Off-site Community Discussion (Reset, etc.) -- READ OP. Stay civil. Don't make it personal. Keep it in here.

Status
Not open for further replies.
2. As for the comparison to paedophilia: In contrast to acting on paedophilia, acting on homosexuality (consent being a given) has no victims. So comparing an act that necessarily humilates a person to one that has no victims is a false equivalence (to stay on topic of Resetera).

In a bit of a hurry as I'm at work but I just want to be clear that I don't personally compare homosexuality with paedophilia, rather I was comparing how some Christians may feel about it vs something the rest of us can compare it with, ie something that feels seriously icky for both groups - perhaps I did it badly but the key was to illustrate that we should try to avoid forcing them to go against their beliefs (eg baking a cake with a pro-gay slogan or whatever). I'll try to come back to this later - your other point is valid of course and I agree that Jesus was about forgiveness, but one must also consider that people have been indoctrinated by fairly aggressive evangelical churches and thus their opinions may be coloured by that.
 
In a bit of a hurry as I'm at work but I just want to be clear that I don't personally compare homosexuality with paedophilia, rather I was comparing how some Christians may feel about it vs something the rest of us can compare it with, ie something that feels seriously icky for both groups - perhaps I did it badly but the key was to illustrate that we should try to avoid forcing them to go against their beliefs (eg baking a cake with a pro-gay slogan or whatever). I'll try to come back to this later - your other point is valid of course and I agree that Jesus was about forgiveness, but one must also consider that people have been indoctrinated by fairly aggressive evangelical churches and thus their opinions may be coloured by that.

It was pretty clear to me that you were speaking somewhat abstractly and speculating on how a Christian may see the two as comparable to some degree, not presenting your own view. In my experience, Yoshi Yoshi is very literal, so his response is not unexpected (said with love).
 
He may or may not have interpreted it that way, but I just wanted to clarify just in case anyone got that impression!
 
What can you use so you don't offend a gender fluid person?

Shit in my own language (Spanish) it's even worse because we don't have Neutral words.
- You people
- You all (not y'all though, you will offend me with that)
and of course: Hello friend(s) (with a Indian accent, if you know Diddy Kong Racing)

@hariseldon: It was clear to me what you wanted to say, but I wanted to clarify why I think this viewpoint is still not justified, even if taking Christian belief granted.
 
Last edited:
I don't identify as a person, I identify as a mad professor holding a spanner.
 
This post appears generic at first, but it's the Donkey Kong avatar that makes it.

https://www.resetera.com/threads/cn...-ad-days-before-midterms.78395/#post-14471851
nJtKW6n.png
 
What if someone identifies as an apache helicopter?
User banned (duration pending): Lingering transphobia, discriminatory against helicopters, specifically Apache helicopters, incorrect usage of grammar, namely capitals, history of pretending happiness, in junior phase

:messenger_winking:
 
Ningens is the clear choice. But anybody not Japanese may think you said the other word. N'wah.
 
I read somewhere online that Ree is the shit when it comes to blazing fast game news. Suppose some people never heard about Reddit or sth. I tried to make an account on that shithole of a forum, but wasn't accepted. Guess they didn't like my nickname CultOvXbox.
 
All I needed to see was first post and last page first post.

And like ERA fashion a thread that has nothing to do about rape is now being pulled into that.

What the fuck is wrong with them pushing so hard for rape culture, and pedophilia?

0b49fd7a-d085-42cc-9d4c-0a243153a302_text.gif

9945d634-c9a2-4298-9945-bacd40cb3a49_text.gif

db0d82f2-ea97-46e7-bfbf-aba4092758e3_text.gif
 
I love when re trolls come over here with new accounts acting like regular video-game-playing joes, but immediately give themselves away through the vocabulary they use
 
2. It's not necessary to separate families or lock children up in chain link cages like animals. The only reason this should be a thing to do at all is in extreme circumstances where the child is in danger or sick. Otherwise families should be kept together. Treating them like animals is barbaric and it's inhumane.

Do you think children aren't separated from all criminals who commit crimes that require incarceration? These children simply have no one else family wise to go to. Is it the government's fault these people broke the law trying to illegally immigrate and had to be incarcerated? Should criminals get special treatment because they have had a child? There are consequences to breaking the law. The illegal immigrant parents are the true problems here who put their children in these positions.

3. And I agree that it was a less than great plan, but it's all we have now. If the GOP wishes to repeal the ACA and replace it with something better then I will support that 100%. But it has to be a plan that will ensure that NOBODY loses their current coverage. Nobody deserves to have their healthcare stripped away. The ACA literally saved lives. That should be seen as a good thing. Not something to be thrown into the trash. If it's a problem then fix it. Don't say it's broken and then set it on fire as if that's going to be any better.

ACA saved and killed. It just moved the killing from the lower class to the middle class. The lower class could get free medical while the middle class rates skyrocketed to provide it for them. Middle class medical was plundered and left with him premiums, copays, and upfront costs where now middle class families had to think of whether to choose going to a doctor and not being able to afford it or just trying to get by without it. ACA killed just as it saved. It just changed who was dying.

4. And that's fine. People are entitled to their religious beliefs. They can disagree and not like it all they want. What they can't do is use their religion as a weapon and force everyone else to follow it. They don't get to directly affect the li es of others due to THEIR religious beliefs. Laws should not be made as a result of religion.

Is this like using your politics as a weapon and trying to force everyone to follow it or they are a bad person?
 
What can you use so you don't offend a gender fluid person?

Shit in my own language (Spanish) it's even worse because we don't have Neutral words.

Funny, i was talking about this yesterday with my boss from work, she said someone told her these people want to be called something new

Example: Instead of saying "Hermosa" or "Hermoso" we should be calling them "Hermose" because that will be a neutral gender.

Both of thought this way too absurd, but its something like that.
 
All I needed to see was first post and last page first post.

And like ERA fashion a thread that has nothing to do about rape is now being pulled into that.
This week at work a female colleague called me and my female co-worker to the table for a talk and she did so with ''Can you take a look at this you guys.''

Nobody threw up a fuss or screamed ''That's discriminatory!''

Probably because we were more focused on working than discussing theories that nobody IRL throws a fuss about unless you have nothing better to do.

Which in retrospect is precisely the secret message of that thread that @PKM linked: They are basically saying: ''We have nothing better to do, so we are looking for things to be upset over or that we can push a new narrative with.''

I wish they were atleast honest with their ulterior motives like that.

What the fuck is wrong with them pushing so hard for rape culture, and pedophilia?
Because they are pedo's themselves.*
ShruggingShoulders.png
6.png


*I mean, if they can make gross and stupid reaching generalizations, so can we, right? And what i say is always right, so whatever they say is invalid. :messenger_winking:

Your move ERAdians. Keep digging.
TEbwhr8.gif


I love when re trolls come over here with new accounts acting like regular video-game-playing joes, but immediately give themselves away through the vocabulary they use
''Yikes''
fantasia2.png
 
I don't understand how even me someone who is sorta pushy on my pronouns doesn't get offended at this "guys" thing then I don't understand how the fuck they did.
 
I'm sure there are ways around it.
To get in? I guess. I just found it peculiar that i got axed on 3 Discords on the same day, months after my ban with no visible reasoning.

Honestly I am surprised that not even members of KiwiFarms have gotten in to troll them, or list their stupidity (unless I missed it).
Kiwi also has users active on Ree and some do have missions aswell. One of the aspects i dislike about that though. There is no need to look for gotcha's on Ree as they manufacture, produce, label and send the gotcha's to the internet highway themselves.
 
Last edited:
They state they are part of the LGBT community (though in an asinine way with the "being LGBT" which would infer that they are both L, B, G, and T). Agar states that they thought they were Gay, but found out they were pansexual after "being with" (sleeping with) a Female to Male transgender.

I always found pan to be a weird descriptor. They almost always like dick, pussy, or both and are less picky about the secondary sexual characteristics and gender.

Pan sounds like they should be getting aroused by tree stumps and random shit.
 
Funny, i was talking about this yesterday with my boss from work, she said someone told her these people want to be called something new

Example: Instead of saying "Hermosa" or "Hermoso" we should be calling them "Hermose" because that will be a neutral gender.

Both of thought this way too absurd, but its something like that.

Hermosura?
Cacho pan?
 
Looks like everybody's favorite height-challenged fake black guy has been accused of some sort of sexual assault. I'm pretty sure I remember him virtue signaling that he was an "ally" and completely on board with the whole "always believe women" bandwagon. So is he believing his own alleged female victim? It seems not and has instead chosen to defend himself and claim his innocence. I, for one, am shocked.
bobby.jpg

I have no clue about what exactly he's being accused of or any details, I just came across this pic so if anybody else can fill in the blanks on this... I sure am curious.
 
Looks like everybody's favorite height-challenged fake black guy has been accused of some sort of sexual assault. I'm pretty sure I remember him virtue signaling that he was an "ally" and completely on board with the whole "always believe women" bandwagon. So is he believing his own alleged female victim? It seems not and has instead chosen to defend himself and claim his innocence. I, for one, am shocked.
bobby.jpg

I have no clue about what exactly he's being accused of or any details, I just came across this pic so if anybody else can fill in the blanks on this... I sure am curious.
https://disneystarwarsisdumb.wordpress.com/2018/11/01/bryan-young-apologizes/


Seems like this is what it is about.
 
They have done it... they have reached PEAK REE FORM..

https://www.resetera.com/threads/can-we-please-stop-using-the-word-boys-to-address-the-room.78465/







This...this...this is a troll thread right?!?!
I know there was a large group of people who were in a competition and had troll accounts and access to some established members from another site but I dont think this is one of them as it is too blatantly obvious.....and the op is not permabanned.....I think it was a honeypot thread as some of the more paranoid members were talking about trying to smoke these people out on the discord ....this thread would serve the purpose
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom