sixteen-bit
Member
It's going to be a long week.
especially if there's disappointment at the end, lol
It's going to be a long week.
This, basically. We'll all be disappointed if the worst-case scenario happens (if the game happens).
especially if there's disappointment at the end, lol
Where did all this 2v2 stuff come from
Also pls cable.
MvC without X-men or FF characters...
![]()
This is what Neoxon tried to worn ya about but no one was listening...No Xmen? I call BS.
No Xmen? I call BS.
No x men sounds nuts. COTA damn near started the versus series and Def was the first crossover (secret akuma). I really hope this is false. No mag/storm/sent/wolv is crazy. I was pissed when they didn't have cyclops in.
That game was made before the ban started.Aren't there X-Men in that Contest of Champions mobile game? How come that game can use X-Men characters but not MvC?
Aren't there X-Men in that Contest of Champions mobile game? How come that game can use X-Men characters but not MvC?
There's no reason to believe that 2v2 thing right?
No X-Men.
I'm actually looking forward to the Capcom side of things more than the Marvel roster. Knowing that all of my favorite characters have zero chance of making it in (Doom, Magneto, Sentinel, etc.) it will be more interesting to see the Capcom side.
Not really, at least not right now. Same for the rumor is general.There's no reason to believe that 2v2 thing right?
Malaysia
edit:
![]()
Marvel Cinematic Universe vs. Capcom Cinematic Universe.
No, because we don't even know if this game is real. But logically, it's easy to see why going back to 2 on 2 is possible and even attractive.There's no reason to believe that 2v2 thing right?
His movie rights are owned by Fox. But he was in Avengers Assemble (likely since they weren't aware of the rights at the time), so maybe.Then Kang the conqueror. Everyone needs to get shot.
No, because we don't even know if this game is real. But logically, it's easy to see why going back to 2 on 2 is possible and even attractive.
I'd rather have 2v2. Easier for them to balance means less chance of mvc3 bullshit happening again.
Why even make a Marvel game then?I'd rather have 2v2. Easier for them to balance means less chance of mvc3 bullshit happening again.
It would feel really weird going back to 2 v 2 after MVC3, but, eh, TVC worked perfectly, so it wouldn't be a deal breaker.
If it truly is 2 v 2 + Assist, i hope it's like KoF 99 and 2000 rather than the original MVC, where you pic 3 normal characters and you select which one is the assist.
Believe it or not, UMvC3 wasn't nearly as broken as its predecessors.I'd rather have 2v2. Easier for them to balance means less chance of mvc3 bullshit happening again.
no reason to believe anything
I definitely play. Hell, I played UMvC3 non-stop for the last month (& SFV since it launched). I was really into it for the first 2-3 years.however you're excited, but you don't play. if anything casuals and non-players are more excited. look at neoxon and dahbomb. and yams.
Why even make a Marvel game then?
Mvc1 was in an era before patches were a thing. And regardless, it is much easier to balance a 2v2 game. Going up to 3v3 drastically increases the difficulty of balancing.Except mvc3 was well balanced for a Vs game. Mvc1 was broken as shit compared to it
Why even make a Marvel game then?
I still don't get the 'No XMen' fear mongering. While it's true Marvel has been smudging Mutants out for a while, there's still very little evidence that the videogame properties are being given the same treatment.
I mean, pretty much every post-CoC game got screwed over in this way, so there's reason to be concerned. But at the same time, recent events do give us a reason to be hopeful.I still don't get the 'No XMen' fear mongering. While it's true Marvel has been smudging Mutants out for a while, there's still very little evidence that the videogame properties are being given the same treatment.
I still don't get the 'No XMen' fear mongering. While it's true Marvel has been smudging Mutants out for a while, there's still very little evidence that the videogame properties are being given the same treatment.
Oh yeah, didn't Marvel cock-block Wolverine for 2.0 & the Maximoff Twins (Quicksilver & Scarlet Witch) for 3.0?You haven't checked the mobile games, have you?
Also there were evidence of Disney cockblocking X-men characters for Disney Infinity
It's mostly a joke, BUT I love seeing people figure out something that is on the brink of being broken and then how to beat it. You need a game with a lot of freedom to have something like that and I think that is actually what people want from it.This mindset is kind of absurd to me.
"You want Marvel to be BALANCED? WHY?!?"
As if terrible balancing can ever be anything but a massive detriment to a fighting game from almost every standpoint.
EDIT: Side note, in the extremely unlikely chance that the 2v2 thing isn't bullshit... why do there have to be a separate roster of assist characters like MvC1? The assists could literally just be picked from the roster like MvC2 and MvC3, just with a dedicated assist character instead of a third character. Honestly, that's both easier AND preferable to me if that "leak" has to be true.
Believe it or not, UMvC3 wasn't nearly as broken as its predecessors.
But half of the appeal of Mahvel is the 3v3 insanity (which evolved from the initial 2v2 of MvC1) & the openness of the combo system.That doesn't change the fact that it is much easier (and hence likely to occur) to balance a 2v2 game vs a 3v3 game. If not in the initial release, at least through patches. Sniffing out the broken stuff is a much easier task with far fewer combinations.
In theory, if the game is 2v2, I think the main reason would be to solve the "third character" problem without X-Factor. If both characters have assist support, then you are always on roughly equal grounds with your opponent.