Hypothetically speaking, if i were Tyler. You would certainly not qualify for a shower scene with me. Im a little too old for you.Don't get your hopes on.
As a person who has been here since 2010 I feel like I am learning in this thread and wish to have something clarified.
In 7 years I have 1,787 posts for an average of 0.65 posts per day. Does this make my opinion less valid?
If so, Ive learned that in the most recent Brave EXVIUS thread I was a top poster. Does this make my posts about that game one of the best?
Im experiencing conflicting views and not sure how it works.
Thanks guys!
Its Dont get your hopes up, UP! you ding, even your insults are garbage.
why do you guys overreact when someone calls out something you say as racist/sexist/homophobic
it doesn't mean you're a demon.
just that something you said is problematic
you shouldn't interpret it as a mark against your character. no one is perfect
No, you are a lurker and you are not upholding your duty to post more than once a day. Ergo, your opinion is invalid.
My opinion is invalid, too
The biggest irony in all this is they say they're doing this because the forum has become toxic, yet they're the ones making the forum toxic.
The worst thing is some of them are then trying to entice people to join them on another forum....
There's nothing wrong with being a 'junior.'
There's nothing wrong with being a lurker.
There's nothing wrong with being an active poster who shares their opinion every day in every thread.
Without juniors and lurkers, we'd all be talking to ourselves, this forum would have never gotten a fraction of the posts its gotten. We'd be bloviating at the dark expanse of the internet.
Given that the average word count per post is 5.7 I couldnt agree more. But then again Im a junior, and have been for years.This cannot be said enough. A lot of this people, the most active, the most invested, were the ones that discouraged me the most from posting in threads that were "controversial."
Sure why not. You're not a junior with a handful of posts.
There's nothing wrong with being a 'junior.'
There's nothing wrong with being a lurker.
There's nothing wrong with being an active poster who shares their opinion every day in every thread.
Without juniors and lurkers, we'd all be talking to ourselves, this forum would have never gotten a fraction of the posts its gotten. We'd be bloviating at the dark expanse of the internet.
To clarify further, if I typed the same stuff I do now, but am still a junior, its instantly of less worth?
Thank you. I think I almost have it figured out.
To clarify further, if I typed the same stuff I do now, but am still a junior, its instantly of less worth?
Thank you. I think I almost have it figured out.
To clarify further, if I typed the same stuff I do now, but am still a junior, its instantly of less worth?
Thank you. I think I almost have it figured out.
To clarify further, if I typed the same stuff I do now, but am still a junior, its instantly of less worth?
Thank you. I think I almost have it figured out.
This cannot be said enough. A lot of this people, the most active, the most invested, were the ones that discouraged me the most from posting in threads that were "controversial."
Was this the post that brought you to member status? If so, how poetic.
The biggest irony in all this is they say they're doing this because the forum has become toxic, yet they're the ones making the forum toxic.
The worst thing is some of them are then trying to entice people to join them on another forum....
Just looking forward to seeing the evidence at the end of the process tbh 👀
The ๖ۜBronx;252840939 said:Which topics were the threads about? Just curious as to what input you were afraid to post before but would do so now.
why can you only send 1 PM every 10 minutes?
![]()
Because misogyny.why can you only send 1 PM every 10 minutes?
![]()
There's nothing wrong with being a 'junior.'
There's nothing wrong with being a lurker.
There's nothing wrong with being an active poster who shares their opinion every day in every thread.
Without juniors and lurkers, we'd all be talking to ourselves, this forum would have never gotten a fraction of the posts its gotten. We'd be bloviating at the dark expanse of the internet.
Why are links banned in PM's?
![]()
As a person who has been here since 2010 I feel like I am learning in this thread and wish to have something clarified.
In 7 years I have 1,787 posts for an average of 0.65 posts per day. Does this make my opinion less valid?
If so, Ive learned that in the most recent Brave EXVIUS thread I was a top poster. Does this make my posts about that game one of the best?
Im experiencing conflicting views and not sure how it works.
Thanks guys!
Just looking forward to seeing the evidence at the end of the process tbh 👀
Why are links banned in PM's?
![]()
Why is the name of the upcoming forum on the banned word list?some people say that cucumbers taste better pickled
![]()
The biggest irony in all this is they say they're doing this because the forum has become toxic, yet they're the ones making the forum toxic.
The worst thing is some of them are then trying to entice people to join them on another forum....
Politics
Gender Equality
Gay Rights
Feminism
Social Justice
...
The list goes on.
edit:
Religion
Drugs
Politics
Gender Equality
Gay Rights
Feminism
Social Justice
...
The list goes on.
edit:
Religion
Drugs
I don't know about links being banned in PM's. Possible theres a word in the link thats blacklisted, not sure.
Anyway, there are sites out there that are reporting staff are reading their PM's and banning them for things they sent/received etc. vBulletin does NOT let any user read another users PM. You'd have to either login as that user, or have direct access to the database.
Junior bashing wasn't even allowed previously. It was against the rules. Not to mention lazy as fuck.
I'm fully supportive of their desire to create a new forum. You all seem to be painting them as freaking out over EvilLore, when the majority of people are pissed off with how EvilLore has handled all of this. He was fine with politics and womens rights until he became part of the conversation. He didn't manage the situation at all and when threads were opened asking him of this, he just shut the whole site down.
Now instead of actually refuting what happened, he's removed OT and banned all Political and social threads, then blamed OT for all of this.
Lol yeah, been seeing a lot of this mentality... its pretty toxic because it shuts down conversations as they try to validate someones opnion.As a person who has been here since 2010 I feel like I am learning in this thread and wish to have something clarified.
In 7 years I have 1,787 posts for an average of 0.65 posts per day. Does this make my opinion less valid?
If so, Ive learned that in the most recent Brave EXVIUS thread I was a top poster. Does this make my posts about that game one of the best?
Im experiencing conflicting views and not sure how it works.
Thanks guys!
I don't know about links being banned in PM's. Possible theres a word in the link thats blacklisted, not sure.
Anyway, there are sites out there that are reporting staff are reading their PM's and banning them for things they sent/received etc. vBulletin does NOT let any user read another users PM. You'd have to either login as that user, or have direct access to the database.
The ๖ۜBronx;252841557 said:What were some points for them that you were previously afraid to raise?
Not sure when and where I gained member status if I could be completely honest. Never really put any stock into the title.
How cute. The idea that NeoGAF hasn't been at ALL about labeling, denigrating, and dismissing out of hand, with yes indeed, a holier-than-thou attitude, an entire segment of users here, simply because they disagreed with certain positions or ideas they had, is just laughably inane. That you would try now to paint yourself the victim of someone with *haha* "gamergate ways" is pathetic.
NeoGAF has indeed been a protected safe haven for people with specific political/social agendas. That someone would send you off to a new "safe haven" for those of your apparent worldview/mindset is hardly surprising, especially given that at least one major NeoGAF alternative has already specifically stated that they are making sure that those with opposing viewpoints are being filtered out.
Opposing viewpoints as in homophobic, racist, sexist yadda yadda you know the same rules that used to apply here.Holy shit, that is nuts. Some of these people would be scary if they were actual leaders. They are authoritarians without the power. Very mentally weak individuals.
Opposing viewpoints as in homophobic, racist, sexist yadda yadda you know the same rules that used to apply here.