get so screwed up that all you can really do is laugh about it, and that's where i am. Who knows, maybe after you put a few more years on you'll be there too :)

And btw, I got the name because I requested "Donald Trump Building a Wall" (see agree point #1 above) and a mod thought it would be funny to pwn me.

I got the tag because I said i was so disenfranchised that I'd be willing to let someone come in and do whatever the hell they wanted even if I didn't agree with them. /shrug

"Politically correct" usually means "Waaah! Society won't let me say my racist shit without repercussions!" in the context of right wing folk. Just another racist facet of the average Trump supporter.
 
Darn I actually wanted to hear what his definition was. Because it's an incredibly vague phrase that usually just translates to "I dont like that social consequences exist"

I know the definition, I just think it's important that people get on the same page when talking about pc or "offended"
 
Sure that I'll agree with. However, it also is a different kind of argument from the post I quoted. Your point can't be mirrored as effectively as the other one where you can easily sum up negative issues about Hilary.

Might seem like part pooping but it's important if you care about keeping the pressure on Hilary after the election in the hope she betters herself when it comes to her faults or keep her from moving astray from her promises. Politicians are politicians after all.

And I will be one of the people, or try to be, who keeps her honest. The comparison, for me, is that for as many issues as Clinton may have, a too-large percentage of Americans see the issues of Trump as virtues, while the rest refuse to see them at all.

"Politically correct" usually means "Waaah! Society won't let me say my racist shit without repercussions!" in the context of right wing folk. Just another racist facet of the average Trump supporter.

Seriously. "I don't want consequences" works on the issue of political correctness, but also him wanting to be able to support Trump without receiving derision - especially when his support is out of a desire to wreck shit.
 
Don't worry, from the looks of things it's going to be a landslide across the board, I don't think it matters all that much where i am.

You're banned (sad!) so my commentary is probably meaningless, but whatever. Fuck you. You supported a racist, fascist before his loss was a sure thing. You're a turd. I don't care if your single issue is what you say it is; fuck the establishment; or if you're a racist like your boy Trump. Doesn't matter, because the destination is the same.

So fuck you.
 
Voting for trump to express dissatisfaction with the government is some George Michael "maybe we should kiss, that will show em" levels of dumb.
 
I don't actually want trump to be president. I think he's a blowhard. Voting for him is my way of expressing my dissatisfaction with the entire political system. It's my way of saying that I don't think the president even matters, because the problems run too deep for one person to make that much of a difference, even if that one person is the president.

Maybe he makes things worse, but relative to how much of a farce the whole thing already is, it's negligible. Just like whatever good Clinton might do will also be negligible.

If he wins, we look like morons to the rest of the world. Short term loss, but maybe we actually need to be beaten down, dethroned as the worlds superpower, or whatever for the government to take a hard look at what matters and get their shit together.

And if he loses, he brings the republican party down with him and that whole shitfest they call the GOP can disappear into the ashes.

Win win for me, and plus i live in California where my vote literally doesn't even matter, so it's more of just a fuck you on a personal level to a government that I feel has lost its way

If you know your vote doesn't matter, and you want to express your dissatisfaction for a broken system, why not...hmmm....vote for a candidate you believe in. Hell, you can write your own name in for all I care.

This is why people are calling you idiot/fascist. Because voting for Trump means:

A.) You didn't think of what I just said, which would make you kinda silly.
B.) You DO support Trump, which would make you a fascist.

Having said that, the name change does suck for you and is actually quite ironic. The person who did that clearly has a problem with fascism, and yet abused his power to change your name. People on GAF find that amusing/funny/whatever, but it's actually kind of gross to think that someone decided to take your name, and give you another one because they clearly know better. :P

But that's off-topic and obviously rather personal given I think it's obvious I didn't name myself Some Nobody. So let's get focused again:

We already look like morons to the rest of the world. It's like when people continue to say Trump and Hillary are equally bad when they're so obviously not. Trump is a racist, sexist fearmongerer. He says things that are unmistakably false and just goes on like these things can't be immediately fact-checked into oblivion. He's a guy running for the highest military office in the land--the commander-in-chief of the largest military force in the fucking world, and he kicked his political career off by calling POWs "losers". He tried to smear the names of a Muslim family that lost their son--a son who died fighting for this country. He's made mistakes that literally no other human being with even a few months of political experience would've dared make, and is such a shitty candidate he's managing to make some of the people with shorter memories long for the days of Mittens and John McCain.

This is a guy who should never have achieved anything remotely resembling a plurality. He should've gotten 2 percent, maybe five, and been a joke by now. But he's not--because there are enough people in most of the fifty states that believe all of the worst things he's said. And so if I'm from another country following American politics I've got to believe a large percentage of us are a bunch of ignorant mouthbreathers who think Mexico sends us their rapists and we should kill the families of terrorists to make them stop fighting us. (I'm still not sure how he got away with that one.)

And even those of us on the liberal side are a little wrong--we're all so self-satisfied that the GOP is getting what they've earned over the past twelve years and self-destructing. And rightfully so, but....why are none of us fucking embarrassed? Because over anything else right now, knowing that Trump has no shot but is still The Other candidate for the Presidency of the United States of America? We should be.
 
Eh, nah. At the time that the user was looking for a name change, Trump was pretty horrific. If we swapped out David Duke for Donald Trump, I think that that would make it more appropriate to fuck with someone's name like that.
 
There is really nothing wrong with Clinton except two, fake scandals and maybe some shady but relatively par-for-the-course shit with the Clinton foundation and State Dept thing and that hasn't even been proven.

This notion that Clinton is such a terrible candidate is absolute horseshit based on mostly lies and a media that decided to go along with the narrative. She's made mistakes but she is intelligent, reasonable, and possibly one of the most qualified candidates in history.

The other factor is that people feel obligated to say she's "as bad as Trump" to try and look impartial. Fucking nonsense.

Honestly, why is she tied to Benghazi? I know people who hate her with a passion because of it and I don't think they watch Fox News but they probably have gotten soundbites. I can't see them being very happy if she wins and I want to be able to douse their hatred with a little sense.
 
I'm plenty honest. Here's how honest i am, I'll list out all the areas i agree and disagree with trump.

Agree:
* build the wall
* America is too politically correct

Disagree:
* pretty much everything else

I admit, while everyone else is running around picking apart every little thing he says and going nuts over it, I'm just over here laughing at what this country has become. I mean eventually things get so screwed up that all you can really do is laugh about it, and that's where i am. Who knows, maybe after you put a few more years on you'll be there too :)

And btw, I got the name because I requested "Donald Trump Building a Wall" (see agree point #1 above) and a mod thought it would be funny to pwn me.

I got the tag because I said i was so disenfranchised that I'd be willing to let someone come in and do whatever the hell they wanted even if I didn't agree with them. /shrug

I don't think you understand what that term actually means.
 
This. He's having a nervous breakdown. I wouldn't be surprised if he bows out in spectacular fashion in the next week or so.

I'll need to google up symptoms of nervous breakdown, to see whether it's that or just Trump being Trump. My intuition says the latter.
 
People compare him to Hitler a lot but it seems now his political rise and fall align more with Pablo Escobar. He wants political legitimacy so he tries to ride his popularity with the people into power but lacks any knowledge of how politics actually work. As a result he is laughed out of the entire political system.

Hopefully his anger and humiliation won't manifest the same way Escobar's did.
 
I'm plenty honest. Here's how honest i am, I'll list out all the areas i agree and disagree with trump.

Agree:
* build the wall
* America is too politically correct

Disagree:
* pretty much everything else

I admit, while everyone else is running around picking apart every little thing he says and going nuts over it, I'm just over here laughing at what this country has become. I mean eventually things get so screwed up that all you can really do is laugh about it, and that's where i am. Who knows, maybe after you put a few more years on you'll be there too :)

And btw, I got the name because I requested "Donald Trump Building a Wall" (see agree point #1 above) and a mod thought it would be funny to pwn me.

I got the tag because I said i was so disenfranchised that I'd be willing to let someone come in and do whatever the hell they wanted even if I didn't agree with them. /shrug

Being banned from gaf isn't enough. You should be banned from society.

And if not that, I hope by some circumstance you lose your right to vote or be allowed to express your opinions.
 
Don't worry, from the looks of things it's going to be a landslide across the board, I don't think it matters all that much where i am



Kinda hard to "refute" someone's opinion with your own opinion.

At the end of the day, it doesn't matter once Hillary wins. Other than the fact that you voted for Donald fucking Trump.

I guess some people really pride in seeing the world burn. Or at least the potential of it.
 
I simply cannot wrap my head around the sentiment that Trump is "anti-establishment" or that voting for him is "sticking it to the man".

He's an old white guy who was born into fabulous wealth and survives (despite incompetence and constant failure) through the phenomenal wealth-generation of his land holdings. He is literally landed gentry, for god's sake. You are voting for hereditary aristocracy to "stick it to the man".

You want to show your disdain for the system? Vote for Vermin Supreme. There's literally no other way to read that vote other than disgust with American politics and hatred for the Washington elite. If you're going to "protest vote", you at least need to make sure that your vote actually conveys the message you want it to. The easiest way to read a vote for Trump is "I kind of like The Man and enjoy paying him rent."
 
I simply cannot wrap my head around the sentiment that Trump is "anti-establishment" or that voting for him is "sticking it to the man".

It is bit of a head scratcher, but I suppose the rationale goes - enemy of your enemy is your friend. And while he naturally is an enemy of democrats, he has also obviously upset the republican establishment, where the inner circle was meant to be impenetrable for anyone not from the right background.
 
I don't actually want trump to be president. I think he's a blowhard. Voting for him is my way of expressing my dissatisfaction with the entire political system. It's my way of saying that I don't think the president even matters, because the problems run too deep for one person to make that much of a difference, even if that one person is the president.

Maybe he makes things worse, but relative to how much of a farce the whole thing already is, it's negligible. Just like whatever good Clinton might do will also be negligible.

If he wins, we look like morons to the rest of the world. Short term loss, but maybe we actually need to be beaten down, dethroned as the worlds superpower, or whatever for the government to take a hard look at what matters and get their shit together.

And if he loses, he brings the republican party down with him and that whole shitfest they call the GOP can disappear into the ashes.

Win win for me, and plus i live in California where my vote literally doesn't even matter, so it's more of just a fuck you on a personal level to a government that I feel has lost its way

Blah blah blah

Not surprised this is coming from a Trump supporter. Yet to see a reasonable and intelligent one XD
 
Oh, so he wasn't "bought and sold"? He doesn't own Peter King because he contributed to his campaigns?
Trump consistently attacks Clinton for being essentially owned those who contribute to her campaign, yet he turns around and complains when the politicians he has donated to are not obeying him like loyal dogs?
I noticed that too, I wonder if that will ever come up again considering how hard Trump is riding the anti-establishment train.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom