Clinton: 'I was on the way to winning' until Comey, Russia intervened

Yeah, and nothing will change the fact that she lost to Donald Fucking Trump, on what should've been the easiest win in decades, and that man is now the President of the United States, doing stupid shit every single day and wasting taxpayers money in Mar-a-lago.

Sounds like your outrage should be directed at the people who voted for Trump and all of the other factors that contributed to Hillary's loss instead of just Hillary then huh
 
The data said no such thing. Even at 99% chance to win there's still a chance to lose, especially since the data was a snapshot before the final choice.

The odds were incredibly in her favor. Maybe it was my fault for skipping home after work buying a bottle of wine and getting ready to call my trump supprting relatives to bask in there tears * hyperbole.

But I'm sure at the very least that anyone here would have not given trump a gnats dick length of a chance of winning the thing.
 
There were probably a lot of factors which, if played out slightly differently, would have resulted in Clinton winning. Some of them were outside her control (Comey, Russia). Some were inside her control (messaging, campaign team). By addressing the latter, some of the former might have been insufficient to derail her, so in that sense she bears full responsibility.

No by your own explanation, she does NOT bear FULL responsibility. Only partial responsibility.

And even if she DID barely win, it wouldn't have mattered because there would have still been a GOP senate and house.
 
I mean the reality is I'm sure part of the reason some are downplaying Russia/Wikileaks is because they're the same people using those sources as proof that the DNC rigged the primary against Sanders...

And god knows the Young Turks prayed the FBI would indict her so that Bernie could takeover after he officially lost the primay.
 
The ol' Han Solo defense, my kids would use it all the time until they were 12 or 13 too

r2Q7PSW.gif

Hopefully your kids don't take too much after you. Especially if they want good reading comprehension skills.
 
A poll recently came out in which Obama turned Trump voters actually said that they felt Trump better supported their economic interests. There was a big gap. It's important to remember that many of the rustbelt voters that won Trump the election had previously supported Obama. The poll was on Reddit the other day, I'll look for it.

The point is that the DNC is pointing fingers at a lot of excuses for Hilary's failure (racism, sexism, Russia) and these may all be contributing, to varying degrees that are essentially impossible to measure. But there's little attention given to the failure by the Obama administration (and the Democrat's more generally) to represent the interests of poor and middle class rural voters.
 
I mean life is a gift, so if I told them, at least you have your life, and your still here. Yeah that is the argument Id make. I really don't see anything wrong with that.
There isn't. But people nowadays like complaining, feeling sorry for themselves and surround themselves with selfish ideals and motives.
I was fucking homeless as a kid. I didn't complain and whine and tell everyone a sob story, I picked myself up and worked hard. I treasure every belonging I have.
I'm glad you try to be positive, keep at it.
 
Fundamentally, to win in 2020, at least some people who voted for Trump need to vote for the 2020 Democratic nominee for that Democratic nominee to win.

Not really? Unlikely voters skew Democratic.

If you imply that everyone who voted for Trump was hoodwinked by Russia, well, that's not likely to win hearts and minds.

I don't think it's a correct strategy to orient your messaging entirely around what people who voted for Trump want to hear from the Democratic Party. It's bad for the Democratic base, who run the party via volunteering and donations, and it normalizes toxic ideas by making them bipartisan.

Dems should just focus on saying whatever their base wants to hear and assume the people who voted for Trump will just decide to vote Democratic next time because they don't like Nazis and/or want better services.

But Hillary should take a break either way.
 
I mean the reality is I'm sure part of the reason some are downplaying Russia/Wikileaks is because they're the same people using those sources as proof that the DNC rigged the primary against Sanders...

And god knows the Young Turks prayed the FBI would indict her so that Bernie could takeover after he officially lost the primay.
If only the FBI had leaked both of the other investigations too...
 
I mean the reality is I'm sure part of the reason some are downplaying Russia/Wikileaks is because they're the same people using those sources as proof that the DNC rigged the primary against Sanders...

And god knows the Young Turks prayed the FBI would indict her so that Bernie could takeover after he officially lost the primay.

If there's one thing that helps inspire voter confidence it's having the previous candidate of the same party get arrested.

/s
 
Yeah, and nothing will change the fact that she lost to Donald Fucking Trump, on what should've been the easiest win in decades, and that man is now the President of the United States, doing stupid shit every single day and wasting taxpayers money in Mar-a-lago.

It wasn't an easy win for the eleven other Republican candidates, why would it be easy for Clinton? Hell I didn't think America could be so fucking stupid, but here we are.
 
The "actual progressive" got blown out pretty hard by the most progressive voters in the American electorate.

Yes but he still managed to get 43% of the popular vote and most likely would have won if there were more states that allowed independents to vote in primaries. Independent votes would have ment more in the general election as well.
 
Yeah, and nothing will change the fact that she lost to Donald Fucking Trump, on what should've been the easiest win in decades, and that man is now the President of the United States, doing stupid shit every single day and wasting taxpayers money in Mar-a-lago.

i would've hoped that people would actually learn something from the fact that Donald Trump is now the POTUS

instead, they still want to dismiss him and talk about how easily he should've been beaten
 
Are we really going to pretend that 'but her emails' wasn't a legit and very damaging talking point?

BREAKING NEWS: Hillary's emails for the 200th day.

Asshole pundit: "Also did you guys know that she's super dishonest? She's the most dishonest candidate in history."

Person watching the news: "Wow she's that dishonest? I need to tell everyone how dishonest she is."

Asshole pundit: "For some reason people in the polls keep saying how dishonest she is, they just don't trust her."

And people who still bring up the primaries blame Hillary or the DNC for crushing Bernie instead of Bernie taking responsibility for losing. Even though Bernie himself admitted he lost fair and square and to vote for Hillary.

Well I'm not surprised that's something people latched on to, especially when they can't take a good long look in the mirror and admit that they got played by falling for the narrative that Wikileaks and the Russians wanted them to believe.

To be fair, I have been seeing less of the DNC robbed Bernie garbage but I wouldn't be surprised if a year from now the people that still believe it, have turned it into some giant myth where the DNC was so powerful that they paid off the 3 million voters that wanted Hillary instead.

Are you saying she didn't campaign in Pennsylvania?

650x366


In case people forgot, which apparently some already have.
 
So explain this to me. She takes responsibility for the mistakes she and her campaign made. She points out, correctly, that she was going to win despite those mistakes but then outside factors caused her to lose.

Where is the not taking responsibility part? Where is the effort to overlook mistakes?

Why the fuck do her comments mean the party isn't addressing its shortcomings?

Your argument sucks and you should make a better one.

She is not taking "some" responsibility. She said, and i quote, i take absolute personal responsibility. Again, she is being vague about what she did wrong and putting emphasiso the russia part so obviously she ain't admitting anything precise

I will ne3d to wait to see some change in the democratic party to decide whether the party has course changed

Basically, i need to see the receipts about change, ablut clinton admitting the specific problems of her campaign, about the party changing in response to this gigantic defeat

All i see is whining about thibgs out of her control and not even personal change
 
Of course the FBI played a part in her losing but I think she still would have lost had Comey never come out and said anything, and I don't really think it's controversial to say that.

There are so many people within the Democratic Party that could have wiped the floor with Trump. Had Biden ran he would have fucking annihilated the Donald. We should all be hoping Diamond Joe runs in 2020, he probably has the best chance at taking the incumbent Drumpf down.
 
It wasn't an easy win for the eleven other Republican candidates, why would it be easy for Clinton? Hell I didn't think America could be so fucking stupid, but here we are.

You're going to try and tell me that the - even though now we know they were wrong - polls didn't predict Hillary winning? And I'm not saying one or two, basically all of them had her winning.
 
It wasn't an easy win for the eleven other Republican candidates, why would it be easy for Clinton? Hell I didn't think America could be so fucking stupid, but here we are.

come on, it should have been so easy, everyone thought it would be easy. but instead a goddamn orange clown is destabilizing the world right now.
 
You're going to try and tell me that the - even though now we know they were wrong - polls didn't predict Hillary winning? And I'm not saying one or two, basically all of them had her winning.

national polls had her winning by about the same amount that she won nationally.

state polls are a different story, but are significantly less reliable especially if the states aren't polled frequently.
 
Despite breaking no laws?

This is a thing people love to just assert. "Oh if it were the little guy it'd be all over, believe me!" Well, I don't.

It's also the case that there is a substantive difference between some office worker and the Secretary of State. Guess which position previously used separate emails? Guess which position doesn't sit at one desk for 8 hours?
Well it's true. Sorry to tell you. What Clinton did, whether you choose to accept the truth or not, was illegal. The sad fact is I'd still rather have her than trump.
 
Not really? Unlikely voters skew Democratic

Right, but unlikely voters are... unlikely to vote, so trying to rely on them as a path to electoral victory has some pretty serious flaws.

I don't think it's a correct strategy to orient your messaging entirely around what people who voted for Trump want to hear from the Democratic Party. It's bad for the Democratic base, who run the party via volunteering and donations, and it normalizes toxic ideas by making them bipartisan.

I think this is misunderstanding. I'm not saying that Democrats tell them what they want to hear. I'm saying that Democrats need to try and persuade them of what the Democrats believe.

Dems should just focus on saying whatever their base wants to hear and assume the people who voted for Trump will just decide to vote Democratic next time because they don't like Nazis and/or want better services.

But this loses elections, because the current Democratic base (that is: people who voted Democrat) didn't add up to 270 electoral votes.
 
She is not taking "some" responsibility. She said, and i quote, i take absolute personal responsibility. Again, she is being vague about what she did wrong and putting emphasiso the russia part so obviously she ain't admitting anything precise

I will ne3d to wait to see some change in the democratic party to decide whether the party has course changed

Basically, i need to see the receipts about change, ablut clinton admitting the specific problems of her campaign, about the party changing in response to this gigantic defeat

All i see is whining about thibgs out of her control and not even personal change

What you're doing is barreling ahead with your preconceived narrative and dismissing what's being said to avoid questioning it. Your reasoning is illogical only because it has to be to perpetuate your dogma.
 
come on, it should have been so easy, everyone thought it would be easy. but instead a goddamn orange clown is destabilizing the world right now.

It should have been yeah but the world isn't perfect and the US has a lot of shitters in it. I mean, W got re-elected just a little over a decade prior.
 
If that's the case then why are so many liberals hellbent on "winning them back"

exactly, it's a terrible strategy

you have to get voters enthused. there were plenty of democrats who stayed home this election, people who were excited about Obama but bored or disinterested in Hillary. you need to reach them, and fear tactics and a host of negative campaign ads didn't work to get them in gear.
 
She is correct and poll numbers back that up. That said, that she was that close at all is another problem and she is a politician, so that's one of the things that you have to deal with.

Republicans could've ran a used condom and still pulled within 5 percentage points. There's just a certain amount of the country that will pull R regardless.

That all being said, Clinton made several tactical unforced errors in her campaign.
 
Yeah, and nothing will change the fact that she lost to Donald Fucking Trump, on what should've been the easiest win in decades, and that man is now the President of the United States, doing stupid shit every single day and wasting taxpayers money in Mar-a-lago.

Yeah, you should be asking what the fuck is wrong with almost 63 million Americans, now shouldn't you?
 
No by your own explanation, she does NOT bear FULL responsibility. Only partial responsibility.

And even if she DID barely win, it wouldn't have mattered because there would have still been a GOP senate and house.

Yes it would have mattered. After 8 years of squeezing water from stone and incremental progressive initiatives and change Obama's entire legacy is being wiped out by Trump.
 

Long term it absolutely wouldn't have mattered for a few reasons:

1) The GOP senate would have continued to block SCOTUS appointments

2) She wouldn't get any legislation passed

3) She would have only lasted one term

4) It would have been followed up by Dems getting completely slaughtered in 2018

Yes it would have mattered. After 8 years of squeezing water from stone and incremental progressive initiatives and change Obama's entire legacy is being wiped out by Trump.

And if Hillary had won, that shit would have happened again in four years after Hillary would inevitably lose reelection. The GOP would use their control of both houses of congress to literally eep Hillary from being able to do anything.
 
didn't take long for an HRC thread get hijacked by Busters



she is partially right but she should have listened more to her husband Bill instead of freakin' Mook.

Bubba was right all along
 
You're going to try and tell me that the - even though now we know they were wrong - polls didn't predict Hillary winning? And I'm not saying one or two, basically all of them had her winning.

come on, it should have been so easy, everyone thought it would be easy. but instead a goddamn orange clown is destabilizing the world right now.

We all thought it would be easy, but the fucker steam rolled his opponents to get the nomination, that is what I am talking about.
 
No by your own explanation, she does NOT bear FULL responsibility. Only partial responsibility.

And even if she DID barely win, it wouldn't have mattered because there would have still been a GOP senate and house.

Fuck THIS. It most certainly would have mattered.
 
Top Bottom