Carrot AND a stick or ON a stick?

Right, so if you possess a cake, why would you NOT eat it? But the idiom implies your desires are unreasonable. Eating a cake that you possess is entirely reasonable

Imagine it is a small one bite cake. It's not one after the other. You can't simulatneously consume and still possess it.
 
Then shouldn't it be "have your cake and have eaten it too". Eat is either preset or future, so you can certainly have a cake and eat it at the same time. It's not until after you've finished eating it that you can no longer have it
 
nah man that's carrot OR stick

Well there's also the visualization that you hold a carrot in front of the proverbial donkey, while having the stick behind him, which leads to the donkey both chasing the promise of orangey goodness as reward, while trying to run away from the promise of the ass having pain applied upon his ass.
 
metal as fuck.

2dQ08F5.png
 
Then shouldn't it be "have your cake and have eaten it too". Eat is either preset or future, so you can certainly have a cake and eat it at the same time. It's not until after you've finished eating it that you can no longer have it

The phrase originated in the 16th century (if not earlier). The English language has evolved since then. It probably made a lot more sense back in those days in how people used the language than it does now.

Edit:
I should stop trying to have discussions about proverbs at 4:30 AM. Head and fingers are writing out different sentences at the same time.
 
Imagine it is a small one bite cake. It's not one after the other. You can't simulatneously consume and still possess it.

But we describe eating food as having food.

'What did you have for dinner?'

'I had spaghetti.'

The process of eating is the process of having. If you didn't actually eat spaghetti, you wouldn't say you had it, even if you actually owned spaghetti.
 
Now someone come up with an explanation of "have your cake and eat it too". If you don't eat it, wtf else are you going to do with it? That's literally what cakes are for

Replace the cake with money and the eating with spending. I'd love to say that I have a million dollars,but I would also like to spend it. I would have to choose having the money or having the stuff. You can't have both.
 
Replace the cake with money and the eating with spending. I'd love to say that I have a million dollars,but I would also like to spend it. I would have to choose having the money or having the stuff. You can't have both.

Another alternative would be to say I want to go swim but also stay dry. Obviously if you go swim, you're going to get wet, but if you stay dry, you can't go swim. It's either or, not both.
 
I don't want to live in the Carrot & Stick parallel universe

You'd have to be a Libertarian to want that

Did your wife vote for Gary Johnson, OP?
 
Replace the cake with money and the eating with spending. I'd love to say that I have a million dollars,but I would also like to spend it. I would have to choose having the money or having the stuff. You can't have both.
But the money is only valuable because it can be exchanged for things. Is money really money if it isn't meant to be spent?
 
Both of them are used for their respective meanings. One refers exclusively to reinforcement. The other refers to both reinforcement and punishment.

Punishment is reinforcement.
 
It's the two sides of extrinsic motivation.

Carrot = incentive

Stick = punishment

Specifying the carrot delivery device is a funny idea, however dumb.
 
Never heard of carrot on a stick.

Carrot and stick is as others have mentioned, reward and punishment.

You can dangle your carrot from any damned thing you like.

I surmise that "carrot on a stick" has come from the same place as "I could care less", "bit of a damp squid" or "for all intensive purposes".
 
It's the two sides of extrinsic motivation.

Carrot = incentive

Stick = punishment

Specifying the carrot delivery device is a funny idea, however dumb.

How is it dumb? How else are you going to get a horse follow a carrot while currently riding it?
 
Carrot on a stick is the picture in the OP. These days it's typically meant the same as "moving the goalpost"... the closer you get to a reward or goal the goal is then moved so you can never reach the result required.

The Carrot and the Stick is a method of reinforcement vs reward... though I never hear this used often...

I can't remember the last time I ever heard someone use the phrase in conversation at all..

Never heard of carrot on a stick.

Carrot and stick is as others have mentioned, reward and punishment.

You can dangle your carrot from any damned thing you like.

I surmise that "carrot on a stick" has come from the same place as "I could care less", "bit of a damp squid" or "for all intensive purposes".

You'd be wrong.
 
I've heard both. They're completely different phrases.

One is for leading someone around with a reward right out of reach, the other a combined reward punishment.

"Carrot and stick" does seem less popular to me.
 
Never heard of carrot on a stick.

Carrot and stick is as others have mentioned, reward and punishment.

You can dangle your carrot from any damned thing you like.

I surmise that "carrot on a stick" has come from the same place as "I could care less", "bit of a damp squid" or "for all intensive purposes".
It's the opposite

A carrot on a stick is the origin and is the universally known image of dangling a carrot from a stick for a rabbit to chase but never feel rewarded

People who say fucked up phrases like "peace of mind" are the ones who perverted it into "carrot and a stick"
 
English teacher here:
Both idioms exist and are correct in their own right. If I remember correctly "carrot and stick" as in motivation through offering reward and punishment originated from the "carrot on a stick" idiom, but took off as its own thing.

So basically somebody was saying it wrong and then came up with a lame excuse instead of admitting it, lol.
 
Carrot and stick was those people who think "peace of mind" is the correct phrase taking their mistake and running with it

I'd never heard of the "and" version before this thread, so I'm going with this.
 
Carrot on a stick is 'correct' and implies a 'dangling' reward to coax someone into certain behaviour.

'Carrot and stick' is an evolution of the former and acts as a metaphor for a reward/punishment approach.
 
UK here
We use Carrot AND Stick (or possibly Carrot OR Stick) to describe the two different ways of motivating someone.

Carrot on a stick sounds like your typical common or garden American bastardisation of an English phrase (see also: I could case less) but I could be wrong and I can't be arsed to check. In any case "carrot on a stick" is not commonly used here although the carrot in "carrot and stick"is understood to be a carrot on a stick.
 
Top Bottom