Crackdown 3 campaign is fully playable offline.
and what about the cloud?
Crackdown 3 campaign is fully playable offline.
and what about the cloud?
Only available in multiplayer.and what about the cloud?
Multiplayer only
Don't tell me your one of those sprint is the devil people or are you referring to microtransactions
so are you telling me that SP will just be a random tps with bad graphics and basic destruction?
That tells us a lot about you.
so are you telling me that SP will just be a random tps with bad graphics and basic destruction?
so are you telling me that SP will just be a random tps with bad graphics and basic destruction?
The cloud, from what I've seen doesn't help graphics in Crackdown 3. Only physics.
so are you telling me that SP will just be a random tps with bad graphics and basic destruction?
so are you telling me that SP will just be a random tps with bad graphics and basic destruction?
so are you telling me that SP will just be a random tps with bad graphics and basic destruction?
but if at least it have had great destruction, the graphic would be justified
What the hell are you on about? We haven't seen game footage in a long time. What makes you think the graphics are bad?
I do yes. but that's not for this threadI don't really want to get into it on this thread, but yes I have issues with the effect sprint and clamber have had on the flow of the game and design of the maps. I still like Halo5 a lot, but the inclusion of sprint and clamber have removed elements of the game that I and many others found more enjoyable. IMO run&gun is better for Halo than runORgun. Don't tell me you discredit the opinion of people who don't like sprint?.,,
I'm not opposed MTs, but I think the implementation in halo and Gears leave much to be desired.
https://news.xbox.com/2016/06/06/xbox-e3-2016-right-around-corner/I wonder when MS put up an article or video on Xbox Wire? The show is a week tomorrow and they normally try to generate a bit of anticipation with a hype video or something similar. Quick sixty second video teasing what we know and what we don't.
I do yes. but that's not for this thread
😂🤣I love when people get all circular with their critique of Crackdown.
Dev: we are going to use the power of the cloud,
"Concerned" gamer: lol that won't work
Dev: here watch this 17min demo of it working
"Concerned" gamer: gotta be online to play solo? Lol
Dev: we've got an offline single player mode
"Concerned" gamer: W/o cloud-based distruction? Lol
Now people are complaining that they can't access the online components of the game if they are offline. I've seen it all.
https://news.xbox.com/2016/06/06/xbox-e3-2016-right-around-corner/
You mean like this? I guess this Monday.
I love when people get all circular with their critique of Crackdown.
Dev: we are going to use the power of the cloud,
"Concerned" gamer: lol that won't work
Dev: here watch this 17min demo of it working
"Concerned" gamer: gotta be online to play solo? Lol
Dev: we've got an offline single player mode
"Concerned" gamer: W/o cloud-based distruction? Lol
Now people are complaining that they can't access the online components of the game if they are offline. I've seen it all.
I love when people get all circular with their critique of Crackdown.
Dev: we are going to use the power of the cloud,
"Concerned" gamer: lol that won't work
Dev: here watch this 17min demo of it working
"Concerned" gamer: gotta be online to play solo? Lol
Dev: we've got an offline single player mode
"Concerned" gamer: W/o cloud-based distruction? Lol
Now people are complaining that they can't access the online components of the game if they are offline. I've seen it all.
Yeah but Red Faction did the exact same thing like 10 years ago on a weaker console, this is just typical MS and their underpowered console wanting us to be online all the time for no benefits.
I think he's trolling.Red faction didn't do "the exact same thing" the hyperbole knows no bounds.
Red faction didn't do "the exact same thing" the hyperbole knows no bounds.
It was legit prediction, but we'll see at E3Just need to add TVTVTV in there for this driveby to reach its final form.
The GIF comparisons and hyperbole were a sight to believe.Pretty sure he's goofin' on cool arguments people brought up in the past. The amount of times I read "Red Faction Guerrilla" in regards to Crackdown 3 is pretty incredible.
I think he's trolling.
Pretty sure he's goofin' on cool arguments people brought up in the past. The amount of times I read "Red Faction Guerrilla" in regards to Crackdown 3 is pretty incredible.
The GIF comparisons and hyperbole were a sight to believe.
Lol I can never tell these days!!
And here I am with my gifs lol
No i don't tell you that.
I tell you, that the destruction in multiplayer will be much more and varied.
I mean in a linear singleplayer campaign it does not even make sense to destroy everything
Man if the physics compare to the tech demo it's going to be epic!
Hahah, left out the /s because I didn't think it was necessary, but I'm glad I'm not the only one that got pissed off at people not seeing the difference between those gifs a few years back. I've been waiting for Crackdown 3 since the Xbox One reveal.
But in Red Faction Guerilla this was fully in the story mode and all structures could be demolished. But that game world was quite different from Crackdown.
It's fine with me as long as they bring a great SP mode. Bring me tons of orbs too.![]()
Please forgive me. I've been dealing with some real doosies in the EA access thread, so my sarcasm meter is not calibrated well.
No worries man, the crap you see on this site is beyond belief sometimes so I don't blame ya.
People joke but the reality is a lot of gamers are more or less idiots and will go along with whatever rubbish EA/Ubisoft/Bethesda etc put out.
This directly impacts other gamers as games move from a "make a good game, try to sell it" model to the future "we have your money already so fuck you" model.
Sony are quite right to protect the rest of gaming from those gamers and in turn those gamers from themselves. It is basically the equivalent of making cocaine illegal. People can still make their own choice about it if they want to buy or use it, but ultimately it does a lot of harm to the wider society and you shouldn't really be asking the addicts to decide policy around it.
PSNow is only available in very select areas and nobody is ever going to be using it for a long time in any serious way. It is basically the gaming equivalent of a methadone clinic where Sony hopes that it assists gamers who can't help themselves from using something more destructive.
Is Crackdown still slated for this year? I'm really hoping that game surprises us.
I love when people get all circular with their critique of Crackdown.
Dev: we are going to use the power of the cloud,
"Concerned" gamer: lol that won't work
Dev: here watch this 17min demo of it working
"Concerned" gamer: gotta be online to play solo? Lol
Dev: we've got an offline single player mode
"Concerned" gamer: W/o cloud-based distruction? Lol
Now people are complaining that they can't access the online components of the game if they are offline. I've seen it all.
Why not though? It might mean we get something a lot of want to actually play and it will actually sell too. Unlike SO sadly.
Really nice video. I have high hopes too. And I hope that Microsoft will resurrect some old IP like Blinx: The Time Sweeper and Project Gotham Racing. I suppose Microsoft Flight Simulator could work well with Project Scorpio, though I doubt we'll see anything new in that series for quite a while.Finally finished my Microsoft E3 Predictions video!
I'm basically expecting a 50/50 approach when it comes to third party games (looking amazing running on Scorpio) and first party games (which means a lot of announcements of new games). This could be a great show for Microsoft, I have high hopes!
The cloud-powered destruction will not necessarily be multiplayer only. We don't know yet.How does the online in Crackdown 3 even work? Is it like the first one where you can do full co-op together?
Is it more like GTA Online?
lol these strawmen arguments. It isn't hard to understand what people want. People are saying that they'd like the cloud destruction to also be in campaign as an option. In other words, if they're online, they can have it enabled, if they're not, then it won't be.
Hell, I'd take just a free-roam mode (outside of campaign, but not multiplayer) where I can just go around doing whatever I want, including destroying the city.
Because having the destruction be multiplayer-only is cool and all, but if it's going to be a situation where it's just a massive free-for-all where there are 10-20 other players and you can all kill each other like GTA Online, then I can see why people don't want that to be the only option.