SameThis one of my most hype game this year.
I'm hoping the demo also comes on PS5 and other platforms.
This one of my most hype game this year.
I think 3rd game takes looooong after two, I don't think you need to my opinion it's worth playing Stories 1&2.i need to play 2 in order to play this one or are they independent games ?
ABSOLUTELY Not! I like MHStories combat.I hope they take some cues from games like E33 and Pokemon Legends Z-A and improve the gameplay. It is too simplistic in MHS and MHS2.
My gif this game fucking GORGEOUS!
This game is already HUGE over second game.
Interesting, S2 might be an old build. The game is smooth as butter on base PS5 in balanced mode. Graphically a huge leap over MHS2.Honest opinion here.
Scarlet and Violet ran better than this shit on Switch than this does on Switch 2. It actively hurts my eyes to move the camera. I gave up and deleted after a few minutes.
I've seen some people that have played it say it ran better when they did. I wouldn't buy it like this, so I can only hope its an old build. There's no setting customizations for motion blur or graphics/performance mode.Interesting, S2 might be an old build. The game is smooth as butter on base PS5 in balanced mode. Graphically a huge leap over MHS2.
S2 version should be performing better. While the game is graphically a gen better than previous MHS games and more than 2-3 gens ahead of Pokemon games, it should not be that demanding. Motion blur, film grain, depth of field and chromatic abberation toggles should be a must in every game regardless of system.I've seen some people that have played it say it ran better when they did. I wouldn't buy it like this, so I can only hope its an old build. There's no setting customizations for motion blur or graphics/performance mode.
They added longsword which is good, but they removed sword and shield? This is really disappointing, one step forward one back.
I'll try the demo for 3. I don't like the art or character design of 1&2 but this one they nailed it.I think 3rd game takes looooong after two, I don't think you need to my opinion it's worth playing Stories 1&2.
I personally enjoyed 1&2 but 3rd game is another level when it comes to visuals and artstyle, it's fucking good.I'll try the demo for 3. I don't like the art or character design of 1&2 but this one they nailed it.
Feel like this is as close as breath of fire 6 as we will ever get.
- Monster Hunter Stories 3 offers three display modes on Xbox Series S and PS5. On Switch 2, there is only one display mode.
- The most notable differences between settings are in performance mode, which significantly reduces shadow quality and draw distance.
- PS5 manages to keep the fps above the target rate in all display modes, even reaching 60fps at times in balanced mode, which is the most recommended.
- Xbox Series S surprises with how close it is to the PS5 settings, something that is not often seen. However, it finds it difficult to maintain them stably.
- Switch 2 also runs with settings similar to balanced mode and shows greater stability than the Xbox Series S version in dock mode. However, in portable mode, it can fall below 30 fps more often.
2nd is kinda direct sequel to the first game with returning characters but 3rd game take loooong after the 2nd game, I dont think you dont need need worry about not understanding the story.Are these standalone ? As in can you just jump in without having played the previous ones?.
Just like mainline MH you need recognize their attack patterns.....for example Velocidrome starts with Speed attack which you can counter with Technical attack but once his in enrage he starts using Power attack which you counter with Speed attacks.I love the game, but the mechanics are very confusing. Most of the monsters are beating my ass.
I personally LOVE that combat because just like mainline MH games it's all about recognizing monsters's attack patterns. I like 2nd game you could switching weapons middle of the battle since different body parts is weak to different weapons.Not sure on it, game looks and sounds great but I didn't love the battle system. I never really liked the whole rock / paper / scissors thing from the previous games and it carries it forward to this one. I will still probably check it out though, I'm a sucker for JRPGs and that these look so good now on Switch 2 is tickling my brain well.
I personally LOVE that combat because just like mainline MH games it's all about recognizing monsters's attack patterns. I like 2nd game you could switching weapons middle of the battle since different body parts is weak to different weapons.
I disagree, you might take damage from head to head but it will never kill you even in 1 HP and its good defensive option if the monster is targeting you which its better to do head to head than trying to heal.The battle mechanic really needs tuning,
specially on the face up turns. The game extremelly lacks visibility, as the frame where they show you taking damage occurs incredibly fast(Im talking about miliseconds here). Also, if you still take damage for that (and I mean huge damage because every monster is supposed to be overwelming), then it makes the face off kinda redundant.
That criticism I understand in the 1st game because it was little more random but in both 2nd and 3rd game the attack patterns are much more consistent, once you experience fighting monster once you know what they gonna do.Also the patterns also really needs tunning. The only monster with clear pattern behavious is the Velociraptor monster, witch uses Speed unless it change behaviour. All the other monsters are almost erratic with no clear patterns in terms of the 3 types.