• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PREDATOR: BADLANDS Trailer (2025)

The Kojima review is in



"A few days ago, I threw out my back, so I wasn't sure I'd make it through to the end watching a movie. But armed with my secret weapon—an inflatable lumbar pillow into the chair—I watched "Predator: Badlands." A back-friendly 107 minutes! And it was great!

I'm sure some long-time fans will say, "This isn't Predator!" I, too, love John McTiernan's Predator (1987). But director Dan Trachtenberg already pulled off a brilliant reimagining of the original style with "Prey," successfully completing that mission. "Predator: Badlands"marks his next phase. It builds on the animated film, "Predator: Killer of Killers." This is a character-driven movie about the Predator "Dek" and his partner "Thia" (Elle is, as always, adorable). Rather than a tale of "terror of being hunted," it's a classic, comedic action film that depicts the "friendship" born in the midst of the hunt."

Failure of the weak, isolation, journey, training, encounter, rebellion, clash, comradeship, betrayal, redemption, reconciliation, unity, revenge, growth, choice, family—and a new threat."

These elements form the very blueprint of mainstream Japanese manga storytelling, typified by "Weekly Shonen Jump." The film also takes heavy visual inspiration from video games. It represents a new direction for Hollywood entertainment led by a new generation of filmmakers who have inherited the global 'memes' of manga, anime, and gaming culture.I especially hope young anime fans who usually steer clear of live-action Western films will give this one a try. Even with Dek's "ugly" face, you'll find yourself emotionally invested from the opening scene. You'll definitely get hooked."
 
I honestly don't understand the comments urging not to compare it to the original and expect simple entertainment. Yeah I know it would be difficult to make something close to the original (in terms of plot and overall quality), but it's a different case when you bastardize the original IP just because you own it and you can.
Predator had a tone of machismo, threat, intensity, and, for lack of a better term, "swagger" that Badlands doesn't have. It's not a total genre shift like Alien to Aliens, but it is DEFINITELY a step down in tone and a big shift in focus, so while it is a very fun film, it doesn't leave you with the lingering sense of having seen something awesome that Predator did. By trying to show more yautja society it really just strips away the aura of mystery from the first few films and doesn't add a lot (for example, their merciless "kill anything that's weak" attitude to the point of killing your own offspring for merely allowing another to go on a hunt) doesn't seem to be one that would foster their technological advancements because they only show these things in techno-savage arenas. We never see a slave population that must be the things actually building their gear, maintaining their ships, and growing/raising their food. Or a sense that they are a parasitic culture feeding off the relics of a prior advanced society. It's a partial glimpse into their culture that doesn't open up questions, really, just doubles down on the little we already know.

So in that context I don't feel that Trachenberg is really advancing our understanding of Predator "lore", he's had three films now that have all circled this "survival of the fittest" mantra we basically got from AvP.

Anyway, long story short, enjoy the movie as a fun action romp but don't expect it to carry the nearly 4 decades old torch of Predator.
 
doesn't seem to be one that would foster their technological advancements because they only show these things in techno-savage arenas. We never see a slave population that must be the things actually building their gear, maintaining their ships, and growing/raising their food. Or a sense that they are a parasitic culture feeding off the relics of a prior advanced society. It's a partial glimpse into their culture that doesn't open up questions, really, just doubles down on the little we already know.
This is exactly what it is, they were enslaved by a super advanced race and all that tech is theirs, they overthrew them and repurposed the tech for their own use, but they don't really understand how it works; as in if something breaks they just discard it instead of performing maintenance. They basically got kicked into advanced space age straight from the stone age.
 
I had to cancel my watch of this earlier. Will try again tomorrow, but really looking forward to this one after the special look on Disney+ / Hulu
 
i seent it GIF


I liked it, I liked prey more but this was also good. I can see why some people might think this is a big departure from the normal predator franchise.

Don't be fooled by the PG13 rating. It's only that cause there's no "human" gore. Buncha wild life, synths, monsters etc get brutally beheaded, gutted etc through out the film. They maximized the shit out of the legalese of the age ratings.
 
Last edited:

"Predator: Badlands" clawed its way to $80 million at the global box office, ranking as the biggest debut in the nearly 40-year-old franchise. Director Shane Black's 2018 reboot "The Predator" previously held the record with $73.5 million, not adjusted for inflation.
"Predator: Badlands" is reinvigorating the box office after a dismal October. November should remain strong with "Wicked: For Good" and "Zootopia 2" around Thanksgiving, while December offerings like "Five Nights at Freddy's 2," Sydney Sweeney's psychological thriller "The Housemaid" and "Avatar: Fire and Ash" should help end the year on a high.



Damn It Wesley Snipes GIF by IMDb
 
Last edited:
Seen the film.

Overall I had a blast despite it feeling like a Disney take on the Predator a bit too often. I loved Dek as protagonist, great job there. IMO all of the Predator anthropomorphizing (language, emoting etc) is the way forward. I hope the sequel takes place on Yautja Prime, exploring their culture and technology.

I'd rate it even higher than Prey, and a notch above Killer of Killers, which was also really good except that pointless final chapter... I think this franchise is in good hands.
 
I was going to go see it Saturday while my son was at a birthday party in the same theater. But I could not make the timings work. Maybe I will go during Veterans Day tomorrow.
 
Mostly agree with him except the part where he goes he always wanted to see a predator team up with another person.

It's ok in a vacuum or isolated movies like this, but if they start doing that in every film, it'll get tiresome real quick.

Nah. I think it's great that Trachtenberg is expanding the scope of what a Predator film can be. There's no reason to limit it to just a horror franchise. There's so much more to explore with the lore.
 
"A few days ago, I threw out my back, so I wasn't sure I'd make it through to the end watching a movie. But armed with my secret weapon—an inflatable lumbar pillow into the chair—I watched "Predator: Badlands." A back-friendly 107 minutes! And it was great!

I'm sure some long-time fans will say, "This isn't Predator!" I, too, love John McTiernan's Predator (1987). But director Dan Trachtenberg already pulled off a brilliant reimagining of the original style with "Prey," successfully completing that mission. "Predator: Badlands"marks his next phase. It builds on the animated film, "Predator: Killer of Killers." This is a character-driven movie about the Predator "Dek" and his partner "Thia" (Elle is, as always, adorable). Rather than a tale of "terror of being hunted," it's a classic, comedic action film that depicts the "friendship" born in the midst of the hunt."

Failure of the weak, isolation, journey, training, encounter, rebellion, clash, comradeship, betrayal, redemption, reconciliation, unity, revenge, growth, choice, family—and a new threat."

These elements form the very blueprint of mainstream Japanese manga storytelling, typified by "Weekly Shonen Jump." The film also takes heavy visual inspiration from video games. It represents a new direction for Hollywood entertainment led by a new generation of filmmakers who have inherited the global 'memes' of manga, anime, and gaming culture.I especially hope young anime fans who usually steer clear of live-action Western films will give this one a try. Even with Dek's "ugly" face, you'll find yourself emotionally invested from the opening scene. You'll definitely get hooked."

Screenwriting lectures from the same guy who wrote the incomprehensible drivel that is Death Stranding.
 
This felt like a Dysnified version of The Predator. The comedy attempt completely destroyed the film for me.

The first 10 minutes of this is fantastic and should have kept the same tone.

They should have gone with a serious storyline about Dek finding love for his brother instead of his clan, cut the monkey out of the movie and focused on Thia making Dek reflecting that he could still be a great hunter despite his flaws like his blood-brother tried, it would have been great if they focused on that.
 
Last edited:
That last battle was so absurd with the tamed animals and the synth fighting while detached. What a hell was that. He had the spitter animal as his shoulder cannon :-/
 
What an average movie this was. I didn't go in with high expectations, but the Predator should have just thrown the chatterbox bubbly synth up on the rocks after he found her and just kept moving. I probably would have liked the movie more if he had. I get that they had to give him a companion to interpret his language to those that can't read subtitles, but I would have been fine with just watching him hunt alone and not talk at all, personally. 😂 For a Predator movie, it was very tame compared to past films, unfortunately.
 
still cant get over the face of the new predator

i mean when a bust you can buy for £1500, looks 10000x better than the £80m film, youve got major issues.

cEG5ozMI3sExM2aX.jpg
 


#PredatorBadlands director Dan Trachtenberg explains why James Cameron is thanked in the credits:"He had seen 'Prey' and loved it — which, there's no words for that. We shot 'Badlands' in New Zealand, up in Auckland and he was down in Wellington making 'Avatar.' He invited me to see him doing some of 'Avatar,' and we spent some time on his soundstage and when we were in the edit bay, I pitched him what we were doing with the movie, this brand new process having a guy in a prosthetic suit, and then visual effects are taking over for his face. Then we reconvened at dinner, and when he sat down, he said, 'I was thinking about what you're doing on the way over here. And I gotta tell you, think it's going to work.' That blew wind in my sails all the way back to Auckland.Then, when we were finishing the movie, the cut was in pretty good shape — not totally finished, but pretty good. I wanted to send it his way to get, if he had the time, whatever feedback he could give. He wrote me a note back that said many things, and one of them was, 'I have to tell you, when I first heard about what you're doing, I did not think it was going to work. But holy crap, you really pulled it off.' And that put wind in my sails. I think he just knows exactly what someone needs to hear when they need to hear it. He's just a tremendously generous filmmaker."
 
still cant get over the face of the new predator

i mean when a bust you can buy for £1500, looks 10000x better than the £80m film, youve got major issues.

cEG5ozMI3sExM2aX.jpg
/
i mean when a bust you can buy for £1500, looks 10000x better than the £80m film, youve got major issues.

This is in the movie, the character is established as a smaller runt looked down upon.
 
This is in the movie, the character is established as a smaller runt looked down upon.


still looks shit, and fake due to the CGI, compared to the orginal practical make up. and no amount of word salad and explaination as to why it looks shit will change that
 
This is in the movie, the character is established as a smaller runt looked down upon.
The issue (as often with modern Disney) is that the movie uses crappy design language to convey that, taking the easy route by making it look more human and give creatures more cutesy eyes to immediately show it's not evil.

Just look up existing Predator designs that could've been used/altered for Dek's.
 
Last edited:
The issue (as often with modern Disney) is that the movie uses crappy design language to convey that, taking the easy route by making it look more human and give creatures more cutesy eyes to immediately show it's not evil.

Just look up existing Predator designs that could've been used/altered for Dek's.

I get what you're saying,
But aside from this being the point of this character, an inferior small runt last-picked-for-the-football-team,
for practical reasons it makes more sense in this particular movie.

The feral-predator in Prey only used facial animation for certain segments, 98% of the time it was wearing a helm or shot at a distance, a very tall man in a rubber suit seeing through the slits.

iu


This movie by comparison has the Predator as the main character extensively emoting, much of the time focusing on the face unmasked. Which itself, far from being lazy, required extensive work and thought combining both digital effects with nuts and bolts practical tinkering.

G5bCkdKW0AAmPMP


If prefer complete practical effects I can understand this argument, in general I agree aesthetically it is pretty much always better, though think it would lead to limitations of its own and contextually, it makes sense in this movie to combine it with digital. Typically puppetry tends to be static or sporadic.
 
Last edited:
I get what you're saying,
But aside from this being the point of this character, an inferior small runt last-picked-for-the-football-team,
for practical reasons it makes more sense in this particular movie.

The feral-predator in Prey only used facial animation for certain segments, 98% of the time it was wearing a helm or shot at a distance, a very tall man in a rubber suit seeing through the slits.

iu


This movie by comparison has the Predator as the main character extensively emoting, much of the time focusing on the face unmasked. Which itself, far from being lazy, required extensive work and thought combining both digital effects with nuts and bolts practical tinkering.

G5bCkdKW0AAmPMP


If prefer complete practical effects I can understand this argument, in general I agree aesthetically it is pretty much always better, though think it would lead to limitations of its own and contextually, it makes sense in this movie to combine it with digital. Typically puppetry tends to be static or sporadic.


or not make a buddy cop predator movie, where we get to see a fucking predator with emotions in the first place, and solve the whole issue from the get go (y)
 
or not make a buddy cop predator movie, where we get to see a fucking predator with emotions in the first place, and solve the whole issue from the get go (y)

You can watch Predator, Predator 2, Predators, The Predator or Prey for that.

The vast majority of people, critics alike, are enjoying it, not seeing it as a problem, further, this concept existed in the comic books, video games and was in AVP about 20 years ago.

It's not new.
 
Liked the movie but clearly is not a classic Predator movie...Its like You go to watch an IT movie and what you get is an Scream one.
 
You can watch Predator, Predator 2, Predators, The Predator or Prey for that.

The vast majority of people, critics alike, are enjoying it, not seeing it as a problem, further, this concept existed in the comic books, video games and was in AVP about 20 years ago.

It's not new.

well if you wanna watch a disney predator with daddy issues, go for it, and most "people" and "critics" have no idea wtf theyre on about, and will swallow any old trash that fits the marvel formula
 
Weird take...
Having seen the movie, does the "evil" twin look heavier than the other?
Or is it just costumes and missing legs throwing out perspective.
 
well if you wanna watch a disney predator with daddy issues, go for it, and most "people" and "critics" have no idea wtf theyre on about, and will swallow any old trash that fits the marvel formula

Well you can continue to stay mad in the face of the movie doing well at the box office, I guess.
 
Last edited:
Weird take...
Having seen the movie, does the "evil" twin look heavier than the other?
Or is it just costumes and missing legs throwing out perspective.
The hair, I think. They did a good job making them easily differentiated with the eyes and scars. Not sure about that "sister" relationship as we never got much about their actual programming versus just the body they were in.
 
I'm ashamed to admit that the last Predator-related thing on my radar was the infamous AVP. After that, I lost interest.

Having said that...I might actually watch this one.
 
Last edited:
Weird take...
Having seen the movie, does the "evil" twin look heavier than the other?
Or is it just costumes and missing legs throwing out perspective.

They did a good job differentiating them. Elle also talked about it in the interview that she shot both the characters on completely different times so she could focus on one role at a time, instead of having to switch make-ups on the same day etc.

She did a pretty good job with the dual roles, all things considered.
 
I get what you're saying,
But aside from this being the point of this character, an inferior small runt last-picked-for-the-football-team,
for practical reasons it makes more sense in this particular movie.

The feral-predator in Prey only used facial animation for certain segments, 98% of the time it was wearing a helm or shot at a distance, a very tall man in a rubber suit seeing through the slits.

iu


This movie by comparison has the Predator as the main character extensively emoting, much of the time focusing on the face unmasked. Which itself, far from being lazy, required extensive work and thought combining both digital effects with nuts and bolts practical tinkering.

G5bCkdKW0AAmPMP


If prefer complete practical effects I can understand this argument, in general I agree aesthetically it is pretty much always better, though think it would lead to limitations of its own and contextually, it makes sense in this movie to combine it with digital. Typically puppetry tends to be static or sporadic.
I think the mechanics of physical face mandibles require a wider head to accommodate the hydraulics or whatever they use, which is one of the big visual differences with Dez and the rest of predators. Pair that with his top knot hair style and he's very dainty looking and decidedly un-masculine compared to previous yautja. I really though he was gonna be some sort of half-human crossbreed (guess that could still be the case with the 'mother' not being revealed).
 
Predator - 10/10
Predators - 7/10
Prey - 5/10
All of the others (includes AVP stuff) - worthless slop

My expectations for the franchise couldn't be much lower. Prey was very 'meh' for me. This is one I will watch in pieces on the iPad while doing my cardio. If it's better than 'meh', great.
what??? Prey was great
 
I think the mechanics of physical face mandibles require a wider head to accommodate the hydraulics or whatever they use, which is one of the big visual differences with Dez and the rest of predators. Pair that with his top knot hair style and he's very dainty looking and decidedly un-masculine compared to previous yautja. I really though he was gonna be some sort of half-human crossbreed (guess that could still be the case with the 'mother' not being revealed).

Purely opinion but I think this is the worst Predator design in part because it's head looks comically massive and overly tech'fyd.


4599082-1709029038-preda.jpg



The Feral Predator is probably fav design even over the classic OG. I love the lanky, more primative look of the sub-species. It's skin (in the movie) almost looks like raw meat. The design as well suggests it's from a warmer region/planet without having to spell it out.

photo_16_2025-04-28_18-52-55.jpg
 
Last edited:
Z9LCitvVEOLsXkOB.jpg


So we have Thia as the softer, more maternal, more feminine "twin" with Tessa as the hard, cold, feminIST one. Thia is literally split into her upper, intellectual and communicative part and her lower, all ass and sexual parts. Her lower half can defeat the beta males around her, representing women using their sexuality to get ahead and men being uncaring for a womans opinions. But sexuality is insufficient in the face of militant feminism, represented by Tessa in a GIANT asexual mechanical body, devoid of any softness, capable of destroying even raw maternalism, as seen by her chainsawing the Mother in half. And even aggressive masculinity falls before the power of militant feminism as Dek has to sacrifice his penis-like appendage to save himself. But maternalism is resilient and eternal as the Mother can reform, until hard feminism LITERALLY freezes it from the inside and destroys it. But when the family unit, Father (Dek), new Mother (Thia) and CHILD unite, they can defeat feminism as it is ultimately rotten in the core. The new Father then goes on to destroy his father, with the only goal to obtain invisibility so that he can remain unseen within the family, placing the Mother and Child ahead of himself as dutiful but unimposing provider. At least until a new, more intimidating Mother arrives.

How's them liberal arts film critique classes for yah???? :P
 
Z9LCitvVEOLsXkOB.jpg


So we have Thia as the softer, more maternal, more feminine "twin" with Tessa as the hard, cold, feminIST one. Thia is literally split into her upper, intellectual and communicative part and her lower, all ass and sexual parts. Her lower half can defeat the beta males around her, representing women using their sexuality to get ahead and men being uncaring for a womans opinions. But sexuality is insufficient in the face of militant feminism, represented by Tessa in a GIANT asexual mechanical body, devoid of any softness, capable of destroying even raw maternalism, as seen by her chainsawing the Mother in half. And even aggressive masculinity falls before the power of militant feminism as Dek has to sacrifice his penis-like appendage to save himself. But maternalism is resilient and eternal as the Mother can reform, until hard feminism LITERALLY freezes it from the inside and destroys it. But when the family unit, Father (Dek), new Mother (Thia) and CHILD unite, they can defeat feminism as it is ultimately rotten in the core. The new Father then goes on to destroy his father, with the only goal to obtain invisibility so that he can remain unseen within the family, placing the Mother and Child ahead of himself as dutiful but unimposing provider. At least until a new, more intimidating Mother arrives.

How's them liberal arts film critique classes for yah???? :P


2HK27A558CwNZ7dV.jpg
 
madem web also made a 100m at the box office..........how does this have any relevance to anything

It doesn't, neither does anyone saying what someone else's idea of a good movie in a franchise might be. There's about the same number of people in this topic who appreciate the changes as those who decry them.
 
It doesn't, neither does anyone saying what someone else's idea of a good movie in a franchise might be. There's about the same number of people in this topic who appreciate the changes as those who decry them.

probably the same people who loved the fact that the xenomorph in alien earth, became a house trained pet, and were glad how theyve taken the franchise to new disney heights

cant wait for the alien vs predator musical
 
probably the same people who loved the fact that the xenomorph in alien earth, became a house trained pet, and were glad how theyve taken the franchise to new disney heights

cant wait for the alien vs predator musical

Yeah man, the last non Disney Predator was such a banger afterall.

The_Predator_official_poster.jpg



🤭
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom