3080 Ti was released in 2021 and is a slightly cut down GA102 (TOTL, near 3090/Ti) with different memory configurations. 3-4 years to come close to that in raster for current midrange is pretty good imo. Assuming the PS5 Pro gets a Navi 32 equivalent GPU (7800XT) and you get a whole system for sub $600.
Does it need to match the 3080ti? It's not like the TI is substantially faster than the 3080.
And still have random stutters and issues on the PC due to trash Windows or bad ports.
It's nothing to do with power. It's idiots who don't know how to connect a cable properly. And in a console, that wouldn't be a problem anyway.
Guys, stop thinking PS5 is equivalent to 6600XT!PS5 launched in 2020 with similar power to a 2070 Super/2080 in best case scenarios so a 2 years old GPU by that point.
If PS6 launches in 2028 assuming the trend continues it will have the same GPU power as a 2026 GPU.
4090 launched in 2022, assuming 2 year GPU dev cycle -> 2024 is 5000 series -> 2026 is 6000 series.
So the PS6 will probably have around ~6070 power.
Now, is a xx70 GPU more powerful than the top of the line GPU 2 generations earlier? The 4070 is ~26% better than the 2080 Ti, so we could assume the same for the 6070 against the 4090.
No, it's not "designed" to brute force its way. What kind of stupid statement is this? NVIDIA makes the cards. It's up to the developers to use it properly.
Every time I see you post about PCs, it's to make up some fake shit. Don't you have a 4090 in your rig? Then why do you always outright lie or spread misinformation at any given occasion?
1K watts? Not even if you remove the power limiter and push its clocks as high as possible. Ada is much more power efficient than RDNA 3 or 2.
Which kind of makes the whole thing kind of disappointing since a 3080 isnt going to be able to run the higher end rt tech that would be needed to distinguish it from the base console especially since they dont have a dlss equivilant to maintain image quality at low resolutions.
The problem is making a strong selling point to distinguish the pro console from the base one, an upgrade at a 3080 level won't really allow the high-end rt tech to be used which would be the easiest way to make an easily noticed difference especially since amd lacks a dlss equivalent which allows acceptable image quality at lower resolutions. Especially since they are using the same zen2 cpus which means bye bye to consistent 60fps as a selling point as cpu heavy games show up on next gen only games.
It can reach up to 30 percent higher and if they want to target the high end rt in games as an easily distinguishable bullet point a 3080ti would be just about right.
Considering that RDNA 4 is coming next year I wouldn't be surprised if we get some tweaks and features from 4 to makes its way into PS5 Pro. Much like "Strix Point" APU's (AMD Ryzen 8000) which have RDNA 3.5 iGPU's in them. In any case I don't think its massively a big downer if they stick to Zen 2 for the Pro. Since consoles are largely fine at 30-40 fps with high fidelity settings and effects and higher resolutions. And with more importance to UE5; which run terribly, and even more-so on lower end hardware like with consoles. Having near 70% more GPU performance will help a lot to differientate from the core models with way higher base resolutions to work from. And possibly other enhancements with newer hardware.
To prevent the PSU from getting knocked offline in the event of power spikes from the GPU. Ampere had that nasty habit of GPUs spiking suddenly 50% above their regular wattage for a split second and this was at times enough to shut down the whole computer. It's always recommended to have significant headroom for power consumption, especially with higher-end parts.
Not sure if this is sarcasm, pure ignorance or inadultared bias.
havent been here in a bit so hi but holy crap im the one who has been saying zen 5 (not zen 4) would be so awesome for the pro I hope these specs are true I really pray id be willing to pay up to $700 for those specs.Strix Point with 60CUs (54 active) just sounds so good for the PS5 Pro. One can dream.
the pro should be above the 3080ti in pure raster (though probably still weaker in rt) especially if its gonna be over 600+. my expectation is equal to/slightly above a 3090 ti if its $600 or in between a 7900xt and xtx if $700
not for pure raster im expecting it to be above each of those cards slightly in that metric specifically
Apparently you know more than us. Could you share more info?
I actually think the ps6 will be slightly better than this since im not expecting a $499 msrp but a $599 one (and possibly discless at that) so im expecting in between a 6080 and 6090.PS5 launched in 2020 with similar power to a 2070 Super/2080 in best case scenarios so a 2 years old GPU by that point.
If PS6 launches in 2028 assuming the trend continues it will have the same GPU power as a 2026 GPU.
4090 launched in 2022, assuming 2 year GPU dev cycle -> 2024 is 5000 series -> 2026 is 6000 series.
So the PS6 will probably have around ~6070 power.
Now, is a xx70 GPU more powerful than the top of the line GPU 2 generations earlier? The 4070 is ~26% better than the 2080 Ti, so we could assume the same for the 6070 against the 4090.
one thing I noticed I think it would be better if they left it at 8 cores though the zen 5 is good and put that budget more towards the gpu and memory so (20gb) so its more equal to an 8060 or possibly 8070Strix Point with 60CUs (54 active) just sounds so good for the PS5 Pro. One can dream.
In this video, devs wanted 16 cores.
There's exactly 0% chance of that happening. Price isn't the only factor.
The toilet paper you flush after it wipes the shit from your arse is more useful than MLID "leaks".
2nm being in mass production by 2026 has already been confirmed by TSMC. PS5 Pro having better RT was leaked by Tom Henderson and a patent by Mark Cerney. A new console being more powerful then a 6 year old GPU is just me extrapolating from 25 years of GPU progression.
Strix Point is real though.
2028 is 5 years but yeah
Plus that special Sony sauce.
We will be on rdna 7 by then why is this extreme to think especially for a $599 msrp. This would be like the ps5 being worse than the 980 ti in terms of equivalence
Because no one here play any games. We all focus on finding and making up various numbers and statistics to claim win for either team. /s
This is not true. Wholistically speaking, PS5 is closer to a 6700 than a 6600XT.... or even a 6600. And is more like a 2070 super than a 2070, mind you the latter performs worse than a 5700xt, which is not as powerful as a PS5.
Possible yes. Needed? No.
Didn't the 3090 also ship the same year :\
