Oh and also after raping and murdering her sister with her husband, she rubbed a rose on Bernardo's dick to leave at her sister's grave. Then she dressed in her dead sister's clothes and had sex with Bernardo on her sister's bed and they filmed it.
There's a defense force for this woman.
Partly offtopic, but i would really like one day to know what exacyl leads to the development of such personalities.
I believe those who have the potential to be rehabilitated SHOULD be allowed that chance, but I also believe that there are some people who are beyond saving, damaged goods that will NEVER fit into normal society without leaving a path of victims in their wake.i believe in rehabilitation.
like that dude who was released early and turned his life around.
this... no... i don't believe in her.
People have said she wasn't really rehabilitated, which doesn't mean anything to me because it's someone just saying something. People have said that she took advantage of the system to get out, which is significantly more relevant, and I in no way ignored ur - I don't know what I'm supposed to say after that? I don't think she's a good person, I don't even think I'd want to keep my kids in the same city as her. I'm sincerely trying to think about this from every perspective, I'm actually interested in links that go over psychiatrists opinion on her.That you're not trying to have a conversation in earnest and you're disguising that by emphasizing how polite you're supposedly being over the actual content of your argument.
People have explained to you that she clearly wasn't rehabilitated, and you've ignored it several times now. If you're really that open to new information, be proactive enough to look up a stinking Wikipedia page.
She should been charged with perjury after they found out she lied under oath and threw a max sentence at her.
i believe in rehabilitation.
like that dude who was released early and turned his life around.
this... no... i don't believe in her.
Here's the challenge with that? What's the criteria for that cutoff? Legally or ethically? Where's the link for you vs where do you think the line should be legally?I believe those who have the potential to be rehabilitated SHOULD be allowed that chance, but I also believe that there are some people who are beyond saving, damaged goods that will NEVER fit into normal society without leaving a path of victims in their wake.
IAdd in so good ol' fashion sexism because no one could fathom such a pretty young girl like Homolka could be the monster she actually was and here we are today.
She selected her own sister to be raped and murdered. Then raped a teenage girl with her husband, tortured her, filmed her husband piss and shit on her before cutting her into pieces. Then did that all over again.
Paul Bernardo himself said she was worse than him. She got away with it because they found the snuff shit they filmed themselves doing AFTER she lied to investigators that she was just an unwilling victim. Psychologists here have said over and over and that's she's a brutal psychopath that's a threat to everyone, but because of the deal they gave her before they knew she was a killer herself, nothing could be done.
If you think Homolka is rehabilitated, you are a fool that's being played just like these investigators were.
So she said she was a victim and they believed her? So fucking stupid.
Jesus fuck at the person in this thread defending a woman that raped, tortured and killed kids, do you write fan mail to the Manson family by any chance?
Kinitari is usually a decent poster, but s/he missed a crucial step:Jesus fuck at the idiot in this thread defending a woman that raped, tortured and killed kids, do you write fan mail to the Manson family by any chance?
Ok I did not know who this is or what she did but after some research I got pretty sick to my stomach and that does not happen often to me....
She had a girlfriend inside prison who she manipulated into basically serving her like a goddess and helping her acquire amenities inside prison. She also had sex with guards for perks.Over here in Quebec when she was about to be released, there was a lot of TV stuff about her time in prison, and it was pretty awful shit. She was a monster inside and out of jail.
She had a girlfriend inside prison who she manipulated into basically serving her like a goddess and helping her acquire amenities inside prison. She also had sex with guards for perks.
Her prison psychiatrists almost all said that she's a high probability repeat offender.
I mean, what's the position you think I hold here?Kinitari is usually a decent poster, but s/he missed a crucial step:
That human sack of filth should be rotting in jail. People like them don't deserve a second chance.
How do you know if any adult is trustworthy?
I don't even know what is happening right now. My position on this isn't at all decided, I'm actually trying to have a discussion about this, I'm open to reading and learning, someone says something that's interesting to me and I say 'can you share some links', and multiple people are telling that is reflective of some sort of pattern? What does a sea lion have to do with anything? What the fuck are people even implying about me right now?
How do you know if any adult is trustworthy?
I guess it being a private school circumvents any background screening laws?
Violent felon, even former ones, are usually prohibited from working with children in most professional capacities.
What the fuck is this defence force?
I agree, I would normally disagree, people deserve second chances.
BUT
Not serial killers. There is currently no evidence that they can be rehabilitated, and that Elementary School is fucking moronic to have her anywhere near the school considering her victims were kids. It's the absolute opposite of what should happen, since it would adversely effect any possible management of the Psychopathy.
I swear a few days ago, there was someone who said "If you can think of it, there's a defense force for it". And my first thought was "Not for serial child killers lol"
And here we are
Considering the first thing she did after she got out was shack up with another murderer.So then Karla presents an interesting case. I imagine you think, had the legal system succeeded with her, she should be in jail forever. But she's out, and she's in public - what do you think should be done about her? How do you think this situation should play out instead?
I thought she was forbidden to be around children...
"Have no job or volunteer position with people under the age of 16."
It would not surprise me if the government or the police actually steps in now there's this media hoopla and asks the school to enforce this.
Considering the first thing she did after she got out was shack up with another murderer.
Nothing good.
Every person involved with the decision to let this person in a school should be fired.
She gave up her own sister to be raped and killed by Bernardo, she should have been executed, put a bullet in her, dump her ashes in the trash and be done with it.That human sack of filth should be rotting in jail. People like them don't deserve a second chance.
" Homolka scored 5/40 on the Psychopathy Checklist, in contrast to Bernardo's 35/40." It clearly shows that those tests can be perfected.
If she is not psychopath what is she, sociopath? I am not good at making differences between the two pathologies, despite reading and searching on google.
She was also such a high re offense risk that her parole board unilaterally denied her early release even though she didn't file for it so as to make sure it was known that she was, and remains, a monster who would kill again if afforded the opportunity.They talked about that when she was about to get out of jail here. She's a malignant narcissist. That's her diagnosis.
She was also such a high re offense risk that her parole board unilaterally denied her early release even though she didn't file for it so as to make sure it was known that she was, and remains, a monster who would kill again if afforded the opportunity.
Judging from this thread, he's posting on GAF
https://web.archive.org/web/2007082...da/story/2004/12/16/homolka-parole041216.htmlI'm actually sincerely asking here - do you have links that go more into her psychological profile, what her parole board felt, etc? I just got home so I can look things up, but if you have anything in particular you can share that gives more information about her - maybe a good article or something? I would like to read it.
It still amazes me that anyone fell for her innocent victim crap. Well, not as much as it used to, as my understanding of sexism has grown over the years.
I wonder if she masturbates to the memory of her crimes.
To me, your position is 'Everyone can be rehabilitated, and should be allowed back into society.' Personally, I agree most people can be. Karla Homolka is not one of those people.I mean, what's the position you think I hold here?