Toons
Member
Freudian slip?
Ted cruz never fails to make an embarrassment of himself
Freudian slip?
Easy. Statue of all the cops holding down floyd. Plaque says "We need justice".
Justice for whom? You can even adjust the sympathies of the viewer by choosing what emotion to have the faces show.
This ain't a hard dog to walk, man. All sorts of events can be encapsulated in a way that both mocks and inspires.
Or it took four guys to restrain a drugged up noncompliant man with a history of violence who died DURING (not necessarily because of) use of a technique taught to the cops as part of their department policy. Those guys were punished for enforcing the system on a guy that happened to be of a specific color to engender the outrage.The only people that could be claiming that extrajudicial killing of a guy without a trial is "justice" can't claim to seek justice at all. Theres no question whos being denied justice in such a statue.
Justice outside of a court, or without the decision of a committee, isnt true justice. Its vigilantism at best, and in Floyd's case, murder.
Nope. A democrat won a spot recently and they've been delaying her certification because it would mean the house can vote on it and pass it. Marjorie Taylor Green publicly has been saying she's not suicidal and intends to vote to release it. They're still blocking it.Havent kept up.
So still no master list of names?
Or it took four guys to restrain a drugged up noncompliant man with a history of violence who died DURING
Nope. A democrat won a spot recently and they've been delaying her certification because it would mean the house can vote on it and pass it. Marjorie Taylor Green publicly has been saying she's not suicidal and intends to vote to release it. They're still blocking it.
They're going to blow up the fucking servers that are holding these files before they release them at this rate.
I'm not arguing "truth" one way or the other, just that I could make a statue showing the event, PEOPLE with biases either way can use it, and depending on how I tweak the statue, I can also bias observers. Showing Trump and Epstein skipping hand in hand implies a level of comradery that may have existed between them at one point, but certainly doesn't accurately represent how we THINK their relationship was for the last couple of DECADES. So just like a statue of terrified cops kneeling on the bull neck of a ferocious giant man, or menacing men crushing an exhausted man gasping for breath, the statue triggers an emotional response based on your biases, in ways photos on a piece of paper does not, because we have been conditioned to give weight to statues through millennia of their use (aka they are an effective propaganda tool).Youre still fighting this pointless battle in defense of a convicted murderer.
The drugged up guy is somehow stronger than 4 grown adult men but also died pretty much as soon as they restrain him?
Chauvin is a killer, and deliberately caused a man's death by compresinf his next for almost 9 minutes amidst exasperated claims of him being unable to breath. Without a trial. Without a jury. Without a judgment. There is no other side to this discussion to be had, just denial of what we watched happen. Even if Floyd didn't die, hed STILL be guilty of attempted murder.
I'm not arguing "truth" one way or the other, just that I could make a statue showing the event, PEOPLE with biases either way can use it, and depending on how I tweak the statue, I can also bias observers. Showing Trump and Epstein skipping hand in hand implies a level of comradery that may have existed between them at one point, but certainly doesn't accurately represent how we THINK their relationship was for the last couple of DECADES. So just like a statue of terrified cops kneeling on the bull neck of a ferocious giant man, or menacing men crushing an exhausted man gasping for breath, the statue triggers an emotional response based on your biases, in ways photos on a piece of paper does not, because we have been conditioned to give weight to statues through millennia of their use (aka they are an effective propaganda tool).
Havent kept up.
So still no master list of names?
Not surprised. I watched some of the Joe Rogan video on YT with him on it. Guy sounds like a worm thinking he's the greatest guy ever cracking down on every conspiracy ever.Not on Kash Patel's watch, no.
How are Dems better than Trump? Biden is a zombie, Harris is a cackling witch with no substance and the only things they seemed to care about are abortion rights and transgender rules.I dunno. For all you MAGA folks, what do you find appealing about Trump and his handling of the Epstein files? Like deep down you know he lied about the election, he lied about Ukraine, he is lying about Epstein...guy lies almost as readily as he breathes. Why do you want to be a part of his fanclub? Is watching "the libs" suffer that satisfying? Is seeing your country erode just so "your side" wins worth it that much? Maybe deep down you just want everyone else to suffer, like those girls who were passed around on Epstein island.
I don't get it man. Why do people feel the need to follow, to not think for themselves, to be beholden to some powerful figure be it a demagogue or a God. Does it give you comfort? Safety? A sense of belonging? Does it make up for not having a loving family? Maybe it's a way to be angry, to see others hurt and feel better. Maybe watching someone with a lot of power hurt others make you feel powerful because you support him. I just don't get the psyche, almost like it's completely devoid of any empathy or a shared sense of human compassion.
Strange times we live in.
Honestly, I don't understand how anyone could listen to him talk yesterday in front of our generals and not want to crawl up in a ball in shame. That was the cringiest of cringe. Along with it being dangerous AF.How are Dems better than Trump? Biden is a zombie, Harris is a cackling witch with no substance and the only things they seemed to care about are abortion rights and transgender rules.
Beating Trump is actually easy in theory, but hard to pull off. He's a very business focused guy where a lot of his hot topics involve money, jobs, economy and immigration laws (which also relates to giving them social assistance which is more about money off taxpayers backs).
All anyone has to do is talk boring stuff like jobs and economy and come up with better ideas than his supposedly iron fisted ideas. Problem is nobody on the left even tries or can come up with better ones.
Trump actually has a disadvantage right away with voters because a lot of people vote based on likeability, not policies. And Trump is a predicatbly abrasive guy who will turn off lots of people right away. And friendly Dems with that advantage still couldnt beat him.
From a pure law perspective (not politics), he kinda crosses the line on presidential powers a bit too many times. I mean most of the headlines I'm reading nowadays is like "X court rules Trump cannot do this or that" and I don't recall seeing that 2-3 times per week for other presidents.How are Dems better than Trump?
That's because Trump sees the law differently than most. To him the laws represent the MINIMUM he is allowed to do, so he pushes, knowing the courts (lawsuits and rulings are second nature for him) will correct any oversight.From a pure law perspective (not politics), he kinda crosses the line on presidential powers a bit too many times. I mean most of the headlines I'm reading nowadays is like "X court rules Trump cannot do this or that" and I don't recall seeing that 2-3 times per week for other presidents.
And he's really getting serious with the whole 3rd term "joke".
I don't recall Obama insisting several times on a 3rd term for eg. Nor Bush to be fair.
The issue with this whole concept is that other people in other countries did the same (and I am not exagerating). Putin did it over the time in Russia, Orban as well in Hungary, Erdogan did it in Turkey, and some tried to stop them but for the sake of democracy (as these people were elected), they were allowed to continue. And Trump is following the same path, which is clear to people from outside who were already through the same kind of situation in their own country, but it is new for people who only know democracy.That's because Trump sees the law differently than most. To him the laws represent the MINIMUM he is allowed to do, so he pushes, knowing the courts (lawsuits and rulings are second nature for him) will correct any oversight.
What he sees to rarely do is use a lawyer to determine legality FIRST, probably because he knows a government lawyer will almost always just say no rather than try to work the system.
It's just like his negotiating tactic of spouting off some extreme demand or position, knowing full well his actual goal is somewhere in the middle.
Trump does this time and time again because it works for him in business and somewhat in politics. The media falls for it over and over because they hate him and that's not how a politician is "supposed" to operate.
This guy has it figured out. Tell us how we faked the moon landing nextThat's because Trump sees the law differently than most. To him the laws represent the MINIMUM he is allowed to do, so he pushes, knowing the courts (lawsuits and rulings are second nature for him) will correct any oversight.
What he sees to rarely do is use a lawyer to determine legality FIRST, probably because he knows a government lawyer will almost always just say no rather than try to work the system.
It's just like his negotiating tactic of spouting off some extreme demand or position, knowing full well his actual goal is somewhere in the middle.
Trump does this time and time again because it works for him in business and somewhat in politics. The media falls for it over and over because they hate him and that's not how a politician is "supposed" to operate.
There is a good documentary on thisThis guy has it figured out. Tell us how we faked the moon landing next
You can't genuinely see a difference between any of those people and Trump? This isn't even a difference between parties as I can at least believe some on both sides truly govern with a set of conviction and principles. For Trump it's a means to an end. For him, the Constitution is an annoying speed bump for his agenda. He's quite possible the most inept, intellectually deficient corrupt turd to ever have been elected to damn near anything. "they're all the same" is just cope for knowing there IS no justifying him.How are Dems better than Trump? Biden is a zombie, Harris is a cackling witch with no substance and the only things they seemed to care about are abortion rights and transgender rules.
True.From a pure law perspective (not politics), he kinda crosses the line on presidential powers a bit too many times. I mean most of the headlines I'm reading nowadays is like "X court rules Trump cannot do this or that" and I don't recall seeing that 2-3 times per week for other presidents.
And he's really getting serious with the whole 3rd term "joke".
I don't recall Obama insisting several times on a 3rd term for eg. Nor Bush to be fair.
I can't even figure out what else he would have said. Politicians?Stop attacking PDFiles? Really?!
whatever happened to Obama being guilty of treason or whatever
That's because Trump sees the law differently than most.
this is frankly "Trump was installed by Russia" all over again (singling you out, but it's most of the thread now to be honest) and extremely embarrassing conspiracy thinkingI don't think it's too difficult to put 2 and 2 together at this point.
- Trump campaigns on releasing the list, presumably thinking it wasn't much of an issue as his ties to Epstein are already known (they were close friends, there is no denying that at this point either). Likely he didn't participate in any problematic events, or at least not that he perceived.
- At some point his handlers (wealthy donors or people with leverage) tell him releasing the list will be a problem, so he backtracks. He gained the nickname TACO for a reason - there are background interests that keep him in line
- he is now openly floundering calling it a hoax, because he hadn't expected to get caught with his pants down, effectively making him a pedophile protector
- a lot of very powerful people, Thiel, Musk, Prince Andrew, etc were named in the files, we just don't know the extent of their involvement, but likely at least a few of them openly knew of the sex ring and took advantage of it.
- Given that Thiel is in the list, Project 2025, lil' Smokey-Eyes Vance being a product and plant from Thiel's efforts, I suspect they are worried that their entire plan will unravel if they can tie powerful Epstein associates who did bad things to project 2025, part of which is to have Vance take over (though perhaps not officially) or have major influence as it's pretty clear Donald is suffering from dementia and a bunch of other health issues
Like project 2025 isn't some conspiracy, it's happening right before everyone's eyes, they told us exactly what they wanted to do, Trump even sees it as problematic as he tried to distance himself from it. They rely on tribalism, religion, Fox News to keep the base in line while actively preparing to harm most of the population in order to gain more power/wealth. Elon literally bought Trump the election and gutted the government which they are needing to rehire now. That was just a little taste of what's to come of people don't clue in.
But see the Epstein thing is a snag in the plan. It could potentially cause the house of cards to collapse because pedophelia is a hard sell even for Republicans, though perhaps not for Ted Cruz.
I stopped reading at the first line. Noone believes Trump was installed by Russia or was that ever the allegations.this is frankly "Trump was installed by Russia" all over again (singling you out, but it's most of the thread now to be honest) and extremely embarrassing conspiracy thinking
We went through a Russia hoax for years in his first team simply because the notion of someone of his kind winning was psychologically devastating for the progressive side, and some secret puppetmaster behind the scenes absolutely had to be invented as an emotional crutch to explain how it could have happened that history didn't go as planned.
Now, with another much more significant win including popular victory, the exact same impulses are causing something that used to a right-wing fantasy (secret pedophiles running the government; a low iq conspiracy all along) to be embraced by the other side to the point of hysteria, borderline a Q-Anon on the left coming into being.
Bombshells like you actually seem to believe in -- ie., not just that Trump was as generally gross and womanizing as any figure like Bill Clinton, which we already know, but that he was actually buying underage girls -- obviously do not exist, or they would have been exposed by other prior administration which had every reason to do so. There is bound to be a lot of "scummy people hanging around other scummy people" that implicates probably half of Washington (not in pedophilia but in having terrible associations and judgment) and there are surely pressures to avoid causing scandal, and all of it is rather stupid political maneuvering by the administration.
But to believe that there is a smoking gun here is to sound exactly like a mix of Q-Anon and "Trump is a secret Russian asset" circa 2017. And when you throw in things like project 2025 is taking over it sounds even more like a bad conspiracy brain that has found a weird need to see a vast hidden series of coverups instead of just seeing that the popular sentiment and political movement did, in fact, turn towards the right in 2024, and there isn't any secret to be uncovered that will reverse that.
It's exactly what was believed, just stated in its barest form. The widespread, deeply irrational panic that gripped the entire left/progressive side was a fantasy conspiracy that Trump was in power because of Russia, and it was indeed as unhinged as believing that Putin held direct power over Trump by way of secret sex tapes and so forth.I stopped reading at the first line. Noone believes Trump was installed by Russia or was that ever the allegations.
....on a thread page with discussions about project 2025, fox news brainwashing dumb masses, God/religion and Trump psychologized as some kind of related belief system, dark money from Soros (oops, I mean from Thiel, the left-winger's version of Soros conspiracy) creating the VP, and so onbro if ur gonna bring up irrelevant shit in an Epstein thread, at least make an effort to get the basic facts straight
It's correct. Do you want receipts?"Trump was installed by Russia" was either poorly worded and not what you actually meant, or just a gross mischaracterization and reflects a misunderstanding of what actually took place
Trump won't acknowledge the crime because Trump was the beneficiary of the crime. Trump won't insult Russia because it may well be that he was installed by Russia. Trump is as much a Russian project as an American president.
The effort to install Yanukovych prefigured many elements of Trump's campaign. His campaign exploited ethnic divisions and portrayed his opponent, Yulia Tymoshenko, as corrupt and the election as rigged. Yanukovych called for closer ties with Russia while obscuring the depth of his own furtive Russian connections. Most significant, the consultant brought in to manage Yanukovych's campaign was the same one who managed Trump's six years later: Paul Manafort.
But nothing about qanon is true or based in reality while it's been proven that Russia interfered in the US election with the intention to help Trump. If you think these are remotely analogous you are deluding yourself....on a thread page with discussions about project 2025, fox news brainwashing dumb masses, God/religion and Trump psychologized as some kind of related belief system, dark money from Soros (oops, I mean from Thiel, the left-winger's version of Soros conspiracy) creating the VP, and so on
Yeah, that's literally the kind of thread we're in.
It's correct. Do you want receipts?
New York Times opinion pages, 2017 - op-eds printed here are extremely widely circulated, and probably no source can better record what the zeitgiest and dominant conversation on the left was in any particular snapshot in time
Or Jonathan Chait, who writes for many of the most circulated papers among the same left crowd, including the Atlantic, also in 2017:
... he frames all of it as a form of installation. Do you want me to show how widely shared and cited that was? Or the other op-eds and articles that were extremely mainstream?
I don't really need to go on, because it was all over major left-aligned publications (tv shows like Maddow almost every night, etc etc). I'm sorry that the reality of the Russian hysteria is a dark history... it is one of the most discrediting moments for progressivism in centuries, because it revealed that conspiracy thinking was, in fact, just as fully embraced by mainstream left as it is by the darkest QAnon corners of the right.
Maybe don't repeat it again.
![]()
Supreme Court rejects appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, imprisoned former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein
The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned ex-girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein.apnews.com
Why? The current thinking is that Trump wants her to have him as her only option of salvation. This way he can coerce a testimony from her in exchange for saying Trump was never involved. That's why she got moved to a prison with reduced security. If the supreme court came to her aid, then she could just ignore him and say nothing.Holy shit, I'm legitimately surprised at this decision from this current SC.
"Radical leftists" are a pain in my ass, but the worst thing they did was enable the "radical right" to clamp down with authoritarianism.How are Dems better than Trump? Biden is a zombie, Harris is a cackling witch with no substance and the only things they seemed to care about are abortion rights and transgender rules.