feynoob
Banned
Microsoft was against Nvidia deal, which they worked hard to block it. Here are some info about it.What was the "tangible" reason to block the Nvidia Arm deal?
The team Alaily leads aimed to torpedo Nvidia's $40 billion bid for chipmaker Arm, a deal Microsoft believed would harm it and others in the tech industry by raising the licensing costs for Arm's chip designs (Microsoft uses chips based on Arm designs for servers and other products). Working under the supervision of her boss, Microsoft president Brad Smith, and with Microsoft's outside counsel at the time, Jonathan Kanter, Alaily's team crafted the arguments Microsoft put forward to urge the Federal Trade Commission to intervene and block the deal, according to someone with knowledge of the situation. Last December, the FTC filed a lawsuit against the acquisition—which other prominent tech companies also opposed—and in February, Nvidia abandoned its bid for Arm.
LONDON — Microsoft-backed Graphcore has objected to Nvidia's $40 billion acquisition of Arm Holdings, according to a key member of the British chipmaker's early development.
Hermann Hauser told CNBC that Graphcore has opposed the deal in a "major submission" to the U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority.
"If Nvidia can merge the Arm and Nvidia designs in the same software then that locks out companies like Graphcore from entering the seller market and entering a close relationship with Arm," said Hauser, who is an investor in Graphcore through his venture capital firm Amadeus Capital.
A spokesperson for Nvidia, which is planning to buy Arm from Japanese tech giant SoftBank, described the deal as "pro-competitive" on Wednesday. Arm did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for comment.
Graphcore and the CMA declined to comment. However, Graphcore CEO Nigel Toon told CNBC in December that Graphcore views the deal as anti-competitive. "It risks closing down or limiting other companies' access to leading edge CPU processor designs which are so important across the technology world, from data centers, to mobile, to cars and in embedded devices of every kind," he said.
And MS have the ability to take this to the court, or offer concession. This is not something MS would simply give it up.These regulators have pretty far reach in terms of blocking deals on antitrust grounds. If they conclude Microsoft buying the largest 3rd party publisher in the games industry would result in reduced competition, the courts aren't going to side with Microsoft.
Not really. MS have high level of lawyers, and experts who they get their advice about this deal. The fact that MS is sure about it, shows how confident they are about this deal.Microsoft is really shooting for the moon here in this attempt and there really isn't any precedent for this happening.
Plus they know any problems with deal, from their experts.