• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

What is a possible Microsoft answer to Horizon Zero Dawn and Breath of the Wild?

Crackdown has masses of potential based mostly off the fact that we haven't seen much of it it and they seem to have been given a reasonably long development time. I'm not sure what the teams experience is though I loved c1 but it was a long time ago and the lead guy made apb after and that was a bit of a turd to say the least. I hope they can deliver something special again.
 
I still dream that MS will deliver an actually awesome full scale RPG Fable revival one day. But they have no studios to do it at this point. Turn 10 are Forza. 343 is Halo. Coalition is Gears. Rare is on Sea of Thieves.

It fucking sucks what MS did to the Fable brand and I'm not sure that's something I'll ever get over after loving the first 2 games.
 
I would love nothing more for Microsoft to ask themselves this very question. The Xbox One very badly needs some original IPs and some new ideas. I was really excited when all the rumors were brewing about Black Tusk studios creating a new IP for them. I was on the brink of buying an Xbox until Gears of War happened. They play it too safe, but I guess they seem content with where they're at.

So I'm sure they'll just make another Halo and another Gears of War, and I'll keep not buying an Xbox One. It's too bad. I hope I'm wrong.
 
Ori has more fun per inch than either of those games.

sorry I couldn't help myself. No joke though, ori is great.
 
Scalebound and Cuphead are the only games that interest me from Microsoft. I also like the Forza Horizon games. Also, I don't know who thought Beats by Dre was a good idea for that character in a world where you have a dragon as a pet. Who greenlit that?
 
The best shot I think would be seriously giving a Lost Odyssey successor a chance.

Followed by a either a Fable IV, Open World Halo, or a much more expansive Phantom Dust reboot, in order of possibility.
 
There doesn't need to be a direct answer but there does need to be a decent quality stream of games to a platform...

Isn't it sad when people keep asking "Xbox should have more diversity of games", but when Halo Wars 2, an RTS game(which is very rare on console) released recently, it keep getting ignored, and even pictures like #57 and #86 exist.
 
If they even could get started on an "answer" right now, it would be 3 years before their answer came out. Seeing as we no longer live in the age of sail, a 3 year reply on correspondence is no longer acceptable.

I'd kill for some new Fable though.
 
Isn't it sad when people keep asking "Xbox should have more diversity of games", but when Halo Wars 2, an RTS game(which is very rare on console) released recently, it keep getting ignored, and even pictures like #57 and #86 exist.
Because, quite frankly, RTS doesn't excite console players. It's just not something those platforms are known for. Nintendo has a similar issue with Pikmin (which isn't exactly RTS, but it kind of is).

That's like asking PC gamers to get excited over a fighting game. Yes, some will, but it will likely not draw players to the platform.
 
If they even could get started on an "answer" right now, it would be 3 years before their answer came out. Seeing as we no longer live in the age of sail, a 3 year reply on correspondence is no longer acceptable.

I'd kill for some new Fable though.

I'm not sure if I want to a new fable unless they can find a team to make that game what it always deserved to be. I've never forgiven Peter M. I remember reading about all the possibilities in regards to making decisions and watching them live on through the world. What we got was so terribly disappointing.

This question is silly. Halo alone counters both of those despite its decrease in sales. Let alone what sea of the Ives and Scaleby under do.

Does anybody asking these odd questions think about how much ms first party actually sells?

People probably just don't consider halo all that relevant in the same way anymore. When talking about bold new games, I certainly wouldn't think of halo.
 
This question is silly. Halo alone counters both of those despite its decrease in sales. Let alone what sea of the Ives and Scaleby under do.

Does anybody asking these odd questions think about how much ms first party actually sells?
 
If they even could get started on an "answer" right now, it would be 3 years before their answer came out. Seeing as we no longer live in the age of sail, a 3 year reply on correspondence is no longer acceptable.

I'd kill for some new Fable though.
Just because they havent announced any new games doesnt mean they haven't been working on any.
 
Did people think Scalebound looked that good.
For multiple publishers Kamiya had a perfect track record of games that successfully try out new stuff. Microsoft could have had a piece of that as well hadn't they cut it short there.
Resident Evil 2 (1998)
Devil May Cry (2001)
Viewtiful Joe (2003)
Ōkami (2006)
Bayonetta (2009)
The Wonderful 101 (2013)
Scalebound (Cancelled)
 
I still dream that MS will deliver an actually awesome full scale RPG Fable revival one day. But they have no studios to do it at this point. Turn 10 are Forza. 343 is Halo. Coalition is Gears. Rare is on Sea of Thieves.

It fucking sucks what MS did to the Fable brand and I'm not sure that's something I'll ever get over after loving the first 2 games.

You mean what lionhead did?
 

I don't remember the article but the writer said that the game shown at press conferences, which he heavily implied the second reveal, and the game shown behind closed doors were almost two different games.


Edit: Found it. It's not explicitly stated but you can make a pretty rational deduction as to what was happening. Especially considering Kamiya's frustrations with MS during the dev cycle.
 
Sunset Overdrive 2

please

Man, every single time I see an enemy spawn out of the ground in BotW, I think about Sunset Overdrive and how believably it spawned enemies into the game world. So awesome. I really hope we get a sequel at some point.
 
Nothing? Forza, Halo, Gears, Sea of Thieves, Crackdown 3, State of Decay 2, Killer Instinct, and Minecraft all have online MP focuses. The last time they showed off Scalebound it was 4-player co-op. I just don't see how games like Horizon ZD and Zelda fit their obvious focus on building online communities with games as a service.

My guess is the next new IP they show off will also be MP focused and maybe have SP content. They'll partner with indies and small to medium devs for unique SP-built experiences like Cuphead, Ashen, Below, and Ori and the Blind Forest.

For multiple publishers Kamiya had a perfect track record of games that successfully try out new stuff. Microsoft could have had a piece of that as well hadn't they cut it short there.
Resident Evil 2 (1998)
Devil May Cry (2001)
Viewtiful Joe (2003)
Ōkami (2006)
Bayonetta (2009)
The Wonderful 101 (2013)
Scalebound (Cancelled)

Unfortunately the commercial success of most of those games doesn't measure up to their critical acclaim.
 
This question is silly. Halo alone counters both of those despite its decrease in sales. Let alone what sea of the Ives and Scaleby under do.

Does anybody asking these odd questions think about how much ms first party actually sells?

Halo is FPS built around competitive play. I think question was referring to a game in similar genre. And neither Zelda nor Horizon are either companies biggest games so Halo would be competing against Uncharted/TLOU or Mario Kart/Pokemon/Smash under your terms of pure sales and it would still lose as of recent.
 
This question is silly. Halo alone counters both of those despite its decrease in sales. Let alone what sea of the Ives and Scaleby under do.

Does anybody asking these odd questions think about how much ms first party actually sells?

Did you?

The last figure we have for Halo 5 was "5 million". Assuming that's sold-through, I would say Zelda is a lock to exceed that mark (it's Zelda and critically acclaimed), and Horizon has a good chance to do so as well (it sold 2.6 million in its first two weeks). Do you disagree? As for SoT and Scalebound, I'm not sure what you were trying to say there.
 
When clicking the thread I already knew this was gonna be #Scalebound: The Thread




Cuz MS kept butting into the development and making them do stupid shit like adding 4 player coop.

Come on bro, game looked like trash before they showed the 4 player co-op. For all the praise Platinum gets they shit the bed pretty hard with this.

Game also ran like trash if it (probably) couldn't run on Scorpio target specs because this could have been a showcase game for them. Things must have been really fucking bad for this to be canceled this late.
 
Ori has more fun per inch than either of those games.

sorry I couldn't help myself. No joke though, ori is great.
Haha, I see what you did there. I think your statement is still true though. :p
When clicking the thread I already knew this was gonna be #Scalebound: The Thread
Cuz MS kept butting into the development and making them do stupid shit like adding 4 player coop.

What? A: no one knows if that's true or not, and B: how is adding coop a bad thing? The main reason I was hyped was cuz me and my buddies were gonna ride around on our customized dragons together. Had the game been strictly single player, I wouldn't have been as hyped for it. Yeah, I still would've wanted it, but I don't see how adding Multiplayer is a bad thing at all.

OT here: Crackdown 3, State of Decay 2, and Sea of Thieves are gonna be some amazing open-world experiences. I think those will be pretty good answers in my book. Plus I'll get to enjoy them all with friends, which makes it even better. :D
 
Because, quite frankly, RTS doesn't excite console players. It's just not something those platforms are known for. Nintendo has a similar issue with Pikmin (which isn't exactly RTS, but it kind of is).

It doesn't matter about excite them or not, it's people treat it doesn't exist when at the same time they're asking diversity lol.
 
Top Bottom