I mean that is his literal job. I wouldn't blame Reggie here, this wasn't his idea or decision. But yeah that bulky headset excuse is still super funny.Reggie should be a cricket bowler, he's such a master of spin.
I mean that is his literal job. I wouldn't blame Reggie here, this wasn't his idea or decision. But yeah that bulky headset excuse is still super funny.Reggie should be a cricket bowler, he's such a master of spin.
Here is what Nintendo has said officially so far:
<snip>
Multiple Nintendo statements and not once did they use the word "optional app" or say things like "in addition to the built-in console functionality." I don't think people are jumping to conclusions here or speculating too much. This is all the information we have (straight from Nintendo themselves) and it sounds bad. You're right though that we don't know every single detail about their online setup just yet, but that's a big problem for a system that's just 43 days away from launch.
No, no, no, no, no we need to wait for Nintendo to send representatives to our homes to do a demonstration before we can know for sure!... Remember, always give corporations the benefit of the doubt!
![]()
There is no chance the smart device is pumping game audio through to your head phones. There is no mechanism in place for that to be a plausible scenario, let alone one with ubiquitous support across smart devices without significant lag and numerous behind the scenes technical hurdles. Not happening.
We already had numbers in this very thread that shows that only 70% of adults in the US have smart phones, and far fewer children do. Even then, if you assume that 100% of potential Switch owners have smart devices though, no, your TV comparison is still bullshit. Many people do still have dated/unsupported iPhone and Android devices. Others still have Windows devices. You're locking entire standard functionality to devices players could conceivably and reasonably not have. Your TV comparison further fails because literally no one interested in home consoles doesn't also have a TV, as it's something that by the entire nature of the product going back to the very first home console is a necessity. Literally the entire concept of a home game console requires a TV. Not only have console players never needed a smart device, there is no conceivable reason to require them.
As for your "wait and see" and "we have no info" remarks, I point you towards my edit:
I really hope the 'free trial' period until fall make them realise how fucked up this is.
People who will actually use it, and not random guys on message boards, should provide negative feedback.
Hope they have a reporting system.
How do you know this? Just the difference in capacity between 6000mah and what is already in the Switch is bigger than a 3DS battery. How much extra would 6000mah cost?
Which ones? Because the GPD ones you mentioned earlier have a clamshell design, so components of the screen, including the touchscren controller can be fitted in the top section, and also appear to be thicker than the Switch. The Switch also needs space for the fans and it has a bigger / more powerful SoC.
GPD Win not only have controls and a keyboard as you said (which then would be moved on sides on the Switch) but also has a fan and a fast mobile SoC (the same as the Surface 3).
What in the flying fuck.
I mean, this would be ridiculous in a free service. But in something they want to charge for? You've got to be kidding.
It appears to me that the "Free Trial" they speak of only refers to the most basic online multiplayer on the Switch itself. Everything else seems to be part of this premium smartphone app which won't be ready until Fall 2017.
Source: http://www.nintendo.com/switch/online-service/
Look at the table.
So does your hot take come with an idea of what the execution involves, or is it one of those which are basically "this probably isn't the negative thing everyone thinks it is, I'm sure Nintendo has a better idea that everyone can't imagine right now, and neither can I"?
I really don't see the connection between having to pay or not to pay and using that app for managing things. It's just the way they would like to handle things and the paywall does not make it worse or better. I mean: the outrage would still be there if all of it, without even having an optional app, would be done on the device.
We still don't know about the pricing, for example, and everyone is assuming that you'll have to pay $60 or so per year for using the subscription features. And even that there will be no improvement at all in comparison to before. There is no way of telling now. Talking about hyperbole.
Talking about defending everything
Yeah I'm not sure how to parse that part of the sentence. It either means there's a very basic matchmaking available in the game without the app (which will probably be so limited as to suck), or it's some kind of PR-spin on Nintendo "enhancing" the matchmaking experience by forcing you to use the app.To be fair, "enhance" matchmaking vs "allow" voice chat does make it seem that a basic matchmaking feature is available outside the app.
I'm guessing random matchmaking in-game, lobbies and friends in-app ONLY.
To be fair, "enhance" matchmaking vs "allow" voice chat does make it seem that a basic matchmaking feature is available outside the app.
I'm guessing random matchmaking in-game, lobbies and friends in-app ONLY.
Clearly you won't need a smart phone to do matchmaking so I don't known what Reggie is talking about here.
Well I use my phone often too. Just, I like it being free when not in use. I have no desire to run a charger to my couch for my phone to do voice chat, or even find a safe place to put it so I don't sit on it if I move. I like to look stuff up on it while playing. Or leave maps up.I use my phone virtually all day, whether I'm at work, home, commuting, or out of the house in general, so to me personally I don't see the "separate app" aspect as a negative unless it's a shitty app.
I understand others don't feel the same and are rightfully skeptical, and this is probably where I'm just gonna duck out of the discussion and "wait and see". If it's bad, I'll be right there reaming Nintendo with the rest of GAF, but if it's good, I'll be the first to ask all the naysayers to eat their hats.
Haha yikes. Well yes to the former. I think that if Nintendo truly ties any oft-used and fundamental uses of online functionalities to an app which requires a smartphone, those functionalities will be a one-time and perhaps recalibration-type setup which lets you control everything from your Switch so long as your phone is nearby.
I.E. Yes you need a smartphone, but not beyond setup/making sure you have service.
So if I'm right about what "enhanced" matchmaking implies, players really will be limited to random ranked/unranked matches until the app arrives.
Seems plausible with Nintendo.
That's what I've parsed from this as well.That sounds like a logical interpretation. It seems that anything friend related will be dealt through the app.
This is even worse than always-online DRM lol. Now it's always-with-your-phone, always-charged, somehow using the phone for voice chat while listening to the game, $200 pay gated, online DRM.
So if I'm right about what "enhanced" matchmaking implies, players really will be limited to random ranked/unranked matches until the app arrives.
Seems plausible with Nintendo.
This thing is half-baked. They've had so long to prepare and still it feels rushed.It appears to me that the "Free Trial" they speak of only refers to the most basic online multiplayer on the Switch itself. Everything else seems to be part of this premium smartphone app which won't be ready until Fall 2017.
Source: http://www.nintendo.com/switch/online-service/
Look at the table.
Nah, always online DRM is the worst thing by a long shot.This is even worse than always-online DRM lol. Now it's always-with-your-phone, always-charged, somehow using the phone for voice chat while listening to the game, $200 pay gated, online DRM.
Haha yikes. Well yes to the former. I think that if Nintendo truly ties any oft-used and fundamental uses of online functionalities to an app which requires a smartphone, those functionalities will be a one-time and perhaps recalibration-type setup which lets you control everything from your Switch so long as your phone is nearby.
I.E. Yes you need a smartphone, but not beyond setup/making sure you have service.
Clearly you won't need a smart phone to do matchmaking so I don't known what Reggie is talking about here.
Yeah I'm not sure how to parse that part of the sentence. It either means there's a very basic matchmaking available in the game without the app (which will probably be so limited as to suck), or it's some kind of PR-spin on Nintendo "enhancing" the matchmaking experience by forcing you to use the app.
That's my take as well.It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.
But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.
That's how I read it.
Reggie should be a cricket bowler, he's such a master of spin.
No.
Youre saying it's logical that someone who's not in a position to own a common, current smartphone would reasonably purchase a completely optional $300 luxury entertainment device. This makes no sense.
Also, yeah, I agree Nintendo's communication sucks here. That this thread even exists is their fault. That Switch presentation had numerous issues.
But, the fact still remains that we have no info. Any decision you make now is premature. Any calls you make are conjecture without solid insight.
It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.
But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.
That's how I read it.
Online lobby and voice chat
Our new dedicated smart device app will connect to Nintendo Switch and let you invite friends to play online, set play appointments, and chat with friends during online matches in compatible games─all from your smart device.
A free, limited version of this app will be available for download in summer 2017.
It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.
But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.
That's how I read it.
Yup. That seems like an accurate summary.It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.
But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.
That's how I read it.
...if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.
But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app...
But the app is Nintendo branded still what it means "child got molested while playing Nintendo in his phone" for the general public.2. It kind of moves responsibility of children having access to internet chat away from the switch and on to the phone.
That does makes the most sense and more sense than my uncharitable reading for sure.It's not that hard to parse from my perspective. What I read it as is - if you boot up a game and go into "Online" and "Find Match", as long as you are subscribed, you're all good.
But if you want to create parties via your friend list, join games as a group, have group voice/text chat, etc, you will need the smartphone app.
That's how I read it.
What I want to understand is why. They had to put resources into making that smartphone app...why wasn't that just baked into the Switch's OS instead of paying programmers to build a smartphone app?That's my take as well.
I think this is a good move. Let's keep things separated. Let the Switch be the best gaming device. Why build all that online stuff into the Switch when everybody has a phone. Nintendo proved time and time again that they can't build a solid OS + apps. I'm not going to use it anyway. So lets have that experience on my phone.
It's the same with in-car entertainment. I've a 2015 Renault Clio and they can't figure it out. The console is way too slow. You can only scroll trough your playlist with buttons (3 songs at a time, then wait 3 sec. for the next screen to appear). Navigation is outdated, ugly and has no POI. I always use my phone to navigate, listen to podcasts/music, make phone calls etc.
TL;DR: I think it's smart that Nintendo knows its weak points. And that they don't try to reinvent the wheel.