• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

US PoliGAF 2012 | The Romney VeepStakes: Waiting for Chris Christie to Sing…

Status
Not open for further replies.
TPM has Gingrich now leading in SC.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/01/and_gingrich_takes_the_lead.php?ref=fpblg

I don't think Gingrich can win the nomination.

But. And this is a huge but. If Gingrich can get past his whole other marriage and his ex's interview, he can do some serious damage to Romney. Romney will have to slug it out with Gingrich, and that's definitely a fight he absolutely does not want.
I think the only chance of that happening is with Gingrich winning SC, Paul and Santorum dropping out (Maybe even an endorsement from Sabtirum), and that he/his super PACs have enough money left to saturate Florida's airwaves with more negative ads than Romney's compatriots can muster and come out on top there.

The winning Florida part is the long shot, I don't see how he won't get steamrolled by Romney's money...
 
Same here. But the only reason I thought Perry would win was because the morning after he announced his candidacy, my former co-workers just couldn't stop gushing about Perry. Total man-crush going on.

Me three. I feared his - at the time - apparent power to win elections. Now I realize that the only reason he's had staying power in Texas is because we're still pretty red and at this point he's got half the state in his pocket.
 
Roemer never had money, support of PACs, and any noticeable rise in popularity. Cain and Bachmann both had stints at the top of the polls.

Limiting campaign contributions to $100 is both the reason he got nowhere and the reason he was a good candidate. He literally only had one person on his staff.
 
I wonder how this talk of open marriages will impact SC. Today should have been a semi-victory lap for Newt, instead people are talking about his personal life again.

Can't wait for tonight's debate
 
Limiting campaign contributions to $100 is both the reason he got nowhere and the reason he was a good candidate. He literally only had one person on his staff.

Sounds like a good person, but a terrible "politician." It is the definition of "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em"

Too bad, I would LOVE to see a massive campaign finance reform bill. The way it is now, money absolutely determines the outcome of nearly every race.
 
Listening to Dennis Miller on the way to work today and he had a caller who explained he supported Perry for governor for one reason: SECESSION!!!! Yes, this caller who when asked how succession could happen in Texas and couldn't answer, supported Rick Perry for governor and would've supported him for President because of his state rights shpiel and his support of the soldiers urinating on the taliban.
 
I wonder how this talk of open marriages will impact SC. Today should have been a semi-victory lap for Newt, instead people are talking about his personal life again.

Can't wait for tonight's debate

He will just counter any attack with, "Romney comes from a family of avowed polygamists!!" "I am not a shitbag!"


Cloving - I think you mean secession.
 
I think the only chance of that happening is with Gingrich winning SC, Paul and Santorum dropping out (Maybe even an endorsement from Sabtirum), and that he/his super PACs have enough money left to saturate Florida's airwaves with more negative ads than Romney's compatriots can muster and come out on top there.

The winning Florida part is the long shot, I don't see how he won't get steamrolled by Romney's money...
If Newt wins SC he'll get a lot of media talk, momentum, and more money. You'll hear statements such as this on cable: "No Republican nominee has won the GOP nomination without winning South Carolina. Is Mitt in trouble?" I predict that Santorum will drop out after SC, further coalescing conservative voters around Gingrich.
I wonder how this talk of open marriages will impact SC. Today should have been a semi-victory lap for Newt, instead people are talking about his personal life again.

Can't wait for tonight's debate
It's interesting. As Steven Benen points out, most of it is old news. How much can old news have an impact? The information has been out there for quite a while. Remember, GOP voters weren't bothered by the sexual allegations of Herman Cain. It took as many as four different women to tear him down.
 
You guys don't understand. Newt is a genius and a world-historical figure. It would be unfair to women for him to give the gift of his penis to only one woman (at a time).
 
I like this graph:

120119_jobs.jpg
 
Pretty sure this wife stuff will sink Gingrich. Might not be enough for South Carolina, but afterwards he's toast.

