North Korea launches missile that passes over Japan

NK was already a MAD scenario before they had nukes because of Seoul's location relative to DMZ.

Is that really true though? The desire to avoid another Korean War was less about civilua casualties but rather a fear it would involve rival superpowers getting into a war with one another. The US, China and SK also fear the collapse of the NK state in any conflict that would likely trigger the greatest humanitarian disaster since WWII, with literally millions flooding acrosd the Yalu to China. South Korea has also stated it's in no mood to destroy its massive economy trying to reunify the peninsula under its rule.
 
I didn't say NK was like the Nazis. I just used the Nazis as an example of a group of people that ultimately had no sense of self-preservation. Who is to say Kim won't use his nuclear weapons as a final act before his regime crumbles due to complete economic collapse?
But the Nazis did have a sense of self-preservation. You'd have a bit of a point if you're talking about Imperial Japan, but North Korea resembles Imperial Japan even less than it does Nazi Germany.

And that what their intentions for using the weapons are unclear. Hence the possibility that they will, you know, use them.
What? North Korean intentions aren't unclear at all. Everyone knows that they're aiming for deterrence.
 
So is there any outcry from western allies (Europe)? Maybe I just don't see it reported, I never see any after these launches.
 
I didn't say NK was like the Nazis. I just used the Nazis as an example of a group of people that ultimately had no sense of self-preservation. Who is to say Kim won't use his nuclear weapons as a final act before his regime crumbles due to complete economic collapse?

Deterence theory holds, even for despotic, maniacal regimes as the Soviet Union and Red China proves.
 
I didn't say NK was like the Nazis. I just used the Nazis as an example of a group of people that ultimately had no sense of self-preservation. Who is to say Kim won't use his nuclear weapons as a final act before his regime crumbles due to complete economic collapse?

The Nazis were many things, but suicidal wasn't one of them. All of their expansionist ambitions were intended to obtain more land for future generations of Germans.

The worry that Kim might use nuclear weapons if his regime is about to fall is precisely why we don't initiate an attack and does, in fact, suggest that he would only become dangerous when there is no more self to preserve.
 
Whether you like it or not, nations like to have control over their energy supply, strategically important trade routes and ultimately resources. From this perspective it doesn't have to be a cold war for the US or China or any other major power to maneuver in ways to make sure they can sustain and potentially grow their economic power and influence. The worst situation is assumed to be the default in geopolitics. China would not sit still if the US wasn't in NK. This is why what you advocate is not a realistic appraisal of the geopolitical situation.

As far as I'm aware, The South China Sea dosn't touch, SK. Philiphines, Camboia, Malaysia,... but not SK. They can mantain pressence in those areas.

Is very doubtfoul that China would invade SK or claim NK for they. To me SK military bases are just a consequence of a very old war and a totally different geopolitycal era.
 
If a bullet is 300miles above your head its a bit different than a few inches

It's an analogy. Missiles aren't fired every day.

Ie no missile has ever been fired above Japan like that. So it might as well be a bullet, and might as well be inches.

As a signal it's insanely hostile and dangerous.
 
Is that really true though? The desire to avoid another Korean War was less about civilua casualties but rather a fear it would involve rival superpowers getting into a war with one another. The US, China and SK also fear the collapse of the NK state in any conflict that would likely trigger the greatest humanitarian disaster since WWII, with literally millions flooding acrosd the Yalu to China. South Korea has also stated it's in no mood to destroy its massive economy trying to reunify the peninsula under its rule.

It's a simple question, are you OK with 10million dead? The humanitarian crises would be a secondary effect over a longer period of time. The first issue are the massive casualties that can not be prevented.
 
Of course on my day off I'm awoken by my phone screeching about a missile. >.< Well, I'm glad it didn't fail over where I live.
 
China needs to step up and control some of this nonsense behavior. Trump is not the sort of person who can handle behavior like this with diplomatic subtlety. Dude's gonna start beating the war drums tomorrow and have half the country would be behind him, as evidenced by people in this thread.
 
Just want to reiterate that tit for tat is definitely the correct strategy here, not escalation. Troubling that so many people are eager for the death of millions
 
It's the missile they said they would use to surround guam earlier. So they went from firing 4 to firing 1 and sending it nowhere near Guam.

Which somewhat proves that NK is a rational actor to an extent. They could have launched this missile towards Guam like they threatened but obviously realised it would have led to a very real confrontation with the US. Hence their decision to launch it in a north-east direction. NK gets to demonstrate their resolve while also not being retaliated against.
 
So is there any outcry from western allies (Europe)? Maybe I just don't see it reported, I never see any after these launches.

Europe views it primarily as a japan, south korea, American issue and chooses not to interfer. Although the UK is going to start sticking it's oar in soon when we send one of our new carriers to the region. Annoyed North korea with that announcement.
Europe will state the obvious like it's annoyed with the launch and views it badly but it's not our neck of the woods really. America also doesn't want Europe interfering in its foreign affairs in the region.
 
China needs to step up and control some of this nonsense behavior. Trump is not the sort of person who can handle behavior like this with diplomatic subtlety. Dude's gonna start beating the war drums tomorrow and have half the country would be behind him, as evidenced by people in this thread.

Why would china do anything. This is a chance for xi and the politburo to gouge both America and Japan's reactions.
 
That is way too close to a declaration of war.

I didn't think they'd go that far tbh...

He really is crazy... And we're fucked with the orange child in the WH.
 
None of NK's options make sense for them. They lose in every single scenario. It's just a matter how how much collateral damage they do along the way.

"They" are a very small number of people. They aren't threatened by famine nearly as much as they are by regime change. Doing what they're doing makes sense.
 
It's nothing unless Trump monumentally overreacts. Even he hasn't done so so far, so I'm pretty optimistic!

I mean, what would qualify as monumental, in this situation? What would a justified reaction to this be? I'm asking anyone in sincerity, I'm trying to imagine what a reaction from the US to this situation would look like.
 
IF ATTACKED

not one of your articles has mentioned the realistic belief the NK's will launch a first strike

Not one of my articles? I posted one article...

"Should the U.S. dare to show even the slightest sign of attempt to remove our supreme leadership, we will strike a merciless blow at the heart of the U.S. with our powerful nuclear hammer, honed and hardened over time," the state-run Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) reports, citing a spokesperson of the North's foreign ministry.
-Time.

You're telling me no one in the world takes that statement seriously?

"They" are a very small number of people. They aren't threatened by famine nearly as much as they are by regime change. Doing what they're doing makes sense.

And so does striking at their most hated enemy when they are on their way to obsolescence. They aren't going to disappear without a bang.
 
The USA is going to unload on NK Trump going is going to do it with or without china consent. I think USA should to NK like they did to Iraq obliterate them.

When USA oblitearted Iraq, they created ISIS and thousands and thousands of civilians died because of that, and that's without taking into consideraration the damage ISIS did in Siria and other countries.


I wonder what kind of disaster could be born from this....
 
Not one of my articles? I posted one article...


-Time.

You're telling me no one in the world takes that statement seriously?

They have been saying shit like that for decades. It's nothing other than one of their many saber rattling statements they do to project strength that does not exist. S. Korea has dealt with this BS for so long it no longer rattles the country.
 
Not one of my articles? I posted one article...


-Time.

You're telling me no one in the world takes that statement seriously?



And so does striking at their most hated enemy when they are on their way to obsolescence. They aren't going to disappear without a bang.

That quote doesn't indicate a first strike. They are talking about retaliation and the entire reason you make such a statement is so that there is nothing to retaliate against.
 
The USA is going to unload on NK Trump going is going to do it with or without china consent. I think USA should to NK like they did to Iraq obliterate them.

What a stupidly narrow minded response. Yes, just like they obliterated Iraq and aided in obliterating Libya and Yemen. Great idea!
 
It's a simple question, are you OK with 10million dead? The humanitarian crises would be a secondary effect over a longer period of time. The first issue are the massive casualties that can not be prevented.

Not sure where you're plucking 10 million dead from. Not even the First Korean War had thst many dead. Due to the decrepid nature of the North's military it's ability to inflict mass casualtied on the South would be limited. Recent studies have shown any war would see tens of thousands of dead in the Seoul Metropolitan area over the course of a week after hostilities began before the KPA and its large artillery force is wiped out along the DMZ. Terrible for sure but nowhere near 10 million.

The real worry is the potential for a total collapse of the NK state and descent into anarchy leading to large scale refugee flows into China and SK.

Oriel
world war 3 would be so uguu~

How is this relevant in any way?
 
Top Bottom