Watch it. You'll learn new things about magic.How many of you have watched Mahou Shoujotai: Arusu (aka Tweeny Witches)??
How many of you have watched Mahou Tsukai Tai :Alice (aka Tweeny Witches)??
[Steins;Gate]
Uh, becausenone of that really makes any sense, especially the concept of a fixed point. I mean, if someone crosses the road and gets killed by a speeding car that's unlucky, so going back in time to make sure they don't cross the road would save their life. It seems bizarre that the same person would then, say, get shot by a mugger instead of getting hit by that car. For that to happen some guiding hand would surely be having to push all these situations onto that person.
[Steins;Gate]
The problem is that it's completely arbitrary.
"You can change this, you can change that, you can even change the circumstances of Mayuri's death (the day she died, too), but Mayuri's death itself? No, you can't change that. Why does Mayuri's death matter more than, say, Nae's trauma? Or even the consequences of Okabe's time jumps on the insect world of Tôkyô, really (no reason to be anthropocentric)? Because."
"Serious" time travel plots either pick a model where you can't change anything at all (the time traveler didn't change anything but merely played his part in the past), or a model where you can change anything you want because you end up in a new, separate timeline where time paradoxes aren't an issue.
Sadly, it's not uncommon on TV and in movies, indeed...
"The first model is tempting because, y'know... Fate! Irony! That's always nice. But then again, it's also very restrictive whereas the second model allows us to go wild and show amusing alternate histories... Hmm... I know! Let's pick a bit of both!" Dude, I see why that would be tempting, but that makes no sense: they're not compatible models!
point taken, the way she died did bug me a little at first but I was too busy laughing by the train one to be bothered by it
[Steins;Gate]
The problem is that it's completely arbitrary.
"You can change this, you can change that, you can even change the circumstances of Mayuri's death (the day she died, too), but Mayuri's death itself? No, you can't change that. Why does Mayuri's death matter more than, say, Nae's trauma? Or even the consequences of Okabe's time jumps on the insect world of Tôkyô, really (no reason to be anthropocentric)? Because."
"Serious" time travel plots either pick a model where you can't change anything at all (the time traveler didn't change anything but merely played his part in the past), or a model where you can change anything you want because you end up in a new, separate timeline where time paradoxes aren't an issue.
For all the crap I've given Mardock Scramble that really sounds like a change for the better. It sounds like they took an info-dump and then worked it into the story as a whole, which would help it to seem more organic than just using a traditional flashback.Mardock Scramble Movie 1
Took a half year break from anime, I guess this is a good start to come back to anime watching. I liked the Mardock manga, the anime did change the story a bit, instead of learning the main character's back story from a long flash back, the anime tell her back story bit by bit from her conversation, small flash back, and a court hearing.
I guess the change is for the better, it gives a better impact, and the story is a lot faster pace compare the the manga.[...]
Watch it. You'll learn new things about magic.
I don't mind fanservice shows being produced at all, and i'm aware that there was a fair share of them even in the past, but I find a problem with it when it's dominating the industry itself.
Now we have artistic/animating talent being wasted, and not necessarily because they're working on pure fanservice shows. Even the shonen-action shows are affected because studios are pressurized into showing more fanservice (Guilty Crown comes to mind, such wasted production values)
As has been mentioned before, while in a sense you could argue that skilled animators are being 'wasted' animating, say, The Idolm@ster (which would require a separate discussion of what it means to 'wasted') but then again if you listen to the animators themselves what they enjoy drawing is cute girls. If that's their passion it's not like they'd necessarily be out there doing character animation in some more serious drama.
Then how'd you miss the part where Arusu explicitly mentions her name being similar to but not the same as "Arisu" or Alice.No I have it. Ive seen it half a dozen times. I was just asking if anybody else has seen it.
I just realized I listed the japanese name for Magic Users Club, which is even more hnnngh.
But yeah, Mahou Shojo Tai Alice.
Agent Aika - 1
Holy shit! It this the legendary, the holy grail, the perfect anime? I'm flashed!
It has all the things I ever wanted:
As a 'predestination paradox', that kind of situations can be theoretically consistent and approachable through some particular acceptances of the 'general relativity'.Uh, becausenone of that really makes any sense, especially the concept of a fixed point. I mean, if someone crosses the road and gets killed by a speeding car that's unlucky, so going back in time to make sure they don't cross the road would save their life. It seems bizarre that the same person would then, say, get shot by a mugger instead of getting hit by that car. For that to happen some guiding hand would surely be having to push all these situations onto that person.
You wouldn't be able to change anything though.As a 'predestination paradox', that kind of situations can be theoretically consistent and approachable through some particular acceptances of the 'general relativity'.
Just an innocent query but, why would you start with Zeta (a sequel to another show in the UC continuity) and then jump to Wing (in it's own continuity) before moving on to more 'one off' works and then hitting up Unicorn (which set after the original show, Zeta, Double Zeta and Char's Counter Attack and so forth). It just seems a bit...sporadic.A note on Gundam.
Over the past couple months I've been watching various Gundam series. Started with Zeta then followed it up with a ten year-ish anniversary rewatch of Wing. Currently I'm making my way through a rewatch of 00. I'm really tempted to buy Unicorn. This has been a lot of Gundam to absorb in such a short span of time.
Early 2000's anime, truly the golden years.
You wouldn't be able to change anything though.
Will it still be a delay when no one expected it to come out on time anyway?
Also,
![]()
I think that is my least favorite of the titles.
Goddamnit, weren't they supposed to release together? I don't want to wait 2 years asfskdgl
I love mechas in video games and live action shows but I fucken hate mecha animes or any animes with mecha in them( am fine with mecha parody jokes) .
That's unfortunate. I mean, a small percentage of mecha shows are great! Some aren't even that mecha focused.It has mecha's, I hate mecha's.
You wouldn't be able to change anything though.
What? No.That's the whole point on how Okabe got out of it.
Pretty much, "Redo" is a huge confirmation
GAINAX, or Khara? Who owns what?That's up to Gainax, and hopefully it's sooner rather than later. I hope by 2013 Funimation can make a deal with Matt Greenfield to direct the dubs for the last two films.
Wait, when did these "remakes" become part of the same universe? How did this turn into some Zelda timeline shit?
Right. You can't change anything in one timeline. Therefore the only solution is the completely change the timeline. Basically the way time works in Steins;Gate is that making minor alterations to a timeline may change the circumstances of how things happen, but everything is pretty much predetermined in that particular timeline. The only way to actually change the future is to create a change so earth-shattering it creates a completely different timeline. Most popular fiction depicts all changes to a timeline as a complete split (the Back to the Future model). Steins;Gate doesn't follow that model so much. It follows the idea that a timeline is predetermined in many respects, you can just change the circumstances (i.e. Akiba changes from being Otaku centric to just being Gadget centric, but the fact that Okarin and co. are working on a time-machine in Akiba does NOT change because that's predetermined). The predetermined aspects are the so-called "convergence points" I mentioned in my post above.
The second half was perfect as it was.Fuck the haters
See to me Gurren Lagann was already mecha perfection. I don't need more. It's my favourite animu of all timez.
Of course, early anime films from that era, such as the works by Toei, would try and emulate the Disney style of animation rather than going for the 'limited animation' style that eventually became commonplace.
Truly, a golden age for fanservice? Id have assumed that Agent Aika is certainly notorious enough to have cropped up on your radar before now.
Let's be fair now, all the Rebuild films have bad titles.
But who chooses the "convergence points"? It's such a subjective matter that there has to be a hand in choosing them, no? I think that's what some of the posters are getting at.
Is it really You Can (Not) Redo? Haha. That's horrible.
The characters and tropes in mecha titles are pretty much the same characters and tropes present in anime as a whole, few of them are unique to the genre.I don't find the characters and tropes in them, entertaining in anyway quite the opposite.
There doesn't have to be, no. That's just what each inevitability, or fate, is. Hold on, let me draw a graph.
But who chooses the "convergence points"? It's such a subjective matter that there has to be a hand in choosing them, no? I think that's what some of the posters are getting at.
![]()
Cajunator must be behind this.
Right. You can't change anything in one timeline. Therefore the only solution is the completely change the timeline.
The only way to actually change the future is to create a change so earth-shattering it creates a completely different timeline.
Most popular fiction depicts all changes to a timeline as a complete split (the Back to the Future model).
The predetermined aspects are the so-called "convergence points" I mentioned in my post above.
But who chooses the "convergence points"? It's such a subjective matter that there has to be a hand in choosing them, no? I think that's what some of the posters are getting at.
And, in the end that's what it boils down to?For a story with such a huge emphasis on science, that looks like a nice deus ex machina
To be honest, that mother did endanger her child going through that so shes actually a bad mom, but it was still awesome.
But the D-mail's didn't really change much outside of turning an apple into an orange, it's still a fruit or to mirror it better turned Rukaku from a guy to a girl, it's still the same Rukaku.
But the D-mail's didn't really change much outside of turning an apple into an orange, it's still a fruit or to mirror it better turned Rukaku from a guy to a girl, it's still the same Rukaku.
It's more sci-fi, which isn't all that far removed from fantasy tbh. Fantasy doesn't have to all follow the same rules. So long as the rules are (fairly) consistent within individual works, that's fine.
Legendarily badEva 3.0 will be legendary and theres nothing we can do about it.va
Got done with Bakemonogatari. Wow. What an anime. Is there any second of it where the characters aren't talking? Bring on Nisemonogatari!
Finishing up Toradora, then to finish up Shana season one (yeah, I'm still in season one).
True but with reservations, because (and only potentially, of course) some acts could lead to a certain circumvention. Probably, as it is constituted the apparent outcome can't be changed but it can be affected intrinsically, remaining true within what an external observer could have attested.You wouldn't be able to change anything though.
Legendarily bad
Hmm, you liked the TV series ending better than EoE?
Uh what aboutThat seems pretty major, I'd say.the part where it revived the dead and fundamentally changed Tokyo?
[Steins;Gate]
But as we've seen, you couldn't change anything you liked in those other world lines: Mayuri would still get "killed by the world", no matter what. Okabe needed to clear an RPG-like condition for that to change.
The "importance" of an event is a subjective notion, all in the eye of the beholder. The universe has no more reason to care about Okabe preventing SERN's dystopia than it has to care about that one ant he stepped on six seconds into his first time jump.
Not a complete split, actually, or Marty wouldn't be affected by his parents not getting together.
The Back to the Future are nice movies, but poor time travel stories.
And they're arbitrary.
Yup.
As it stands, we're pretty much told that "the universe" decided that Mayuri's death (no matter the circumstances, but we're working on a relatively loose schedule) and SERN's dystopia were tightly linked. Why though? Why that specifically? Er... Because!
Again, not a very scientific notion, far from it, and it's a bit jarring considering how Steins;Gate sells itself. To justify this seemingly arbitrary rule, you'd probably have to introduce some kind of sentient "god of fate" who cares very much about human beings and have him say "I just thought it'd be more fun and dramatic that way... plus it gives Okabe a nice character arc, don't you think?" Might as well call him "the Writer".
It must be quite an interesting experience to watch one of the most lavishly animated TV series back to back with Bakemonogatari, which was clearly made on a shoe-string budget for most of it’s run.
Is it really You Can (Not) Redo? Haha. That's horrible.
Legendarily bad
That's unfortunate. I mean, a small percentage of mecha shows are great! Some aren't even that mecha focused.
But there's no logical connection between cause and effect here. That's what people are bothered by. Because A, unrelated event Z occurs.Again, you're applying a sort of malicious intent on "time" or whatever to kill her. It's not malicious, it's just inevitable because they altered time to prevent Kurisu's stabbing.
But there's no logical connection between cause and effect here. That's what people are bothered by. Because A, unrelated event Z occurs.
But there's no logical connection between cause and effect here. That's what people are bothered by. Because A, unrelated event Z occurs.
E: To clarify my position,the problem is that Mayuri's death is not directly tied to the consequences of Chris's survival, and the gang discovering the secrets of time travel (alerting SERN). If Mayuri were inevitably killed by SERN agents, that would be somewhat more "acceptable" than the universe apparently deciding that this girl just gotta die, don't matter how.
Correct. That's the problem.Yes it does. Dramatically.Chris is the one who figured out how it all worked, AND how to control it. Without her help, they NEVER would have gotten as far as they did and developed a full time machine, and thus, never would have been pursued by SERN.