Not only that, but youth shows in posts, no matter where your opinions lie.
That's what YOU think!!!!!!
Not only that, but youth shows in posts, no matter where your opinions lie.
That's what YOU think!!!!!!
I think the only chance of that happening is with Gingrich winning SC, Paul and Santorum dropping out (Maybe even an endorsement from Sabtirum), and that he/his super PACs have enough money left to saturate Florida's airwaves with more negative ads than Romney's compatriots can muster and come out on top there.TPM has Gingrich now leading in SC.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/01/and_gingrich_takes_the_lead.php?ref=fpblg
I don't think Gingrich can win the nomination.
But. And this is a huge but. If Gingrich can get past his whole other marriage and his ex's interview, he can do some serious damage to Romney. Romney will have to slug it out with Gingrich, and that's definitely a fight he absolutely does not want.
Same here. But the only reason I thought Perry would win was because the morning after he announced his candidacy, my former co-workers just couldn't stop gushing about Perry. Total man-crush going on.
Roemer never had money, support of PACs, and any noticeable rise in popularity. Cain and Bachmann both had stints at the top of the polls.
Limiting campaign contributions to $100 is both the reason he got nowhere and the reason he was a good candidate. He literally only had one person on his staff.
I wonder how this talk of open marriages will impact SC. Today should have been a semi-victory lap for Newt, instead people are talking about his personal life again.
Can't wait for tonight's debate
He will just counter any attack with, "Romney comes from a family of avowed polygamists!!" "I am not a shitbag!"
Cloving - I think you mean secession.
If Newt wins SC he'll get a lot of media talk, momentum, and more money. You'll hear statements such as this on cable: "No Republican nominee has won the GOP nomination without winning South Carolina. Is Mitt in trouble?" I predict that Santorum will drop out after SC, further coalescing conservative voters around Gingrich.I think the only chance of that happening is with Gingrich winning SC, Paul and Santorum dropping out (Maybe even an endorsement from Sabtirum), and that he/his super PACs have enough money left to saturate Florida's airwaves with more negative ads than Romney's compatriots can muster and come out on top there.
The winning Florida part is the long shot, I don't see how he won't get steamrolled by Romney's money...
It's interesting. As Steven Benen points out, most of it is old news. How much can old news have an impact? The information has been out there for quite a while. Remember, GOP voters weren't bothered by the sexual allegations of Herman Cain. It took as many as four different women to tear him down.I wonder how this talk of open marriages will impact SC. Today should have been a semi-victory lap for Newt, instead people are talking about his personal life again.
Can't wait for tonight's debate
Pretty sure this wife stuff will sink Gingrich. Might not be enough for South Carolina, but afterwards he's toast.
I wonder how Perry and his supporter would have reacted if we had a video of Taliban pissing on the corpses of dead marines.Listening to Dennis Miller on the way to work today and he had a caller who explained he supported Perry for governor for one reason: SECESSION!!!! Yes, this caller who when asked how succession could happen in Texas and couldn't answer, supported Rick Perry for governor and would've supported him for President because of his state rights shpiel and his support of the soldiers urinating on the taliban.
I wonder how Perry and his supporter would have reacted if we had a video of Taliban pissing on the corpses of dead marines.
I don't dispute that, I just wonder if it would be enough to win Florida.If Newt wins SC he'll get a lot of media talk, momentum, and more money. You'll hear statements such as this on cable: "No Republican nominee has won the GOP nomination without winning South Carolina. Is Mitt in trouble?" I predict that Santorum will drop out after SC, further coalescing conservative voters around Gingrich.
How about some labels or some links or something? What is this, FOX?
How about some labels or some links or something? What is this, FOX?
How about some labels or some links or something? What is this, FOX?
You really need to weigh the pros and cons.If Newt's habit of leaving his wives when they become ill with cancer and MS didn't hurt him in any way, I don't see how wanting to bang two chicks is going to. But, then again, I don't really understand the mind of the average Republican voter.
He's kind of a dick?I don't want to believe it's because he's a Mormon, but I'm running out of explanations.
I wonder if the article contributes to the fact that people have exhausted their benefits.
Another fucking debate tonight? How many has there been so far? 20?
i know right? far more interested in the primaries, didnt even bother watch the new hampshire polls/coverage
oh and im probably one of the few on this board who wants a mitt v obama GE. i think an interesting contrast will show in the debates.
I doubt the ensuing process would have been appreciably different. The outcome for both scenarios is a push; it was a virtual tie. Romney proved he was a viable candidate to a firmly conservative electorate.So santorum won iowa in the certified votes. Its too little to late now. I wonder how the popularity votes would look had the media not jumped the gun on assuming Romney won Iowa. The story up until now has been Romney winning Iowa and NH.
The difficulty with forecasting the House stems from the countervailing shifts from 2008 to 2010. House elections are not independent events. That's why a seemingly improbable scenario, such as Democrats securing initially vulnerable seats, winning the toss ups, and stealing a few GOP districts, could prove eminently possible. While the presidential vote will probably shift to the GOP from 2008, the latest House elections occurred in 2010. And the House vote share will undoubtedly shift to the Democrats. Notwithstanding, will it be substantial enough to flip the House? I would have dismissed the possibility only a few months ago. Now, if the upward trajectory of the economy proves sustained, it would improve the Democrats' prospects enough to make the scenario plausible. I actually think qualified optimism is warranted.I think it's really funny how about this time two years ago, Republicans started posting poll leads smaller than what the Democrats lead now and conventional wisdom followed that of course Democrats would lose the House, and control of the Senate was a toss-up.
Right now Democrats probably aren't where they need to be to win back the House, but I'd say they're pretty close and could probably pick up an extra 15-20 seats if the election were held today, regardless of the GOP nominee.
The amount of money that was raised and burned by Perry is hilarious.
If they donated to his PAC then the money isn't necessarily wasted.Shows that you can be rich and still be an idiot and lack all financial sense.
What the ROI on a perry investment?
So, what do you guys think the chances that Biden will be the VP?
He is sorta safe, a bit bumbling sure but he's largely not gonna lose you any votes. But he's not really gonna gain any either. But that Tepid approach is not gonna set Biden up in 2016.
Hillary would be polarizing and not safe, but I think she'll gain more votes than she'd lose. Also people that wouldn't vote for Hillary largely wouldn't vote for Obama anyway. And Hillary would be very well poised for a 2016 run.
So, what do you guys think the chances that Biden will be the VP?
He is sorta safe, a bit bumbling sure but he's largely not gonna lose you any votes. But he's not really gonna gain any either. But that Tepid approach is not gonna set Biden up in 2016.
Hillary would be polarizing and not safe, but I think she'll gain more votes than she'd lose. Also people that wouldn't vote for Hillary largely wouldn't vote for Obama anyway. And Hillary would be very well poised for a 2016 run.
Dude's running against Gingrich and Santorum.He's kind of a dick?
Cain built his brand and will make shitload of money in speaking fees, book deals etc. as a result.The guy made Cain seem smart.
Is this a troll post, ronito? Haven't we dismissed this plenty?
I don't think it would ever happen, unless Biden gets ill. What kind of oppo can anyone dredge up on Biden? But, there's a lot of old baggage that Republicans could use against Clinton if she were on the ticket. And we don't need to add conservative sexism to the mix (had enough of that in the Democratic primaries).
I think it comes down to how confident Obama is feeling. If he's confident then there's no reason not to keep Biden. But if he's feeling threatened then I think he might have to rethink Biden. Like I said, Biden wont cost him votes but he wont gain him any either.
But if the nominee is Romney I think Obama will feel confident.
Cuomo 2016
Sherrod Brown >>> Cuomo
Cuomo 2016
Cuomo 2016
Its funny, I go drudge up old posts of mine from the late 90's/early 00's and just get embarrassed. i was a pompous ass and my posts just oozed with douchebaggery.
Warren would have a decent shot at getting the nomination if she wanted it. You want a way to excite the base? You pick her.