Reggie: Switch matchmaking and lobbies handled through phone app

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is what Nintendo has said officially so far:

<snip>

Multiple Nintendo statements and not once did they use the word "optional app" or say things like "in addition to the built-in console functionality." I don't think people are jumping to conclusions here or speculating too much. This is all the information we have (straight from Nintendo themselves) and it sounds bad. You're right though that we don't know every single detail about their online setup just yet, but that's a big problem for a system that's just 43 days away from launch.

I appreciate the compilation. I understand people's skepticism. Like I mentioned above, I think I've discussed the topic sufficiently and am just gonna go into wait and see mode from here until launch.

May the Nintendo gods have mercy on all our souls.

No, no, no, no, no we need to wait for Nintendo to send representatives to our homes to do a demonstration before we can know for sure!... Remember, always give corporations the benefit of the doubt!

how_to_put_out_a_fire_in_japan-14309.gif

Just when I think I'm out, someone goes and says something absolutely ridiculous.. ah GAF.

By "send representatives to our homes to do a demonstration" do you mean show any actual footage of how any of the vaguely mentioned online features actually woot and what the online functionality looks like outside of the average GAFfer's imagination?

Just don't preorder it. If what they show sucks, don't buy it. If what they show is good, buy it if you want. I have no idea why so many people insist on equating a lack of radical skepticism based on largely unannouced information to be some kind of corporate dick-sucking. Fuck people who reasonably want to wait and see what a company has to show before renouncing them and all their products to the ninth circle of hell.
 
There is no chance the smart device is pumping game audio through to your head phones. There is no mechanism in place for that to be a plausible scenario, let alone one with ubiquitous support across smart devices without significant lag and numerous behind the scenes technical hurdles. Not happening.

We already had numbers in this very thread that shows that only 70% of adults in the US have smart phones, and far fewer children do. Even then, if you assume that 100% of potential Switch owners have smart devices though, no, your TV comparison is still bullshit. Many people do still have dated/unsupported iPhone and Android devices. Others still have Windows devices. You're locking entire standard functionality to devices players could conceivably and reasonably not have. Your TV comparison further fails because literally no one interested in home consoles doesn't also have a TV, as it's something that by the entire nature of the product going back to the very first home console is a necessity. Literally the entire concept of a home game console requires a TV. Not only have console players never needed a smart device, there is no conceivable reason to require them.

As for your "wait and see" and "we have no info" remarks, I point you towards my edit:

No.

Youre saying it's logical that someone who's not in a position to own a common, current smartphone would reasonably purchase a completely optional $300 luxury entertainment device. This makes no sense.

Also, yeah, I agree Nintendo's communication sucks here. That this thread even exists is their fault. That Switch presentation had numerous issues.

But, the fact still remains that we have no info. Any decision you make now is premature. Any calls you make are conjecture without solid insight.
 
I really hope the 'free trial' period until fall make them realise how fucked up this is.

People who will actually use it, and not random guys on message boards, should provide negative feedback.

Hope they have a reporting system.

It appears to me that the "Free Trial" they speak of only refers to the most basic online multiplayer on the Switch itself. Everything else seems to be part of this premium smartphone app which won't be ready until Fall 2017.

Source: http://www.nintendo.com/switch/online-service/

Look at the table.
 
How do you know this? Just the difference in capacity between 6000mah and what is already in the Switch is bigger than a 3DS battery. How much extra would 6000mah cost?

Which ones? Because the GPD ones you mentioned earlier have a clamshell design, so components of the screen, including the touchscren controller can be fitted in the top section, and also appear to be thicker than the Switch. The Switch also needs space for the fans and it has a bigger / more powerful SoC.

GPD Win not only have controls and a keyboard as you said (which then would be moved on sides on the Switch) but also has a fan and a fast mobile SoC (the same as the Surface 3).

Some posts I found interesting, from the 'Switch charging time is 3 hours, non-removable battery' thread: one / two
 
What in the flying fuck.

I mean, this would be ridiculous in a free service. But in something they want to charge for? You've got to be kidding.

I really don't see the connection between having to pay or not to pay and using that app for managing things. It's just the way they would like to handle things and the paywall does not make it worse or better. I mean: the outrage would still be there if all of it, without even having an optional app, would be done on the device.

We still don't know about the pricing, for example, and everyone is assuming that you'll have to pay $60 or so per year for using the subscription features. And even that there will be no improvement at all in comparison to before. There is no way of telling now. Talking about hyperbole.
 
It appears to me that the "Free Trial" they speak of only refers to the most basic online multiplayer on the Switch itself. Everything else seems to be part of this premium smartphone app which won't be ready until Fall 2017.

Source: http://www.nintendo.com/switch/online-service/

Look at the table.

So if I'm right about what "enhanced" matchmaking implies, players really will be limited to random ranked/unranked matches until the app arrives.

Seems plausible with Nintendo.
 
I haven't paid for PS Plus for over a year (monthly free games weren't doing much for me, and I don't play online, so no point in keeping the subscription).

I suspect this will be the same for me with the Switch. All of my multiplayer experiences come from couch co-op/multiplayer scenarios. Voice chat has never been a thing for me, and I have zero interest in it to this day.

So yea, Nintendo's Online Subscription doesn't currently offer anything that would entice me to sign up. Hopefully there are more things to share regarding this service.
 
So does your hot take come with an idea of what the execution involves, or is it one of those which are basically "this probably isn't the negative thing everyone thinks it is, I'm sure Nintendo has a better idea that everyone can't imagine right now, and neither can I"?

Haha yikes. Well yes to the former. I think that if Nintendo truly ties any oft-used and fundamental uses of online functionalities to an app which requires a smartphone, those functionalities will be a one-time and perhaps recalibration-type setup which lets you control everything from your Switch so long as your phone is nearby.

I.E. Yes you need a smartphone, but not beyond setup/making sure you have service.
 
I really don't see the connection between having to pay or not to pay and using that app for managing things. It's just the way they would like to handle things and the paywall does not make it worse or better. I mean: the outrage would still be there if all of it, without even having an optional app, would be done on the device.

We still don't know about the pricing, for example, and everyone is assuming that you'll have to pay $60 or so per year for using the subscription features. And even that there will be no improvement at all in comparison to before. There is no way of telling now. Talking about hyperbole.


Talking about defending everything
 
I'm not really surprised by this. MyNintendo is a huge piece of shit and is worse than Club N ever was. Nintendos online services are getting worse, if you can believe it. 3DS may be the last Nintendo system I ever own.
 
To be fair, "enhance" matchmaking vs "allow" voice chat does make it seem that a basic matchmaking feature is available outside the app.

I'm guessing random matchmaking in-game, lobbies and friends in-app ONLY.
Yeah I'm not sure how to parse that part of the sentence. It either means there's a very basic matchmaking available in the game without the app (which will probably be so limited as to suck), or it's some kind of PR-spin on Nintendo "enhancing" the matchmaking experience by forcing you to use the app.
 
This is even worse than always-online DRM lol. Now it's always-with-your-phone, always-charged, somehow using the phone for voice chat while listening to the game, $200 pay gated, online DRM.
 
I have no interest whatsoever in paying for online multiplayer, I don't do it for Xbox or PlayStation and I won't do it for Nintendo, so this doesn't affect me one way or the other, but even I can see that it is a strange and potentially damaging decision to put all of your online functionality on a smartphone app.

I could understand if it was just voice chat. Nintendo are a company that want to be family friendly and voice chat in most games is just toxic, so putting up some kind of barrier to entry would be understandable at least. But if they're not even giving people the option to ignore the app and just go with the basic ability to play online through the Switch?... No, they can't be doing that. That's crazy talk. This has to be a failure of communication in some way.
 
To be fair, "enhance" matchmaking vs "allow" voice chat does make it seem that a basic matchmaking feature is available outside the app.

I'm guessing random matchmaking in-game, lobbies and friends in-app ONLY.

That sounds like a logical interpretation. It seems that anything friend related will be dealt through the app.

Clearly you won't need a smart phone to do matchmaking so I don't known what Reggie is talking about here.

Clearly based on what?
 
I'm not immediately opposed to the idea. I'll have to see what it's actually like.

On the PS4 I do all of my messaging on the PlayStation app. Just because it's so much easier that trying to message through the clunky on-screen keyboard with a gamepad.

A miiverse app that actually works well, could be good. It is odd that the matchmaking is done that way...

I think there are 2 real reasons why they are doing this though.

1. The switch OS is not actually complete. That's why there is a free trial period and things like sharing video are not included at launch.

2. It kind of moves responsibility of children having access to internet chat away from the switch and on to the phone.
 
I use my phone virtually all day, whether I'm at work, home, commuting, or out of the house in general, so to me personally I don't see the "separate app" aspect as a negative unless it's a shitty app.

I understand others don't feel the same and are rightfully skeptical, and this is probably where I'm just gonna duck out of the discussion and "wait and see". If it's bad, I'll be right there reaming Nintendo with the rest of GAF, but if it's good, I'll be the first to ask all the naysayers to eat their hats.
Well I use my phone often too. Just, I like it being free when not in use. I have no desire to run a charger to my couch for my phone to do voice chat, or even find a safe place to put it so I don't sit on it if I move. I like to look stuff up on it while playing. Or leave maps up.

And I don't even want to think about batteries. So now a game on the go with the Switch will be a race against the system's, your phone's, and if you use wireless, your headphones' batteries. Heaven help you if you're playing it with the stand because then the joycons' battery life are in play as well.

It's just such a fucking hassle. I don't have a problem with it when outside as a true portable. But when used as a console it's yet another step back.
 
I don't even understand how this would work. Or why anyone even thought this was a good idea to begin with?

You use your phone to find matchmaking games? What...?

I'd like to hear more, but I'm currently very confused.
 
I said this in the other thread and I'll say it again here:

'But we don't know all the details yet' is becoming the new 'but the power of the cloud'.

The only major detail we don't know is the price, aside from that, I don't see how any additional details will somehow remedy the colossal shitshow this online service seems to be.
 
Haha yikes. Well yes to the former. I think that if Nintendo truly ties any oft-used and fundamental uses of online functionalities to an app which requires a smartphone, those functionalities will be a one-time and perhaps recalibration-type setup which lets you control everything from your Switch so long as your phone is nearby.

I.E. Yes you need a smartphone, but not beyond setup/making sure you have service.

What exactly is being set up in this scenario though? I mean, I'm open to ideas because theory crafting is fun to a certain extent. If the smartphone is not the direct gateway for the mic and the lobby access, then what is it used for? What is being calibrated? What is the purpose of it? What does the smartphone do that the Switch cannot?
 
This is even worse than always-online DRM lol. Now it's always-with-your-phone, always-charged, somehow using the phone for voice chat while listening to the game, $200 pay gated, online DRM.

I mean, if this applies to single player games or modes, then sure. Otherwise, not even close.
 
So if I'm right about what "enhanced" matchmaking implies, players really will be limited to random ranked/unranked matches until the app arrives.

Seems plausible with Nintendo.

Well, this basically already took place with Splatoon and to a lesser extend Smash 4/Mario Kart 8 in terms of those games missing online features until a long time post-launch. The more things change the more they stay the same lol.
 
This is even worse than always-online DRM lol. Now it's always-with-your-phone, always-charged, somehow using the phone for voice chat while listening to the game, $200 pay gated, online DRM.
Nah, always online DRM is the worst thing by a long shot.

Doesn't make this good though.
 
Haha yikes. Well yes to the former. I think that if Nintendo truly ties any oft-used and fundamental uses of online functionalities to an app which requires a smartphone, those functionalities will be a one-time and perhaps recalibration-type setup which lets you control everything from your Switch so long as your phone is nearby.

I.E. Yes you need a smartphone, but not beyond setup/making sure you have service.

But in this case why should you even need a smartphone in the first place? Just run the one time setup from Switch. You don't need an app for that.
 
Weren't they previously aiming for a holiday 2016 release? Seems weird the non-game software is so behind, given that.

i.e. online service not ready, no netflix/web browser etc.
 
Yeah I'm not sure how to parse that part of the sentence. It either means there's a very basic matchmaking available in the game without the app (which will probably be so limited as to suck), or it's some kind of PR-spin on Nintendo "enhancing" the matchmaking experience by forcing you to use the app.

It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.

But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.

That's how I read it.
 
The whole thing is one half of a great idea.
Be able to do Voice-Chatting, Match-Making and more over a app away from the device, is great. Even fantastic. It simply misses the other half, where you can "switch" to the app on the console and have no need to use your mobile-phone. All Nintendo needs is having this app run on the Switch ...

Overall i would see the actual situation as slightly annoying. It's all manageable and can work great, but soooooo slightly annoying.
 
It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.

But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.

That's how I read it.
That's my take as well.
 
Reggie should be a cricket bowler, he's such a master of spin.

lol seeing how Reggie or NoA have zero input in the design (I believe), I think some of them are as surprised by some of the decisions as us.
 
No.

Youre saying it's logical that someone who's not in a position to own a common, current smartphone would reasonably purchase a completely optional $300 luxury entertainment device. This makes no sense.

Also, yeah, I agree Nintendo's communication sucks here. That this thread even exists is their fault. That Switch presentation had numerous issues.

But, the fact still remains that we have no info. Any decision you make now is premature. Any calls you make are conjecture without solid insight.

No, it's not illogical. There are literally people chatting in this thread with this very issue. I know people with this very issue. Fuck, until recently I would have had this issue. Many gamers have little disposable spending and prioritize that money towards consoles, particularly younger players who make up the majority of Nintendo's target market. Not everyone has a recent iPhone or Android device, a statement especially true among players in the pre-teen and teen brackets, and there is literally no conceivable reason to require one to.

You also continue to ignore the other issues, but whatever. This is getting tiring.

And nah, look on the last page. Nintendo's ran through this multiple times. As I said, it's technically conceivable (if only barely so) that Nintendo is horrifically messing up the messaging here, but no, it is not reasonable to assume that's the case. Nintendo has repeated made it quite clear we actually all have this quite right. In fact, they've done so far more times than I've realized.

See: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=228663734#post228663734
and: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=228663913#post228663913

This isn't conjecture. We don't not have info. This is taking the exact damn words Nintendo has given to us five times now at face value.
 
It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.

But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.

That's how I read it.


Online lobby and voice chat

Our new dedicated smart device app will connect to Nintendo Switch and let you invite friends to play online, set play appointments, and chat with friends during online matches in compatible games&#9472;all from your smart device.

A free, limited version of this app will be available for download in summer 2017.

Ah, there it is.

Random matchmaking in-game.

Lobby and friend invites in-app.

No app? No lobby or friends. Also, waiting til summer.

How much more clairifcation do you guys need?
 
It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.

But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.

That's how I read it.

Yes. This is the most logical interpretation of all this. It also means that all these functionalities will miss until fall.
 
It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.

But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.

That's how I read it.
Yup. That seems like an accurate summary.
 
...if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.

But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app...

It has to be something like this.
 
Some posts I found interesting, from the 'Switch charging time is 3 hours, non-removable battery' thread: one / two

Thraktor's post is very informative. Also, nobody questioned the validity of his posts because they realised the amount of common sense Thraktor was speaking far outweighed any presumptuous opinion the naysayers had already come to.
 
I think this is a good move. Let's keep things separated. Let the Switch be the best gaming device. Why build all that online stuff into the Switch when everybody has a phone. Nintendo proved time and time again that they can't build a solid OS + apps. I'm not going to use it anyway. So lets have that experience on my phone.

It's the same with in-car entertainment. I've a 2015 Renault Clio and they can't figure it out. The console is way too slow. You can only scroll trough your playlist with buttons (3 songs at a time, then wait 3 sec. for the next screen to appear). Navigation is outdated, ugly and has no POI. I always use my phone to navigate, listen to podcasts/music, make phone calls etc.

TL;DR: I think it's smart that Nintendo knows its weak points. And that they don't try to reinvent the wheel.
 
It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.

But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.

That's how I read it.
That does makes the most sense and more sense than my uncharitable reading for sure.

Still sounds dopey as hell. And kind of shocking that those features are going to miss the launch of the device. Guess it's not that big of a deal with a lack of multiplayer titles though.
 
That's my take as well.
What I want to understand is why. They had to put resources into making that smartphone app...why wasn't that just baked into the Switch's OS instead of paying programmers to build a smartphone app?

These decisions are perplexing from many angles.
 
I think this is a good move. Let's keep things separated. Let the Switch be the best gaming device. Why build all that online stuff into the Switch when everybody has a phone. Nintendo proved time and time again that they can't build a solid OS + apps. I'm not going to use it anyway. So lets have that experience on my phone.

It's the same with in-car entertainment. I've a 2015 Renault Clio and they can't figure it out. The console is way too slow. You can only scroll trough your playlist with buttons (3 songs at a time, then wait 3 sec. for the next screen to appear). Navigation is outdated, ugly and has no POI. I always use my phone to navigate, listen to podcasts/music, make phone calls etc.

TL;DR: I think it's smart that Nintendo knows its weak points. And that they don't try to reinvent the wheel.

I'm literally sweating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom