UGA and Meeechigan are 1-1 against each other and you haven't played since 1965 (UGA win): http://www.jhowell.net/cf/scores/Georgia.htm
OSU up to #3.
Stanford to #4 by a huge margin and close to ok state
Agreed, don't want to play Houston. Beating them would mean as much as Hawaii.Nice. Make it happen, voters.
This discussion on ESPN is so terrible.
Guy A: "You know, it sucks that LSU beat Alabama and now has to play an extra game whereas Bama gets to rest"
Guy B: "BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BAMA DESERVES TO GET IN MORE THAN OTHER TEAMS, SEC SEC SEC"
Guy A: "What does that have to do with Bama getting a bye for losing to LSU?"
Guy B: "BLAH BLAH BLAH, SYSTEM EVERY GAME MATTERS EXCEPT GAMES LSU AND ALABAMA PLAY"
I am now irritated.
Is Guy B a old man with speech impediment?
It's okay, I prefer everyone thinking UGA has no chance. Most probably haven't watched the team play.Dudes, who cares? Georgia's not beating LSU anyway.
And if they do, their reward is Houston. So it goes.
There you go. Sounds like Stanford's in no matter what.
I managed to forget who Craig James was for a few weeks, he's Guy B.
James is an idiot. "I still have Arkansas at 3 on my ballot because, herp derp, their only losses were to #1 and #2!" What he neglected to mention is that each game was a blowout loss.
I'm guessing Va Tech dropped in the computers way more than Stanford rose
Edit- Looks like I was wrong
Stanford Comp average .82
Va Tech Comp average .62
The SEC wants a +1 system, the rest of the conferences should join us.Doesn't the NCAA and BCS defenders love to throw out "Every game is a playoff game!". Well in that case Alabama had their playoff game against LSU, they had their shot, and lost. You don't get a do over. If the Yankees beat the Redsox in the ALCS, should they play again in the World Series if it's determined they are both better than any NL team? If the NCAA is going to be too stupid to form a simple playoff, at least they should add a provision to the BCS that you cannot play in the title game if you haven't won your conference.
ACC going 1-3 in non conf on Saturday with the Pac 12 going 2-0 has made the computer gap too big. Computer rankings won't really change with such a small sample size of games due to conference champ games. Stanford's got it locked up as long as something fluky doesn't happen and OSU makes the title gameEhhhh...
I can see voters changing Stanford /Va tech if they win the Conf championship. Certainly would help in their computer rankings.
With voters, VA Tech would have gotten revenge on their only loss.
Aight blue you starting a gaf bowl pick ems on yahoo soon? Or is it way too early
The SEC wants a +1 system, the rest of the conferences should join us.
Are sign ups available?
Edit:
Group ID# 2677
Password:threeballz
If you participated last year, check your email! You should have an invite.
I see you and I chose basically the same team name. :jnc
No they don't. They wanted a +1 system a few years ago when it looked like Florida would get left out of an OSU-Mich rematch.
Evidence that they have subsequently changed their position by down-voting a change in the BCS rules to adopt a +1 system?
Are you being Mr Big City Lawya, or do you honestly believe the SEC favors a +1?
6 of 10 Big 12 teams are ranked, and aggy isn't one of them. Pooooooooor aggy
Evidence that they have subsequently changed their position by down-voting a change in the BCS rules to adopt a +1 system?
Nope, completely against a playoff. Discussed to death already. It would start at 8 and end up at 96 before you blink.Fuck +1. We need a playoff, preferably 16, but most likely 8 teams
James is an idiot. "I still have Arkansas at 3 on my ballot because, herp derp, their only losses were to #1 and #2!" What he neglected to mention is that each game was a blowout loss.
Fuck +1. We need a playoff, preferably 16, but most likely 8 teams and reduce the regular season by a game or two with conference championships this past weekend. Could you imagine next week:
#1 LSU vs. #16 Michigan
#2 Alabama vs. #15 Wisconsin
#3 Oklahoma State vs. #14 Georgia
#4 Stanford vs. #13 Michigan State
#5 Virginia Tech vs. #12 South Carolina
#6 Houston vs. #11 Kansas State
#7 Boise State vs. #10 Oklahoma
#8 Arkansas vs. #9 Oregon
And the BCS/big conferences don't think they wouldn't make a shit-ton more money on this playoff with the TV revenues and sponsorships than they do in the 1-game bowl season?
So everyon and their mother (including people with the Sugar Bowl), are saying Houston wins Saturday and they are going to Sugar, so why are so many people in this thread denying that?
Not knocking you guys, just wondering why what you are saying is so different than the national thought.
The only people who were saying that were confused about BCS selection rules. Houston is going to the Sugar.
Can't imagine them matching Ok State vs K-State...
The only people who were saying that were confused about BCS selection rules. Houston is going to the Sugar.
Only way Michigan doesn't become eligible is if Kansas St., Oklahoma and Georgia all win. They'll be ahead of any 3 loss teams.There was an interesting comment tonight that, for pure Track Meet entertainment value that having Oklahoma State and Houston in the Fiesta Bowl could make some sense.
It would be putting an awful lot of faith in Houston though...
Also, if Michigan isn't eligible and Sugar gets first pick, what if they do pick Stanford? Fiesta then has to choose among ... Boise, Houston, & K-State?
Can't imagine them matching Ok State vs K-State...
ESPN has all the BCS games.Who broadcasts the Sugar Bowl? I'm betting they're praying Houston loses next weekend.
No, definitely not. I'm assuming they take Boise in that scenario.
Who broadcasts the Sugar Bowl? I'm betting they're praying Houston loses next weekend.
Why wouldn't they take Houston?
(realistically, Michigan MUST have LSU beat Georgia AND Ok State beat Oklahoma, or they can't be in the top 14. They probably have to be HUGE Texas fans over Baylor).
Only way Michigan doesn't become eligible is if Kansas St., Oklahoma and Georgia all win. They'll be ahead of any 3 loss teams.
To make up a .04 BCS gap, you would need to go up by .12 in the computers if the humans stayed the same. Not really possible with so few games left. If anything the gap in the humans will widen. Look at how many votes separate Michigan from the 3 loss teams.Now that I look at Michigan a little closer... If Baylor beats Texas, I don't see how Baylor doesn't jump Michigan and stop them from getting a number 14 BCS ranking even with LSU and OK State winning...
16 Michigan .4310 Computer Avg 15 Points .410 (current)
17 Baylor .3910 Computer Avg 13 Points .550 (current)