Probably, although Rush is already leading the "everyone has a bitter ex lol" brigade. If he wins big in SC who knows, maybe he can turn things around in Florida too. If he can survive until Super Tuesday he could at least win the southern states+Alaska; that's about half of the contests on that day. IMO that's his best possible hope - he certainly won't beat Romney, but can prolong things.

I just wonder what Santorum does. We can probably declare his Iowa victory a bust, as he has flailed about since then. I'm surprised his advisers never said "hey, our Iowa victory speech was highly praised and well regarded. How about we carry that message forward?" Instead we've gotten more rambling about his electoral history in PA (while ignoring his last election race of course) and rants about family and gays. Everyone who is concerned about family/social issues already supports him, I see no point in re-enforcing that continually
 
Listening to Dennis Miller on the way to work today and he had a caller who explained he supported Perry for governor for one reason: SECESSION!!!! Yes, this caller who when asked how succession could happen in Texas and couldn't answer, supported Rick Perry for governor and would've supported him for President because of his state rights shpiel and his support of the soldiers urinating on the taliban.
I wonder how Perry and his supporter would have reacted if we had a video of Taliban pissing on the corpses of dead marines.
 
If Newt wins SC he'll get a lot of media talk, momentum, and more money. You'll hear statements such as this on cable: "No Republican nominee has won the GOP nomination without winning South Carolina. Is Mitt in trouble?" I predict that Santorum will drop out after SC, further coalescing conservative voters around Gingrich.
I don't dispute that, I just wonder if it would be enough to win Florida.

Newt's going all-out in SC, even if he retakes the mantle of the Not Romney and the conservatives coalesce around him at long last, I don't know if he'd have the funds or time to take Florida.

Then again, I have no idea how far in advance ad buys need to be, or how long it takes to put one together, etc.
 
If Newt's habit of leaving his wives when they become ill with cancer and MS didn't hurt him in any way, I don't see how wanting to bang two chicks is going to. But, then again, I don't really understand the mind of the average Republican voter.
 
If Newt's habit of leaving his wives when they become ill with cancer and MS didn't hurt him in any way, I don't see how wanting to bang two chicks is going to. But, then again, I don't really understand the mind of the average Republican voter.
You really need to weigh the pros and cons.
On the one hand, he cheated on his sick wife with a younger woman, twice, but on the other hand, he is really not Mitt Romney.

I don't want to believe it's because he's a Mormon, but I'm running out of explanations.
 
I wonder if the article contributes to the fact that people have exhausted their benefits.

The effect of that is felt in a different data point. Two key numbers are reported each week:

In the week ending January 14, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 352,000, a decrease of 50,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 402,000. The 4-week moving average was 379,000, a decrease of 3,500 from the previous week's revised average of 382,500.

The advance number for seasonally adjusted insured unemployment during the week ending January 7, was 3,432,000, a decrease of 215,000 from the preceding week's revised level of 3,647,000. The 4-week moving average was 3,576,250, a decrease of 34,000 from the preceding week's revised average of 3,610,250.​

Initial claims are a measure of job losses. Lower claims are associated with stronger job markets. A range of 300-350k is considered normal, and a sign of an improving labor market.

The insured employment number can drop for two reasons. Either someone who was drawing UI got a job, or their benefits ran out. The graph (and article) were focusing on initial claims, so expiring benefits were not a factor.

Too many people have forgotten the people that have run out of benefits, though, which is unfortunate.
 
So santorum won iowa in the certified votes. Its too little to late now. I wonder how the popularity votes would look had the media not jumped the gun on assuming Romney won Iowa. The story up until now has been Romney winning Iowa and NH.
I doubt the ensuing process would have been appreciably different. The outcome for both scenarios is a push; it was a virtual tie. Romney proved he was a viable candidate to a firmly conservative electorate.
I think it's really funny how about this time two years ago, Republicans started posting poll leads smaller than what the Democrats lead now and conventional wisdom followed that of course Democrats would lose the House, and control of the Senate was a toss-up.

