Trump refuses to commit to accept the results of 2016 Presidential Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel like this is part of the reason why Hillary's campaign has been pushing positive advertisements into historically red states. It's not just about winning November 8th; it's about trying to keep the country from turning against itself even more.
 
Absolutely nobody is worrying that trump supporters will successfully and violently overthrow the country. People are instead worried that this is doing harm to the belief in our election process, and that this could spark violent, ignorant, and futile outrage.

Trump's candidacy has already sparked all of the above. I'm not worried about them overthrowing the country just making a specific remark to a scenario that is not really plausible. Calm down.
 
It's truly amazing how a woman that is nearly on the verge of death can:

-launder millions of money from terrorists through her charity
-murder her investigators
-pay off all of the media
-pay off SNL
-rig voting booths all across the country
-become the co founder of ISIS

How does she do it all?

she can do all this yet she can't even shoot an email from a secure server to save Benjamin Ghazi. Sad!
 
Absolutely nobody is worrying that trump supporters will successfully and violently overthrow the country. People are instead worried that this is doing harm to the belief in our election process, and that this could spark violent, ignorant, and futile outrage.

If 1 single person dies because of Trump's words no matter what side they're on it will be an immense tragedy.
 
This MOTHERFUCKER.

image.php


Dying.
 
While I agree that we would be in a better place had he won the election, I don't think anything good would have come from him not conceding. It was over there was really nothing for him to do without tearing the country apart.

Agreed it's a path you just don't want to go down.
 
Absolutely nobody is worrying that trump supporters will successfully and violently overthrow the country. People are instead worried that this is doing harm to the belief in our election process, and that this could spark violent, ignorant, and futile outrage.

They don't have to overthrow the government...

... But I absolutely fear they'll hurt innocents.
 
Trump's candidacy has already sparked all of the above. I'm not worried about them overthrowing the country just making a specific remark to a scenario that is not really plausible. Calm down.

And this is my third time telling you that the scenario people are actually worried about is entirely possible. I'm not going to calm down, rather you should stop trying to down play this.
 
I'd like to see them try and see how far their gun nut fantasies can go against a well trained army. They would give up real quick.

Edit: Trump's Rebellion started at 10:00am ended at 10:05am when the tanks rolled in.

The US is not Turkey; they won't start shooting or using tanks/jets/etc. against their own civilians.
 
They are whiny bitches with lots of anger, little self control, and plenty of guns. I can see someone urging folks that they should exercise the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms for the purposes of forming a standing militia to oppose "tyranny".

There isn't anything a militia can do against drones and hellfire missiles. Those guns are for shooting their family and neighbors, not the government.
 
And this is my third time telling you that the scenario people are actually worried about is entirely possible. I'm not going to calm down, rather you should stop trying to down play this.

Listen, if they want to use guns they will be dealt with accordingly end of story. It doesn't mean I'm advocating for it or looking forward to it.
 
It's truly amazing how a woman that is nearly on the verge of death can:

-launder millions of money from terrorists through her charity
-murder her investigators
-pay off all of the media
-pay off SNL
-rig voting booths all across the country
-become the co founder of ISIS

How does she do it all?
Talent.
 
NYMag is an extremely credible source, and your MSM suspicion is just anti-intellectual tripe. And I'd put MORE of them in that basket. Trump has demonstrated that he is a uniquely offensive candidate, variously courting white supremacists, offending disabled, veterans, Mexicans, women, etc. He is racist, a bigot, a xenophobe and a misogynist and, frankly, a grotesque sexual predator. His only prominent policy positions he has gone into depth is the comically unrealistic BUILD A WALL and DEPORTATION FORCE (that he is never going to get Mexico to pay for, because he is an abominable moron). There is no argument left that this is just a political difference.

If you support Trump, you are a deplorable. 100% of Trump voters are deplorables. I'd call them worse. Scum, villains, detritus. Find your insult and apply it. If they can see what this monster has done and still support him, their moral center is adrift and nobody should respect these people because they don't deserve respect. They let this authoritarian Putin rimjobber get nominated, and now this shit is on their fucked up heads. Including owning a candidate with zero respect for our Democratic process.

No it's not. Nothing to do AT ALL with anti-intellectual whatever. For financial matters, I'd rather trust more credible sources, that's all.

Your position is misguided. People have a right to support whoever they want - that's the beauty of democracy; besides, if you truly want to go down that path, Clinton is no angel, either.

Ultimately, I have no horse in this one. I don't like either candidate. Trump because of his sheer ignorance and Clinton because I simply don't trust her.
 
The US is not Turkey; they won't start shooting or using tanks/jets/etc. against their own civilians.
The U.S. is not some high beacon of civilization that is above that type of thing.

If Trump fans flames enough for insurrectionist action to become a real possibility it would be irresponsible by a U.S. government to not deploy forces to exterminate those type of people.

That point is not here yet but not some unreachable dystopia only in fiction.
 
This is going to fuck over even the minimal chance he has of winning anyone over while solidifying his base. This is the big thing we're taking from this third debate, not foreign policy, positions on the second amendment, or a woman's right to choose.

This news plus "Nobody has more respect for women like I do" & "Such a nasty woman" will most likely be plastered all over the newspapers, all over the internet & social media, too.

He made a complete fool out of himself.
 
Remember the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge earlier this year? Where a bunch of yahoos with guns barricaded a government building in Oregon? Imagine that happening in like 20 different places in the week following the election.
 
It's truly amazing how a woman that is nearly on the verge of death can:

-launder millions of money from terrorists through her charity
-murder her investigators
-pay off all of the media
-pay off SNL
-rig voting booths all across the country
-become the co founder of ISIS

How does she do it all?

I'm reminded of Fox News' arguments that Obama is somehow both a tyrant that wants to take all your freedoms away, and a weak ineffective leader that could learn from Putin.

I'm amazed how nobody can detect the cognitive dissonance.
 
He's going to get someone killed. That's all this will do. It's not like anyone in govt gives a fuck if he accepts it or not. Her being sworn in isn't conditional on him accepting anything.

All he's going to do is get one of his crazy culty supporters ruled up and they are going to kill someone or try.

Fuck this "human" filth
 
No it's not. Nothing to do AT ALL with anti-intellectual whatever. For financial matters, I'd rather trust more credible sources, that's all.

Your position is misguided. People have a right to support whoever they want - that's the beauty of democracy; besides, if you truly want to go down that path, Clinton is no angel, either.

Ultimately, I have no horse in this one. I don't like either candidate. Drumpf because of his sheer ignorance and Clinton because I simply don't trust her.
This is what I never understand, that people hold Hillary to some 'trustworthy' label but completely ignore the non-stop, blatant lying that Donald Drumpf engages in. He'll be ON TAPE saying something and he'll deny it was said. He literally will deny anything if it doesn't suit his agenda, yet Hillary is the untrustworthy one. Baffling double standards.
 
I'm reminded of Fox News' arguments that Obama is somehow both a tyrant that wants to take all your freedoms away, and a weak ineffective leader that could learn from Putin.

I'm amazed how nobody can detect the cognitive dissonance.

I've always loved that.

A tyrant and a weak ineffective leader at the same.

Just like how Hillary is in bed with big business, but she's also an enemy to capitalism and a socialist.
 
I am totally expecting a scenario where he loses, and Pence is like "nope, I'm out" on hour 0 while Donald still tries to string things a long for a week after the election.
 
It's truly amazing how a woman that is nearly on the verge of death can:

-launder millions of money from terrorists through her charity
-murder her investigators
-pay off all of the media
-pay off SNL
-rig voting booths all across the country
-become the co founder of ISIS

How does she do it all?

She learned from Obama, who according to Republicans somehow managed to simultaneously be extremely weak and ineffective while also being a ruthless dictator with too much power.
 
No it's not. Nothing to do AT ALL with anti-intellectual whatever. For financial matters, I'd rather trust more credible sources, that's all.

Your position is misguided. People have a right to support whoever they want - that's the beauty of democracy; besides, if you truly want to go down that path, Clinton is no angel, either.

Ultimately, I have no horse in this one. I don't like either candidate. Trump because of his sheer ignorance and Clinton because I simply don't trust her.

What is it that you don't trust?

I know she doesn't say what she thinks. Calling half of Trump's base deplorables is her kind way of saying, "Racist fucking morons"
 
No it's not. Nothing to do AT ALL with anti-intellectual whatever. For financial matters, I'd rather trust more credible sources, that's all.

Your position is misguided. People have a right to support whoever they want - that's the beauty of democracy; besides, if you truly want to go down that path, Clinton is no angel, either.

Ultimately, I have no horse in this one. I don't like either candidate. Trump because of his sheer ignorance and Clinton because I simply don't trust her.

uh huh both sides yadda yadda

the point is Trump is a uniquely horrific candidate, and Clinton is a fucking glorious angel personally blessed by Jesus Christ in comparison. Trump has been endorsed by no credible newspapers, the first ever for a candidate because of how bad he is. Republican newspapers have come out and endorsed a Democrat for the first time in some cases 180 years. Dozens of Republicans in the Senate have come out against him. Dozens in the House.

Trump is a racist, misogynist, bigot, xenophobe sexual predator. Hillary is a bit careless with emails. There is no comparison. You could on principle disagree with every one of Hillary's policies and STILL she is the preferable candidate, because she isn't a horrific human being who hates anyone of color and anyone with a vagina. Unlike Trump, she hasn't advocated for committing war crimes against women and children. Unlike Trump, she hasn't come out for breaking the constitution on separation of church and state and on freedom of speech and others. Unlike Trump, she hasn't said she would refuse to concede or whined like a petulant baby about election results. She hasn't sexually molested women. She hasn't been a racist monster.


Sorry, no. I will not let Trump supporters off of responsibility for letting this monster loose on our Democracy. I will nail every last one of these nasty fuckers to the wall on this issue whenever possible, deplorable as they are, for throwing any semblance of personal respect out the window for a fleeting victory. They wanted to win more than they cared about the health of America or the way its citizens are treated.

And for that, there is no forgiveness as far as I'm concerned. I don't want to get to know these people, because they're so fundamentally broken as human beings. Trump isn't Romney. He isn't even Bush. He's something else, a nothing, a loser, an symbol of anti-Americanism, someone who fundamentally misunderstands why we are great as a country (and where we are not great). He is a danger to our Democracy. And people who support him are not going to be allowed to simply pretend they are not accountable for this shit. They are going to be called out for being deplorables, just like Hillary did.
 
I just, I just don't know how you can justify voting for Trump anymore. Sure, his dumb shit might have been entertaining at one point but this is just sad. The entire world is watching Trump screw up at every possible opportunity, and yet he can't even admit the system is fair when he isn't winning.

What a fucking disgrace. Man of the people my ass.
 
He's totally gonna incite a riot after he loses, isn't he?

No, he doesn't wanna die in jail. The only reason he hasn't been arrested yet is because it looks bad to arrest a candidate in the middle of an election. After the 2nd though, that's his ass if he does anything else stupid.
 
This is what I never understand, that people hold Hillary to some 'trustworthy' label but completely ignore the non-stop, blatant lying that Donald Drumpf engages in. He'll be ON TAPE saying something and he'll deny it was said. He literally will deny anything if it doesn't suit his agenda, yet Hillary is the untrustworthy one. Baffling double standards.

With Clinton, it's a case of anything usually being "more than meets the eye". Don't think people believe Trump is more trustworthy, but he's got so much going against him, people are pouncing on various things at once. Trustworthiness and her lack of charisma/warmth have always been big issues for Hillary though.
 
It's truly amazing how a woman that is nearly on the verge of death can:

-launder millions of money from terrorists through her charity
-murder her investigators
-pay off all of the media
-pay off SNL
-rig voting booths all across the country
-become the co founder of ISIS

How does she do it all?

The question is not how she does ... is why someone who is OBVIOUSLY super rich and sucessfull and smart can't overpay them because if he is so rich and smart as he says, that is probably some tipping money for him, right ?
 
Yup, this will get innocent people killed. Who do you think will be scapegoated? I say blacks and Muslims (groups that are over 90% anti-Trump).
 
With Clinton, it's a case of anything usually being "more than meets the eye". Don't think people believe Drumpf is more trustworthy, but he's got so much going against him, people are pouncing on various things at once. Trustworthiness and her lack of charisma/warmth have always been big issues for Hillary though.
Yeah, I assumed that was the case. It just seems a weird double standard to me - if people care about trustworthiness, hold both candidates to that standard. The guy could put $10 in your hand and say he gave you $500. It's infuriating to watch as an outsider.
 
The conspiracy theorist in me worries that Russia hacks the polling stations and then Trump turns these conversations back on Hilary when there is a protest

...but then again I'm in Canada and my voting is done with good old paper so I have no idea how the electric ballots work lol
 
It's truly amazing how a woman that is nearly on the verge of death can:

-launder millions of money from terrorists through her charity
-murder her investigators
-pay off all of the media
-pay off SNL
-rig voting booths all across the country
-become the co founder of ISIS

How does she do it all?

STAMINA!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom