vaibhavpisal
Member
Just forget that this deal was ever proposed and move on.
No. UK is one of Xbox's biggest markets.Doesn't Playstation massively dominate the console market in the UK?
What does this mean in general?
Is the deal dead?
Funny, all of those criticisms can be applied to Xbox as well.Ok guys, less innovation for UK gamers.
Pack it up boys and go and play the 567th edition of CoD.
Now THAT is innovation.
Also, go pay 70 each game instead of an affordable subscription.
Now THAT is lower prices.
And don't forget, wait for the game you want one year or two to be available in PC and Xbox.
Now THAT is power of choice.
There is always a danger reading between the lines, but it sounds to me like they would accept Microsoft’s 10 year commitment, it just doesn’t exist officially yet. Which makes perfect sense - it completely assuages any concerns.
Seems to open the door for Microsoft providing an iron clad, legally enforceable guarantee on COD parity (stupid concept). CMA gets to look strong, Microsoft does what it had already agreed to. Politics wins.
That deal with Nintendo wasn’t as stupid as people made out. Anyone would think (probably) the best corporate lawyers in the world knew something about what they were doing…
That’s so unlike us.Common sense has prevailed here in the U.K it seems.
Per Idas:
There is still a bit of hope for MS:
18. Microsoft has, however, informed us of existing and potential contractual arrangements with third-party platforms relating to access to Call of Duty. Accordingly, while none of the circumstances in which the CMA would select a behavioural remedy as the primary source of remedial action in a merger investigation (as summarised in paragraph 15 above) appear to be present, the CMA will also consider a behavioural access remedy as a possible remedy.
19. Access remedies are a form of behavioural remedy which seek to maintain or restore competition by enabling competitors to have access on appropriate terms to the products and facilities of a merger entity that they require to remain competitive. Access remedies normally require an access commitment which is set out in significant detail so that both customers and monitoring agencies can enforce compliance effectively. In this case, an access remedy would look to ensure third party access to Activision Blizzard, Inc's content that is necessary to remedy the provisional SLCs.
20. We consider in further detail below each of the possible remedies on which views are sought. More generally, the CMA will consider any other practicable remedies that the Parties, or any interested third parties, may propose that could be effective in addressing the SLCs and/or any resulting adverse effects.
I think these "concerns" seem pretty baseless and MS should be able to remedy them pretty easily.Ok guys, less innovation for UK gamers.
Pack it up boys and go and play the 567th edition of CoD.
Now THAT is innovation.
Also, go pay 70 each game instead of an affordable subscription.
Now THAT is lower prices.
And don't forget, wait for the game you want one year or two to be available in PC and Xbox.
Now THAT is power of choice.
During our investigation, Microsoft told us that it has offered to enter into new long-term agreements with Sony, Nintendo, and Steam to supply them with CoD post-Merger. Whether some form of supply or licensing agreement might satisfactorily remedy our concerns in gaming consoles is something that we will consider as part of our remedies process, rather than in our competitive assessment.
As noted above, the circumstances in which the CMA might select a behavioural remedy as the primary source of remedial action are not present in this case. The two markets in which the CMA has provisionally found SLCs are multi-faceted and continue to develop. This is particularly the case in cloud gaming, where the customer offerings and business models of market participants are evolving rapidly. We are of the initial view that any behavioural remedy in this case is likely to present material effectiveness risks. We invite the Parties to provide evidence on how these risks could be appropriately managed to ensure that any behavioural remedy is effective.
They’ve literally spelt out that divestiture is what they want - they’ve historically refused to entertain behaviours remedies. If they want ABK they aren’t having CoD (is the CMA’s position).There is always a danger reading between the lines, but it sounds to me like they would accept Microsoft’s 10 year commitment, it just doesn’t exist officially yet. Which makes perfect sense - it completely assuages any concerns (or can, perhaps if extended to include cloud somehow).
Seems to open the door for Microsoft providing an iron clad, legally enforceable guarantee on COD parity (stupid concept). CMA gets to look strong, Microsoft does what it had already agreed to. Politics wins.
That deal with Nintendo wasn’t as stupid as people made out. Anyone would think (probably) the best corporate lawyers in the world knew something about what they were doing…
Maybe next switch is coming soon.Content parity for COD on Nintendo?
I consider that a lie unless they have specs for next Switch / console on par with new gen.
If you didn't think CMA was a joke already, maybe this will help you.
Ok guys, less innovation for UK gamers.
Pack it up boys and go and play the 567th edition of CoD.
Now THAT is innovation.
Also, go pay 70 each game instead of an affordable subscription.
Now THAT is lower prices.
And don't forget, wait for the game you want one year or two to be available in PC and Xbox.
Now THAT is power of choice.
Those were always the only 2 options MS had. That hasn't changed.Microsoft have 2 options if they still wish to move forward - do what the CMA want or go to court.
It's what they (MS) themselves said regarding the price hike.Yeah this is a BS take. How do you explain the pricing differences between PS4 and PS5 versions of the same game while there was no price difference between XBO and Series X|S games.
Beginning in 2023, games built for Xbox Series X|S including Forza Motorsport, Redfall, and Starfield will cost $69.99 USD at launch. While Xbox has noted that regional pricing may differ, it has not yet given specifics for other countries.
"This price reflects the content, scale, and technical complexity of these titles," a Microsoft spokesperson told IGN.
Sounds like potentially MS would have to guarantee 3rd party access to all the Activision games and not just COD?Per Idas:
There is still a bit of hope for MS:
18. Microsoft has, however, informed us of existing and potential contractual arrangements with third-party platforms relating to access to Call of Duty. Accordingly, while none of the circumstances in which the CMA would select a behavioural remedy as the primary source of remedial action in a merger investigation (as summarised in paragraph 15 above) appear to be present, the CMA will also consider a behavioural access remedy as a possible remedy.
19. Access remedies are a form of behavioural remedy which seek to maintain or restore competition by enabling competitors to have access on appropriate terms to the products and facilities of a merger entity that they require to remain competitive. Access remedies normally require an access commitment which is set out in significant detail so that both customers and monitoring agencies can enforce compliance effectively. In this case, an access remedy would look to ensure third party access to Activision Blizzard, Inc's content that is necessary to remedy the provisional SLCs.
20. We consider in further detail below each of the possible remedies on which views are sought. More generally, the CMA will consider any other practicable remedies that the Parties, or any interested third parties, may propose that could be effective in addressing the SLCs and/or any resulting adverse effects.
How does that make the CMA a "joke"?
Yup haha.That’s so unlike us.
Microsoft dick-rider Jez is hyperventilating again! He should probably work on his cardio.How does that make the CMA a "joke"?
Yeah, it's a pretty ridiculous finding. But that's been the case this whole time. Xbox barely present in Europe while Sony raised game and console prices in Europe. CMA finds Xbox being in a stronger position could hurt prices lol?Doesn't Playstation massively dominate the console market in the UK?
If you didn't think CMA was a joke already, maybe this will help you.
If you didn't think CMA was a joke already, maybe this will help you.
You are ignoring the subsequent paragraphs. But I’m not going to try to convince you - no one is right or wrong at this point, because they left the door open to continue. If you consider this the moment of climax and it’s final, go right ahead, entirely up to you.They’ve literally spelt out that divestiture is what they want - they’ve historically refused to entertain behaviours remedies. If they want ABK they aren’t having CoD (is the CMA’s position).
Same with me.
I was waiting for you to join. Come on.Because it's not what he wants.
If Microsoft's previous playbook is anything to go by the "gloves off" approach is what comes next via their talking heads on the press.
So did Microsoft and Nintendo. One would guess is the response of everything going up.higher prices? wasnt it sony that raised the current gen prices?
I am pretty sure that Microsoft's expectations hasn't been altered during all this, given they also still try to make it go through.Exactly...so spending 70b on something that's not nearly of what MS expected at first may not make any sense for them anymore. Some decisions will have to be made. That's my point.
If you didn't think CMA was a joke already, maybe this will help you.
But isn't Xbox the lowest selling console brand in the UK?No. UK is one of Xbox's biggest markets.
You are ignoring the subsequent paragraphs. But I’m not going to try to convince you - no one is right or wrong at this point, because they left the door open to continue. If you consider this the moment of climax and it’s final, go right ahead, entirely up to you.
Those were always the only 2 options MS had. That hasn't changed.
The only joke here in this Tweet to me is Jez.
The CMA is, of course, right.
Those who can't buy expensive consoles will use Cloud gaming. And Microsoft will be able to stifle competition in the Cloud gaming area, which could harm those gamers.
Jez is clearly agitated and frustrated after this news. I reckon he couldn't read and understand it properly.
You are asking logic from this dude.How does that make the CMA a "joke"?
You are asking logic from this dude.
At this point, my annoyance with CMA has made my own judgment into a joke and I agree that the text could be read the way you described it. I say could, because given CMA's lack of understanding of the gaming market, they could very well mean it in the way that they think you need expensive consoles for cloud gaming.
Fanboys don't really read that much. They act through emotions.The only joke here in this Tweet to me is Jez.
The CMA is, of course, right.
Those who can't buy expensive consoles will use Cloud gaming. And Microsoft will be able to stifle competition in the Cloud gaming area, which could harm those gamers.
Jez is clearly agitated and frustrated after this news. I reckon he couldn't read and understand it properly.
I often ignore what I don’t want to hear.You are ignoring the subsequent paragraphs. But I’m not going to try to convince you - no one is right or wrong at this point, because they left the door open to continue. If you consider this the moment of climax and it’s final, go right ahead, entirely up to you.