Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
The PS3 was notoriously hard to develop for, especially for multi-platform games, for a big majority of its lifespan. I don't think it's fair to say Bethesda purposefully gimped the PS3 version of Skyrim.
Yeah but that is the beauty of the argument. When a publisher is independent, he can choose to do this or not. We would loose that with the merger. It is not about the reality of Microsoft intentions, but of its ability to prove and demonstrate that he can do parity.
Imagine this stupid idea 1 second:
Sony does test before any patch and new game launch of COD. Microsoft know that Sony does that for every language there is in the game. So Microsoft deliberatly choose to put COD games in all languages, even dead ones like latin. They can pay more people to verify this themselvers and have exclusive acces to COD devellopers to help them. But it is Sony job to do that on the PS5 version. Would this scenario happen in real life? No. But can the CMA be sure of it? No either. So what? They have to make Microsoft promise not to do this? And this is a stupid example. It is easy to say that parity is hard to enforce. A independent COD would have no problem in that case. And that is what Sony want. The divesture. The point is, Microsoft can promise parity, but can they prove that parity? Sony says no. And the CMA had already said that behavioral remedies are hard to implement in this case and not the prefered choice because of problems like this.
 
A portion of your post was discussing continued support... doesn't apply to Psychonauts 2 I suppose. 🤷‍♂️
Psychonauts 2 was a single game release. ESO and Fallout 76 are service games. MS honored contracts in both cases. On the topic of Psychonauts 2 since Sony expressed a concern of MS putting bugs into PlayStation versions of games, did any of the titles I mentioned earlier have game breaking bugs introduced by MS? If an accusation is going to be levied you should provide proof.
 
It is applicable, and not the main "concern" but rather an example used for the difficulties of oversight, but one for console war contention. Why is it applicable? "First, better, best" PR, that's why.

We are going in circles here.
Great then there should be no marketing deals for COD. If COD is so vital and sabotaging is likely then we can't put it past Sony and Activision to collude to tank the xbox and pc versions. This is just as likely as Microsoft sabotaging the ps version after purchase. I guarantee Sony would freak if that same standard applied to them and thier deals.
 
Really curious to see what happens if the CMA doesn't budge, the FTC gains ammo and MS backs away.

Will fans pretend it was all a fever dream or we gonna get people losing their mind and spreading stories about Xbox closing shop?
 
Oh please. The game breaking bug was inexcusable and did not hinder most 3rd party games. The argument isn't "purposely gimped," the argument is "can't be fucked with to fix, fuck you we got our monies."

There are many pubs/devs guilty of this on select platforms.

Bethesda is a prime example of said pubs/devs being notorious for never fixing day 1 bugs. The very day 1 bugs still were there in "anniversary editions/GOTY" and even new platforms like the Swtich version over a decade later. But hey, I guess you can call that "parity" but that won't fly with the "first, better, best" mantra.

I came late to the party with Skyrim, FO3, and New Vegas on PS3. I still remember being confused on how games could be sold in that state and looking up the update history for New Vegas - and seeing the last update was two years ago. Then came the realization that I wasted my money on those games. I do wonder if that poor practice of Bethesda's will see improvement with a new entity overseeing them. I hope so because it's been unacceptable for a long time now.
 
Last edited:
Great then there should be no marketing deals for COD. If COD is so vital and sabotaging is likely then we can't put it past Sony and Activision to collude to tank the xbox and pc versions. This is just as likely as Microsoft sabotaging the ps version after purchase. I guarantee Sony would freak if that same standard applied to them and thier deals.

Why is it so hard to understand that Activision doesn't have its own hardware? They have no incentive to do that but MS sure as fuck does.
 
Really curious to see what happens if the CMA doesn't budge, the FTC gains ammo and MS backs away.

Will fans pretend it was all a fever dream or we gonna get people losing their mind and spreading stories about Xbox closing shop?

In retaliation, Xbox buys the rest of the industry. Sony better be careful what they wish for. Papa Phil is comin for that ass, Jimbo! :messenger_smiling_horns:
 
Really curious to see what happens if the CMA doesn't budge, the FTC gains ammo and MS backs away.

Will fans pretend it was all a fever dream or we gonna get people losing their mind and spreading stories about Xbox closing shop?

Probably the latter seeing as that's already started.
 
Lots of noise in here, but I'm a layman. If the CMA wants divestment, is that a deal breaker to Microsoft?

I see through their PR fluff about CoD after what transpired with Starfield and Elder Scrolls--they'll flip that script so fast and I think the powers that be are hip to it.
It seems nobody wants to address the elephant in the room. Most talking points for the duration of this acquisition have been about COD, that should show you the importance of this franchise in terms of the acquisition, MS don't care as much about the rest.
 
Really curious to see what happens if the CMA doesn't budge, the FTC gains ammo and MS backs away.

Will fans pretend it was all a fever dream or we gonna get people losing their mind and spreading stories about Xbox closing shop?
Whats funny about the whole xbox closing shop is xbox fans like jez corden were the ones who actually added fuel to that sentiment. Before I don't think that was really much of a talking point at all with this deal falling through.
 
Last edited:
Whats funny about the whole xbox closing shop is xbox fans like jez corden were the ones who actually added fuel to that sentiment. Before I don't think that was really much of a talking point at all with this deal falling through.
It wasn't. Until the viral marketing ;)
 
I came late to the party with Skyrim, FO3, and New Vegas on PS3. I still remember being confused on how games could be sold in that state and looking up the update history for New Vegas - and seeing the last update was two years ago. Then came the realization that I wasted my money on those games. I do wonder if that poor practice of Bethesda's will see improvement with a new entity overseeing them. I hope so because it's been unacceptable for a long time now.
I played all of those games on my PS3 and they were all fantastic and some of my favourite games of all time.
 
It's begun

for MORE gamers

eddie-murphy-yrEs4m.gif
 
I played all of those games on my PS3 and they were all fantastic and some of my favourite games of all time.

I got a bug that made it impossible to save the first time I started Skyrim. Had to uninstall and reinstall the game. Gave up eventually due to crashes. Completed FO3 but the memory leak issue led to slow-motion frame rates and regular crashing. I liked the game enough to keep at it, though. I couldn't finish New Vegas due to performance issues. Perhaps we had different versions of the PS3. Mine is a slim, but it was one of the first ones released.
 
Psychonauts 2 was a single game release. ESO and Fallout 76 are service games. MS honored contracts in both cases. On the topic of Psychonauts 2 since Sony expressed a concern of MS putting bugs into PlayStation versions of games, did any of the titles I mentioned earlier have game breaking bugs introduced by MS? If an accusation is going to be levied you should provide proof.
Only the last dlc of destiny 2...ah no wait.. 😂
 
What's funny is people who read the financial times are not gonna give one flying fuck about call of duty.

Daily mail on the other hand i don't think you want support from fans of that newspaper. It's just a mob that complains about everything in the comments section.
 
Last edited:
Lots of noise in here, but I'm a layman. If the CMA wants divestment, is that a deal breaker to Microsoft?

Yes it is.

In the document posted today, much of MS's rebuttal is basically that divestment is non-viable and their behavioral remedies are sufficient.

MS also made statements to that effect at the EC event a couple of weeks back.

It seems to me that MS has discounted any form of divestment, so it's either the deal with their behavioral remedies, or no deal at all.

So far, the CMA have asked for divestment and there's no new information from any official source so we're waiting.

I see through their PR fluff about CoD after what transpired with Starfield and Elder Scrolls--they'll flip that script so fast and I think the powers that be are hip to it.

Well yeah. That seems to be the feeling outside of MS cheerleaders but let's see.
 
What's funny is people who read the financial times are not gonna give one flying fuck about call of duty.

Daily mail on the other hand i don't think you want support from fans of that newspaper. It's just a mob that complains about everything in the comments section.
I read the Financial Times and yet here I am

Surprise mother fucker
 
Really curious to see what happens if the CMA doesn't budge, the FTC gains ammo and MS backs away.

Will fans pretend it was all a fever dream or we gonna get people losing their mind and spreading stories about Xbox closing shop?
You're going to get articles like "Why the ABK deal being blocked is actually a good thing for Microsoft"
 
Last edited:

Just for completeness
MS response to the remedies
https://assets.publishing.service.g...n_-_Response_to_Remedies_Notice_-_NCV__2_.pdf


Will let others have a look. They have shared the key terms for the Nvidia deal with the CMA,


Basically.
Thanks for posting these!


Disgusting misogynist message received from a mod removing a post from here.
This fangirl is out of here. Please permabanme. Bye.

gold melting GIF by South Park
 
It's begun


if this is what microsoft are doing, i think the deal is beyond dead at this point. this isnt the kind of thing you do when your confident. they already know the deal aint happening and want to come out looking like the good guys. microsoft fucked up and everyone can see through their bullshit now.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for taking the time to write out the post. Again, like @Heisenberg007, you're focusing exclusively on hardware sales. Keep in mind, @Heisenberg007 declared that Microsoft (meaning Xbox) as a whole was down against the Xbox One, inferring they meant launch aligned and all inclusive. In any case, there's a lot of pluff in here, so I'll steel man this quickly:
PS4 + PS5 = 147.2m consoles. Microsoft says it has a 30% split against Sony. If 147.2 = 70%, 100% = 210.28. Therefore, Microsoft's total sales = 63.08 as the floor. Citing other analysis can change the make up. Let's ignore the fact that, as many in this thread have pointed out, Microsoft has incentives to cite analysis sources rather than simply provide its own numbers. This gives us some makeshift numbers for Microsoft.

Cool. So, the source for the PS5's 30m is the same source as the XBS 18.5m. So, if we use one part of that analysis, we'll need to use the other part as well. Using your scenarios, we're forced to take scenario 1 as a result, meaning 18.5m XBS sales. Looking at Ampere's XB1 analysis, and Microsoft's own comments, however, we know the ceiling for XBO is ~59m and (Ampere's) floor is 51m. Using Ampere's analysis, we're now at 18.m XBS + 51m XBO (at last estimate) = 69.5m for Xbox as their floor for the last two gens. If 69.5m is Microsoft's 30%, then 100% = 231.6m. If Sony has 70% of that, then their lifetime sales must be somewhere around 162.12m for PS4 + PS5. However, we know that's likely not true - Sony have actually confirmed a good chunk of their hardware sales, so the 147.2m console sales is likely closer than 162.12m. So, the maths of straight percentage conversions based on Microsoft's figures doesn't line up, creating a gap of about 14m consoles for Microsoft depending on how you want to use the analyst's figures.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom