SlickShoesRUCrazy
Member
One of my right wing acquaintances is complaining about Clinton talking about the confidential time to initiate a nuclear strike.
Can't find anything about that?
Can't find anything about that?
Yup. He was behind the fake ACORN videos in 2008 that got them shut down despite being nothing. He's no one that should be taken seriously as he's completely thrown away any credibility he has.He's a '''''''''''''journalist''''''''''''' who is actually a convicted crimal who makes these fake hidden tape videos. He's a liar and huckster.
Because it's nonsense. That's not confidential information at all.One of my right wing acquaintances is complaining about Clinton talking about the confidential time to initiate a nuclear strike.
Can't find anything about that?
You're crazy. Go watch Trump's response to the question about Mosul; it's clear he has no fucking clue what he's even talking about.Sàmban;220826125 said:Finished watching. I thought Trump did really well. He was actually fairly toe-to-toe with Hillary but absolutely RUINED everything with that concession statement. God, that was fucking terrible. He just made himself look really bad with that.
It's not confidential info. I already knew it was only a few minutes, and I'm a spider.One of my right wing acquaintances is complaining about Clinton talking about the confidential time to initiate a nuclear strike.
Can't find anything about that?
Because it's nonsense. That's not confidential information at all.
One of my right wing acquaintances is complaining about Clinton talking about the confidential time to initiate a nuclear strike.
Can't find anything about that?
I mean, I can't even find anything regarding a statement to such a thing that she made.
I mean, I can't even find anything regarding a statement to such a thing that she made.
HILLARY CLINTON
.. Japan, Korea, even Saudi Arabia. He said, well if we had them why don't we use them? Which I think is terrifying. But here's the deal: the bottom line on nuclear weapons is that when the president gives the order, it must be followed. There is about four minutes between the order being given and the people responsible for launching nuclear weapons to do so. And that is why ten people who have had that awesome responsibility have come out in an unprecedented way said they would not trust Donald Trump with the nuclear codes or to have his finger on the nuclear button.
100%
Am Australian, can confirm. Half the country lost our fucking shit when Julia Gilliard became our Prime Minister
Donald Trump probably sounds OK to people who are as ignorant as he is. Because you need to know something about something to know when someone is wrong about that something.You're crazy. Go watch Trump's response to the question about Mosul; it's clear he has no fucking clue what he's even talking about.
Am Australian, can confirm. Half the country lost our fucking shit when Julia Gilliard became our Prime Minister
Oh it wasn't so bad, it was...
![]()
Oh yeah it was pretty fucking bad wasn't it?
Trump did really well if you aren't familiar with some of the material. Part of the reason that Hillary didn't respond to a few of his points (i.e. almost everything Trump said on the subject of Mosul) is that she'd have to spend a while tearing down false premises before getting to the meat of the discussion. Which is cool and all, but she was trying to at least somewhat pretend to make positive policy discussion in between her attacks on Trump.Sàmban;220826125 said:Finished watching. I thought Trump did really well. He was actually fairly toe-to-toe with Hillary but absolutely RUINED everything with that concession statement. God, that was fucking terrible. He just made himself look really bad with that.
Someone you don't release material through if you actually have anything to talk about.Who the hell is James O'Keefe?
I'm 99% sure he's not conceding. Trump will declare everything rigged and go the rest of his life arguing with anyone who mentions him losing the election.
Oh it wasn't so bad, it was...
![]()
Oh yeah it was pretty fucking bad wasn't it?
Here is the transcript:
So the only thing she says that could be remotely taken as confidential is that there's a 4 minute gap between when the order is given and when the strike occurs. But I'm sure this has been mentioned before.
There's nothing confidential about the process of launching nuclear weapons. It's been openly talked about in the media for months now. It even has it's Wikipedia page.
Saying "it takes four minutes" doesn't make a difference.
Just reading this this morning... Why are some of you putting Microsoft or Nintendo in your subject lines?
You know, back in the 1970s, I worked for the Childrens Defense Fund. And I was taking on discrimination against African-American kids in schools, she began. He was getting sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination in his apartment buildings.
She added: In the 1980s, I was working to reform the schools in Arkansas. He was borrowing $14 million from his father to start his businesses. In the 1990s, I went to Beijing. Said womens rights are human rights. He insulted a former Miss Universe Alicia Machado called her an eating machine. And on the day I was in the Situation Room monitoring the raid that brought Osama bin Laden to justice, he was hosting the Celebrity Apprentice.
I do wonder if Trump will decide his surrogates didn't do a good enough job... and refuse to pay them.Feel kinda sorry for Conway, she really can't say he was shit can she?
Maybe the suitcases of money he pays will cheer her up.
I didn't notice Hillary's color schemes in the debates. Quite patriotic.
![]()
It was Bill Clinton who ended up actually signing it into law. Trump is correct in saying that. Bush Sr was part of the drafting process. Congress didn't even vote on it until late 1993.Wait a minute, I just found out that Bush Sr. signed NAFTA and not Bill Clinton. Why the hell does Trump continually use it against Bill and Hillary and why the hell doesn't Hillary call him out on blatantly lying on that?
Wait a minute, I just found out that Bush Sr. signed NAFTA and not Bill Clinton. Why the hell does Trump continually use it against Bill and Hillary and why the hell doesn't Hillary call him out on blatantly lying on that?
Wait a minute, I just found out that Bush Sr. signed NAFTA and not Bill Clinton. Why the hell does Trump continually use it against Bill and Hillary and why the hell doesn't Hillary call him out on blatantly lying on that?
Ah okIt was Bill Clinton who ended up actually signing it into law. Trump is correct in saying that. Bush Sr was part of the drafting process. Congress didn't even vote on it until late 1993.
Well yeah but that was one instance, he drops nafta like 5 times every debateI mean, why doesn't she call him out when he specifically says that she and her team caused the riots at his rallies? Serious question. Is it better to ignore a lie than to say it isn't true?
Ah ok
Well yeah but that was one instance, he drops nafta like 5 times every debate
I mean, why doesn't she call him out when he specifically says that she and her team caused the riots at his rallies? Serious question. Is it better to ignore a lie than to say it isn't true?
If Hillary called Trump out on every lie he said, she'd be on the defensive the entire time. You can't beat gish gallop by engaging in it.
So vague question, who "won".
Take a guess.So vague question, who "won".
More of his projection again. Same dude who regularly calls for violence.The rally video is something that sounds like nonsense on its own. You really think a legit video of Hillary and Obama plotting to start violence at Trumo rallies leaked and no legit news source picked up on it? She basically let that shit speak for itself
Oh damn, Hillary's playing 4D chess. The delayed patriotic effect is riding a time wave that will break upon a variety of swing states just as voters enter their booths.I didn't notice Hillary's color schemes in the debates. Quite patriotic.
![]()
So vague question, who "won".
Just read this.Is there a highlight reel yet?
He brought it up multiple times in this one though. I hadn't heard about it and her just doing nothing made me think it was true
So vague question, who "won".
So vague question, who "won".
Clinton in reality, Trump in Trumpland
Take a guess.
More of his projection again. Same dude who regularly calls for violence.
Early polling is showing Clinton again.
Also, the big headline pretty much every news outlet is running with is Trump refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of the election, which...probably won't play well outside of his hardcore base.
Look at the headlines. Trump is trying to destroy one of the founding principles of this country while more women and witnesses come out with sexual assault allegations. He is being torn apart limb by limb.
Nasty Woman, 52 to 39 in the CNN poll.
I didn't notice Hillary's color schemes in the debates. Quite patriotic.
![]()