Right now Democrats probably aren't where they need to be to win back the House, but I'd say they're pretty close and could probably pick up an extra 15-20 seats if the election were held today, regardless of the GOP nominee.
The difficulty with forecasting the House stems from the countervailing shifts from 2008 to 2010. House elections are not independent events. That's why a seemingly improbable scenario, such as Democrats securing initially vulnerable seats, winning the toss ups, and stealing a few GOP districts, could prove eminently possible. While the presidential vote will probably shift to the GOP from 2008, the latest House elections occurred in 2010. And the House vote share will undoubtedly shift to the Democrats. Notwithstanding, will it be substantial enough to flip the House? I would have dismissed the possibility only a few months ago. Now, if the upward trajectory of the economy proves sustained, it would improve the Democrats' prospects enough to make the scenario plausible. I actually think qualified optimism is warranted.
 
So, what do you guys think the chances that Biden will be the VP?
He is sorta safe, a bit bumbling sure but he's largely not gonna lose you any votes. But he's not really gonna gain any either. But that Tepid approach is not gonna set Biden up in 2016.

Hillary would be polarizing and not safe, but I think she'll gain more votes than she'd lose. Also people that wouldn't vote for Hillary largely wouldn't vote for Obama anyway. And Hillary would be very well poised for a 2016 run.
 
Shows that you can be rich and still be an idiot and lack all financial sense.

What the ROI on a perry investment?
If they donated to his PAC then the money isn't necessarily wasted.

Also, assuming he's able to hold onto the governorship of Texas (is he term limited or anything?), there'll probably be some business opportunities there for campaign investors donors.
 
So, what do you guys think the chances that Biden will be the VP?
He is sorta safe, a bit bumbling sure but he's largely not gonna lose you any votes. But he's not really gonna gain any either. But that Tepid approach is not gonna set Biden up in 2016.

Hillary would be polarizing and not safe, but I think she'll gain more votes than she'd lose. Also people that wouldn't vote for Hillary largely wouldn't vote for Obama anyway. And Hillary would be very well poised for a 2016 run.

It's not happening.
 
Is this a troll post, ronito? Haven't we dismissed this plenty?

I don't think it would ever happen, unless Biden gets ill. What kind of oppo can anyone dredge up on Biden? But, there's a lot of old baggage that Republicans could use against Clinton if she were on the ticket. And we don't need to add conservative sexism to the mix (had enough of that in the Democratic primaries).
 
So, what do you guys think the chances that Biden will be the VP?
He is sorta safe, a bit bumbling sure but he's largely not gonna lose you any votes. But he's not really gonna gain any either. But that Tepid approach is not gonna set Biden up in 2016.

Hillary would be polarizing and not safe, but I think she'll gain more votes than she'd lose. Also people that wouldn't vote for Hillary largely wouldn't vote for Obama anyway. And Hillary would be very well poised for a 2016 run.

I think both would be too old by then. Clinton has done her hard line statement about it, and Biden will be entering Crypt Keeper years by the time 2016 rolls around.

I can see Hillary going to VP and Biden to State. But even that would be unusual and strange and strikes me as unlikely.
 
Is this a troll post, ronito? Haven't we dismissed this plenty?

I don't think it would ever happen, unless Biden gets ill. What kind of oppo can anyone dredge up on Biden? But, there's a lot of old baggage that Republicans could use against Clinton if she were on the ticket. And we don't need to add conservative sexism to the mix (had enough of that in the Democratic primaries).

I think it comes down to how confident Obama is feeling. If he's confident then there's no reason not to keep Biden. But if he's feeling threatened then I think he might have to rethink Biden. Like I said, Biden wont cost him votes but he wont gain him any either.

But if the nominee is Romney I think Obama will feel confident.
 
I think it comes down to how confident Obama is feeling. If he's confident then there's no reason not to keep Biden. But if he's feeling threatened then I think he might have to rethink Biden. Like I said, Biden wont cost him votes but he wont gain him any either.

But if the nominee is Romney I think Obama will feel confident.

I thought choosing Hilary would be smart too but as others have pointed out it'd seem desperate at the same time. That he'd just be choosing her to get the female vote.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom