Lognor
Banned
Ps5 and xsx will hit that wall as well. All in time. Whether the series s hits it significantly earlier, we'll see. But I tend to doubt itI'm only talking about it from a tech perspective. Not gamer value.
Ps5 and xsx will hit that wall as well. All in time. Whether the series s hits it significantly earlier, we'll see. But I tend to doubt itI'm only talking about it from a tech perspective. Not gamer value.
Ps5 and xsx will hit that wall as well. All in time. Whether the series s hits it significantly earlier, we'll see. But I tend to doubt it
Sony's game subs make more money than the MS ones.Subscription service will bring in more money but requires more upfront investment and it's riskier and may not be as profitable. I believe the average Xbox or PS user spends less than $140 a year. Gamepass is $180 a year. That's already a 28% increase in revenue. For these reasons, I can see Sony changing their stance in a few years.
Square Enix, Polyarc, Deviation, and White Moon Dreams if I had to guess based on those criteriaI think this fiscal year we'll see:
- Acquisition of a Japanese publisher, a VR focused studio who already worked for them, a 2nd party studio and a porting or outsourcing team
No need to spread misinformation.Sony game division has billions of profits every year while the MS one instead a has billions of loses.
Show me proof.Sony game division has billions of profits every year while the MS one instead a has billions of loses.
Seems unnecessarily rude.Yeah mostly to retards that want to console war.
Are you one of them?
Because it looks like you are.
No need to spread misinformation.
Wtf are you talking about?Show me proof.
I don't think you understand finances.In the recent years MS game division acquired many studios for almost $100B (still didn't pay the $68.7B for ABK because still not closed) and they made around $15B/year in revenue. Even if they would work for free and wouldn't have to buy hardware, licenses, internet, patents, etc for their offices and servers all that revenue would be profit (which obviously isn't the case at all) they would need many years to recoup that and turn it into profit.
Lol, I didn't say to pay for something is a loss, I said it's a cost.I don't think you understand finances.
Spending money on an asset isn't the same as making a loss.
No.You make the loss if and when you try to sell the asset but you get less for the asset then you paid for it.
So you are giving him the reason. You don't know anything about finances.A given year you have revenue (like game sales or monthly payments of a sub) and costs (like to pay acquisitions, pay for server costs, pay gamedevs or marketing campaigns).
If revenue is bigger than costs, you have profit for that year. If instead you have bigger costs, you have loses for that year.
No, I'm telling him and you that I'm not talking about assets. I'm talking about profit or loses of a game division.So you are giving him the reason. You don't know anything about finances.
Assets are not accounted as a loss.
You just need to stop regurgitating nonsense about Xbox running at a loss. I asked you simple proof to back up your statement and you have been unable to do so.No, I'm telling him and you that I'm not talking about assets. I'm talking about profit or loses of a game division.
If you pay a transaction in cash this is a cost and if you pay tthat team their salaries, electricity bills, licenses, marketing of their game etc etc these are costs too.
And if for a specific year your costs are way higher than your revenue you have loses in that division for that year.
Stop acting like one. I made a prediction & I'll say it again, it'll be a 2:1 margin or higher by the end of this gen. Cope & seethe.Yeah mostly to retards that want to console war.
Are you one of them?
Because it looks like you are.
You're wrong bro, just take the L.No, I'm telling him and you that I'm not talking about assets. I'm talking about profit or loses of a game division.
If you pay a transaction in cash this is a cost and if you pay tthat team their salaries, electricity bills, licenses, marketing of their game etc etc these are costs too.
And if for a specific year your costs are way higher than your revenue you have loses in that division for that year.
Just to add to his point. When you're buying a company (an asset), it's not an expense, it's an investment. What they're doing is taking cash and converting it into "shares" in a new company they own. It's like when I buy $500 worth of shares in a company, its not an expense, I've just turned my $500 into $500 worth of stock instead. Now when that company increases in value, I can actually book that as a profit (and when it decreases in value I book that as losses)!I don't think you understand finances.
Spending money on an asset isn't the same as making a loss. You make the loss if and when you try to sell the asset but you get less for the asset then you paid for it.
Yeah, from what i've read big AAA games, especially single player campaigns, are way more evenly split physical/digital. It would be interesting to see the yearly split taking into account only games that have both physical and digital releases, but i guess we will never see that info.Basically, physical sales fluctuates more. Digital sales are more even year round.
PS5 launch was a big quarter for physical. Quarter after that was very low.
Physical game sales spike every year from Oct-Dec. Christmas season, etc.
![]()
Go fuck yourself in your fantasy worldYou're wrong bro, just take the L.
No need to antagonize. Facts are facts.Go fuck yourself in your fantasy world
True, it would be good for you to accept factsNo need to antagonize. Facts are facts.
Hardware numbers will be interesting. May give us an idea if they can really reach that 18m they are predicting this fy.Friendly bump that we should be get data tomorrow.
Any interesting data points that you are looking out for? May influence my post/thread if I get there first.
Tbh the fall trimester is always the best one. I could see Sony shipping around 7M or more just this current trimester.Hardware numbers will be interesting. May give us an idea if they can really reach that 18m they are predicting this fy.
All of them.Friendly bump that we should be get data tomorrow.
Any interesting data points that you are looking out for? May influence my post/thread if I get there first.
First party software sales are going to be interesting. Is their PC strategy really working?Friendly bump that we should be get data tomorrow.
Any interesting data points that you are looking out for? May influence my post/thread if I get there first.
They had TLOU Remake release, they had Spider-Man PC release (which is probably their biggest PC release ever), hardware sales will have quite the bump, etc...First party software sales are going to be interesting. Is their PC strategy really working?
…and PS3 era.We won pretty good last gen and the 2 were far apart….ahh same goes for PS2 era.
- Hardware (because Sony has been super aggressive, and I think the next 2 quarters will be huge for PS)Friendly bump that we should be get data tomorrow.
Any interesting data points that you are looking out for? May influence my post/thread if I get there first.
I'm also curious on PS Plus numbers and revenue after the revamp. I'm sure some changes happened with this, plus the PS5 stock increase.- Hardware (because Sony has been super aggressive, and I think the next 2 quarters will be huge for PS)
- First-party software sales
- PS5 software sales
- PS+ numbers / revenue ratio (so we can see if the Extra/Premium membership brought any additional revenue and how much)
Friendly bump that we should be get data tomorrow.
Any interesting data points that you are looking out for? May influence my post/thread if I get there first.
Definitely will be interesting to see if the Arpu related to subscription has increasedPS+ numbers / revenue ratio (so we can see if the Extra/Premium membership brought any additional revenue and how much)
Yeah, like 5 hrsThe earnings report is a few hours away right? I'm going with 3.2 million PS5 shipped for the quarter.
The earnings report is a few hours away right? I'm going with 3.2 million PS5 shipped for the quarter.
Friendly bump that we should be get data tomorrow.
Any interesting data points that you are looking out for? May influence my post/thread if I get there first.
Definitely will be interesting to see if the Arpu related to subscription has increased
Main
- PS5 Units (Last year was 3.3m)
- Hardware (Last year was 160,635m yen)
- First-party software sales (7.6m last year; lowest of the year)
- PS5 software sales (Don't split by platform sadly)
- PS+ numbers / revenue ratio (Last year was 47.2m and 100,444m yen so ARPU roughly ~797 yen per month per user(???))
- OI margin (Last year was 12.8%)
- Shift in sales to customers* (US was 27% last year, Q1 was 30%)
Others
- Game sales info
- Investment update
- Any indication of PSVR release date (suspect wont get anything)
*USD obviously did make a difference
That is extremely outlandish, PS5 would have to easily beat the competition in NA & EU and be competive in Japan and from the data we do have that is not the case, PS5 won August and September NPD, in Europe It Won in the Uk but has been losing to Switch in Continental Europe and it Gets destroyed by Switch In Japan,. When Switch was selling 5 million in a regular non-holiday quarter we got press releases saying things like "best August for hardware units since 2008" etc but we didn't hear that from Sony. From PS4 data we know the highest PS4 ever sold in a non holiday quarter was 4.2 million so selling 5 million is truly exceptional and Sales would have to be record breaking to sell that much, not record breaking for unit sales for NPD but definately dollar sales because of the much higher price for the PS5 over the Wii, DS, Switch.Sony has a projection of 18 million PS5's this FY. In Q1 of this year they only shipped 2.4 million units as they were very heavily supply constrained. Since July they've had noticeably larger quantities of units available. I'm gonna guess it'll be a lot higher, more like 4.5 to 5 million. That'll let them aim for several million units during the holiday period and covering Ragnaroks launch.
No, I'm telling him and you that I'm not talking about assets. I'm talking about profit or loses of a game division.
If you pay a transaction in cash this is a cost and if you pay tthat team their salaries, electricity bills, licenses, marketing of their game etc etc these are costs too.
And if for a specific year your costs are way higher than your revenue you have loses in that division for that year.
Earnings reports have replaced the PlayStation Showcase. Who else is calling off work tomorrow?
Costs are costs and losses are losses even if there are different types of them, or if they can be placed in different sides. But at the end investments and acquisitions affect the profits or loses of the year.Cost of operations is separate from investments. Saying a company "made a loss" because it purchased a company that generates additional revenue is nonsense. Cash on a balance sheet is converted into an equivalent amount of assets. Go read up on financial statements and you'll see that investments are separated from expenses related to running a business.
That is extremely outlandish, PS5 would have to easily beat the competition in NA & EU and be competive in Japan and from the data we do have that is not the case, PS5 won August and September NPD, in Europe It Won in the Uk but has been losing to Switch in Continental Europe and it Gets destroyed by Switch In Japan,. When Switch was selling 5 million in a regular non-holiday quarter we got press releases saying things like "best August for hardware units since 2008" etc but we didn't hear that from Sony. From PS4 data we know the highest PS4 ever sold in a non holiday quarter was 4.2 million so selling 5 million is truly exceptional and Sales would have to be record breaking to sell that much, not record breaking for unit sales for NPD but definately dollar sales because of the much higher price for the PS5 over the Wii, DS, Switch.
lolSee? We were both wrong. You said 3.2, I said 4.5-5... and the actual figure was 3.3. I think we we can both agree that I was closer, and therefore I take the win on this prediction.
...![]()