Next month is the 10th anniversary of Bloodborne

From ludwig boss in DLC
bloodborne-ludwig.gif

Ugh, I have that DLC and it's kicking my ass :messenger_pensive:
 
Nintendo fanboys when Nintendo takes down a Zelda fan project: F*ck them
Sony fanboys when Sony takes down a Bloodborne fan project: It's happening guys!
 
Last edited:
It'd be so funny to have them release a PC port or a remake and sell only 2 million copies or something like that...
 
LOL, hilarious how Shuhei Yoshida can do an interview about this and GAF still ignores the interview so that they can blame Sony.

Half the people crying for bloodborne wouldn't even buy a remake/remaster and never played the original game, they're just along for the hate wagon.
 
It'd be so funny to have them release a PC port or a remake and sell only 2 million copies or something like that...
Don't kid yourself, it would open at 1 million copies in its debut week alone. And that's on PC only, and I'm being highly conservative.

A simple (and by simple I mean a basic Prepare to Die-like effort) port would still sell like hotcakes.
LOL, hilarious how Shuhei Yoshida can do an interview about this and GAF still ignores the interview so that they can blame Sony.

Half the people crying for bloodborne wouldn't even buy a remake/remaster and never played the original game, they're just along for the hate wagon.
I want the Bloodborne port(s) and I don't care about any of the meta commentary that some of you keep blathering.
 
Don't kid yourself, it would open at 1 million copies in its debut week alone. And that's on PC only, and I'm being highly conservative.

A simple (and by simple I mean a basic Prepare to Die-like effort) port would still sell like hotcakes.

I want the Bloodborne port(s) and I don't care about any of the meta commentary that some of you keep blathering.
I was just kidding.

It would sell a lot for sure but if I was from I'd rather sell almost 30 mil of another elden Ring rather than having to share with Sony.

It will come, though. It has to come at some point.
 
Ill never understand people after all these years are hoping for a remaster/remake instead of asking for a sequel...
Because I dont think FROM is interested in making sequel to Bloodborne and I don't like idea of forcing sequel just because the game popular.
 
Last edited:
Because I dont think FROM is interested in making sequel to Bloodborne and I don't like idea of forcing sequel just because the game popular.
If they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.
 
If they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.
For me Personally as much as I love Bloodborne I'm more interested in Armored Core VI expansion/sequel or Sekiro 2 and unlike Bloodborne, Sekiro has good set up for sequel because of returning the dragon ending.
 
If they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.
A remaster wouldn't need to sell as much as the original to be successful, especially since the game already has a loyal fanbase. And given how much Sony invests in remasters, it's not unreasonable to expect Bloodborne to get similar treatment

Also, just because a handful of people can mod the game to run better doesn't mean the general audience can. Not everyone has access to a hacked console or a powerful PC, and relying on backwards compatibility isn't always ideal, especially if a game wasn't optimized for newer hardware

Saying Bloodborne doesn't need a remaster is like defending dial up internet in the age of fiber optics
 
Last edited:
If they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.
Defending Sony for not providing updates for exclusives that would make certain games infinitely more playable at 60 fps is asking for too much? This is not something we should be defending or accepting as PS5 owners.
 
Defending Sony for not providing updates for exclusives that would make certain games infinitely more playable at 60 fps is asking for too much? This is not something we should be defending or accepting as PS5 owners.

Uhhhh? Defending what, I dont even like souls games lol. Im saying peiople crying 10 years for a 60fps should do something better with their lives. And no, not every single game needs to be updated for modern standards. Thats that stupid mentality that started in the tail end of PS3 with remasters. I want a new game, not lazy devs tripple dipping on the same title over and over.
 
I don't think playstation will even do a tweet about it, in my opinion playstation have no understanding as to what their customers are wanting them to do.

You have to look at Concord and the fact it's unlikely that a single playstation player asked for that game to be made yet since the playstation 4 pro came out, players have been wanting a bloodborne 60fps patch.

PlayStation are a business and the business of bloodborne isn't on the lips of the shareholders.
 
At this point... just seen Days Gone Remaster... they are gonna remaster every other PS4 game possible before it... maybe they have an internal problem with the IP or the deal with fromsoftware doesn't let them re-release the game on PS5?

We'll have a The Order remaster first...
 
Last edited:
Fans: it's 10th anniversary of Blooborne, who knows what Sony is preparing to celebrate the anniversary. Perhaps a remaster, or a patch? Or maybe... a sequel!
Sony: here's a skin for Astro Bot.
 
That dead horse you're beating? It's been glue for years. And the game? Massively overrated. Move on, before your obsession becomes a diagnosable condition.
 
You're overrating it. It's not FromSoft's best, or even the genre's.
My favourite FROM game is Sekiro but I still don't think Bloodborne is overrated.

Also who decides that what's overrated and whats not? If you don't like as much as other people then that's your taste and opinion but still doesn't make it overrated.
 
Last edited:
releasedate.jpg

It's day one of the anniversary because the game's official release dates were spread on four different days.

Crazy (in a good way) how this sort of situation pretty much doesn't happen anymore in today's gaming world.
 
Imagine not having played Bloodborne and hearing all those people begging for a remaster for the past 8 years.

And then it happens, and you buy the game on Steam.

And you're like, "That's it? That's what the fuss was all about? A Souls game with a gothic coat of paint and a firearm parry mechanic instead of a block?!"

And you realize there's nothing worse than overhype.
 
Imagine not having played Bloodborne and hearing all those people begging for a remaster for the past 8 years.

And then it happens, and you buy the game on Steam.

And you're like, "That's it? That's what the fuss was all about? A Souls game with a gothic coat of paint and a firearm parry mechanic instead of a block?!"

And you realize there's nothing worse than overhype.
Please, shut the fuck up, because it sounds like you're the one that has never played Blooborne.

But maybe you're just fishing for replies because you're an attention-seeker.
 
Please, shut the fuck up, because it sounds like you're the one that has never played Blooborne.

But maybe you're just fishing for replies because you're an attention-seeker.
I've played a decent chunk of it and I stand by my statement. It's a good Souls game, but the community would make you think it's the pinnacle of entertainment or something.
 
dont do this to yourselfs , nothing will happen and EVERYONE knows it...
Personally speaking, as the guy who made the thread, I came back to simply celebrate the anniversary instead of waiting for something.
I've played a decent chunk of it and I stand by my statement. It's a good Souls game, but the community would make you think it's the pinnacle of entertainment or something.
A ''decent chunk of it'' he says! Opionion discarded.

Call me back when you at least clear the game plus the expansion.
 
as the guy who made the thread
Ah, that explains the tantrum.

Call me back when you at least clear the game plus the expansion.
Won't change my mind. I've beaten Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, spent 100 hours on Elden Ring, 30 hours on Dark Souls 3, 20 hours on Sekiro and 20 hours on Bloodborne.

My conclusion is that I'm playing the same game each time, with numerous tweaks in the gameplay per title, but my impressions are almost always the same. An addictive game formula which I very much enjoy, but I hardly value each of these games more over the others, with the exception of Demon's Souls - subjectively, because it was my first FROM souls game. If you asked me if any other of those games is better, I would say no, except DS2, which has an inferior game design compared to the others.


But I do not find any Souls game to be this immaculate perfect experience that cannot be topped by anything else in the industry (which is what people like you make Bloodborne sound like, sometimes).

Tldr: You played one Souls game, you've played them all, besides DS2, which feels like the handicapped sibling, compared to the others.
 
Ah, that explains the tantrum.


Won't change my mind. I've beaten Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, spent 100 hours on Elden Ring, 30 hours on Dark Souls 3, 20 hours on Sekiro and 20 hours on Bloodborne.

My conclusion is that I'm playing the same game each time, with numerous tweaks in the gameplay per title, but my impressions are almost always the same. An addictive game formula which I very much enjoy, but I hardly value each of these games more over the others, with the exception of Demon's Souls - subjectively, because it was my first FROM souls game. If you asked me if any other of those games is better, I would say no, except DS2, which has an inferior game design compared to the others.


But I do not find any Souls game to be this immaculate perfect experience that cannot be topped by anything else in the industry (which is what people like you make Bloodborne sound like, sometimes).

Tldr: You played one Souls game, you've played them all, besides DS2, which feels like the handicapped sibling, compared to the others.
Tantrum? I looked you up and you are a serious baiter.

Imagine actually thinking that Bloodborne with its unique systems (trick weapons, regain, no defense combat, distance parry etc.) is comparable with mainline Souls title.

I don't even want to entertain the old silly ''you've played one, you've played all'' because it's a simple waste of time.
 
Imagine actually thinking that Bloodborne with its unique systems (trick weapons, regain, no defense combat, distance parry etc.) is comparable with mainline Souls title.
And Elden Ring has horseback and a jump button. Big fucking woop. The core formula is the same. 2-3 gameplay mechanics which you need to adequately apply to each enemy's attack pattern after you memorize it in order to prevail.

Every Souls game is this. Bloodborne is not different in its core. You're basically overhyping its particular mechanics because they probably were more to your liking.
 
And Elden Ring has horseback and a jump button. Big fucking woop. The core formula is the same. 2-3 gameplay mechanics which you need to adequately apply to each enemy's attack pattern after you memorize it in order to prevail.

Every Souls game is this. Bloodborne is not different in its core. You're basically overhyping its particular mechanics because they probably were more to your liking.
Imagine oversimplifying things this much, imagine being so intellectualy dishonest.

You can apply this absolute lousy reasoning to virtually every game in existence whether or not their part of an already existing franchise, because games don't exist in isolating bubbles.
 
Imagine oversimplifying things this much, imagine being so intellectualy dishonest.

You can apply this absolute lousy reasoning to virtually every game in existence whether or not their part of an already existing franchise, because games don't exist in isolating bubbles.
Exactly. Which is why I roll my eyes when you present Bloodborne as this Godlike experience for basically having a gimmicky way of carrying two weapons in one, an aggression-reward system and a ranged parry/stun mechanic. All good things, yes. All making Bloodborne a very good action game, yes.

But hardly a reason to jizz your pants when you already have Sekiro, DS3 and Elden Ring under your belt. When you've played those FROM games, Bloodborne won't be nearly as impactful, compared to someone who probably only had DS1 and 2 under his FROM experiences ten years ago.

That was the fucking point of my original post which you viewed as sacrilege and 'baiting'.
 
I was late getting into the soulsborne series, for years I dismissed it as clout-machine for harcore gamers. Repeatingly dying and respawning enemies a part of the core gemplay loop, no thank you. Not for me.

Bought Dark Souls 2 on a deep-deep sale and thought I'd sate my curiosity with minimum financial investment. And I fucking HATED it. Slow combat that didn't respond to my button-mashing, but actively punished me for it. Got as far as the first mini-boss (big armor wearing, gliding, mofo). He fucked me over a handful of times...and I noped the fuck out. Uninstalled and that was that.

Or so I thought.

This stupid game lived rent free in the back of my mind for several weeks, how could this series be so popular? Was it me?

Next thing you know I've installed it again, determined to give it the good old college-try. Took my time to learn some basic move-sets and familiarised myself with a couple of weapons and dodge/block mechanics.

Confident I'd beat him this time... But nope, his wide sweeps would catch me at the end of my rolls. His reach was deceivingly long. And it felt like I was punished for even trying to damage him. Aaaand I rage-quit. Angry at the game, angry at myself. But I wasn't going to let this game beat me.

The next day I went at it again, calm and serene like a fucking shaolin monk. Started seeing patterns and recognising wind-up animations. He still humiliated me, time and time again. But I was getting his healthbar lower and lower each time. With some setbacks as I grew impatient and/greedy.

Then it happened I beat his ass. Oh-my-fucking-god what a rush, I was jumping in my chair and fistpumping like a retarded lunatic. Hadn't felt this feeling of accomplishment in a game since I beat Castle of Illusion on the Genesis as a wee lad.

And that was it, I got it. Went back and played the rest of the games. Just fucking amazing experiences all around.

So yeah, I really hope we get to see them do something with Bloodborne soon. The only black mark on that game is the frame-rate. Give us 60fps you cowards!!

Thanks for reading my Tedtalk, sorry not sorry. 😅
 
Top Bottom