Nobody who is leaving is claiming they never ever inadvertently support gross people. Theyre saying theyve seen how gross Evilore is and no longer wish to support him. His grossness is not solely being determined by these accusations.
The norm was justifiable bans, but there will always be some outliers.
Do we really need to repeat this again and again?What do you mean by "gross"? Gross is a broad term, so what is the specific act that you are saying that is gross?
Ya'll are diluting the events that took place.
He hasn't taken accountability over the events, how he made her feel, how he responded, etc.
That is why people dipped. People fuck up all the time.
Do we really need to repeat this again and again?
The order of events don't add up. You don't get into a sexual relationship with your sexual harasser if you think you're a victim.
Many victims continue to have a relationship with their abuser.
Though it may be difficult for the public to understand, it is common for survivors of sexual abuse to continue relationships with their abusers after the abuse has stopped. Individuals react to trauma in different ways. For example, it is common for victims to maintain contact with their abusers because they may still feel affection for them even though they hate the abuse. This is especially normal when the abuser is a member of the family or a close family friend. It is also common for some victims to maintain contact in an attempt to regain control over their assault. Others may maintain contact in an attempt to regain a feeling of normalcy.
It is intellectually dishonest to ask as if it isn't already well known at this point.They got into a relationship afterwards, so, at that time, she felt pretty fine and dandy about it.
Do we know he didn't apologize or anything in private during their relationship? We don't know. All we know, from Klepick's article, is that the shower thing happened, then they got into a relationship, then they broke up, and now she's accusing him of sexual harassment.
The order of events don't add up. You don't get into a sexual relationship with your sexual harasser if you think you're a victim.
Well, we can't tell you if what you're saying is right or wrong if it's so vague.
By no means am I saying he did it, but at the same time, the behavior doesn't automatically mean she's lying either. It's perfectly normal behavior for such an incident.
can you provide one?
Is getting naked into a shower and being told to leave and then doing so actually abuse? Abuse to me is pressing the issue, becoming threatening, ensuring she's drunk and isolating her etc.
WHAT IS SEXUAL ASSAULT?
Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient.
Its OK guys, much like Phoenix Rising did I expect most of you defending EviLore to show up on Era and act like that never happened. We wont bring it up so get it out of your systems now.
the most american thing I've ever seen.As defined by the US Justice Department, it sounds like the answer is yes.
https://www.justice.gov/ovw/sexual-assault
You should probably read up on the subject and behavior:
https://www.pcar.org/blog/common-victim-behaviors-survivors-sexual-abuse
By no means am I saying he did it, but at the same time, the behavior doesn't automatically mean she's lying either. It's perfectly normal behavior for such an incident.
It is intellectually dishonest to ask as if it isn't already well known at this point.
the most american thing I've ever seen.
'please sign this waiver before I allow myself to get an erection'.
You'll have to excuse me if I don't differ to the USA as the bastion of right and wrong and I can't really pretend the US as a whole is winning the race in having a healthy attitude towards sex when compared to other first world countries.
Yeah, I know about that. I'm just pointing out that the order of events complicates any judgement and requires more evidence. I don't think it's perfectly normal because perfectly normal and logical behavior is to get away from it. We don't know if she had full control of her decisions at the time of their relationship. It's just something you can pin as evidence.
I agree that the US's behavior towards sex is regressed compared to other places, but both of the people involved live in the US and the events took place in the US which means they are bound by US laws. So no matter what you think of what should or should not be sexual assault, those are the circumstances of the incident.
can you provide evidence to this personal attack?for a junior with 5 posts, you sure reek of alt account.
Do we really need to repeat this again and again?
which begs the question have charges been laid and who is guilty and at what point according to those laws?
Also, does the US government give examples of what explicit sexual consent sounds like in practice? Is there somewhere I can read those examples?
EDIT: I appreciate the discussion by the way and I don't know the owner or the girl accusing him from a bar of soap, but based on the story so far I'm having very hard time just posting a banner that says 'believe women'. I'm proudly moderate and I don't believe this situation actually has to result out in 'he's a rapist' or 'she's a liar'. Despite the current celebrity drama going on.
(8)Consent.
(A) The term consent means a freely given agreement to the conduct at issue by a competent person. An expression of lack of consent through words or conduct means there is no consent. Lack of verbal or physical resistance or submission resulting from the use of force, threat of force, or placing another person in fear does not constitute consent. A current or previous dating or social or sexual relationship by itself or the manner of dress of the person involved with the accused in the conduct at issue shall not constitute consent.
(B) A sleeping, unconscious, or incompetent person cannot consent. A person cannot consent to force causing or likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm or to being rendered unconscious. A person cannot consent while under threat or in fear or under the circumstances described in subparagraph (C) or (D) of subsection (b)(1).
(C) Lack of consent may be inferred based on the circumstances of the offense. All the surrounding circumstances are to be considered in determining whether a person gave consent, or whether a person did not resist or ceased to resist only because of another persons actions.
She should have pressed charges and things could have then been handled behind closed doors, though putting his and her name out there wasn't the wisest thing to do, but I'm not a lawyer so what do I know.
Evilore should probably move to another country and change his name if he ever wants to have a normal life again.
item C in the list is a pretty broad 'choose your side' kind of clause. Which is good I suppose because that's how it really is.
the issue I've got with the story is that in the story about the owner, he made a 'pretty bold' advance. The person girl apparently very clearly 'did not give consent' and as the story goes he immediately left.
While you can crucify the guy for 'being a creeper' or whatever, he quite obviously, as the girl told it that way, immediately left the room when consent wasn't given. so.... is he a sexual assaulter as defined by those laws? seems not?
But studies about sexual assault show that the behavior of victims isn't perfectly normal or logical. That's the whole point. You can't hold it against them because victims do often go against what you might think they would do. I feel like people trying to point out the relationship are trying to use that as proof that it didn't happen or to dilute the allegation when we shouldn't be.
Its OK guys, much like Phoenix Rising did I expect most of you defending EviLore to show up on Era and act like that never happened. We wont bring it up so get it out of your systems now.
How come she didnt lock the door?
How did op get banned?
Holy shit there are 24k members on resetera
There have been under 200k accounts registered on gaf since its inception
The fact that I can leave off topic for an hour and come back to less than 10 threads being bumped sucks.
If you look at the article, they had discussed about how the incident was not okay, and it says Evilore was receptive to the discussion. This is the part where I think she stops being a victim because they talked about the inappropriateness of the shower incident. Everything afterwards is just a normal relationship uninfluenced by the inappropriate behavior in the shower.
How come she didnt lock the door?
How come she didnt lock the door?
So much of the Internet has fought for this very moment. Where accusations, especially against wealthy males are the judge, jury, and executioner. It's sad really. This site has vigorously defended that it ever incited any type of "mob rule". I wonder if that opinion is still fully intact.
Wait until you are accused of something that is either untrue, or completely blown out of proportion. It will make you put down that flaming pitchfork at every news article you read. Imagine making a name for yourself in 10 years from now and achieving the dream for yourself and your family. Hopefully you didn't even say anything questionable in your lifetime or it's all over. Everyone is so concerned with smearing each other and furthering their own causes, that no one gives a crap about ruining your life.
It's also pretty crazy that I could have made this same post a month ago, and would have been met with graphs, being called ignorant, responses such as "are you even serious right now?", the works, probably even a ban. Yet today, at the very least, it shows an ounce of credibility.
This is a pretty good summary of my feelingsIt's a 11.5 hours from the first and last post on page 1 of OT. Gaming at least seems a bit healthier at 2.5 hours but it used to be separated by minutes
I think I'm gonna take a break from here as I am coming for the wrong reasons, I feel like a rubbernecker slowing down looking at the car wreck.
good luck!
Talking with your harrasser and telling them that harrassing you is not ok doesn't mean it didn't happen (even if they stop then)
She called it a "teachable moment" because she felt she could correct him on it and he would be ok with that but he still did the thing that she had to then teach him not to do.
Dude was creepy as fuck and then tried to call her a liar and crazy when it came back on him.
The problem is that this seems to become the only viable option. I love the resource of old threads here on the gaming side but I'm shocked with the output for the new Paris Sony event. Especially as you can compare the same threads on both forums. I did not expect the fallout from these allegations to be so drastic.
I tell you what, man, if someone asks you what happened, the longer you wait to answer the guiltier you look. Saying "hold on I'll make a statement in a sec" and then three days later coming back with "nah, that chick is crazy" makes you look like a untrustworthy as fuck.
As does your entire workforce quitting after you speak to them about it.
As does closing a section of your website for clearly no other reason than to try to stop discussion of your situation.
As does speaking to the press before speaking directly to your community.
Too much smoke choked the website out, the allegations we're just the spark that started the blaze.
Imagine being a cheerleader for a message board. As if this some football league
She didn't even close it. "I had it cracked open enough for protection" lol.
Or, he thought it was an invitation because she was in their for so long and they were both drunk. Everyone has the same critical thinking skills you have while drunk. A possibility perhaps.
That doesn't make it an invite, although I'm guessing you're a rapist.
That doesn't make it an invite, although I'm guessing you're a rapist.
She didn't even close it. "I had it cracked open enough for protection" lol.