Bullet Club
Banned

Last edited:
Yes, all the time.People review games without finishing them? Is this a common thing and I'm just super naive about it?
They rarely beat the games reviewed.
People review games without finishing them? Is this a common thing and I'm just super naive about it?
At least with ACG he's only one guy and still manages to put in enough substantial detail in his reviews, but these big websites and publications just seem lazy as a result.I was surprised ACG didnt finish all his games either (despite the amazing review standard).
I can understand it for remasters or as I mentioned above at least the critical patch should be done with a good slice of side content IMO for new games.
This.Translation: we didn't like is and we value Sonys support and don't want to be burned with the fire of a thousand suns by Sony/Kojima fanboys.
At least with ACG he's only one guy and still manages to put in enough substantial detail in his reviews, but these big websites and publications just seem lazy as a result.
People review games without finishing them? Is this a common thing and I'm just super naive about it?
This sounds so fucking wrong. Does that mean they would release the review without finishing the game if they had the opportunity?There's no review of Death Stranding in the next issue of Edge because the embargo insisted we finish the game before we could review it.
No it should have that rule to every game.That is one stupid embargo.
Perfect point.wish i worked at a job where i could just not do my work and tell the boss i ran out of enthusiasm. must be nice to have a job with that kind of privilege.
the fact this jackass can't even do a job he is being paid for tells me more about the game than his review ever could.
This sounds so fucking wrong. Does that mean they would release the review without finishing the game if they had the opportunity?
Fucking gross.
No it should have that rule to every game.
Sounds like they were going to give it a bad/average review. I don't see what the problem is.This sounds so fucking wrong. Does that mean they would release the review without finishing the game if they had the opportunity?
Fucking gross.
Lol learn to read between the lines. The guy is saying he got bored and didnt want to finish the game, so hasnt reviewed it. Half of you go off on some stupid tangent and miss the entire point. At least the guy hasnt released some bullshit review just because he has to.
Lol learn to read between the lines. The guy is saying he got bored and didnt want to finish the game, so hasnt reviewed it. Half of you go off on some stupid tangent and miss the entire point. At least the guy hasnt released some bullshit review just because he has to.
The point is boredom is no fucking excuse for not doing the job. Its not like he's being forced to work on the front-lines and being placed in peril! This lazy slob literally tapped-out on playing a game even though that's what he's a supposed professional at doing.
He is paid to finish the review no matter his feelings.Lol learn to read between the lines. The guy is saying he got bored and didnt want to finish the game, so hasnt reviewed it. Half of you go off on some stupid tangent and miss the entire point. At least the guy hasnt released some bullshit review just because he has to.
Ok you carry on being upset by it. I think he is on point, its not like they do this every edition, in fact probably the first time he has ever done this. I would rather no review than some idiot putting a shit score on something for the sake of it, like Stevivors review for example. Thats just me though, im wierd.
No. People are payed for review a game without finishing them.People review games without finishing them?
They did review it.
Too shit to finish seems to be the verdict. That's enough for me.