And somehow cheapest 4090 is way above msrp atm, and same with bis cpu 9800x3d, thats a gaming cpu, and ppl buy so many of those that it made its launch price(which was by no means low) jump up significantly.
Yeah the 1000 series is the best series ever in price, how long they last, and how well they perform in games. It's unfortunate that we won't ever see something as good as that ever again. In the current time, anything that's consider decent and not even high end still cost a insane amount of money for what they offer. I did thought about the PS5 Pro when it gets discounted too cause I could also use it as a UHD bluray player although I heard the fat og PS5 with the built in drive was better for it. The thing that makes me not want to focus on the pro is because all the exclusive games I want from it like Rebirth and Stellar Blade are coming to the PC and by the time the PS5 Pro gets on a discount than the PS6 would be right around the corner. Plus one of my main things on PC is modding and getting mods for games like Elder Scrolls VI and Fallout 5 plus others. If the PS6 has no disk drive version than I'll still consider getting the PS5 Pro.
They sell out due to the limited number that gets manufactured and 4090s' aren't all sold for gaming purposes.
4070 ti super is 20% slower than 4080 in game. It doesn't make sense for 5070 ti to be slower than 4080.
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/ 4090 sitting at 1.03% of users, which isnt big %age but considering steam had 132m users back in 2021 and grew substantially from there... its probably around 1,5 to 2m of 4090 gpu's on steam xD
Yeah price is getting too insane, I get that price slowly increases over a long period of time but this is way beyond that. I don't expect the RTX 5070 to be at the exact same price as I paid for the GTX 1070 long ago at 300 something but it should have been 400 something or 500 at most while being several times better. The PS5 pro is a complete rip off at 700 even if it came with the drive. If the PS5 PRO news never happened and people were to ask me what I think the PS6 would cost, I would have guessed 600 to 650 for the drive version and this is for the PS6. Would have never expected 700 for a mid gen upgrade that didn't even include a drive.Look how are they trying hard to justify it above
But but but PS5 has 10GB of ram for games!! Its ok I can spend $800 for this gimped Nvidia Gpu! Lmao
Who here is trying to justify this? I know you have a clown in your avatar, but you don't have to act like one.Look how are they trying hard to justify it above
But but but PS5 has 10GB of ram for games!! Its ok I can spend $800 for this gimped Nvidia Gpu! Lmao
The Pro is not great value, at least relative to the PS5. It's like going from a 3060 12GB to a 4070 and only getting a 30-40% uplift in performance. 75% increase in price over the OG Digital for a 35-40% increase in performance.
Welp this is probably true coming from Nvidia lol
And we can tell you to piss off with your useless trolling.
GTFO with this bullshit. I bought a Pro day 1, whereas all you do is weak trolling. Quote me "trolling" those Pro threads. You won't find those posts because you made that shit up to use as a "no u" defense for being called out.
The steam hardware survey is only for people who have volunteered to participate when picked at random. I assume that even those numbers are skewed more towards the high-end since people with high-end pcs love to tell everyone about their high-end pc.
A 600 dollar card should be at least 16gb or more and stronger than the 4070 super by a decent amount.
Agreed but this is modern Nvidia.
If that is the case these new gpus are DOA.
We are barely pushing the envelope at 8GB now. Games are poorly optimized and using tricks to hit visual peaks but often look like shit in motion. Secondly, not everyone games in 4K, nor do we need to. Lastly the 5070 is more mid-high tier where as the 5080 and 5090 would be high to ultra tier where people should be at 4K.
RDNA 5 doesn't exist anymore. The next jump in architecture is uDNA. But lets not get too ahead of ourselves. Everytime the hype train comes, they release their GPU's and its a dissapointment.
Eh, Doom ran just fine on my 1080 without any special features at a native1440p. Also the 3080 came out quite a while ago, it's no wonder games today may put it at the limits. Although God of War, Dead Space and Resident Evil should not have put your PC at its limits.
www.notebookcheck.net
There's a 3080 12gb btwYes, but all things equal (VRAM) a 3080 stomps an A770 with Indiana Jones. The only problem it has is memory limitations which turn it into a slideshow.
Bloodbath for GPUs with less than 12 GB VRAM: Indiana Jones and the Great Circle hammers cards like RTX 4060/Ti
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is the latest game to show that VRAM-limited GPUs are not feasible for the current and upcoming AAA titles. The case is doubly worse for 8 GB cards like the RTX 4060 and RX 7600 that fail to even register a smooth 30 FPS at 1080p.
This is abysmal. The game is unplayable at 1080p because the GPU doesn't have enough memory. Whereas If it had 12GB or more, the performance would be excellent.
Anybody that bought 3000/4000 with 8GB will be forced to upgrade if they want to play newer games only because they're VRAM limited, and nothing else.
Maybe, but as NEW games arrive, new specs are required to reach them top of the line visuals. Especially as texture resolution and detail rise. But along with more RAM comes faster speeds. Filling and emptying the RAM will be a much faster process with GDDR7.Yes, but all things equal (VRAM) a 3080 stomps an A770 with Indiana Jones. The only problem it has is memory limitations which turn it into a slideshow.
Bloodbath for GPUs with less than 12 GB VRAM: Indiana Jones and the Great Circle hammers cards like RTX 4060/Ti
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is the latest game to show that VRAM-limited GPUs are not feasible for the current and upcoming AAA titles. The case is doubly worse for 8 GB cards like the RTX 4060 and RX 7600 that fail to even register a smooth 30 FPS at 1080p.
This is abysmal. The game is unplayable at 1080p because the GPU doesn't have enough memory. Whereas If it had 12GB or more, the performance would be excellent.
Anybody that bought 3000/4000 with 8GB will be forced to upgrade if they want to play newer games only because they're VRAM limited, and nothing else.
You're really missing the point?
I agree, but your 3080 is almost 2 gens behind. Either use the right settings or suffer the consequences of filling your VRAM. My 1080 still hits medium settings well coming into 2025 at 40-144 fps depending on the game.
