The state of NeoGAF

Status
Not open for further replies.
Definitely, definitely not true. I once argued that Michael Brown was a bad case for BLM to establish it's cause on because of the controversy and many grey areas contained within it - ban.

I argued during the GG-era that Leigh Alexander was doing more damage than good with her opinion piece. I also argued that people asking questions in GG threads were probably just uninformed - not secret GG cells planted to derail conversation as so many were paranoid about. These two things combined got me a permaban because it proved I was apparently a secret GG shill. The moderation was garbage in my experience.
You're presumably on an alt, so I'm not really sure you have much of an argument.
 
Definitely, definitely not true. I once argued that Michael Brown was a bad case for BLM to establish it's cause on because of the controversy and many grey areas contained within it - ban.

I argued during the GG-era that Leigh Alexander was doing more damage than good with her opinion piece. I also argued that people asking questions in GG threads were probably just uninformed - not secret GG cells planted to derail conversation as so many were paranoid about. These two things combined got me a permaban because it proved I was apparently a secret GG shill. The moderation was garbage in my experience.

Holy shit. Like, you can't actually believe you were in the right on these... right?
 
Anyone calling GAF left-wing doesn't know the actual American left. This place is centrist or neoliberal at best. I'm constantly confounded at some of the capitalist justifications by "left-leaning" posters.

I am super-familiar with the actual American left. I work a research university. Almost all of my friends and colleagues are folks of the liberal or left persuasion. The previous incarnation of Gaf was a funhouse mirror of that worldview.

I wouldn’t even call it funhouse mirrors. The majority of ‘left’ posters on here had their politics completely decoupled from economics so at best they were small ‘l’ liberals and at worst were TINAs with sticking plaster solutions.
 
Left leaning people don't tolerate bigotry and hate. Duh.

I don't trust your Jon Tron story. I'm sure there's more to it. Like, with all the "woe is me I got banned by corrupt mod" stories today none seem to even be true cause context is missing so I don't trust you to be forthcoming with all the details.

Yes, people get banned in LGBT threads for posting hateful like how being gay is a choice and transgender people are sick.

You say balanced but then just derided the previous mods for sticking up for decency. Jesus.

Ok.

That's thread-shitting, dude. Basically jumping in just to say "haha you guys care about this thing I don't give a fuck about."

As for the LGBT "counter-opinions," are you sure those weren't also people denying the humanity of others based on their own prejudices? Most bans I saw were of that sort.

I wasn't shitting the thread, I really didn't know who the dude was and was flabbergasted by the reaction he got. Are you suggesting I can't have that kind of reaction? On your LGBT question, I will just say some were rightfully banned, but some were not and leave it at that. Believe me if you want, or don't.
 
Yet we have screecaps of mods targeting certain posters to look for excuses to ban them.

https://imgur.com/a/mWYq8#YgguFL

YgguFLe.gif


And here is the thread where Evilore acknowledges these PM's and his (non)response.

https://web.archive.org/web/2015030...gaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1003990&page=2


Haha, how did I miss this? Watching people be surprised by this is... surprising. I mean how on earth hadn't you guys noticed that members were specifically targeted ALL THE TIME for their opinions? I assumed this and worse a long time ago.
 
For all your worries about dogpiling you sure don't seem to care I'm being dogpiled. Look below.

OH BOY. I HOPE YOU START DEFENDING ME.

Sure. I mean I did actually earlier by saying I know for a fact you were posting against the general consensus in Hillary Threads but I'll bat some more.

Lol, you love the word toxic. That pic would look great as your avatar imo.
I think they got what you're saying. This left being trying to respond to someone's accusations and is moving into being a malicious hunt for internet justice. Calm the fuck down.
 
Loosen up the reigns? How so? Should we allow constant conversations about whether police brutality is just a lie? How about discussing whether or not gendered pronouns are good or bad? Trigger words? Safe spaces?

