I watched it in a movie theater on opening night and it was gorgeous. It is gorgeous. Nobody is saying Sunshine touches Alien - but the film is great and the production design is beautiful. Calling it cheap and shitty looking is more than a bit of a stretch jettiri.
Who's the naked(?) chick looking at the camera? I'm not sure if it's Charlize Theron.
Rapace.
"please!?!" indicating she's being impregnated (wild theory)
I know I'm in the minority, but I actually really dig the look of their space-suits in this. Its the sort of thing I grew up seeing on the cover of old hard sci-fi novels. Love it.
This is a real hnnnnh moment
![]()
Rapace.
"please!?!" indicating she's being impregnated (wild theory)
Yeah, I see it was a puppet. Regardless, it looked awful compared to the aliens from the earlier films.The extended version has one CG alien shot when it runs away from the dead ox. A real directors cut has never been made. If it did it would have a few additions still and would still use the dog as the chest burster instead of the ox.
lol, thats the first thing that that shot reminded me of as well.that shot reminds me of the opening shot of Avatar....
edit:
i remember some people on gaf complaining about the suits.
i told y'all to believe motherfuckers, believe.
I know I'm in the minority, but I actually really dig the look of their space-suits in this. Its the sort of thing I grew up seeing on the cover of old hard sci-fi novels. Love it.
I know I'm in the minority, but I actually really dig the look of their space-suits in this. Its the sort of thing I grew up seeing on the cover of old hard sci-fi novels. Love it.
Exact sameQ: is the individual bluray of ALIEN the same as the anthology set? PQ/audio wise?
Q: is the individual bluray of ALIEN the same as the anthology set? PQ/audio wise?
Me too, brother. Me too.
I recall a recent comic con where Ridley said there would bein the movie.at least two androids.
Q: is the individual bluray of ALIEN the same as the anthology set? PQ/audio wise?
Love it but still, so much cgi. It really bothers me. Will we ever see another sci go or fantasy flick without it? I come to think of the problem being that old sfx were done by artist whereas cgi is done by computer nerds. It's just so damn in your face and uninaginative, a constant reproduction of standard fare. I am particularly looking at you lord of the rings.
Love it but still, so much cgi. It really bothers me. Will we ever see another sco fi or fantasy flick without it? I come to think of the problem being that old sfx were done by artist whereas cgi is done by computer nerds. It's just so damn in your face and unimaginative, a constant reproduction of standard fare. I am particularly looking at you lord of the rings.
You do realize not everything is possible with animatronics and models, right? People are overrating how well old methods looked. They WON'T look well without the natural graininess and low quality of older films. Not to mention people only hate on CGI when they see bad CGI but in reality there's probably a large number of elements of movies that are created digitally that you don't even notice
If something can't be done with practical effects then it shouldn't be done at all. Most directors nowadays are too busy drooling over CGI that becomes dated within a few years. In 30 years from now, I guarantee you that Alien will still hold up better than Prometheus.
If something can't be done with practical effects then it shouldn't be done at all. Most directors nowadays are too busy drooling over CGI that becomes dated within a few years. In 30 years from now, I guarantee you that Alien will still hold up better than Prometheus.
If something can't be done with practical effects then it shouldn't be done at all. Most directors nowadays are too busy drooling over CGI that becomes dated within a few years. In 30 years from now, I guarantee you that Alien will still hold up better than Prometheus.