• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Milo Yiannopoulous resigns from Breitbart over pedophilia comments

Status
Not open for further replies.

76DRWxK.gif
 
Without mincing words -- I find it disgusting that you think attempting to do the bare minimum to help minorities is putting it at the "center".

And even more disgusting to call it a dead end. You would trample over out bodies to win elections.

The white working class chose Donald Trump. They're going to have 'their way' for four years. I can't stand people who argue that the solution to that, is to do more to appeal to white people.

'Hey, they elected a white supremacist, so we've got to cater to them now.'

Like... what the hell?
 
giphy.gif


Anyone with half a brain can tell he's just trying to back peddle, and failing miserably. At least something good came from that horrible appearance on Real Time.
 
the fact that you ignored my repeated and emphasized unhappiness with the choice to a) do the interview at all and b) how it went, shows that you are blinded by the shine off the axe you are grinding.
You came into this thread wanting to give Maher some (undeserved) credit for Milo's recent downfall when his interview had nothing to do with it. Yeah, I saw that you said you didn't want him to do the interview at all and were unhappy with how he handled some of it - yet you still concluded that, despite these disappointments, Maher's interview had still successfully cultivated an environment where it was ok to criticize Milo (as if that had never happened before) and had helped lead to his recent professional problems (which, for the nth time, had everything to do with his pro-pedophilia videos and nothing to do with his appearance on Real Time).

So what am I misrepresenting here?
 
Not everyone that watches is a fan, as seen by this thread lol. Anyway Milo sure as hell went up in hits after Maher's show, love that if there's no correlation at least there's convenient and karmic coincidence

It's 100% coincidence.

Berkley may have caused two major platforms to be offered to Milo

Real Time and CPAC

Despite so many of us lefties begging Maher to not give him a platform Maher ignored us and did it anyway. Then Maher and his staff did zero research, conducted an unprepared onterview which appeased, and even found common ground with Milo and resulted in Maher calling his anti-trans bigotry reasonable and a NYT headline of Bill and Milo Find Common Ground

In response to CPAC giving him a platform some Reaganites did some research, found a good line of attack and voila here we are

Liberal hero Bill Maher got clowned by Reaganites
 
The white working class chose Donald Trump. They're going to have 'their way' for four years. I can't stand people who argue that the solution to that, is to do more to appeal to white people.

'Hey, they elected a white supremacist, so we've got to cater to them now.'

Like... what the hell?

Or, you know, maybe "America is already great" doesn't really play well when half your town is unemployed and addicted to opiates.
 
Not everyone that watches is a fan, as seen by this thread lol. Anyway Milo sure as hell went up in hits after Maher's show, love that if there's no correlation at least there's convenient and karmic coincidence

He also got invited to CPAC at the same time. Did it ever occur to you that maybe the invitation is what sparked the conservatives that took him down to move?
 
I had a feeling people were going to latch on to that term. Calling people out for saying or doing bigoted things is good, but making it the center of left-wing discourse has proven to be a political dead end, as far as I can see. As I said, I'm worried about future elections for Democrats.
How is it the center of "left-wing" discourse and how is it a dead end?
Sounds like you think there should be no focus on minority issues.
 
Thanks Bill Marr

Fuck Breitbart and go away, Milo.
 
the fact that you ignored my repeated and emphasized unhappiness with the choice to a) do the interview at all and b) how it went, shows that you are blinded by the shine off the axe you are grinding.

I'll just point out that this is an axe worth grinding. Grind it to the god damned hilt and then start the next axe on the grindstone when the first one breaks. Never let off these assholes for even a second.
 
Maher's an entertainer who knew he'd get ratings just by having Milo on no matter what he did, so he got two guys he knew would actually challenge Milo while Maher himself rubbed Milo's back.

CPAC is in this for power and the money that comes with it. They understand that the Trump/Milo brand of outlandish idiocy is not sustainable but were willing to use him as long as possible. To that end they combed his past to make sure that aside from the racism, sexism and transphobia there was nothing they actually opposed. They found the pedophilia advocacy and acted swiftly as they did not want that stink on themselves.
 
there's something to the theory that these people gain influence by heckling whoever is in the spotlight, being the underdog, etc. and once the spotlight shifts, they have no way to play their game anymore. was that maher's intention? 100% no, but it happened.
 
You think Bill Maher calling Milo a "fag" in some idiotic attempt at humour or shock is confronting his hateful bullshit peddling?

Good grief.

Bill Maher being a doormat for Milo had nothing to do with CPAC. The latter doesn't take its cues from liberal icon Bill Maher.
 
You came into this thread wanting to give Maher some (undeserved) credit for Milo's recent downfall when his interview had nothing to do with it. Yeah, I saw that you said you didn't want him to do the interview at all and were unhappy with how he handled some of it - yet you still concluded that, despite these disappointments, Maher's interview had still successfully cultivated an environment where it was ok to criticize Milo (as if that had never happened before) and had helped lead to his recent professional problems (which, for the nth time, had everything to do with his pro-pedophilia videos and nothing to do with his appearance on Real Time).

So what am I misrepresenting here?

the part where you said:

Blader said:
The fact that your defense of Maher's interview boils down to "impish British fag" and "I disagree with you on several points" is proof of how weak the interview was. Maher's show did not do anything to create an environment of criticizing Milo.
... which just isn't true.

As usual, there is massive hair-splitting happening in a politically charged thread. We are largely in agreement with the following points, it seems to me:

- Milo is a hateful troll
- Milo ought not have been interviewed
- Milo's interview by Bill Maher was largely weak, if not completely

... with me so far?

The part where we disagree:

- the appearance of Milo on Real Time did zero damage to Milo's reputation

...and I simply disagree. You guys are in such a lather to make sure Maher receives "NO CREDIT" for this, I feel like you're sort of tilting at windmills here.

It doesn't matter in the end. This joker's cooked. So I'll leave it here. Wish he had never been on. I just didn't think it was quite the lower-sack-massage that some others did. *shrug*
 
I find ot funny that everyone is thanking Bill Maher but no one is thanking the Berkeley protestors.

I'm not going to thank people who pepper sprayed innocents and set fire to a building when I'm 100% a supporter of peaceful protest.

Sure, you can draw the line, but I'm not going to signal boost the antifas types that turned a peaceful protest into something else.
 
Don't worry, Milo already has a new gig lined up. He'll be writing for Brietbart's sister publication:

vIhg6Qg.jpg
 
I'm not going to thank people who pepper sprayed innocents and set fire to a building when I'm 100% a supporter of peaceful protest.

Sure, you can draw the line, but I'm not going to signal boost the antifas types that turned a peaceful protest into something else.

I said the protestors... There were you know what 1500 of them?

The rioters were a third party
 
Left gaf is scary to me too, but Sam Harris with his 'Islam is a mother load of bad ideas' line of attack is anything but level-headed. I saw his interview with Bill Maher after the inauguration about the muslim ban and they were both like oh we need moderate and liberal muslims more than ever now! It was hilarious how clueless these guys are, because they turned away moderates and liberals like me with their stupid and careless attacking of an entire religion.

Both Bill and Sam use inflammatory rhetoric whenever it comes to Islam and give credence to bigots on the right who look at these guys and go 'See even Liberals agree with us!'

I honestly saw nothing unreasonable about Sam's arguments about Islam. It's not racist to criticize bad ideas, and Islam is full of them.
 
I said the protestors... There were you know what 1500 of them?

The rioters were a third party

Right. The antifas. Who I specifically mentioned.

The only reason that protest got coverage is because of the antifas. If it hadn't turned sour, you'd barely have heard mention of it, remembering that there were peaceful protests going on all across the country against the travel ban at that same time.
 
Then you'd like him to do better, right

Who to do better in sense of what?

Did you love how he gave Yiannopoulous' balls a tongue bath on the show?
He didn't push back against any of that shithead's bullshit.

I didn't like him a lot during last weeks show, but that doesn't kill my love for Maher and his show during all the other hundred times Ive loved him and the show.

I even agreed with Milo on the "Liberals bait" thing. It's not even a new thought for me.
 
The part where we disagree:

- the appearance of Milo on Real Time did zero damage to Milo's reputation

...and I simply disagree. You guys are in such a lather to make sure Maher receives "NO CREDIT" for this, I feel like you're sort of tilting at windmills here.

It doesn't matter in the end. This joker's cooked. So I'll leave it here. Wish he had never been on. I just didn't think it was quite the lower-sack-massage that some others did. *shrug*

But it literally didn't. If anything Maher's reputation got damaged out of it. Literally the headlines coming out of that were about those two finding common ground

The pedophile shit is the only reason Milo is fucked right now and that wasn't from Bill Maher

And the argument does matter because what happens when the next rock star bigot comes along?
 
You guys gotta admit Bill Maher is pretty great if you like your opinions and musings to never exceed that of a 9th grader who thinks he knows fucking everything.
 
But it literally didn't. If anything Maher's reputation got damaged out of it. Literally the headlines coming out of that were about those two finding common ground

The pedophile shit is the only reason Milo is fucked right now and that wasn't from Bill Maher

And the argument does matter because what happens when the next rock star bigot comes along?

Bingo

Bill Maher and Milo Yiannopoulos Find Common Ground - NYT

The guest panel did all the work on shutting down Milo. Maher did shit all and even looked sympathetic to Milo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom