• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Why don't helicopters have parachutes?

Is it true that it's game over if a helicopter's tail rotor fails? I've often heard the view that if something goes wrong in a civilian helicopter then the chance of survival is very low – you are basically a passenger in a falling chunk of metal. This is in contrast to an aeroplane which can still be guided to a crash landing.
 
Last edited:
Is it true that it's game over if a helicopter's tail rotor fails? I've often heard the view that if something goes wrong in a civilian helicopter then the chance of survival is very low – you are basically a passenger in a falling chunk of metal.
Not at all. It does become much more difficult to control, especially at low speed, (the tail rotor is there to counter the forces imparted on the helicopter by the engine and blades and stop the helicopter spinning) but it's by no means impossible to recover and a skilled pilot can bring it in safely.
 
I mean, objectively.. I don't see why that'd be a bad idea. It'd only really work if your engine somehow went out at altitude, but that seems like it would at least solve that problem. I am not sure how many times that's happened (and wouldn't have saved Kobe).

The thing is, if the engine goes out, helicopters can still generally land safely because of autorotation, the air moves the rotors as the helicopter falls, providing some lift. Enough to make a safe landing.
 
In all honesty, knowing how helicopter lose control when They fall, and knowing I have no choice but die, I'd prefer to instantly die in the crash than ending horribly mutilated by the blades spinning, whose chance would be imo very high if you try to jump from a falling heli

( knowing myself, tho, in the fear and rush I'd probably try the last chance to jump out anyway, if I have a parachute)
 
Last edited:
A parachute takes 600 to 1200 feet of fall to deploy the main parachute depending on velocity at the time of pulling the RIP cord. The secondary chute can open in 400 feet and it takes 700 feet at minimum distance to on average not sustain injury at minimum velocity.

If I am not mistaken its 1000 feet minimum over rural areas and only 500 over anything rural. So in general most helicopters are not high enough to warrant a parachute. Even at 1000 feet by the time you put one on you'll be below the minimum usage height.

And anyone who said helicopter blades then you need your head examined. When you jump out it's not like a parachute magically pops open to full extension the second you set one foot out of the vehicle like its spring loaded or something.

Then again not a lot of people earned their jump wings like I have.
 
anyone have an idea what the debris at the crash site mean? since its scattered so far and how everything has been disintegrated. also theres a huge patch of dirt wasnt sure if that was always there or if thats where it initially hit.

seeing alot of people say it slammed into the side of the mountain but it seems like a somewhat a gradual incline so shouldn't it skidded and not have been such a violent looking crash.

 
This sounds like the kind of idea a stoner would come up with when you explain to him that giving helicopter passengers parachutes is a terrible idea.
"...then just like...put the parachute on the helicopter bro..."

unlimited-power_o_1441357.jpg
 
And anyone who said helicopter blades then you need your head examined. When you jump out it's not like a parachute magically pops open to full extension the second you set one foot out of the vehicle like its spring loaded or something.

Then again not a lot of people earned their jump wings like I have.
Jumping out of a plane / helicopter that is still actively in flight is a very different prospect from jumping out of a helicopter that is actively falling. As soon as you leap from the helicopter it will cease to influence your velocity. Depending on a number of different factors such as the exact mode of failure, orientation and aerodynamics of both you and the helicopter, it may / may not fall faster than you.

If it is and those blades are still spinning, no matter how impaired and damaged they may already be, jumping is a bad decision, since there is a very real chance you may get hit as it leaves you behind in the race towards the ground.

Edit: To say nothing of the tail rotor. If that fucker is spinning wildly and the tail rotor is still going...
 
Last edited:
anyone have an idea what the debris at the crash site mean? since its scattered so far and how everything has been disintegrated. also theres a huge patch of dirt wasnt sure if that was always there or if thats where it initially hit.

seeing alot of people say it slammed into the side of the mountain but it seems like a somewhat a gradual incline so shouldn't it skidded and not have been such a violent looking crash.



From what I read, it said they were descending at like 4000 feet per minute or something. I would guess by the wreckage that they were heading left to right, and just smacked into the mountain.

These were taken sometime after the crash, and it was still really foggy. I am guessing the pilot couldn't see the ground and was trying to get down quick to find the freeway again.


9k4iFOK.jpg


rFc4nwu.jpg
 
Last edited:
for passangers to use in case they have to bail, this whole kobe thing could of been avoided


seriosuly why havn't aviation officials added emergency parachutes in helicopters

because when you crash on a fricking terrain it doesn't matter
 
Some people are talking about it as if it's like the movies when you see a helicopter spinning wildly out of control so you fear they would be cut to pieces if they bailed, but the reality is that Kobe's helicopter crashed into a hillside in extreme fog considered dangerous for flying. It's tragic but it sounds like they were doomed from the start having flown in bad weather.
 
okay that's ingenious, i never thought to blow off its main roters like that. see this is why you need to ask stupid questions sometimes.
 
Last edited:
Some people are talking about it as if it's like the movies when you see a helicopter spinning wildly out of control so you fear they would be cut to pieces if they bailed, but the reality is that Kobe's helicopter crashed into a hillside in extreme fog considered dangerous for flying.
While it's true that a parachute wouldn't have saved Kobe OP asked a more general question: Why don't helicopters have parachutes? Well, the answer is because you can either bring it in safely for landing, and so don't need a 'chute, or it's spinning wildly out of control in freefall with no hope of survival, in which case you don't need a 'chute because you're going to die either way. There's really no inbetween with something like a helicopter that is already incredibly unstable when it's working properly. In or out of the helicopter, it makes no difference, a parachute can't save you.
 
Real question, why aren't cabin cockpits stronger than fiber glass to withstand harder impact. Yes, cost factor vs weight, but plenty of strong material for those who can afford better.
 
I mean, from what I read they were going 184mph when the helicopter impacted. They would've had no time to react at all once they realized what was happening. Sometimes there's just no escaping death.
The pilot nose dived 4000 feet into the ground.
Some thing went wrong other than not seeing a mountain.

Real question, why aren't cabin cockpits stronger than fiber glass to withstand harder impact. Yes, cost factor vs weight, but plenty of strong material for those who can afford better.
Because the human body is pathetically weak.
 
Last edited:
No time, no training, no point.

Most helicopter accidents don't appear to offer the time/opportunity to put on a chute and safely exit the copter at a height conducive to parachuting.

Most passengers don't have the training to parachute from anything, much less a helicopter that has suffered some sort of catastrophic failure that prohibits landing/ditching.

If the pilot has enough control of the copter for passengers to kit up and jump the pilot has enough control of the copter to land/ditch it instead.
 
Last edited:
The pilot nose dived 4000 feet into the ground.
Some thing went wrong other than not seeing a mountain.


Because the human body is pathetically weak.
A cockpit and body frame can be built to withstand greater impacts. With massive airbags, seems like some possibility to survive would exist.
 
Last edited:
A cockpit and body frame can be built to withstand greater impacts. With massive airbags, seems like some possibility to survive would exist.
Helicopters aren't like planes, they have to be lightweight. Planes use aerodynamics to float on a cloud of air. Helicopters batter air into the ground with giant paddles to maintain lift.
 
Some airplanes have a chute for the whole plane

 
Spinning rotors will chew you up on the way down. Also Helicopters go down really fast. Either way the craft is going down you're fucked to put it mildly.
 
You are not surviving a 186mph impact head on into the ground. No matter what.
Apollo capsule used 'shutes to deccelerate their reentry. As with the Russian chopper popping off blades, under some conditions the Apollo method would work, which in a % of crashes is beneficial. Like seatbelts saving lives in some conditions, but not all. Running smack dab into a mountain isn't the same set of conditions. Instead, build chopper cockpit infrastructure stronger than fiberglass. Am sure it can be done, right Elon? It comes down to cost vs weight.
 
Hollywood. Lol.

Just jump out and dive roll when you hit the ground. If you're a good guy you'll live. If you're a bad guy you'll be skewered on a fence or flagpole.

Dude this is reality. Physics and human error are at play here.

Just double jump right before you hit the ground lmao
 
Construct a stronger cockpit... will it blend the pilot or not? /s
 
Last edited:
Honestly one of the biggest problems is the explosion and fire that follows a crash, and that goes for cars too. Even if you survive the crash you can be set ablaze.

If only there was a system that in case of an impact would pump the shit out of the fuel the fuck outta there at high speed, IDK. Or that would burn it in a controlled way. It could at least minimize the hell that goes on in such an event.
 
Honestly one of the biggest problems is the explosion and fire that follows a crash, and that goes for cars too. Even if you survive the crash you can be set ablaze.

If only there was a system that in case of an impact would pump the shit out of the fuel the fuck outta there at high speed, IDK. Or that would burn it in a controlled way. It could at least minimize the hell that goes on in such an event.
Yes let the rich people in the helicopters dump highly flammable fuel all over us expendable plebs so they have a 10% higher survival rate.
Plus what if the fuel evacuation device is faulty and spews all the gas out of an otherwise perfectly functional helicopter.
 
Yes let the rich people in the helicopters dump highly flammable fuel all over us expendable plebs so they have a 10% higher survival rate.
Plus what if the fuel evacuation device is faulty and spews all the gas out of an otherwise perfectly functional helicopter.
I am just spitballing, not greenlighting an idea without even seeing its execution or reliability. There's just so advanced tech nowadays, AI, machine learning, machine vision, things that could be used to determine if it such a manoeuvre is safe or not etc.
 
Top Bottom