This is such bullshit. How would it even work? Sony doesn't even have their PS5/PS4 games on cloud streaming unless you're remote playing your console. Would they port all their exclusives? How much would that cost per title? Such a nonsense story.
There's no glory in battle. MS is doing everything they can to sell a Series S including playing the amazing games from the competition. PlayStation brand expansion at no extra cost for Cryin Jim Ryan.Xbox plays PS2 games better than the PS5 does and MS hasn't shut that down yet.
I mean, it doesn't matter to you. But you're not the one making the decisions here.That doesn't matter. Like we say in portuguese: "Chumbo trocado não doi"
This is such bullshit. How would it even work? Sony doesn't even have their PS5/PS4 games on cloud streaming unless you're remote playing your console. Would they port all their exclusives? How much would that cost per title? Such a nonsense story.
Won't help them though just like Bleem didn't help the Dreamcast.There's no glory in battle. MS is doing everything they can to sell a Series S including playing the amazing games from the competition. PlayStation brand expansion at no extra cost for Cryin Jim Ryan.
Fuck that's a name from the past. I used Bleem on PC back in the day for Metal Gear Solid.Won't help them though just like Bleem didn't help the Dreamcast.
Tekken 3 was amazing on Dreamcast, though. I wonder if I still have my Bleemcast disc in my box of Dreamcast games...Won't help them though just like Bleem didn't help the Dreamcast.
What does that even mean? What is this nonsense?But the wider availability of the leading provider (Game Pass), now endowed with exclusive irreplaceable content, and protected by direct and indirect network effects,
It destroys Phil's whole fake narrative though. Regardless of what's true or not here his whole "bringing gamers more options" is total BS. They are only pushing their own platforms, they aren't about bringing games to more places.Seriously doubt Sony offered this... MS would probably say yeah sure fine let's go. Some people are weird jumping up and down acting like this is a gotcha haha
Bo some amazing deals on LGs this year. Just picked up a 42 C2 to use as a second monitor and spare gaming TV. Well worth the upgrade.
On your thread. I wish MS would allow it after all this goes through. I just signed up for three years of Extra with the BF deal and it would be awesome to have all services everywhere.
What does that even mean? What is this nonsense?
There's a lot of words for just "they didn't allow it" without any statement from MS. It's just he said she said at this point.
I can't for the life of me buy anything else than Sony TVs. I just trust their colour accuracy for cinema. And yes, my KD-55XG8505 still gets updates.I would never touch any non-Android TV. My 2016 Sony X70D is still getting updates until now, my other LG is bugged as fuck and only had 1-2 years of updates then nothing. Also if I would ever buy something none Sony it would be Panasonic as they have camera knowledge so I can trust their color accuracy as well but we don't get them here as well.
Possibly but I know 100% that Xbox approached Sony about gamepass being put on PlayStation and Sony said no.More corporate lawyer bullshit?
More corporate lawyer bullshit.
Possibly but I know 100% that Xbox approached Sony about gamepass being put on PlayStation and Sony said no.
So I could see this story having a lot of truth to it
So ms really want get gamepass on everything, sort of make sense for xcloud.Possibly but I know 100% that Xbox approached Sony about gamepass being put on PlayStation and Sony said no.
So I could see this story having a lot of truth to it
It doesn't.Where does it say they tried?
Buy the CMA?What will be the next move ot MS? This is getting very ugly![]()
Streaming sucks.If Sony wanted ps plus on xbox they can do it anytime. Its on sony for not making it work. They need to modernize the service.
[/URL]
Pretty sure it was a streaming app but don't really remember the detailsWas it a streaming app? Because outside of that, it really doesn't make any sense.
Well, that argument is a bit silly. If you can use that to say MS allows Luna/GeForce then Apple allows Game Pass on iOS via the browser and MS is crazy for siding with Epic in their lawsuit!She wants to validate her opinions. While ignoring geforce and Luna being available on Xbox. Even stadia was available.
If MS didn't want competition for gamepass, they wouldn't have allowed these on their service.
They have no reason to shut that down. It benefits them and it isn't a service provided by their competitor (i.e Sony). Let's not pretend it's the same thing. But no surprise since it is you who is saying it.Xbox plays PS2 games better than the PS5 does and MS hasn't shut that down yet.
It doesn't.
If Sony put ps now / streaming via web browser it would be available.
If Microsoft wants to defend their "google and apple wont let us have streaming in the App Store" position better they should allow for native apps as well downloadable from the Xbox App Store
No one should be comparing Playstation plus without tiers to game pass. It should be compared to Xbox Live Gold.PS Plus didn't start with the 3 tiers though.
Anyway...makes no sense to have PS Plus and Gamepass on the same console and both these companies have NOTHING to gain from that.
Both of them should bring an exclusive catered version of their service to the other platform. It benefits one company with recounting payments from the others fan base and gives fans more options. Win win to me.
Those are both services not platforms. Not the same at all.It wouldn't benefit either of them. Would do nothing but muddy the marketing positions for both.
That's like expecting Disney+ putting their content on Netflix, zero benefit to them there. Would be especially disastrous for the weaker brand.
Those are both services not platforms. Not the same at all.
Right? Why was this even discussed? lolMakes no sense for either of them to allow the others services on their consoles,it will never happen
MS would never make native ports of all their games on PS so GP would be streaming too, same as PS+.Streaming sucks.
How about nobody doing it? We don't need consolidation from either MS, Sony or Nintendo. Anyone trying to buy whole massive publishers should be stopped. No one should be allowed to buy Capcom, SQEX, EA and others, ffs. It's not that hard to understand that.What's weird is you and others acting as if your blatantly hypocritical view of the two companies buying game development studios has anything at all to do with logic and reasoning rather than just pure console wars.
Some people just enjoy it when their favorite company does the buying. But this thread isn't going anywhere so I'll be back May/June next year.
But this thread isn't going anywhere so I'll be back May/June next year.
Seriously doubt Sony offered this... MS would probably say yeah sure fine let's go. Some people are weird jumping up and down acting like this is a gotcha haha
Cant argue with that.Well, that argument is a bit silly. If you can use that to say MS allows Luna/GeForce then Apple allows Game Pass on iOS via the browser and MS is crazy for siding with Epic in their lawsuit!
They won't put each other's services on their consoles but it's possible they both end up on PC and therefore practically anything except each others consoles. Makes me wonder if they'll bother having consoles in the not too far off future.
Yeah. Probably bullshit.I seriously doubt that.
This is wrong, Sony didn't say that they tried to bring PS Plus to Xbox.Sony tried to bring PlayStation Plus to Xbox, but Microsoft 'will not permit' it
Here's the specific excerpt from Sony's CMA response (Page 14, para. 40):
Third, Microsoft argues that demand for multi-game subscription services would not tip towards Game Pass because Microsoft would also make Game Pass available on PlayStation (Microsoft, para.1.3(g)). But the wider availability of the leading provider (Game Pass), now endowed with exclusive irreplaceable content, and protected by direct and indirect network effects, would makes it harder - not easier - for rival multi-game subscription services to compete. Microsoft's stance that Game Pass availability on PlayStation would be a panacea for the harm from this Transaction rings particularly hollow given that Microsoft does not permit PlayStation Plus to be available on Xbox.
Yeah, NOPE. MS played the victim by saying Sony blocked gamepass and now Sony destroyed MS by saying they did the same with PS Plus.
Well played, Sony.
Sony said that MS doesn't allow PS+ to be on Xbox, but didn't say that Sony offered MS to put PS+ on Xbox. Notice the difference.How would that even work? Or are they talking about PlayStation Now running on the Xbox?
Sony, MS and Nintendo confirmed to be working on consoles for the next gen as usual. And in the case of Sony they mentioned that even if they are making PC ports and mobile games or even licensing their IPs for movies their focus will continue being PlayStation and making games for it.Makes me wonder if they'll bother having consoles in the not too far off future.
PlayStation Plus is a multi game subscription since 2010, when back then offered games of multiple generations, time limited full game trials and discounts for games way before Game Pass existed, or years before they started to include online MP (for non F2P games) on PS+.Ah yes, Playstation tiers that has only existed for like 5 months.
I'm not really clear how playstation plus works so I don't really understand what they mean by putting playstation plus on Xbox.Yeah. Probably bullshit.
Also what would Playstation Plus even get you on Xbox and how would it work?
Game Pass would get you free games streamed