Like, when you say loosen up it's kind of suspect. The discussion has already been had and a lot of people felt you shouldn't be able to spew toxic stuff. Cutting off offences at slurs or attacks isn't good enough because the gamer-gaters, alt-right, and generally nasty people thrive in the murky area of promoting discussion about issues that have a clear answer. You loosen the reigns and you get Twitter, Reddit, and what not.



I can't say for sure but he does have a history of dubious actions. I don't fault anyone for peacing out because of that.

I think it depends on whether you want actual CONVERSATIONS or just a thread where everyone just agrees with each other. When I say "loosen the reigns ", I'm referring to easing up on the ban hammer. If someone says they support a border wall, that shouldn't be a perma ban for "espousing Nazi idealogy", or the like. Let the person explain why they support that idea. That's the real world, that's life.

You've got a lot of people here and on the Internet saying they've gotten bans here for ridiculous reasons. I think that's why so many people are loving NeoGAF's turmoils.
 
Haha, how did I miss this? Watching people be surprised by this is... surprising. I mean how on earth hadn't you guys noticed that members were specifically targeted ALL THE TIME for their opinions? I assumed this and worse a long time ago.

you also assumed that he'd been made a RE mod based on a 4chan screenshot and still haven't acknowledged that this was false literally an entire day later, so maybe step down for a minute
 
you need some eyebleach. Search that term on youtube/reddit. im sure the picture was a hoax.

Whatever it was, it sounds like you should forget it. Don't obsess on that shit. Watch a show or talk to your family or loved ones. Real or not, don't let shit get in your brain.

Thanks for the tips! Eyebleach is definitely helping.

Was she in a tub? Sounds like tub girl. A famous picture of a woman getting an enema. The results splash on to her face, leaving it obscured. Could maybe look like her head was smashed in if the pic was low res enough.

Yeah, that is probably what it was. Good to know that it wasn't something devastatingly sinister.

I was watching MindHunter when I saw that pic, so that was where my mind was at the time......

Still a sick pic!!!!
 
God dude, I remember how that toxic shithole used to bully you. Your posts received some of the biggest dogpiles I've witnessed in a forum. Extremely rude replies devoid of any argument.

Devoid of any argument? Dude was posting whack ass conspiracy theories (IIRC - I might be thinking of another poster). There was no argument to be had.
 
Haha, how did I miss this? Watching people be surprised by this is... surprising. I mean how on earth hadn't you guys noticed that members were specifically targeted ALL THE TIME for their opinions? I assumed this and worse a long time ago.

Better yet people knew and openly talked about protected members coming back after bans that would have been perma for pretty much anyone else.
 
Haha, how did I miss this? Watching people be surprised by this is... surprising. I mean how on earth hadn't you guys noticed that members were specifically targeted ALL THE TIME for their opinions? I assumed this and worse a long time ago.

You keep parroting the idea that members were targeted ALL THE TIME but you got no proof of a massive targeting.

You truly are the future of NeoGAF.

It'll be interesting to see how far right and toxic NeoGAF gets when y'all run the place.
 
you also assumed that he'd been made a RE mod based on a 4chan screenshot and still haven't acknowledged that this was false literally an entire day later, so maybe step down for a minute


There's no 4chan screenshot and if there was I haven't seen it. But I have seen the real list and it has a slew of terrible posters that manged to bring the forum to its knees with their fanaticism and dogmatism. So yeah, that forum is gonna be exactly as I expected.
 
Devoid of any argument? Dude was posting whack ass conspiracy theories (IIRC - I might be thinking of another poster). There was no argument to be had.

i don't recall MIMIC posting about much of that, honestly

DAFUQ are you talking about?

that discord invite's still available

(i'll try my damnedest to make sure no one dogpiles you. but then i'm the sole admin, so)

But I have seen the real list and it has a slew of terrible posters that manged to bring the forum to its knees with their fanaticism and dogmatism. So yeah, that forum is gonna be exactly as I expected.

glass houses, fam
 
Geez, all these people hating on the dog-piling in the OT but don't care to dog-pile me.

I hope they understand the conundrum they're in.
The problem with dogpiling was not a lot of people disagreeing with a poster, it was that it was used as a signal from backseat mods that someone "wasn't a good fit" and needed to be banned. I don't think you or many in this thread disagreeing with you seriously expect you to get banned for your opinions.
 
The problem with dogpiling was not a lot of people disagreeing with a poster, it was that it was used as a signal from backseat mods that someone "wasn't a good fit" and needed to be banned. I don't think you or many in this thread disagreeing with you seriously expect you to get banned for your opinions.

It's hard to believe you guys think I am the paranoid one.

You really think people coordinated efforts to ignore or shame y'all? LOL. You guys brought the jackassery and the public saw. You guys blacklisted yourselves.

Like, if you guys went into places and said BLM is a terrorist group or that Michael Brown's death is suspicious or incorrect in a public setting I guarantee you you're going to get side-eyes and folks who don't want to hang with y'all.
 
Holy shit. Like, you can't actually believe you were in the right on these... right?

Trolling only goes so far for me. Mostly when it reaches the level of Poe's law.

You're presumably on an alt, so I'm not really sure you have much of an argument.

I was permabanned years ago, so yes I have a newer account. Who knows if I'll get permabanned again for admitting as much, but either way, if you're that interested you can find my permaban worthy conversations here: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/search.php?searchid=76741
 
Like, if you guys went into places and said BLM is a terrorist group or that Michael Brown's death is suspicious or incorrect in a public setting I guarantee you you're going to get side-eyes and folks who don't want to hang with y'all.

...provided that these places are in zip codes that are more than 1% nonwhite
 
Trolling only goes so far for me. Mostly when it reaches the level of Poe's law.



I was permabanned years ago, so yes I have a newer account. Who knows if I'll get permabanned again for admitting as much, but either way, if you're that interested you can find my permaban worthy conversations here: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/search.php?searchid=76741

Ah, you're just trolling.

No one of worth believes you. If you troll to that level then you got some serious issues.
 
I think it depends on whether you want actual CONVERSATIONS or just a thread where everyone just agrees with each other. When I say "loosen the reigns ", I'm referring to easing up on the ban hammer. If someone says they support a border wall, that shouldn't be a perma ban for "espousing Nazi idealogy", or the like. Let the person explain why they support that idea. That's the real world, that's life.

You've got a lot of people here and on the Internet saying they've gotten bans here for ridiculous reasons. I think that's why so many people are loving NeoGAF's turmoils.

Look. There is a point here. A lot of these stories are lacking details or specifics about the ban and for some cases those details is what the reason for the ban was. S if people omit it you might guess they either just didn't feel like it or they're being disingenuous. And since there's a lot of trolls on this forum is pretty possible they're being disingenuous. So I can understand someone thinking that about another person here.

But then again that has to be balanced with there have been very clear instances of mod abusing their powers and some people just in general had their intentions in their posts misconstrued.
 
glass houses, fam


I'm not the one defending the blatant censorship that was going on against people with dissenting opinion. It's fanatics that want to shut people up who speak their minds. Hell, I'm not even close to a moderate and I still have no problem with people disagreeing with me even on the most fundamental issues.
 
You could have moderate or even right wing values and wouldn't be banned. You just had to be able to defend yourself if you came big dicking into a thread trying to lay down the truth. Lot of right-wing GAF couldn't because - *IS SHOCKED* - a lot of right wing / moderate / libertarian / etc has a lot of hate. That hate wasn't allowed. If you believe you were being oppressed either by mods directly or a chilling effect then you are wrong. You simply couldn't realize your opinions were terrible and were most likely hateful.

I lean left and even I felt this chilling effect others mentioned, often deciding to cancel threads/posts I had started typing up over the last couple of years here because I had seen how rabid some of the active members had become. I dared question Hillary Clinton during the election and rather than having that question answered I was treated like an enemy on a battlefield. I expressed disappointment with fellow posters when they were calling for John McCain's death in a thread that revealed he had brain cancer and somehow I was deemed the monster. I'm still here, so I fared better than others, but the Off Topic section and the forum in general became an increasingly hostile place where that kind of behavior became common and civility became a rarity.

This unfortunate event has the potential to bring some semblance of balance back to the forum, removing some of the toxicity and hopefully making it a more welcoming place, both to those who have silently lurked here for years and those looking to join a forum that plays host to civil discourse on a wide variety of topics. Just like life, NeoGAF will be what we make of it.
 
I'm not the one defending the blatant censorship that was going on against people with dissenting opinion. It's fanatics that want to shut people up who speak their minds. Hell, I'm not even close to a moderate and I still have no problem with people disagreeing with me even on the most fundamental issues.

"blatant censorship"?

So... why are you not upset about Evilore -- and this is by your definition -- censoring politcal and social discussions?

I BET YOU'RE SUPER UPSET ABOUT THAT.

OH WAIT.
 
I'm not the one defending the blatant censorship that was going on against people with dissenting opinion. It's fanatics that want to shut people up who speak their minds. Hell, I'm not even close to a moderate and I still have no problem with people disagreeing with me even on the most fundamental issues.
You and the people you're very upset about don't seem so different, really.
 
I'm not the one defending the blatant censorship that was going on against people with dissenting opinion. It's fanatics that want to shut people up who speak their minds. Hell, I'm not even close to a moderate and I still have no problem with people disagreeing with me even on the most fundamental issues.

i'm not defending anyone, i'm saying you frankly give way too much of a shit about this
 
So uh Offtopic is back up but when I try to post somewhere it says my account needs to be verified like I don't have an account yet. What's going on?
 
Super tickled at the people poking their heads out to endlessly complain about the things they don't like, which is that others were endlessly complaining about things they don't like.

If you say this place has been shutting down your voice (unlikely since you're posting here irl right now, guys!), why the fuck are you still here? There are trillions of websites and forums.
 
"blatant censorship"?

So... why are you not upset about Evilore -- and this is by your definition -- censoring politcal and social discussions?

I BET YOU'RE SUPER UPSET ABOUT THAT.

OH WAIT.


If the admin wants to remove all political discussion to take the forum on another route it's fair and even-handed. I disagree with it like I said at the beginning of this thread but I understand given how terrible both Gaming and Offtopc had become. If the admin wanted to ban all liberals or all rightwingers or all socialists from speaking I'd be very very pissed off. Can you understand the difference?
 
I have yet to read a single one of these posts where the person complaining about an unjust ban wasn't 100% in the wrong and deserved a ban. Its unbelievable how disillusioned they are.

It's like they have conditioned themselves to believe whatever they do is right and so they can carry on with a clean slate.

This whole, "we were oppressed" mentality just shows how they believe they're victims of some hate or malicious attack.

If the admin wants to remove all political discussion to take the forum on another route it's fair and even-handed. I disagree with it like I said at the beginning of this thread but I understand given how terrible both Gaming and Offtopc had become. If the admin wanted to ban all liberals or all rightwingers or all socialists from speaking I'd be very very pissed off. Can you understand the difference?

Hahahahaha.

But you grew resentment over the years about an OT that had rules the admins were OK with it.

You just don't make any sense. It's a real shame Evilore is keeping your ilk around.
 
It's hard to believe you guys think I am the paranoid one.

You really think people coordinated efforts to ignore or shame y'all? LOL. You guys brought the jackassery and the public saw. You guys blacklisted yourselves.

Like, if you guys went into places and said BLM is a terrorist group or that Michael Brown's death is suspicious or incorrect in a public setting I guarantee you you're going to get side-eyes and folks who don't want to hang with y'all.

Come on, there were unspoken rules in the political threads. Things that were not to be said. Mention open borders is an issue for security, or Hillary is a crook and it was immediate racist! Nazi! I read so many posts from people that said if you voted third party, or didn't vote at all that you were JUST AS BAD AS A WHITE SUPREMACIST. It's total horseshit. There was no room for discussion and to the notion "well, come prepared to back up all your words" is fine if you are given a few posts to do that. Most people make a comment or thought and if it's asked about would then reply and have a discussion. In those threads, you could one-line ALL COPS ARE FUCKS all day and all you would get is posters saying, "TRUTH!" but if you said, I voted Johnson because Hillary does NOT have the country's best interests then you had better have had 1000 words and 10 links to support your claim in the same post.

Most people on this site (that remain) are not GGers, racists, homophobes or Islamophobes. Most on here believe in having the right to live the life you want if it doesn't cause harm to others. But, a lot of people disagree on the finer points. These are the areas for discussion that will hopefully be allowed to occur. Two opposite minded people need to be able to talk candidly, even if one view might not be so hot. This is how minds can be changed, how people can become aware of things they might not have considered before. Expecting people to already be "on board" with the left leaning stances shuts out those who are open to have an honest discussion about them.
 
This unfortunate event has the potential to bring some semblance of balance back to the forum, removing some of the toxicity and hopefully making it a more welcoming place, both to those who have silently lurked here for years and those looking to join a forum that plays host to civil discourse on a wide variety of topics. Just like life, NeoGAF will be what we make of it.
Subpar Spatula was also one of those questioning Hillary Clinton though. I don't know their opinion on John McCain but they definitely argued with the Pro-Hillary Crowd back in the day. So I can say they definitely have some grasp of how those discussions went.

Although I do wonder how Spatula had a decent experience with that, I've seen Aeolist have an incredibly hard time arguing with the Pro-Hillary Crowd. (actually wasn't Aeolist banned over one such discussion?)
 
It's hard to believe you guys think I am the paranoid one.

You really think people coordinated efforts to ignore or shame y'all? LOL. You guys brought the jackassery and the public saw. You guys blacklisted yourselves.

Like, if you guys went into places and said BLM is a terrorist group or that Michael Brown's death is suspicious or incorrect in a public setting I guarantee you you're going to get side-eyes and folks who don't want to hang with y'all.

I'm not sure why you assume that everyone that is talking about dogpiles or fairness in moderating is a racist or bigot? Oh wait yes I do, because that was the norm. Hurry up throw a label at someone so we can dismiss their argument and get them banned.

We have all seen the posts where someone says some heinous shit and gets rightfully called out and banned. We have also seen the poster that even after 5+ pages is still defending his or herself against people that mis-read the initial comment and can't be bothered to read the rest of the thread, because they have to get their hot take in.

The difference here is that you are quoting multiple people at once and inviting responses. That's not a dogpile it's a gangbang.
 
more importantly is picking mods from both side of the political spectrum regardless whether or not they plan to have political topics on this forum.

This, so much this!


I can't understand how anyone would think this forum isn't super left-leaning. I felt it was so much in the left/liberal/progressive side that it kinda was - to use the buzzword - toxic to themselves. I felt people were constantly feeding each other with all kinds of right-wing/conservative horror stories that sometimes made people depressed and at worst people were actually encouraging others to cut ties with their families because of politics.

The air felt so damn thick and hostile in most politic and social issue threads that any sort of dialog between people holding different views was naturally weeded out and all that was left was people on the left/liberal/progressive side either collective agreeing on everything they say or then starting to raise the bar on what is acceptable and good and slowly then sometimes turning on each other because some aren't left/liberal/progressive enough.

I would've understood if it would've been about people discussing about why one is wrong about something but it was about making judgments about the morality of the opposing side. It wasn't just that one would be wrong about something. It was about one being a bigot / evil / a shitty person and whatever else.

It certainly felt that if you say something wrong you would either have people dogpiling on you or mods banning you.

That's why I would rather have both a more politically diverse mod team and more politically diverse users in general. That would require making rules a bit less strict which might then lead to more people getting their feelings hurt from time to time, but I don't think that would necessarily be a bad thing. People were hurting their feelings even in their own - again a buzzword - echo chambers anyway. There's no point in having political and social "safe spaces" like this when people can't seem to relax even there.
 
Subpar Spatula was also one of those questioning Hillary Clinton though. I don't know their opinion on John McCain but they definitely argued with the Pro-Hillary Crowd back in the day. So I can say they definitely have some grasp of how those discussions went.

Although I do wonder how Spatula had a decent experience with that, I've seen Aeolist have an incredibly hard time arguing with the Pro-Hillary Crowd.

Aeolist can't defend his position well. That's it. You were only banned if you became a toxic poster posting lies, misogyny, racism, bigotry, etc. You could be banned for repeatedly being obnoxious by not listening to other view points.
 
Hahahahaha.

But you grew resentment over the years about an OT that had rules the admins were OK with it.

You just don't make any sense. It's a real shame Evilore is keeping your ilk around.


Yes I grew resentment which is why I was very rarely posting or visiting the site. Now there's hope.

And good luck with the new forum, don't expect a lot of people to visit there, the only reason people tolerated the post-2012 neogaf was because it was the biggest gaming forum on the internet, not because of the toxic environment.
 
Tried to post a new thread in Gaming but couldn't. I guess my privileges were restricted after asking for a Discord invite in the Media Create thread, as I've never had issues creating threads in the past. Way to treat your legacy members.
 
Ah, you're just trolling.

No one of worth believes you. If you troll to that level then you got some serious issues.

No. I mean I can't tell if you're a contrarian troll or a genuine extreme leftist. And since I can't determine which you are, you've reached Poe's law, which means I'm out.
 
Definitely, definitely not true. I once argued that Michael Brown was a bad case for BLM to establish it's cause on because of the controversy and many grey areas contained within it, while also saying I still supported the movement - ban.

I argued during the GG-era that Leigh Alexander was doing more damage than good with her opinion piece. I also argued that people asking questions in GG threads were probably just uninformed - not secret GG cells planted to derail conversation as so many were paranoid about. These two things combined got me a permaban because it proved I was apparently a secret GG shill. The moderation was garbage in my experience.

this fucking post lmao

I fucking can't
 
Come on, there were unspoken rules in the political threads. Things that were not to be said. Mention open borders is an issue for security, or Hillary is a crook and it was immediate racist! Nazi! I read so many posts from people that said if you voted third party, or didn't vote at all that you were JUST AS BAD AS A WHITE SUPREMACIST. It's total horseshit. There was no room for discussion and to the notion "well, come prepared to back up all your words" is fine if you are given a few posts to do that. Most people make a comment or thought and if it's asked about would then reply and have a discussion. In those threads, you could one-line ALL COPS ARE FUCKS all day and all you would get is posters saying, "TRUTH!" but if you said, I voted Johnson because Hillary does NOT have the country's best interests then you had better have had 1000 words and 10 links to support your claim in the same post.

Most people on this site (that remain) are not GGers, racists, homophobes or Islamophobes. Most on here believe in having the right to live the life you want if it doesn't cause harm to others. But, a lot of people disagree on the finer points. These are the areas for discussion that will hopefully be allowed to occur. Two opposite minded people need to be able to talk candidly, even if one view might not be so hot. This is how minds can be changed, how people can become aware of things they might not have considered before. Expecting people to already be "on board" with the left leaning stances shuts out those who are open to have an honest discussion about them.


None of this ever happened.
 
Yes I grew resentment which is why I was very rarely posting or visiting the site. Now there's hope.

And good luck with the new forum, don't expect a lot of people to visit there, the only reason people tolerated the post-2012 neogaf was because it was the biggest gaming forum on the internet, not because of the toxic environment.

You grew resentment over rules established by the admin and hated them because it was censorship (your definition). However, you like it now that the admin is censoring political and social discourse because it fits your agenda?

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

No. I mean I can't tell if you're a contrarian troll or a genuine extreme leftist. And since I can't determine which you are, you've reached Poe's law, which means I'm out.

"Extremist left". Calling out racists and what not makes me an extremist? SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT

But you're an admitted racist. That's gotta suck. It must suck the people who you want to talk to only hold dislike for you. Damn, must be lonely.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom