Chuck Berry
Gold Member
From ludwig boss in DLC
![]()
Ugh, I have that DLC and it's kicking my ass
From ludwig boss in DLC
![]()
Will Sony do something to celebrate this important milestone? A late 60 fps update on the original PS4, an out of the blue PS5/PS4 Pro patch, the release of the fabled PC port...something, anything!
The most janky, bland, horribly paced game of a generation.
Don't kid yourself, it would open at 1 million copies in its debut week alone. And that's on PC only, and I'm being highly conservative.It'd be so funny to have them release a PC port or a remake and sell only 2 million copies or something like that...
I want the Bloodborne port(s) and I don't care about any of the meta commentary that some of you keep blathering.LOL, hilarious how Shuhei Yoshida can do an interview about this and GAF still ignores the interview so that they can blame Sony.
Half the people crying for bloodborne wouldn't even buy a remake/remaster and never played the original game, they're just along for the hate wagon.
I was just kidding.Don't kid yourself, it would open at 1 million copies in its debut week alone. And that's on PC only, and I'm being highly conservative.
A simple (and by simple I mean a basic Prepare to Die-like effort) port would still sell like hotcakes.
I want the Bloodborne port(s) and I don't care about any of the meta commentary that some of you keep blathering.
Because I dont think FROM is interested in making sequel to Bloodborne and I don't like idea of forcing sequel just because the game popular.Ill never understand people after all these years are hoping for a remaster/remake instead of asking for a sequel...
If they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.Because I dont think FROM is interested in making sequel to Bloodborne and I don't like idea of forcing sequel just because the game popular.
For me Personally as much as I love Bloodborne I'm more interested in Armored Core VI expansion/sequel or Sekiro 2 and unlike Bloodborne, Sekiro has good set up for sequel because of returning the dragon ending.If they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.
A remaster wouldn't need to sell as much as the original to be successful, especially since the game already has a loyal fanbase. And given how much Sony invests in remasters, it's not unreasonable to expect Bloodborne to get similar treatmentIf they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.
Defending Sony for not providing updates for exclusives that would make certain games infinitely more playable at 60 fps is asking for too much? This is not something we should be defending or accepting as PS5 owners.If they are not interested in a sequel, they are even less in making a new port just so people get 60fps. The remaster wouldnt make even 1/3 of sales of the original in that case. Plus people already managed to get the game running at 60fps on hacked consoles and PC. The game is more than playable still, can buy a pS4 disc and stick it in your PS5 no problem. They couldnt care less otherwise they would do it for every single title to date. Move on people.
Lol what? The pacing is perfect and there's almost zero jankThe most janky, bland, horribly paced game of a generation.
Yeah I don't know where fuck people getting that from. Pacing and progression through it's pretty damn smooth.Lol what? The pacing is perfect and there's almost zero jank
Defending Sony for not providing updates for exclusives that would make certain games infinitely more playable at 60 fps is asking for too much? This is not something we should be defending or accepting as PS5 owners.
Fine………………..give me Sekiro 2.enough with bloodborne.
Massively overrated
You're overrating it. It's not FromSoft's best, or even the genre's.
My favourite FROM game is Sekiro but I still don't think Bloodborne is overrated.You're overrating it. It's not FromSoft's best, or even the genre's.
Please, shut the fuck up, because it sounds like you're the one that has never played Blooborne.Imagine not having played Bloodborne and hearing all those people begging for a remaster for the past 8 years.
And then it happens, and you buy the game on Steam.
And you're like, "That's it? That's what the fuss was all about? A Souls game with a gothic coat of paint and a firearm parry mechanic instead of a block?!"
And you realize there's nothing worse than overhype.
I've played a decent chunk of it and I stand by my statement. It's a good Souls game, but the community would make you think it's the pinnacle of entertainment or something.Please, shut the fuck up, because it sounds like you're the one that has never played Blooborne.
But maybe you're just fishing for replies because you're an attention-seeker.
Personally speaking, as the guy who made the thread, I came back to simply celebrate the anniversary instead of waiting for something.dont do this to yourselfs , nothing will happen and EVERYONE knows it...
A ''decent chunk of it'' he says! Opionion discarded.I've played a decent chunk of it and I stand by my statement. It's a good Souls game, but the community would make you think it's the pinnacle of entertainment or something.
Ah, that explains the tantrum.as the guy who made the thread
Won't change my mind. I've beaten Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, spent 100 hours on Elden Ring, 30 hours on Dark Souls 3, 20 hours on Sekiro and 20 hours on Bloodborne.Call me back when you at least clear the game plus the expansion.
Tantrum? I looked you up and you are a serious baiter.Ah, that explains the tantrum.
Won't change my mind. I've beaten Demon's Souls, Dark Souls, Dark Souls 2, spent 100 hours on Elden Ring, 30 hours on Dark Souls 3, 20 hours on Sekiro and 20 hours on Bloodborne.
My conclusion is that I'm playing the same game each time, with numerous tweaks in the gameplay per title, but my impressions are almost always the same. An addictive game formula which I very much enjoy, but I hardly value each of these games more over the others, with the exception of Demon's Souls - subjectively, because it was my first FROM souls game. If you asked me if any other of those games is better, I would say no, except DS2, which has an inferior game design compared to the others.
But I do not find any Souls game to be this immaculate perfect experience that cannot be topped by anything else in the industry (which is what people like you make Bloodborne sound like, sometimes).
Tldr: You played one Souls game, you've played them all, besides DS2, which feels like the handicapped sibling, compared to the others.
And Elden Ring has horseback and a jump button. Big fucking woop. The core formula is the same. 2-3 gameplay mechanics which you need to adequately apply to each enemy's attack pattern after you memorize it in order to prevail.Imagine actually thinking that Bloodborne with its unique systems (trick weapons, regain, no defense combat, distance parry etc.) is comparable with mainline Souls title.
Imagine oversimplifying things this much, imagine being so intellectualy dishonest.And Elden Ring has horseback and a jump button. Big fucking woop. The core formula is the same. 2-3 gameplay mechanics which you need to adequately apply to each enemy's attack pattern after you memorize it in order to prevail.
Every Souls game is this. Bloodborne is not different in its core. You're basically overhyping its particular mechanics because they probably were more to your liking.
Exactly. Which is why I roll my eyes when you present Bloodborne as this Godlike experience for basically having a gimmicky way of carrying two weapons in one, an aggression-reward system and a ranged parry/stun mechanic. All good things, yes. All making Bloodborne a very good action game, yes.Imagine oversimplifying things this much, imagine being so intellectualy dishonest.
You can apply this absolute lousy reasoning to virtually every game in existence whether or not their part of an already existing franchise, because games don't exist in isolating bubbles.